Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective
description
Transcript of Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement: A Canadian Perspective
Remediation Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement:A Canadian Perspective
Michael BinderPresident
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Presentation to the IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting
Vienna, Austria20 September 2012
nuclearsafety.gc.ca
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect the health, safety and security of Canadians and the environment; and to implement Canada’s international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 2
Celebrating over 65 years of nuclear safety!
CNSC Regulates All Nuclear-Related Facilities and Activities
• Uranium fabricators and processing• Nuclear power plants• Radioactive waste management
facilities• Nuclear substance processing• Industrial and medical applications• Nuclear research and educational• Export/import control• Mines and mills• Uranium fuel
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 3
From cradle to grave
Independent Commission
• Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal
• Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources Canada
• Commission hearings are public and Webcast
• Decision can only be reviewed by Federal Court
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 4
Transparent, science-based decision-making
The Remediation Challenge
• Clean-up of widely contaminated areas• Existing guidance: Good enough?• Canadian experience• The way ahead
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 5
Another important lesson from the Japan experience
Radiation monitoring at a baseballdiamond in Japan Post-Fukshima
Action in Major Nuclear Accident
• Urgent and early protective actions– Evacuation, sheltering and
instructions to take KI pills are based mainly on averted dose
• Longer term actions – Balance radiological risk and
social and economic disruption– Normally involve political decisions
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 6
Short term and long term considerationsPolice officers at a checkpoint in
Minamisoma, Japan.
International Benchmarks
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)
• World Health Organization (WHO)
• IAEA - Basic Safety Standards (BSS)
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 7
Expert authorities need consistent advice to stakeholders
Canadian Experience
• No serious accidents to date - hopefully, none will ever happen
• Experience: clean-up of legacy sites– Port Hope - political decision
• Uranium in soil – 23 (vs. 45) ppm– Mine closures
• Remediation work - Gunnar and Lorado
– Transportation – MCP Altona– Business non-compliance,
bankruptcy - Enviropac
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 8
We need to be ready for any accident
Canada - Multilayered Federal Democracy
• Multiple levels of government / layers– Federal, provincial, municipal and operators
• Multiple players within / across each level– Example: CNSC, Health Canada, Public Safety
Canada, emergency management organizations in each province, etc.
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 9
Another important lesson:coordination and communication are the key
Canadian Regulatory Framework
• Risk assessment approach for decommissioning and clean-up
• Need clarity on plan for post-accident recovery– Permanent relocation or resettlement – Clean-up of buildings, soil and vegetation– Managing waste and health surveillance – Information and education of affected communities
• Collaborative work underway for improved clarity and accountability
• Human factors always a concern
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 10
Part of our post-Fukushima Action Plan
Constant Engagement with the Public and Stakeholders
• Set clear requirements and challenge myths
• Science-based, plain-language communications
• Public hearings with participant funding• Webcasting and social media
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 11
On-going Dialogue
Canada – Communications Lessons Learned
• Crisis Web site – information ready for an emergency if one happens
• Spokesperson – Identified early, visible– 24/7 media challenge
• Regulator messaging - clarity, timeliness, consistency• Utilizing international support - i.e., IAEA
• Emergency management– Whole of government approach
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 12
Putting learning into action
The Way Ahead
• Clarify post-accident recovery requirements– What is an acceptable level of risk?– How to best explain: 1 mSv (regulatory dose limit)
vs. upper bound of 20 mSv (reference level for living on contaminated lands after emergency)?
– Consult stakeholders• Consistent messaging from international
bodies• Public communication is critical – let’s prepare
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 13
Regulatory clarity and stakeholder understanding are our priorities
Upcoming Opportunities
• International Experts Meeting on Decommissioning and Remediation after a Nuclear Accident• Vienna, Austria, Jan 28-Feb 1, 2013
• Canada hosting the IAEA 3rd International Conference on Effective Nuclear Regulatory Systems• Ottawa, Canada, April 8-12, 2013
IAEA General Conference: Senior Regulator’s Meeting 2012.09.20 - 14
Let’s take advantage of these opportunities
IAEA