REPORT - govTogetherBC · Replacement Project under contract number 159CS0005. This report...

December 3, 2015

GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT - STEVESTON HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE AND GREEN SLOUGH

George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project

REPO

RT

Report Number: 1414470012-012-R-Rev1

Distribution: 2 Copies - Golder Associates Ltd. 2 Copies - Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure

Submitted to: Sze Pui Kong, P.Eng. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Suite 310 - 1500 Woolridge Street Coquitlam, BC V3K 0B8

GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECT

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1

3.0 TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECT.............................................................................................................................. 2

4.0 GEOTECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................................. 2

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................................................. 2

6.0 CLOSURE ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3

TABLES Table 1: Inventory of September and October 2015 CPTs......................................................................................................... 4

FIGURES Figure 1: Key Plan

Figures 2A and 2B: Site Plan

APPENDICES APPENDIX A CPT Plots

APPENDIX B Dissipation Testing

December 3, 2015 Report No. 1414470012-012-R-Rev1 i


1.0 INTRODUCTION Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) was retained by the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MoTI) to provide geotechnical investigation services for the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project in Richmond and Delta, BC. This report documents the factual results of the geotechnical investigation carried out by Golder along the existing Highway 99 corridor between Steveston Highway in Richmond and River Road at Green Slough in Delta, BC during September and October, 2015, as authorized by MoTI. It is noted that additional geotechnical investigation work has been carried out by Golder as part of the overall George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project and the results of this investigation work is presented in separate factual reports.

Engineering comments and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project are beyond the scope of our assignment and are not addressed herein. MoTI specifically defined the scope of the field or laboratory investigations, testhole locations, investigation depth and investigation methodology for this phase of the geotechnical investigation program. Golder was not involved in planning the investigations and was not aware of any of the project design requirements at the time of the investigation work. Therefore, Golder cannot guarantee or warranty that the geotechnical information obtained is sufficient to fully satisfy the project objectives or requirements.

This report should be read in conjunction with the "Important Information and Limitations of This Report" which is attached following the text of this report. The reader's attention is specifically drawn to this information as it is essential for the proper use and interpretation of this report.

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located on the Fraser River floodplain, extending along the Highway 99 corridor between Steveston Highway Interchange in Richmond, BC and River Road at Green Slough in Delta, BC, as shown in Figure 1. Deas Island lies south of the Fraser River, and is separated from mainland Delta by Deas Slough. Highway 99 crosses beneath the south arm of the Fraser River in the George Massey Tunnel and over Deas Slough via short four-lane bridge connecting the south end of Deas Island to the Delta mainland. Highway 99 through this segment ranges between 4 lanes within the George Massey Tunnel and up to 10 lanes (including on/off ramps) at/near the Steveston Highway interchange.

Drainage ditching and flood-protection earthen embankments have been constructed along the banks of the Fraser River, and encompass the north and south entrances to the tunnel. Based on verbal discussions with MoTI, these embankments are understood to have been constructed of Fraser River dredge sand and possible coarse riprap. Similarly, earthen highway embankments have been constructed at Steveston Interchange and portions of Highway 99 including across Deas Island, Lulu Island and the floodplains in Delta. Drainage ditching is also prominent along both sides of Highway 99 within the project segment.

Current land-use adjacent to Highway 99 consists of agricultural land reserve (ALR), residential, commercial and light industrial developments. In general, the existing site topography along the above ground portions of the Highway 99 corridor is relatively flat and ranges in elevation from approximately 0 m to 6 m.

December 3, 2015 Report No. 1414470012-012-R-Rev1 1


3.0 TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECT No conceptual highway alignment drawings have been provided to Golder at the time of preparing this report.

4.0 GEOTECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK Golder was retained by MoTI to provide geotechnical investigation services for the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project under contract number 159CS0005. This report documents the factual results of the geotechnical investigation carried out by Golder in September and October, 2015. As noted previously, engineering comments and recommendations are not included in the scope of this report.

The scope of Golder’s geotechnical investigation generally included the following:

Plan and coordinate a geotechnical Cone Penetration Test (CPT) investigation, including permit/work notice submissions and coordination of traffic control, utility clearance and drilling subcontractors;

Carry out a subsurface geotechnical investigation(s), including advancement of twelve individual CPTs, to obtain subsurface soil data at locations along the currently proposed bridge/highway alignment selected by MoTI; and,

Prepare and submit a geotechnical data report, in conformance with MoTI’s Guideline for Geotechnical Reports – Technical Bulletin GM9801.

5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Golder conducted a geotechnical CPT investigation program between September 16, 2015 and October 22, 2015, to record the subsurface soil conditions within the above described portion of the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project site. As part of the investigation planning and coordination, Golder obtained underground utility information from BC One Call, private utility companies, and government agencies. Prior to commencement of all subsurface investigation work, Golder retained Western Leakage Services Ltd. to identify physical utility locations in the field. Badger Daylighting Inc. was retained to hydrovac several CPT locations in areas of highly-concentrated utilities. Universal Flagging Inc. and Mainroad Lower Mainland Contracting LP assisted Golder with traffic control of pedestrians and vehicles as required.

All utility clearance and geotechnical investigation field work was carried out under the full-time inspection of a member of Golder’s geotechnical staff who identified the CPT locations in the field, coordinated all utility clearance work, coordinated setup of provincial Work Notification and supervised advancement of CPTs.

A total of 12 CPTs, identified as CPT15-18 through CPT15-29 (with numbering continued from the previous phases of investigation work for the George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project ), were put down at various locations along the existing Highway 99 alignment (primarily at the Steveston Highway interchange and Green Slough locations). The CPTs were conducted to a minimum depth of 50.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) and up to a maximum depth of 74.4 mbgs. ConeTec Investigations Ltd. (ConeTec) of Richmond, BC was subcontracted to provide the cone testing equipment, drill rigs and operators to advance the tests. The CPTs were carried out in general accordance with ASTM D-5778 and measurements of tip resistance, porewater pressure and sleeve friction were recorded at 50 mm intervals. The electronic cone used for each sounding had



a tip capacity of 1500 bar, cross sectional area of 15 cm2, and friction sleeve area of 225 cm2. The CPTs were advanced using either ConeTec’s M7 (14 ton) truck mounted CPT rig, and in areas of constricted access, the CPTs were advanced using ConeTec’s M5T (14 ton) track mounted CPT rig.

Porewater dissipation tests were carried out within select coarser-grained soil horizons to record porewater pressure dissipation rates and to estimate the hydrostatic water level.

The results of the CPT testing and dissipation tests are presented in Appendix A and B respectively.

The majority of the CPT work was carried out during day shift, except CPT15-20, CPT15-21 and CPT15-23 which were carried out during night shift to minimize impacts to highway traffic. Each CPT hole was grouted to the ground surface using a bentonite/cement grout mixture following completion of each CPT sounding and the asphalt surface was repaired with granular base and asphalt cold patch where required in paved areas.

The approximate locations and identification of the CPTs put down for this investigation phase (previous testhole locations are not shown) are presented on Figures 2A and 2B attached. All CPT locations were surveyed in the field using a handheld field GPS and are considered approximate only. The GPS coordinates referenced in this report are presented in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83 coordinate system.

6.0 CLOSURE We trust the information presented in this geotechnical data report is sufficient for your current requirements. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding the information presented, please do not hesitate to contact us.

GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.

Pierce Bakker, P.Eng. Tom Bryski, P.Eng. Associate Principal

PBB/TCB/nnv

Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation.

o:\final\2014\1447\14-1447-0012\1414470012-012-r-rev1\1414470012-012-r-rev1-masstunsepoct15cptinves 03dec_15.docx


NVilla

Origina Signed

NVilla

Origina Signed


Table 1: Inventory of September and October 2015 CPTs

Approximate UTM Coordinates (NAD 83) 1

Testhole ID Date Northing Easting Approximate Elevation (m) 2

Depth (mbgs)

CPT15-18 September 16, 2015 5442410 493755 0 53.00 CPT15-19 September 16, 2016 5442254 493590 1 50.00 CPT15-20 September 17, 2015 5442640 493691 2 50.00 CPT15-21 September 18, 2015 5442520 493656 2 50.00 CPT15-22 September 21, 2015 5442357 493628 1 50.25 CPT15-23 October 16, 2015 5442341 493667 2 74.35 CPT15-24 September 22, 2015 5442367 493707 1 70.00 CPT15-25 October 15, 2015 5442226 493631 1 72.90 CPT15-26 September 22, 2015 5442218 493761 0 70.00 CPT15-27 October 14, 2015 5440025 495232 2 58.70 CPT15-28 October 14, 2015 5440182 495111 2 65.00 CPT15-29 October 22, 2015 5441480 494388 2 62.15

Notes: 1 Coordinates obtained by Golder Associates using handheld GPS unit and are considered approximate only. Zone 10U. 2 Elevations estimated using base elevation information provided by MoTI, GMTR Survey Bases No Spots - UTM Final - 2014-05-30



IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT Standard of Care: Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) has prepared this report in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering and science professions currently practising under similar conditions in the jurisdiction in which the services are provided, subject to the time limits and physical constraints applicable to this report. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made.

Basis and Use of the Report: This report has been prepared for the specific site, design objective, development and purpose described to Golder by the Client. The factual data, interpretations and recommendations pertain to a specific project as described in this report and are not applicable to any other project or site location. Any change of site conditions, purpose, development plans or if the project is not initiated within eighteen months of the date of the report may alter the validity of the report. Golder cannot be responsible for use of this report, or portions thereof, unless Golder is requested to review and, if necessary, revise the report.

The information, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report are for the sole benefit of the Client. No other party may use or rely on this report or any portion thereof without Golder’s express written consent. If the report was prepared to be included for a specific permit application process, then upon the reasonable request of the client, Golder may authorize in writing the use of this report by the regulatory agency as an Approved User for the specific and identified purpose of the applicable permit review process. Any other use of this report by others is prohibited and is without responsibility to Golder. The report, all plans, data, drawings and other documents as well as all electronic media prepared by Golder are considered its professional work product and shall remain the copyright property of Golder, who authorizes only the Client and Approved Users to make copies of the report, but only in such quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the report by those parties. The Client and Approved Users may not give, lend, sell, or otherwise make available the report or any portion thereof to any other party without the express written permission of Golder. The Client acknowledges that electronic media is susceptible to unauthorized modification, deterioration and incompatibility and therefore the Client cannot rely upon the electronic media versions of Golder’s report or other work products.

The report is of a summary nature and is not intended to stand alone without reference to the instructions given to Golder by the Client, communications between Golder and the Client, and to any other reports prepared by Golder for the Client relative to the specific site described in the report. In order to properly understand the suggestions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report, reference must be made to the whole of the report. Golder cannot be responsible for use of portions of the report without reference to the entire report.

Unless otherwise stated, the suggestions, recommendations and opinions given in this report are intended only for the guidance of the Client in the design of the specific project. The extent and detail of investigations, including the number of test holes, necessary to determine all of the relevant conditions which may affect construction costs would normally be greater than has been carried out for design purposes. Contractors bidding on, or undertaking the work, should rely on their own investigations, as well as their own interpretations of the factual data presented in the report, as to how subsurface conditions may affect their work, including but not limited to proposed construction techniques, schedule, safety and equipment capabilities.

Soil, Rock and Groundwater Conditions: Classification and identification of soils, rocks, and geologic units have been based on commonly accepted methods employed in the practice of geotechnical engineering and related disciplines. Classification and identification of the type and condition of these materials or units involves judgment, and boundaries between different soil, rock or geologic types or units may be transitional rather than abrupt. Accordingly, Golder does not warrant or guarantee the exactness of the descriptions.



Special risks occur whenever engineering or related disciplines are applied to identify subsurface conditions and even a comprehensive investigation, sampling and testing program may fail to detect all or certain subsurface conditions. The environmental, geologic, geotechnical, geochemical and hydrogeologic conditions that Golder interprets to exist between and beyond sampling points may differ from those that actually exist. In addition to soil variability, fill of variable physical and chemical composition can be present over portions of the site or on adjacent properties. The professional services retained for this project include only the geotechnical aspects of the subsurface conditions at the site, unless otherwise specifically stated and identified in the report. The presence or implication(s) of possible surface and/or subsurface contamination resulting from previous activities or uses of the site and/or resulting from the introduction onto the site of materials from off-site sources are outside the terms of reference for this project and have not been investigated or addressed.

Soil and groundwater conditions shown in the factual data and described in the report are the observed conditions at the time of their determination or measurement. Unless otherwise noted, those conditions form the basis of the recommendations in the report. Groundwater conditions may vary between and beyond reported locations and can be affected by annual, seasonal and meteorological conditions. The condition of the soil, rock and groundwater may be significantly altered by construction activities (traffic, excavation, groundwater level lowering, pile driving, blasting, etc.) on the site or on adjacent sites. Excavation may expose the soils to changes due to wetting, drying or frost. Unless otherwise indicated the soil must be protected from these changes during construction.

Follow-Up and Construction Services: All details of the design were not known at the time of submission of Golder’s report. Golder should be retained to review the final design, project plans and documents prior to construction, to confirm that they are consistent with the intent of Golder’s report.

During construction, Golder should be retained to perform sufficient and timely observations of encountered conditions to confirm and document that the subsurface conditions do not materially differ from those interpreted conditions considered in the preparation of Golder’s report and to confirm and document that construction activities do not adversely affect the suggestions, recommendations and opinions contained in Golder’s report. Adequate field review, observation and testing during construction are necessary for Golder to be able to provide letters of assurance, in accordance with the requirements of many regulatory authorities. In cases where this recommendation is not followed, Golder’s responsibility is limited to interpreting accurately the information encountered at the borehole locations, at the time of their initial determination or measurement during the preparation of the Report.

Changed Conditions and Drainage: Where conditions encountered at the site differ significantly from those anticipated in this report, either due to natural variability of subsurface conditions or construction activities, it is a condition of this report that Golder be notified of any changes and be provided with an opportunity to review or revise the recommendations within this report. Recognition of changed soil and rock conditions requires experience and it is recommended that Golder be employed to visit the site with sufficient frequency to detect if conditions have changed significantly.

Drainage of subsurface water is commonly required either for temporary or permanent installations for the project. Improper design or construction of drainage or dewatering can have serious consequences. Golder takes no responsibility for the effects of drainage unless specifically involved in the detailed design and construction monitoring of the system.


WESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWYWESTMINSTER HWY

BLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RDBLUNDELL RD

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

HW

Y 99

STEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWYSTEVESTON HWY

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

AH

WY

17A

HW

Y 17

A

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

HW

Y 17

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

GEORGE MASSEY

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

TUNNEL

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

DN

o. 6

RD

No.

6 R

D

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

DN

o. 4

RD

No.

4 R

D

025

mm

IF T

HIS

MEA

SUR

EMEN

T D

OES

NO

T M

ATC

H W

HAT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E SH

EET

SIZE

HAS

BEE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M: A

NSI

A

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD TITLE

PROJECT No. Rev.

PROJECTCLIENT

Path

: \\g

olde

r.gds

\gal

\Bur

naby

\CAD

-GIS

\Clie

nt\M

inis

try_o

f_Tr

ansp

orta

tion_

And_

Infa

stru

ctur

e\G

MT

BCH

Lin

e R

eloc

atio

n\99

_PR

OJE

CTS

\14-

1447

-001

2_G

MT

BCH

Rel

ocat

ion\

02_P

RO

DU

CTI

ON

\14-

1447

-001

2_51

00\D

WG

\ |

File

Nam

e: 1

4-14

47-0

012_

5100

_001

.dw

g

14-1447-0012PHASE5100

FIGURE

10

2015-12-02

J. YOUNG

J. BRUNSWICK

T. BRYSKI

P. BAKKER

GEORGE MASSEY TUNNEL REPLACEMENT PROJECTGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONRICHMOND, BC

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

KEY PLAN

0

1:50,000

1,000 2,000

METRES

VANCOUVER Coquitlam

NewWestminster

Richmond

Delta

BoundaryBaySTRAIGHT OF

GEORGIA

CANADA - USA BORDER

North Vancouver

Burnaby Port Moody

PortCoquitlam

Surrey

White Rock

ENGLARGEDAREA

LEGEND

PROJECT AREA

REFERENCE

IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO, USED UNDER LICENSE. IMAGERY DATE:NOVEMBER 3, 2014. GOOGLE EARTH IMAGE IS NOT TO SCALE.

INSET NOT TO SCALE

2A

2B

X EW

EW

X

X

EW

X

X

XX

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

EWX

X

EW

EW

EWEW

EW

EW

EW

EWEW

CURB

NO-POST

NO-POST

EP

EP

WALL

WALL

NO-POST

EP

NO-POST

EP

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

EP

NO-POST

EP

SHOULDER

NO-POST

FENCE

FENCE

EP

NO-POST

EP

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

FENCE

NO-POST

EP

NO-POST

EP

SHOULDER

SHO

ULD

ER

FENC

E

EP

EP

FENC

E

GR

AVEL RO

AD

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

EP

EP

FENCE

GRAVE

L RO

AD

SHOULDER

FENCE

NO-POST

CURB

EP

GUARD RAIL

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

WALL

CURB

WALKCURBW/LW/L

EP

EP NO-POST

WALL

EP

EP

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

EP

WALL

EP

WALL

WALL

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

EP

EPNO

-PO

ST

CURB

CURB

FENCE

EP

EP

EP WALL

NO-POST

FENCE

WALL

WALL

CURB

FENCE

CURB

EP

WALL

NO-POST

FENCE

RIP

RAP

RIP

RAP R

IPR

AP

CURB

FENCE

CURB

EPNO-POST

CURB

CURB

DIRT ROAD

NO-POST CURB

NO-POST

NO-POST

GRAVEL ROAD

CURB

EP

EP

EP

NO-POST

GRAVEL ROAD

NO-POST

EP

EP

WALL

WALL FENCE

DIRT

ROAD

DIR

T R

OAD

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

WALL

WALL

NO-POST

EP

EPWALL

WALL

NO-POST

FENCE

FENCE

EP

EP

WALL

EP

EP

GRAVEL ROAD

WALL

EP

EP

WALK

WAL

KGRAV

EL S

HOULDER

GRAVEL

SHOULD

ER

NO-POST

NO-POST

BALL

AST

BALL

AST

RAI

L

RAI

L

WAL

K

NO-P

OST

NO-P

OST

NO-POST

EP

WAL

K

CURB

EP

WALK

CURB

GUARD

RAI

L

EP

NO-POST

NO-P

OST

6.56M

29.07M

6.01M

6.0M

12.98M

11.3

1M

24.98M

6.73

M

16.6

9M

27.71M

51.25M

7.17M

12.87

M

C-154

-R

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

2

-6

2

4

2

2

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

0

0

2 2

4

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

4

2

4

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

22

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

-2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

0

2

4

2

2

2 2

2

2

0

2

22

4

2

2

2

2

4

4

2

2

2

0

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

6

2

2

2

2

2

4 4

2

2

4

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

2

2

-4

-2

2

2

-10

2

2

0

2

0

0-4

4

2

0

0

-2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

42

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

6

2

2

0

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

0

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

-82

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

6

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

0

2

2

0

2

2

2

4

6

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

4

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

-4

2

2

2

0

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

2

2 2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

2

2

2

4

2

2

2

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

2

0

2

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

-10

2

2

EP

EPASPHALT CURB

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP

EP EP EP

NO

-PO

ST

NO

-PO

ST

NO-P

OST

NO-P

OST

NO-POST

NO

-PO

ST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO-POST

NO

-PO

ST

NO

-PO

ST

NO-POST

FENCE

FEN

CE

FEN

CE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FEN

CE

FEN

CE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FEN

CE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENC

E

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FEN

CE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

FENCE

CONC. DEC

K

CONC. DEC

K

WALL

WALL

GUARD

RAI

L

GUARD

RAI

L

P-05

8

R-016

-1R

P-05

8"C

OMMERCIA

L"

R-014

-RW

-054

-L

PS-003-R

PS-0

03-R

W-0

54-D

R-002

P-05

8

R-082

-R1

P-05

8

"GAS

SIG

N"

T-00

1

P-05

8

W-0

54-L

R-0

02

G-005

MAT

CH

LIN

EM

ATC

H L

INE

MAT

CH

LIN

EM

ATC

H L

INE

MAT

CH

LIN

EM

ATC

H L

INE

MAT

CH

LIN

EM

ATC

H L

INE

MAT

CH

LIN

EM

ATC

H L

INE

MAT

CH

LIN

E

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

STEV

ESTO

N HIG

HWAY

HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99 R

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

RIC

E M

ILL

RO

ADR

ICE

MIL

L R

OAD

CPT15-18

CPT15-19

CPT15-20

CPT15-21

CPT15-22

CPT15-23

CPT15-24

CPT15-25

CPT15-26

CPT15-29

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD TITLE

PROJECT No. Rev.

PROJECTCLIENT

Path

: N:\C

lient

\Min

istry

_of_

Tran

spor

tatio

n_An

d_In

fast

ruct

ure\

GM

T BC

H L

ine

Rel

ocat

ion\

99_P

RO

JEC

TS\1

4-14

47-0

012_

GM

T BC

H R

eloc

atio

n\02

_PR

OD

UC

TIO

N\1

4-14

47-0

012_

5100

\DW

G |

File

Nam

e: 1

4-14

47-0

012_

5100

_002

.dw

g

025

mm

IF T

HIS

MEA

SUR

EMEN

T D

OES

NO

T M

ATC

H W

HAT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E SH

EET

SIZE

HAS

BEE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M: A

NSI

B

14-1447-0012PHASE5100

FIGURE

2A0

2015-12-02

J. YOUNG

J. BRUNSWICK

T. BRYSKI

P. BAKKER



SITE PLAN 0

1:4,000

100 200

METRES

CONE PENETRATION TEST (GOLDER, SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2015)

LEGEND

REFERENCE

BASE MAP PROVIDED BY MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE FEBRUARY 2015.FILE NAMES: GMTR - Section 1 - Survey Base No Spots - UTM-FINAL - 2014-05-31.dwg;GMTR - Section2 - Survey Base No Spots - UTM Final - 2014-06-02.dwg;

2A

KEY PLANAND

PAGE GUIDE

NOT TO SCALE

2B

X

X

X

X

X

X

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EWEW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

EW

X

X

X

XX

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

SHOULDER

SHO

ULD

ER

SHO

ULD

ER

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P E/

P

E/P E/

P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P E/

P E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P E/P E/

P E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/PE/P

E/PE/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P

E/P E/P

E/P

SID

EWAL

K

SID

EWAL

K

SID

EWAL

K

SID

EWAL

K

E/P

GRAVEL ROAD

GRAVEL

ROAD

GRA

VEL

ROAD

GRAV

EL R

OAD

GRAVEL ROAD

GRAVEL ROAD

GR

AVEL

RO

AD

L=51

M

L=12

M

L=38

M

L=10

M

L=18M

L=52

M

L=16

M

888

8

8

6

6

6

6

6

6

6

66

6

66

6

6

6

6

6

4 4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

2

2

22

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

22

2

2

2

22

2

2 2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

222

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

22

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

CPT15-27

CPT15-28

HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99HIGHWAY 99

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7AH

IGH

WAY

17A

HIG

HW

AY 1

7A

CONSULTANT

DESIGN

PREPARED

REVIEW

APPROVED

YYYY-MM-DD TITLE

PROJECT No. Rev.

PROJECTCLIENT

Path

: N:\C

lient

\Min

istry

_of_

Tran

spor

tatio

n_An

d_In

fast

ruct

ure\

GM

T BC

H L

ine

Rel

ocat

ion\

99_P

RO

JEC

TS\1

4-14

47-0

012_

GM

T BC

H R

eloc

atio

n\02

_PR

OD

UC

TIO

N\1

4-14

47-0

012_

5100

\DW

G |

File

Nam

e: 1

4-14

47-0

012_

5100

_002

.dw

g

025

mm

IF T

HIS

MEA

SUR

EMEN

T D

OES

NO

T M

ATC

H W

HAT

IS S

HO

WN

, TH

E SH

EET

SIZE

HAS

BEE

N M

OD

IFIE

D F

RO

M: A

NSI

B

14-1447-0012PHASE5100

FIGURE

2B0

2015-12-02

J. YOUNG

J. BRUNSWICK

T. BRYSKI

P. BAKKER



SITE PLAN 0

1:4,000

100 200

METRES

CONE PENETRATION TEST (GOLDER, SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2015)

LEGEND

REFERENCE

BASE MAP PROVIDED BY MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE FEBRUARY 2015.FILE NAMES: GMTR - Section 1 - Survey Base No Spots - UTM-FINAL - 2014-05-31.dwg;GMTR - Section2 - Survey Base No Spots - UTM Final - 2014-06-02.dwg;

2A

KEY PLANAND

PAGE GUIDE

NOT TO SCALE

2B


APPENDIX A CPT Plots

December 3, 2015 Report No. 1414470012-012-R-Rev1

The reported coordinates were provided by the client.

0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)

GolderJob No: 15-02090Date: 09:16:15 08:32Site: George Massey Tunnel Replacement

Sounding: CPT15-18 Cone: 274:T1500F15U500

Max Depth: 53.000 m / 173.88 ftDepth Inc: 0.050 m / 0.164 ftAvg Int: 0.200 m

File: 15-02090_CP18.CORUnit Wt: SBT Zones

SBT: Robertson and Campanella, 1986Coords: UTM 10N N: 5442409.99m E: 493755.00m Page No: 1 of 2

X Y

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target DepthNew Sounding


0 200 40050

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)






X Y

Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

New Sounding


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)






X YTarget Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth Target Depth

New Sounding


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)







New Sounding


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)







New Sounding

Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out Drill Out


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)







New Sounding


0 200 40050

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)






X Y


New Sounding


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)


Sounding: CPT15-23 Cone: 409:T1500F15U1K




X Y

Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal Refusal

New Sounding


0 200 40050

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)


Sounding: CPT15-23 Cone: 409:T1500F15U1K




X Y


New Sounding


0 200 4000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

qt (bar)

Dep

th (m

eter

s)

0.0 2.5 5.0

fs (bar)

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0

Rf (%)

0 200 400 6000

u (m)

0 15 300-15-30

Incl X/Y (Deg)






X Y


New Sounding