Report Interpretation Assessment Results Valid Assessments ...

Report Date: 16 Aug 2016

Position: Example Position

Client/Company: ABC Company

Assessments IncludedReport Interpretation

Module

Assessment

Date

Results Valid

Until

16PF® Questionnaire (16PF) * 16 Aug 2016 16 Aug 2017

Please note:

This multi-media presentation provides a guided tour of the individual candidate report content and structure to support the interpretation of

the results. Please note this presentation relates to a generic example and not the actual candidate listed above.

Notice To Report Recipient(s)

Information contained within this report is private and confidential, and is provided on the basis that its recipient(s) will use it responsibly.

Revelian's involvement in the recruitment process is limited to providing the prospective employer with information regarding the relevant

attributes of candidates as measured by Revelian assessments. It is the prospective employer who makes final selection decisions. As some

assessments were completed unsupervised by this candidate, Revelian can not guarantee that their responses are their own. Supervised

testing, where possible, is recommended in this case.

Revelian recommends that assessment information be considered along with information gained from other sources when making final

selection decisions.

Revelian provides the following supporting resources and options to ensure appropriate interpretation of

candidate assessment reports.

Support Resources

Report Interpretation Modules appear throughout this report to help you interpret the information

presented. Please click on the link provided to view an online presentation providing a generic

overview of the content and structure of the report. The modules are designed to help support your

interpretation of the results and ultimate recruitment decisions.

Please click the media icon to view the Individual Candidate Report Interpretation Presentation

(https://app.revelian.com/reports/individual/).

1.

eLearning Modules provide you with a comprehensive overview of each assessment, including

assessment theory, structure of the assessment, candidate experience and interpretation of results.

These training modules are accessed via the 'Learning Centre' in your Revelian Workspace. Please

revisit these modules as often as you like as an ongoing reference.

2.

Psychologist Support is available as needed. To arrange further consultation with a Revelian

Psychologist, please telephone 1300 137 937 (within Australia), 0800 046 9690 (within United

Kingdom) or +61 7 3552 5700 (outside Australia) during business hours. Alternatively, please email:

[email protected].

3.

The following report provides information regarding Katherine Adams's results on the 16 Personality Factor

(16PF®) Questionnaire. Katherine is currently being considered for the position of Example Position.

Katherine's performance can be ranked against other candidates who have completed all the required

assessments.

Candidate Rank: 1 out of 4 candidates

The details of other candidates applying for the position can be accessed by viewing the position report,

available by clicking here.

This report is based on the results of the 16PF Questionnaire. This assessment provides insight into

Katherine's unique personality profile. Other qualities relevant to Katherine's suitability for the role may be

best understood using additional selection methods, such as additional psychological assessment, interviews

and reference checks. In making a final selection decision, Revelian recommends that all available

information about the candidate be considered.

The remainder of this report provides further information regarding Katherine's assessment results.

For further details regarding the interpretation of the results presented below, please view the following online

Report Interpretation presentation. This learning module explains how to interpret this specific section of the

report and extract additional meaning from the results presented.

Please click the media icon to view the 16PF Report Interpretation Presentation (https://app.revelian.com

/reports/16pf/).

The 16PF Questionnaire is designed to measure the personality dimensions that underlie individual

behaviour. Using a common framework that can be applied to all individuals, the 16PF Questionnaire predicts

how people are likely to behave in certain situations and interact with others.

This report firstly presents information on Katherine's response style, which is included to enhance

understanding and confirm the accuracy of her profile. Her scores on the various factors of the 16PF

Questionnaire, known as Primary Factors, are then presented. These are grouped together under five Global

Factors, which provide a useful structure in which to better understand and interpret Katherine's resulting

profile.

The table below displays the Global Factors and associated Primary Factors included in the 16PF

Questionnaire. Please note that some Primary Factors contribute to multiple Global Factors and therefore

appear more than once in the table below. The interpretation of these factors will differ slightly depending on

their associated Global Factor. Please also note that the Reasoning Factor, a Primary Factor of the 16PF

Questionnaire, is not included in this report. The Reasoning Factor is concerned with reasoning ability rather

than temperament or personality, and does not contribute to any of the Global Factors. For these reasons,

this factor has been excluded from this questionnaire.

Global Factor DescriptionContributing Primary

Factors

RELATING TO

OTHERS

1. Indicates the extent to which an individual's

time and energy are focused on

interpersonal relationships, as opposed to

seeking more time alone and working

independently on tasks.

Warmth

Liveliness

Social Boldness

Privateness*

Self-Reliance*

INFLUENCE AND

COLLABORATION

2. Indicates the extent to which an individual

has a forceful, assertive and independent

influence on their environment, or a more

cooperative, collaborative style of

functioning.

Dominance

Social Boldness

Vigilance

Openness to

Change

THINKING STYLE3. Indicates the tendency to have an intuitive,

creative thinking style, or a more objective,

realistic way of thinking.

Warmth*

Sensitivity*

Abstractedness*

Openness to

Change*

STRUCTURE AND

FLEXIBILITY

4. Indicates the tendency for self-discipline and

self-control, or adopting a more unrestrained,

flexible approach.

Liveliness*

Rule-Consciousness

Abstractedness*

Perfectionism

MANAGEMENT OF

PRESSURE

5. Indicates different styles of coping with

pressure, disappointments, challenges,

setbacks and other stressful circumstances.

Emotional Stability*

Vigilance

Apprehension

Tension

* Indicates a negative relationship between the Global and Primary Factor.

The 16PF Questionnaire includes three scales that provide insight into Katherine's test-taking attitude and

response style. This information is important to consider when interpreting and confirming the accuracy of

Katherine's report. A brief description of these scales and her score on each are presented below.

The Impression Management scale measures the extent to which an individual has presented themselves in

an overly positive fashion. A response style that is too positive can indicate that undesirable attitudes or

tendencies have been suppressed by the candidate.

Scale Score

Impression Management Typical

Katherine's score on the Impression Management scale is within the expected range, indicating a typical

pattern of responding.

The Acquiescence scale measures the extent to which an individual has responded in agreement to most

questions, regardless of the content. An acquiescent response style indicates that an individual has tended to

respond with 'yes' or 'true' to a large number of questions rather than choosing answers based on question

content.

Scale Score

Acquiescence Typical

Katherine's score on the Acquiescence scale is within the expected range, indicating a typical pattern of

responding.

The Infrequency scale measures the extent to which an individual has responded to a large number of items

in a way that is different to most people. High scores on this scale may indicate a random or careless

response style.

Scale Score

Infrequency Typical

Katherine's score on the Infrequency scale is within the expected range, indicating a typical pattern of

responding.

After Katherine completed the 16PF Questionnaire, her scores on each factor were calculated from the

various responses she provided to the assessment questions. The scores obtained by Katherine only make

sense when they are compared to a relevant comparison group. The group used for comparison is a sample

of Australian adults who have previously completed the 16PF Questionnaire.

Each of the Global and Primary Factors are bipolar, indicating that each end of the scale (left and right side)

has a distinct definition and meaning. The 16PF Questionnaire uses a 'sten' score system (1-10 scale). The

sten score looks at how different an individual's score is from the average score in the comparison group. As

shown in the graph below, a sten score of 5 or 6 is considered to fall in the mid-range and indicates a score

similar to the majority of the comparison group. A sten score of 4 or 7 indicates an individual is likely to show

slight tendencies toward either left-side or right-side behaviours. A sten score of 1-3 or 8-10 indicates the

individual is quite different from the average and is likely to show strong and distinctive behaviour associated

with left-side or right-side scores.

Please note that there are no right or wrong answers on this assessment, and each individual's report should

be considered in relation to the specific requirements of the role. That is, behavioural characteristics that are

considered ideal for one role may not be for another. Furthermore, different individuals' profiles reflect how

they are likely to approach and perform a role differently.

Katherine's scores on the Global and Primary Factors are described in the sections below. It is important to

note that sometimes a left-side score on a Primary Factor contributes to a right-side score on a Global Factor,

and vice versa. An * is used to indicate where this occurs between the Global and Primary Factors in the

sections below.

A summary of Katherine's scores on the Global and Primary Factors is also provided in Appendix A at the

end of this report.

Katherine sees herself as someone who enjoys her own company rather than that of others, and is highly

likely to enjoy autonomy and to focus time and energy on her own activities.

She will generally prefer to cooperate with others and accommodate their wishes, rather than assert her

will.

When considering Katherine's approach to thinking, she is likely to balance an interest in theories and

concepts with a practical, logical focus.

She also tends towards a controlled and structured approach; however, she will occasionally take a more

flexible stance.

Katherine sees herself as generally calm and relaxed.

Global Factor Sten Left-side 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Right-side

Relating to Others 1Introverted,

socially inhibited

Extraverted,

socially

participating

Influence and

Collaboration4

Accommodating,

agreeable, selfless

Independent,

persuasive, wilful

Thinking Style 6Receptive,

open-minded

Tough-minded,

resolute

Structure and

Flexibility7

Unrestrained,

follows urges

Self-controlled,

inhibits urges

Management of

Pressure5

Relaxed,

unperturbed

Anxious,

worrisome

Note: There is a chart in the Appendix of this report with all primary factor scores and check-boxes to help

identify the appropriate factors for the target role.

The Global Factor of Relating to Others concerns the extent to which an individual's time and energy are

focused on interpersonal relationships, as opposed to seeking more time alone and working independently on

tasks. The Primary Factors that comprise Relating to Others are listed below along with a brief description of

how they relate to this Global Factor.

Primary Factor Description

WARMTH Refers to an interest in, attentiveness to and responsiveness to other people.

LIVELINESS Refers to the energy and exuberance people bring to their interactions.

SOCIAL

BOLDNESS

Refers to a motivation to move towards other to seek adventure, stimulation and

attention.

PRIVATENESS* Refers to the degree to which an individual is likely to keep personal information to

themselves or share it with others.

SELF-RELIANCE* Refers to a preference for making decisions independently or in collaboration with

others.

Katherine's score on Relating to Others is presented in the table below. The diamond indicates the sten score

Katherine received on this factor based on her responses to the assessment.



socially inhibited

Extraverted,

socially

participating

Katherine's score on the Relating to Others factor suggests that generally she has a strong tendency to

spend time alone rather than in the company of others.

She is unlikely to devote a great deal of time or effort to developing and maintaining social relationships and

her reactions will be cautious and serious.

Katherine is very likely to demonstrate a tendency to think independently and deliberate in most situations.

Katherine's scores on the primary factors that comprise Relating to Others are presented in the table below.

The diamond indicates the sten score Katherine received on each of these factors based on her responses to

the assessment.

Primary Factor Sten Left-side 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Right-side

Warmth 1Emotionally distant

from people

Attentive and

warm towards

others

Liveliness 2Serious, cautious,

careful

Lively, animated,

spontaneous

Social Boldness 3Shy, threat-

sensitive, timid

Socially bold,

adventurous,

thick-skinned

Privateness* 8Forthright,

straightforward

Private, discreet,

non-disclosing

Self-Reliance* 10Group-oriented,

affiliative

Self-reliant,

individualistic


Please see the next page for interpretations of these primary factors.

Warmth

Katherine's score on Warmth indicates a strong desire to remain emotionally detached from most others. She

is likely to be more cautious in her involvement and prefers to work alone. Katherine would say that she is

uncomfortable talking about her feelings or showing warmth towards others.

Liveliness

In terms of Katherine's Liveliness, her score indicates a strong likelihood of being serious and subdued in

social situations. There is a strong likelihood that she would be serious and less playful, and would appear to

take life 'more seriously'. Katherine might say that she would prefer to think carefully before speaking or

taking action.

Social Boldness

Katherine's score on Social Boldness suggests a strong likelihood that she is timid in social settings and

sensitive to criticism. She is likely to find speaking in front of a group a difficult experience, and new situations

are likely to be uncomfortable for her. Katherine might say that she is much more comfortable in familiar and

defined social settings.

Privateness

In terms of Katherine's Privateness factor, her score indicates a strong desire to remain guarded and not

disclose personal information. It might be said that Katherine 'plays her hand close to her chest'. Katherine

might say that she has difficulty talking about personal matters.

Self-Reliance

Katherine's Self-Reliance score indicates that she has a strong preference to work independently and make

decisions autonomously. It is possible that she may find it difficult to work alongside others, or she may find it

hard to ask for help when needed. Katherine might say that she likes to do her planning alone, and could

easily spend a lot of time without interacting with others.

The Global Factor of Influence and Collaboration concerns the extent to which an individual has a forceful,

assertive and independent influence on their environment, or a more cooperative, collaborative style. The

Primary Factors that comprise Influence and Collaboration are listed below along with a brief description of

how they relate to this Global Factor.


DOMINANCE Refers to the extent to which an individual is keen to assert their views and influence

others.

SOCIAL

BOLDNESS

Refers to the degree to which an individual is adventurous and fearless in taking on

challenging people and tasks, and is driven to seek out high-risk situations.

VIGILANCE Refers to the extent to which an individual questions other's motives, as opposed to

naturally trusting them.

OPENNESS TO

CHANGE

Refers to an individual's readiness to change trusted and established ways of doing

things, to generate new ideas and think in original ways.

Katherine's score on Influence and Collaboration is presented in the table below. The diamond indicates the

sten score Katherine received on this factor based on her responses to the assessment.


Influence and

Collaboration4

Accommodating,

agreeable, selfless

Independent,

persuasive, wilful

Katherine's score on the Influence and Collaboration global factor suggests that she will generally prefer to

cooperate with others and accommodate their wishes, rather than assert her will.

She usually prefers to adopt a collaborative style, and provide and seek support from others and go with the

group.

Her score suggests that she is usually not likely to be overly forceful with her opinions.

Katherine's scores on the primary factors that comprise Influence and Collaboration are presented in the

table below. The diamond indicates the sten score Katherine received on each of these factors based on her

responses to the assessment.


Dominance 4Deferential,

cooperative,

avoids conflict

Dominant, forceful


sensitive, timid

Socially bold,

adventurous,

thick-skinned

Vigilance 3Trusting,

unsuspecting,

accepting

Vigilant,

suspicious,

sceptical, wary

Openness to Change 7Traditional, values

the familiar

Open to change,

experimenting


Dominance

Katherine's score on the Dominance factor indicates a tendency to be cooperative and agreeable,

accommodating the needs of others. She may sometimes seek to avoid conflict by accommodating the

wishes of others. Katherine might say that she would mostly be more cooperative than assertive, and when

people do things that bother her, she would usually let it go.

Social Boldness

In terms of the Social Boldness factor, Katherine's score indicates a strong likelihood of holding back from

expressing opinions and avoiding confronting situations. She may be uncomfortable in new interpersonal

settings. Katherine might say that she feels shy and cautious when meeting new people.

Vigilance

Katherine's Vigilance score suggests a trusting and tolerant attitude towards others and their views. She

would expect that others would treat her fairly and that they would have good intentions. Generally, others

would say that Katherine trusts what people tell her at face value.

Openness to Change

Lastly, Katherine's Openness to Change score indicates a slight tendency to experiment with new and

different ways of doing things. She may sometimes seek to establish how things could be improved or

changed. Katherine might sometimes say that she finds it interesting when people express new and different

points of view.

The Global Factor of Thinking Style concerns an individual's tendency to have an intuitive, creative thinking

style, or a more objective, realistic way of thinking. The Primary Factors that comprise Thinking Style are

listed below along with a brief description of how they relate to this Global Factor.


WARMTH* Refers to how open and willing an individual is to consider other in their thinking and

decision-making.

SENSITIVITY* Refers to the extent an individual incorporates their personal feeling into the

judgments and decisions they make, as opposed to taking a detached, objective

approach.

ABSTRACTEDNESS* Refers to the extent an individual will remain focused on the practical and concrete,

as opposed to more abstract ideas and associations.

OPENNESS TO

CHANGE*

Refers to an individual's receptivity to exploring new experiences, new ideas and

change.

Katherine's score on Thinking Style is presented in the table below. The diamond indicates the sten score

Katherine received on this factor based on her responses to the assessment.



open-minded

Tough-minded,

resolute

Katherine is likely to balance an interest in theories and concepts with a practical, logical focus.

There may be some situations where she is comfortable using her emotions and intuitions to make sense of

the world, and others where she prefers to take a practical approach.

Katherine's approach to thinking is likely to be dependent on the context of the situation.

Katherine's scores on the primary factors that comprise Thinking Style are presented in the table below. The

diamond indicates the sten score Katherine received on each of these factors based on her responses to the

assessment.


Warmth* 1Emotionally distant

from people

Attentive and

warm towards

others

Sensitivity* 5Objective,

unsentimental

Subjective,

sentimental

Abstractedness* 5Grounded,

practical, solution-

oriented

Abstracted,

theoretical,

idea-oriented

Openness to Change* 7Traditional, values

the familiar

Open to change,

experimenting



Warmth

Katherine's score on Warmth indicates a strong preference for considering tasks and facts more than people

and emotions when making decisions. She is highly likely to maintain emotional detachment when making

decisions. Katherine might say that she is comfortable making unpopular decisions.

Sensitivity

In terms of the Sensitivity factor, Katherine's score suggests a preference for using both objective logic as

well as emotions and intuition when making decisions. Her use of emotions in one instance and logic in

another will be dependent on the situation. Katherine might say that she is interested in action stories or more

imaginative, emotive stories depending on the context.

Abstractedness

Katherine's Abstractedness score suggests a likelihood that she will focus on practical detail, while retaining

the ability to take a more conceptual view. She is able to focus on observable data while also orienting to

more abstract ideas, depending on the situation. Katherine might say that she spends equal time

daydreaming and thinking about what needs to be done.

Openness to Change

Katherine's Openness to Change score suggests a tendency to be open-minded and innovative, and

interested in new ideas and experiences. Katherine's thoughts may tend to move towards developing new

ways of doing things. She might say that she would usually prefer to think of a better approach than following

traditional methods.

The Global Factor of Structure and Flexibility reflects an individual's tendency for self-discipline and

self-control, or a more unrestrained, flexible approach. The Primary Factors that comprise Structure and

Flexibility are listed below along with a brief description of how they relate to this Global Factor.


LIVELINESS* Refers to the degree of impulsivity or restraint an individual might bring to the

way they behave.

RULE-CONSCIOUSNESS Refers to the extent an individual is happy to accept externally imposed rules

and standards.

ABSTRACTEDNESS* Refers to the extent abstract ideas and associations or practical considerations

are the focus when taking in information.

PERFECTIONISM Refers to the degree of importance an individual places on living in a planned

and organised way.

Katherine's score on Structure and Flexibility is presented in the table below. The diamond indicates the sten

score Katherine received on this factor based on her responses to the assessment.


Structure and

Flexibility7

Unrestrained,

follows urges

Self-controlled,

inhibits urges

On the global factor of Structure and Flexibility, Katherine's score reflects a tendency towards a controlled

and structured approach; however, she will occasionally take a more flexible stance.

She will usually demonstrate control and restraint, but may occasionally prefer to take a more unrestrained

approach.

Katherine is likely to strive to control her impulses.

Katherine's scores on the primary factors that comprise Structure and Flexibility are presented in the table

below. The diamond indicates the sten score Katherine received on each of these factors based on her



Liveliness* 2Serious, cautious,

careful

Lively, animated,

spontaneous

Rule-Consciousness 4Expedient,

non-conforming

Rule-conscious,

dutiful

Abstractedness* 5Grounded,


oriented

Abstracted,

theoretical,

idea-oriented

Perfectionism 8Tolerates disorder,

unexacting, flexible

Perfectionist,

organised,

self-disciplined



Liveliness

Katherine's Liveliness score indicates a tendency to be cautious and restrained. She will mostly tend to

appear less playful and spontaneous. She might say that she would prefer to take a serious approach to

matters.

Rule-Consciousness

In terms of Katherine's Rule-Consciousness, her score suggests a slight likelihood that she will not feel

constrained by most regulations nor feel compelled to endorse conventional rules or principles. Katherine

may say that she believes some rules can be broken when a good reason for doing so exists.

Abstractedness

Katherine's score on Abstractedness suggests that she considers both practical considerations and more

abstract ideas. She is likely to strike a balance between reflecting and getting things done. This is likely to

depend on the context of the situation.

Perfectionism

Katherine's Perfectionism score indicates a high concern for planning and persistence. Her score indicates

that she strongly prefers to do things in a structured way and plan ahead to remain organised. She might say

that she likes to have things done just right.

The Global Factor of Management of Pressure concerns the different coping styles an individual may adopt

when dealing with pressure, disappointments, challenges, setbacks and other stressful circumstances. The

Primary Factors that comprise Management of Pressure are listed below along with a brief description of how

they relate to this Global Factor.


EMOTIONAL

STABILITY*

Refers to how calmly an individual tends to adapt to the demands of life and how in

control and satisfied they feel with their current life situation.

VIGILANCE Refers to the extent to which an individual is wary and mistrusting of others.

APPREHENSION Refers to an individual's tendency to worry about their personal adequacy and blame

themselves when things go wrong.

TENSION Refers to the extent to which an individual experiences nervous tension and restless

energy.

Katherine's score on Management of Pressure is presented in the table below. The diamond indicates the

sten score Katherine received on this factor based on her responses to the assessment.


Management of

Pressure5

Relaxed,

unperturbed

Anxious,

worrisome

Katherine's score on the Management of Pressure global factor suggests that she sees herself as no more

stressed and worried than most other people.

There may be specific times or situations that are more difficult for her to cope with than others.

This is likely to be dependent on the context of the situation.

Katherine's scores on the primary factors that comprise Management of Pressure are presented in the table

below. The diamond indicates the sten score Katherine received on each of these factors based on her



Emotional Stability* 5Reactive,

emotionally

changeable

Emotionally stable,

adaptive


unsuspecting,

accepting

Vigilant,

suspicious,

sceptical, wary

Apprehension 5Self-assured,

unworried

Apprehensive,

self-doubting,

worried

Tension 6Relaxed, placid,

patient

Tense, high

energy, impatient,

driven



Emotional Stability

Katherine's Emotional Stability score suggests a tendency to be emotionally resilient and feel in control of

some aspects of life but not others. Her ability to remain emotionally stable and in control will change from

situation to situation. Katherine might say that she can sometimes cope with problems, but not at other times.

Vigilance

Katherine's Vigilance score indicates that she has a trusting, accepting and tolerant attitude towards others.

She usually expects to be treated in a fair and honest way by others. She would say that people can be

trusted to do the right thing.

Apprehension

Katherine's score on Apprehension suggests that she has the capacity to self-criticise without becoming

consumed with self-blame. She tends to be self-assured, but can also experience self-doubt in certain

circumstances. She might say that she isn't usually upset about whether or not people dislike her, but can at

times be sensitive and worry about the things that she does.

Tension

Katherine's score on the Tension factor indicates a balance between being relaxed and composed in some

situations and restless and driven in others. She usually feels relaxed, but can experience restless energy on

occasion, depending on the circumstance. She may say that she is as patient as most people.

Important Considerations

It is important to consider that these results are based on Katherine's description of her own personality and

behaviour, which may not necessarily reflect the way other people see her. Therefore, the accuracy of these results

is dependent on Katherine's openness in answering the questionnaire and her level of self-awareness. In addition,

the report describes Katherine's likely behavioural style, but has not assessed relevant skills or knowledge. No firm

conclusions are therefore drawn regarding her job-related abilities.

® 16PF is a registered trade mark of the Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc., in the USA, the European Community

and other countries.



socially inhibited

Extraverted,

socially

participating

Influence and

Collaboration4

Accommodating,

agreeable, selfless

Independent,

persuasive, wilful


open-minded

Tough-minded,

resolute

Structure and

Flexibility7

Unrestrained,

follows urges

Self-controlled,

inhibits urges

Management of

Pressure5

Relaxed,

unperturbed

Anxious,

worrisome

The scores for each primary factor are shown in the chart below. To aid in the interpretation process, tick the

factors below that are most relevant to the competencies for this role. This may help to guide interpretation of

this report for the job role under consideration.


Warmth 1Emotionally

distant from

people

Attentive and

warm towards

others

Emotional Stability 5Reactive,

emotionally

changeable

Emotionally

stable, adaptive

Dominance 4Deferential,

cooperative,

avoids conflict

Dominant,

forceful

Liveliness 2Serious, cautious,

careful

Lively, animated,

spontaneous

Rule-Consciousness 4Expedient,

non-conforming

Rule-conscious,

dutiful


sensitive, timid

Socially bold,

adventurous,

thick-skinned

Sensitivity 5Objective,

unsentimental

Subjective,

sentimental


unsuspecting,

accepting

Vigilant,

suspicious,

sceptical, wary

Abstractedness 5Grounded,


oriented

Abstracted,

theoretical,

idea-oriented

Privateness 8Forthright,

straightforward

Private, discreet,

non-disclosing

Apprehension 5Self-assured,

unworried

Apprehensive,

self-doubting,

worried

Openness to Change 7Traditional, values

the familiar

Open to change,

experimenting

Self-Reliance 10Group-oriented,

affiliative

Self-reliant,

individualistic

Perfectionism 8Tolerates disorder,

unexacting,

flexible

Perfectionist,

organised,

self-disciplined

Tension 6Relaxed, placid,

patient

Tense, high

energy, impatient,

driven

Important Considerations

As noted above, these results are dependent on Katherine's level of self-awareness and openness in answering

these questions, and represents likely behavioural preferences only. Therefore no firm conclusions can be drawn

from these results. They must be combined with other psychometric assessments, resume checks and interview

responses to make informed selection decisions.

Report Interpretation Assessment Results Valid Assessments ...

Documents

Transcript of Report Interpretation Assessment Results Valid Assessments ...