Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

21
1 - 3859 Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines Chris Brown Foster-Miller - Waltham, Massachusetts, USA and John R. Dugas Jr. DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers - Orange, Texas, USA 33 rd Turbomachinery Symposium

Transcript of Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

Page 1: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

1 - 3859

Remote Visual Inspection of

Steam Turbines

Chris Brown

Foster-Miller - Waltham, Massachusetts, USA and

John R. Dugas Jr. DuPont Packaging & Industrial Polymers - Orange, Texas, USA

33rd Turbomachinery Symposium

Page 2: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

2 - 3859

Outline

Remote Visual Inspection Tooling

Case Studies • Worthington turbines at Sabine River Works (SRW)

• Elliott turbine at SRW

Page 3: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

3 - 3859

Typical Video Probe

Remote Visual Inspection Technology

Used extensively and regularly for a variety of equipment

Mostly off-the-shelf ‘one size fits all’ tools

Not commonly made to go to particular places in particular equipment

Page 4: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

4 - 3859

Custom Tooling for Steam Turbines and Other Large Rotating Equipment

A family of tools designed to go where off-the-shelf tools cannot

• To reach 1st stage nozzles in large steam turbines

• To go further down rows of turbomachinery

• To cross long unsupported distances

Page 5: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

5 - 3859

Worthington Steam Turbines at SRW

Turbine cross section: Inspection paths marked in red

Page 6: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

6 - 3859

Worthington Inspection Description

Two identical Worthington units inspected • GB201 and GB501

Inspection took place in the first three days of a five week turnaround

• Afforded maximum time possible for any maintenance action

Both critical units fully instrumented: • Vibration monitoring

• Efficiency, steam rate, and torque monitoring

• Monthly oil analysis

Page 7: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

7 - 3859

Worthington Diagnostic Triggers

Loss of performance on one unit (GB201) due to fouling

• GB201 typically ran at full capacity

• Required monthly online water wash to maintain capability

• Concern about resulting erosion/corrosion

No mechanical issues (vibration, torque, etc) detected

Primary goal of inspection was to evaluate status of nozzles, buckets, and coatings

Page 8: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

8 - 3859

Worthington Low Pressure Stage

Access through pressure tap port

Stiff tooling ‘parked’ at the leading edge of the first stage nozzles

Flexible video scope extended through the nozzles and the radial guide nozzles to the second stage rotating buckets

Page 9: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

9 - 3859

Radial Nozzle Erosion

Bucket Foreign Object Damage

Worthington: Low Pressure Stage Key Find: Eroded Radial Nozzles

Page 10: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

10 - 3859

Worthington Low Pressure Stage Eroded Radial Nozzle Stills

Page 11: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

11 - 3859

Worthington: Low Pressure Stage Maintenance Action: Immediate Maintenance Required

Erosion was severe enough to warrant opening casing and replacing exhaust end radial vanes on both turbines

One spare was in stock

The other set of vanes was rebuilt and reinstalled

There was foreign object damage (FOD) on the buckets which required repairs to one of the removed rotors prior to reinstallation

Page 12: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

12 - 3859

Worthington: Low Pressure Stage Maintenance Action: Remove Casing to Replace Nozzles

Pictures above were taken after casing was removed

Page 13: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

13 - 3859

Worthington: Low Pressure Stage Maintenance Action: Radial Nozzle Replacement

Radial guide nozzles replaced with

in-stock spares

Page 14: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

14 - 3859

Worthington: High Pressure Stage Key Find: Coating Evaluation

An antifoulant coating had been added to the entire steam path

Inspection revealed it had eroded away on the first stage buckets

No further damage was seen

Page 15: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

15 - 3859

Worthington: High Pressure Stage Maintenance Action: No Immediate Maintenance Action Required

Blade coating status obtained from inspection • Top antifoulant coating was gone

• Intermediate and base coats meant to prevent erosion/corrosion of base materials was still present

• Antifoulant coating was gone due to poor steam quality

- Poor steam quality due to surface condenser leaks and treatment chemicals

Page 16: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

16 - 3859

Case Elliott Steam Turbine at SRW

11 stage turbine

Page 17: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

17 - 3859

Elliott Inspection Description

Each stage accessed through stage-specific pressure ports

Below: Unit with Casing Off in 1999

Page 18: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

18 - 3859

Elliott Exhaust End Stages

Fouling deposits visible

Coating has eroded away

Otherwise buckets are in adequate condition

Page 19: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

19 - 3859

Elliott Inlet End Stages

Nozzles and Buckets in better condition than on the exhaust stages

Less evidence of corrosion or deposits

Page 20: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

20 - 3859

Elliott Maintenance Action

Condition not unexpected given • The unit’s time in service

• The online water washing that had been done

No immediate maintenance action is required

Page 21: Remote Visual Inspection of Steam Turbines

21 - 3859

Summary

Turnarounds are a rare opportunity to assess the condition of large rotating machinery

Tooling specially designed to maximize coverage inside the machinery makes the best use of the turnaround opportunity

If the inspections are done early in the turnaround, maintenance can be performed if problems are found

Spare parts and maintenance planning are enhanced even if no problems are found requiring immediate maintenance action