Report Exit Survey DIS 2012 DET

Programme Exit Survey (PES)

Report

Diploma in Electrical Engineering -

DET

December 2012 Session

Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (PKK)

Sabah

RESEARCH COMMITTEE

Member of Advisory Committee

NO NAME POSITION1 Wan Mohamad Nasir bin Wan Abdul Rahman Director2 Norehan bt Md Shariff Deputy Director (Academic)3 Wan Zain bin Wan Dollah Head of Department

Research Fellow (Polytechnic)

NO NAME1 Dr Hasnim bin Harun (Chief, Bureau of Research and Innovation)2 Dr Suzan binti Impak3 Azman B Talib4 Farah Asyikin Abd Rahman5 Shalizan B. Kadir6 Norzila Salim7 Halina Binti Hamid8 Alester G Jakuil9 Grace Jennifer Philip10 Cynthia Nicholas11 Julkifli bin Awang Besar12 Bahril bin Balli

Research Fellow in Diploma in Electrical Engineering

NO NAME1 Chin Ken Leong (Head of Program)2 Shalizan Bin Kadir3 Farah Asyikin Abd Rahman

2

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this Programme Exit Survey (PES) was to provide data to gauge perceptions

of various aspects of programmes and services offered and to identify areas where

improvements may be needed in the Department of Electrical Engineering (JKE), Politeknik

Kota Kinabalu (PKK). This PES was conducted on 83 final semester students, graduating

from Diploma in Electrical Engineering (DET). They were the first Cohort whose intake was

in June 2010. The survey questionnaire had five main sections: respondents’ profile;

assessment of overall quality; assessment of skills and knowledge; assessment of Lecturers

and Academic Advisor; and assessment of academic resources and facilities. All the data

were analysed using the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software version

IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0. For the assessment of the overall quality, attribute for teaching and

learning experience was rated 95% with “very good” and “good”. Skills and knowledge

section was evaluated by relating the statements with nine items as stated in the Programme

Learning Outcomes (PLO). All the PLOs’ were marked at least “adequate” by 98.8% of the

students. Assessment on lecturers and academic advisor were rated 38.2% as “very good” and

56.2% as “good”. In terms of academic resources and facilities, the access to Wi-Fi had the

highest unsatisfactory concerned from the respondent whereby 18.1% rated the item as

“poor” and 7.2% as “marginal”.

Keywords: overall quality, skills and knowledge, lecturer and academic advisor, academic

resources and facilities

3

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Programme Exit Survey (PES)

PES is a method of collecting information on the quality of diploma education from the

perspective of graduating students upon the completion of their diploma programme. This

report refers to an indirect measurement method by way of self-evaluation based on

individual perception for the assessment of PLO. PLOs are the specific statements of

graduates’ knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired at the end of the programme as evidence

for the programme objectives achievements [1]. This PES was conducted to assess the

graduate students’ satisfaction and perceptions about various aspects of their academic

experiences [2]. 100% of the final semester students from the DET programme had

participated in the survey.

The main objectives of this PES are to [3]:

1) Determine the students perception in their attainment on the overall quality of

learning and teaching in PKK;

2) Determine the students self-assessment of knowledge, skills and soft skills

achievement after going through the PLOs of the programme;

3) Evaluate the students’ opinion towards contributions of Lecturer and Academic

Advisor system implemented based on Outcome Based Education (OBE) approach;

4) Evaluate the students’ opinion towards academic resources and facilities provided in

PKK.

1.2 Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)

OBE is an educational philosophy that believed that educational assessment should recognise

and reflect progress made by individual students. PLOs are statements that describe what

graduates are expected to know or be able to do on graduation. In the curriculum for DET

programme it has been specified that there are nine (9) PLOs’ to be acquired by the graduates

upon graduation [4]. The nine PLOs are as follows:

i. apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering fundamentals to well

defined electrical and electronic engineering procedures and practices.

4

ii. demonstrate practical skills which includes the ability to troubleshoot, repair and do

maintenance work for electrical and electronic equipment

iii. communicate effectively with the engineering community and the society at large.

iv. apply creative and critical thinking in solving problem related to assigned tasks

v. demonstrate awareness and consideration for societal, health, safety, legal and cultural

issues and consequences responsibilities, taking into account the need for sustainable

development.

vi. recognize the need for professional development and engage in independent

acquisition of new knowledge and skill.

vii. recognize the need for entrepreneurship

viii. demonstrate an understanding of professional ethics, responsibilities and norms of

electrical engineering practices.

ix. function individually or in teams, effectively, with a capability to be a leader.

5

2. METHODOLOGY

This survey involved 83 DET students from December 2012 semester. Students were asked

to fill up the PES questionnaires which were posted online and 100% of them responded.

The respondents were required to evaluate and rate themselves based on 5-Likert Scale

indicated below [5]:

1 = Poor

2 = Marginal

3 = Adequate

4 = Good

5 = Very good

Student’s satisfaction and acceptance level were determined from the level of the likert scale.

Very good, Good and Adequate indication rate shows the students were satisfied with the

item. While Marginal and Poor indication rate shows the program needs some improvements

and correction.

This online survey was conducted between March until May 2013. The survey

questionnaires were divided into five sections as follows:

i. Section A: General Information

ii. Section B: Overall Quality of Teaching and Learning

iii. Section C: Skills and Knowledge

iv. Section D: Contributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors

v. Section E: Academic Resources and Facilities

The data collected in this survey was processed through Statistical Product and Service

Solutions (SPSS) software version IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0.

The questionnaires were based on students’ perception on teaching and learning in

PKK, students’ response on skills and knowledge related to PLO’s, students attainment on

the soft skills, students’ rating for lecturers and academic advisors contribution, student’s

opinion towards academic resources, overall services and facilities in PKK [6,7]. This

assessment strategy was aligned with the Curriculum Development Cycle - “develop-

implement-review” as required by the MQA in order to improve the quality of programme. A

description of the survey findings is discussed below.

6

3. RESULTS

The response from the students were analysed based on the following four criteria:

i. Students’ response towards the Overall Quality

ii. Students’ response on Skills and Knowledge

iii. Students’ ratings for Lecturer and Academic Advisor contributions

iv. Students’ opinion towards Academic Resources and Facilities

In Section C: (Skills and Knowledge) the statements have been classified under a particular

PLO so that the data analysis can be done appropriately for accreditation purposes. The

results can be used an indicator to show how well the students have acquired their skills and

knowledge as required in the PLOs of the programme.

3.1 SECTION B: OVERALL QUALITY

Overall Quality was evaluated by relating the students experience with the teaching and

learning environment in PKK. Two survey statements were as follows:

a) What is your impression on the overall quality of curriculum; and teaching and learning

at PKK?

b) To what extent has the quality of teaching and learning in PKK improved since you

were here?

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

4 (4.8%) 5 (6.0%)

52 (62.7%)

51 (61.4%)

27 (32.5%)

27 (32.5%)

Poor Marginal Adequate Good Very good

Responses

Figure 1: Overall Quality rating

7

For statement (a) (Figure 1), 52 of the respondents (62.7%) agreed and categorized as

“good” for the impression on the overall quality of curriculum and teaching and learning at

PKK. The other 27 (32.5%) responded “very good” while 4 (4.8%) expressed as “adequate”.

No respondent rated for “marginal” and “poor” indication.

While for statement (b), 51 of the respondents (61.4%) agreed that item “to what

extent has the quality of teaching and learning in Politeknik Kota Kinabalu improved since

you were here” the scale given was “good”. The other 27 (32.5%) responded “very good”

while 5 (6.0%) expressed “adequate”. No respondent rated for “marginal” and “poor”

indication.

From the analysis on overall quality, 100% of DET students were satisfied with the

overall quality for this programme during their study in PKK based on the experience with

the teaching and learning environment.

3.2 SECTION C: SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE

In assessing the skills and knowledge of the students, the statements had been classified into

nine PLOs as follows:

3.2.1 PLO 1 (Knowledge)

For PLO 1 (Knowledge), four statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to apply knowledge of core discipline courses in my programme.

b) I am able to apply knowledge of specialized courses in my programme.

c) I am able to apply knowledge of elective courses in my programme.

d) I am able to understand the technological applications relevant to my programme of

study.

For statement (a) (Figure 2), I am able to apply knowledge of core discipline courses in

my programme and (b) I am able to apply knowledge of specialized courses in my

programme, all 83 respondents had rated for the same score. A total of 22 (26.5%)

respondents rated “very good”. The other 53 (63.9%) respondent selected “good” while 8

(9.6%) responded “adequate”, respectively. This shows that 100% of respondents were

satisfied with statement (a) and (b).

8

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

8 (9.6%) 8 (9.6%) 11 (13.3%) 14 (16.9%)

53(63.9%)

53(63.9%)

48(57.8%)

51(61.4%)

22 (26.5%)

22 (26.5%)

23(27.7%)

17(20.5%)

1 (1.2%) 1 (1.2%)


Responses

Figure 2: PLO 1 Knowledge rating

For the third statement (c) I am able to apply knowledge of elective courses in my

programme, a total number of 23 (27.7%) respondents rated “very good” while 48 (57.8%)

rated as “good” and 11 (13.3%) respondents rated “Adequate”. Only 1 (1.2%) respondent

rated “Marginal”. This show 98.8% of respondents was satisfied with statement (c).

Moving to the fourth statement (d) I am able to understand the technological

applications relevant to my programme of study, the highest score was for “good” with 51

(61.4%) respondents while 17 (20.5%) respondents rated “very good” and 14 (16.9%)

responded for “adequate”. Only 1 (1.2%) rated for marginal and no respondent rated for

“poor”. This show 98.8% of respondents was satisfied with statement (d).

As the conclusion, average of 98.8% of DET students was satisfied with the

knowledge they gained and agreed that they had understood the relevancy of the

technological application during their studies in PKK. This percentage will reflect the

achievement of PLO1.

3.2.2 PLO 2 (Technical & Practical Skills)

Figure 3 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 2 (Technical & Practical Skills). The

percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and Adequate) for the

three statements were given as follows:

9

a) I am able to apply information technology in my programme (98.8% satisfied)

b) I am able to demonstrate my practical skills effectively (100% satisfied)

c) I am able to use computing technology for applications in my programme (100%

satisfied).

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

11 (13.3%)1 (1.2%)

10 (12.0%) 11 (13.3%)

50(60.2%)

53(63.9%)

50(60.2%)

21(25.3%)

20(24.1%)

22(26.5%)


Respon

ses

Figure 3: PLO 2 Technical & Practical Skills rating

As the conclusion for PLO2, 98.8% (82 respondents) of DET students were satisfied

and were able to make use of technical & practical skills they gained during their studies in

PKK.

3.2.3 PLO 3 (Communication Skills)

Figure 4 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 3 (Communication Skills). The

percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and Adequate) for the

three statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to communicate effectively orally/visually (informal / formal / conversational

/ presentation) - (100% satisfied)

b) I am able to communicate effectively in writing (writing reports and expressing ideas

and opinions clearly and concisely) - (100% satisfied)

c) I am able to use computing technology in communications - (100% satisfied)

10

Figure 4: PLO 3 Communication Skills rating

As the conclusion for PLO3, 100% (83 respondents) of DET students were satisfied

and were able to communicate effectively after finish their studies in PKK.

3.2.4 PLO 4 (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills)

Figure 5 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 4 (Critical Thinking & Problem Solving

Skills). The percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and

Adequate) for the three statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to solve problems using methods, tools and skills related to my programme –

(100% satisfied)

b) I am able to think critically and logically. - (100% satisfied)

c) I am able to plan, organize and complete a task. - (100% satisfied)


and were equipped with critical thinking & problem solving skills which they gained during

their studies in PKK.

11

(43.4%)

(43.4%)

(13.3%)

(28.9%)

(60.2%)

(10.8%)

(33.7%)

(54.2%)

(12.1%)

I am able to solve problems using methods, tools and skills

related to my program.

I am able to think critically and logically.

I am able to plan, organize and complete a task.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

11 (13.3%) 8 (9.6%) 6 (7.2%)

45(54.2% 41

(49.4%)46

(55.4%)

27(32.5%) 34

(41.0%)31

(37.3%)


Respon

ses

Figure 5: PLO 4 Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Skills rating

3.2.5 PLO 5 (Social Skills and Responsibilities)

Figure 5 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 5 (Social Skills and Responsibilities).

The percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and Adequate) for

the three statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to understand the role of my work in relation to social or cultural issues.

(100% satisfied)

b) I am aware of the value of considering diversity and differences in cultures in my work.

(100% satisfied)

c) I am aware of the impact of my work in a social context. (100% satisfied)

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

11 (13.2%) 3 (3.6%) 7 (8.4%)

33(39.8%)

41(49.4%)

45(54.3%)

39(47.0%)

39(47.0%)

31(37.3%)


Responses

Figure 6: PLO 5 Social Skills and Responsibilities rating

12


and were aware of their responsibilities in social context and able to associate with

community effectively which they gain during their studies in PKK.

3.2.6 PLO 6 (Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills)

Figure 7 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 6 (Continuous Learning & Information

Management Skills). The percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good

and Adequate) for the four statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to continuously learn new skills and knowledge. – (100% satisfied)

b) I am able to engage in continuous learning beyond the classroom. – (100% satisfied)

c) I am able to learn and apply new concepts. – (100% satisfied)

d) I am able to use information resources (databases, libraries, internet etc.). – (100%

satisfied)

Figure 7: PLO 6 Continuous Learning & Information Management Skills


and were able to learn new skills and knowledge and able to use information resources

effectively after their study in PKK.

13

(61.4%)

(36.1%)

(2.4%)

(42.2%)

(53.0%)

(4.8%)

(28.9%)

(65.1%)

(6.0%)

(36.1%)

(47.0%)

(16.9%)

3.2.7 PLO 7 (Management & Entrepreneurial Skills)

Figure 8 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO7 (Management & Entrepreneurial

Skills). The percentage of respondents who were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and

Adequate) for the two statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to build/develop my career upon completion of my studies. – (100% satisfied)

b) I am able to develop time management skills. – (100% satisfied)

I am able to build/develop my career upon completion of my studies.

I am able to develop time management skills.0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

5 ( 6.0%) 6 (7.2%)

46(55.4%)

4351.8%)

32(38.6%)

3441.0%)


Respon

ses

Figure 8: PLO 7 Management & Entrepreneurial Skills rating


and believed that their management & entrepreneurial skills were developed in PKK.

3.2.8 PLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral)

Figure 9 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral).


the two statements were given as follows:

For PLO 8 (Professionalism, Ethics & Moral), two statements were provided as follows:

a) I am able to understand the professional and ethical responsibilities related to my work.

– (100% satisfied)

b) I am aware of the importance of safety issues related to my work. – (100% satisfied)

14

I am able to understand the professional and ethical responsibilities related to my work.

I am aware of the importance of safety issues related to my work.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

3 (3.6%) 2 (2.4%)

49(59.0%) 38

(45.8%)

31(37.4%) 43

(51.8%)


Respon

ses

Figure 9: PLO 8 Professionalism, Ethics & Moral rating


and understood the professional and ethical responsibilities and were aware of the importance

of safety issues related to their work during their studies in PKK.

3.2.9 PLO 9 (Leadership & Teamwork Skills)

Figure 10 shows the scores of 83 respondents for PLO 9 (Leadership & Teamwork Skills).


the four statements were given as follows:

a) I am able to work with individuals from different backgrounds. – (98.8% satisfied)

b) I am able to work successfully as a member of a team. – (100% satisfied)

c) I am able to work successfully as a leader of a team. – (98.8% satisfied)

d) I am able to function in multidisciplinary teams. – (100% satisfied)

As the conclusion for PLO9, 98.8% (82 respondents) of DET students were satisfied

and were able to work in a team successfully and capable of being a leader after finishing

their studies in PKK.

15

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

1 1 (1.2%) 1 (1.2%)1 (1.2%) 3 (3.6%) 8 (9.6%) 8 (9.6%)

43(51.8%)

36(43.4%0

43(51.8%)

38(45.8%)

38(45.8%)

44(53.0%)

31(37.3%)

37(44.6%)


Respon

ses

Figure 10: PLO 9 Leadership & Teamwork Skills rating

As the conclusion for the nine (9) PLOs, 100% respondents satisfied with all PLOs

except PLO1, PLO2 and PLO9 were satisfied by 98.8%. In summary, 98.8% respondents

were satisfied with the PLO which assessing the skills and knowledge of the students.

3.3 SECTION D: CONTRIBUTIONS OF LECTURERS AND ACADEMIC

ADVISORS

Responses from students towards the lecturers and academic advisors’ contributions are

summarized in Table 1 and Figure 11. Graduates were asked to offer insights of

encouragement given into the programme delivery process. Six attributes of encouragement

were offered and they were given as follows:

To what extent did your lecturer/academic advisor encourage you to:

a) Set high expectations for learning?

b) Be an actively involved learner?

c) Show concern for student learning?

d) Provide feedback frequently and promptly?

e) Effectively communicate critical concepts and ideas?

f) Incorporate teamwork as part of the learning process?

16

All (83) respondents were “satisfied” (Very Good, Good and Adequate), with more

than 90% rated “Good” and Very Good” to all six statements. This finding concluded 100%

of DET students were satisfied with the contributions of lecturers and academic advisors

during their studies in PKK.

Table 1: Contributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors rating

ResponsesPoor Marginal Adequate Good Very good

Question (a)

Qty 0 0 6 39 38% 0.0 0.0 7.2 47.0 45.8

Question (b)

Qty 0 0 5 49 29% 0.0 0.0 6.0 59.0 34.9

Question (c)

Qty 0 0 3 43 37% 0 0 3.6 51.8 44.6

Question (d)

Qty 0 0 4 56 23% 0.0 0.0 4.8 67.5 27.7

Question (e)

Qty 0 0 7 49 27% 0.0 0.0 8.4 59.0 32.5

Question (f)

Qty 0 0 3 44 36% 0.0 0.0 3.6 53.0 43.4

Average> 0% 0% 5.6% 56.2% 38.2%

Set h

igh ex

pectati

ons for le

arning?

Be an ac

tively

involve

d learn

er?

Show co

ncern fo

r studen

t learn

ing?

Provid

e fee

dback fr

equen

tly an

d promptly

?

Effecti

vely

communica

te cri

tical co

ncepts

and id

eas?

Incorp

orate t

eamwork

as part

of the l

earn

ing pro

cess.

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

6 5 3 4 7 3

39 49 4356 49 44

38 29 37 23 27 36


Respon

ses

Figure 11: Contributions of Lecturers and Academic Advisors rating

For Statement (d) “Provide feedback frequently and promptly?” 56 respondents rated

“Good” as compared to 23 rated “Very Good”. This reflects 65.7% respondents were

satisfied but expected more frequently and promptly feedback from the lecturers.

17

The same situations happened to the statement (b)“Be an actively involved learner?”

and (e) “Effectively communicate critical concepts and ideas?” which means many

respondents were satisfied but expect further improvement from the lecturers to be more

student-centred learning.

3.4 SECTION E: ACADEMIC RESOURCES/FACILITIES

In the education eco-system, academic resources/facilities were important in terms of

educational hardware. The teaching and learning process would be greatly enhanced provided

that there were sufficient resources/facilities for students to thrive academically. Table 2 and

Figure 12 show the percentage of respondents’ ratings towards the sufficiency of

resources/facilities at the PKK. Eleven statements of resources/facilities were given as

follows:

To what extent did Politeknik Kota Kinabalu provide you with the following

resources/facilities?

a) Operation hours of the library

b) Access to databases and collections both physically and online in the library

c) Easy and responsive services of the HEP staff

d) Easy and responsive services of the counselling staff

e) Easy and responsive services of the library staff

f) Easy and responsive services of the administration staff

g) Access to Wi-Fi internet

h) Quality of computer labs

i) Quality of laboratories / workshops / kitchens

j) Quality of classrooms

k) Quality of sports and recreational facilities

According to the finding, more than 90% of the respondents were satisfied with all the

statements, which included 70% rated “Good” and “Very Good”. Apart from the 10

statements, only one statement i.e. (g) “Access to Wi-Fi internet” was satisfied by only 74.7%

of the respondents. As the conclusion, 93.0% of DET students were satisfied with the

academic resources/facilities provided during their study in PKK.

18

Table 2: Academic Resources/Facilities rating

Responses(i)

Poor(ii)

Marginal(iii)

Adequate(iv)

Good(v)

Very good(iii)+(iv)+(v)Satisfied

Question (a)

Qty 1 2 13 33 34% 1.2 2.4 15.7 39.8 41.0 96.5%

Question (b)

Qty 0 1 20 43 19% 0.0 1.2 24.1 51.8 22.9 98.8%

Question (c)

Qty 2 3 17 40 21% 2.4 3.6 20.5 48.2 25.3 94.0%

Question (d)

Qty 1 4 17 47 14% 1.2 4.8 20.5 56.6 16.9 94.0%

Question (e)

Qty 0 6 17 35 25% 0.0 7.2 20.5 42.2 30.1 92.8%

Question (f)

Qty 0 4 18 39 22% 0.0 4.8 21.7 47.0 26.5 95.2%

Question (g)

Qty 15 6 35 18 9% 18.1 7.2 42.2 21.7 10.8 74.7%

Question (h)

Qty 1 5 16 40 21% 1.2 6.0 19.3 48.2 25.3 92.8%

Question (i)

Qty 0 4 17 46 16% 0.0 4.8 20.5 55.4 19.3 95.2%

Question (j)

Qty 0 4 23 43 13% 0.0 4.8 27.7 51.8 15.7 95.2%

Question (k)

Qty 2 3 19 37 22% 2.4 3.6 22.9 44.6 26.5 94.0%

Average> 2.4% 4.6% 23.2% 46.1% 23.7% 93.0%

19

Figure 12: Academic Resources/Facilities rating

4. CONCLUSION

The results of the survey indicated high considerable for Overall Quality of teaching and

learning since 100% students rated as “very good”, “good” and “adequate” measures of

achievement for all the statements. Thus students were satisfied with the overall quality of

teaching and learning in PKK.

Over 98.8% of graduates agreed that they had achieved the PLOs of the programme.

The data showed majority of students responded between “very good’ to “good” scale in this

Skills and Knowledge assessment. The rest of the graduates perceived and rated at least

“adequate” scale for all PLOs (soft-skills and knowledge-skills) acquired by the graduates.

Evaluation of the graduates’ opinions towards contributions of lecturers and academic

advisors system implemented also showed that graduates were satisfied with the lecturers.

Result showed that 100% of graduates rated very “good”, “good” and “adequate” scale. This

also supports the implementation of OBE in PKK which emphasized for student-centred

learning.

Finally 93.0% graduates were satisfied with the academic resources and facilities

provided. The most significant item that graduates were not satisfied with was the Wi-Fi

internet access in PKK where 25.3% of them rated for “marginal” and “poor”. Insufficient

Wi-Fi coverage around PKK was due to lack of Access Point (AP) installed.

This exit survey was found to be an essential tool to help identify the areas needs to

be improved in the quality of education as a whole in PKK especially for Diploma in

Electrical Engineering (DET).

REFERENCES

[1] Sani, M.S.M. (2009) Exit Surveys Assessment of Bachelor Mechanical Engineering

Programs at Universiti Malaysia Pahang. Proceedings of MUCEET 2009.

[2] Mohamed, A. (2012) Graduate Students’ Perspectives on Study Environment Based on

Exit Survey. Asian Social Science Vol. 8(16), 200-208.

20

[3] Zainulabidin, M.H. (2012) Indirect Program Learning Outcomes (PLO) Attainment for

the Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering with Honours (BDD) Degree Program.

FKMP OBE Committee Report 2012.

[4] COPPA. (2008) Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation. Malaysian Qualification

Agency.

[5] Adler, K. (2012) School Exit Surveys What you should know before you start. Michigan

State University.

[6] UNLV. (2011) Graduating Senior Exit Survey Report. University of Nevada Las Vegas

Office of Academic Assessment.

[7] Quality Support Unit. (2011) Exit Survey 2010. University of Limerick.

21

Report Exit Survey DIS 2012 DET

Documents

Transcript of Report Exit Survey DIS 2012 DET