4. Fuller- Positivism and Fidelity to Law- A Reply to Professor Hart
Reply to Professor Griffin
2
Société québécoise de science politique Reply to Professor Griffin Author(s): Thomas Flanagan Source: Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Sep., 1989), p. 607 Published by: Canadian Political Science Association and the Société québécoise de science politique Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3228545 . Accessed: 14/06/2014 20:50 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Canadian Political Science Association and Société québécoise de science politique are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.79.54 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:50:28 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
-
Upload
thomas-flanagan -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
2
Transcript of Reply to Professor Griffin
Société québécoise de science politique
Reply to Professor GriffinAuthor(s): Thomas FlanaganSource: Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, Vol. 22,No. 3 (Sep., 1989), p. 607Published by: Canadian Political Science Association and the Société québécoise de science politiqueStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3228545 .
Accessed: 14/06/2014 20:50
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Canadian Political Science Association and Société québécoise de science politique are collaborating withJSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne descience politique.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.54 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:50:28 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Reply to Professor Griffin
THOMAS FLANAGAN University of Calgary
I welcome Professor Griffin's comments on my article.' Readers can make up their own minds as to whether I attributed too much "abstract logical consistency" to the agricultural argument.2 I would, however, remind Professor Griffin and other readers that my article did not propose the agriculture argument as a satisfactory justification for the European appropriation of North America. After trying to tease out the implications of the agricultural argument, I concluded that the real issue "was not private ownership but public sovereignty."3 I think Professor Griffin would agree that that question has not yet received the treatment it deserves.
1 Nicholas Griffin, "Reply to Professor Flanagan," this JOURNAL 22 (1989), 603-06. 2 Thomas Flanagan, "The Agricultural Argument and Original Appropriation: Indian
Lands and Political Philosophy," this JOURNAL 22 (1989), 601. 3 Ibid., 602.
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.54 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:50:28 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
