Regional ‘THINK 20’ Seminar 23 May 2013 Heenam Choi Director General International Financial...
-
Upload
douglas-manning -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Regional ‘THINK 20’ Seminar 23 May 2013 Heenam Choi Director General International Financial...
Regional ‘THINK 20’ Seminar
23 May 2013
Heenam ChoiDirector General
International Financial Policy Bureau
2
Contents
I. Preparation for the G20 Seoul Sum-
mit
II. Outcomes of the G20 Seoul Summit
III. Assessment on the G20 after Seoul
IV. Expectation & hope for the Aus-
tralian Presidency
3
Ⅰ. Preparation for the G20 Seoul Summit
The 1st G20 Summit in a non-G7 and Asian
country
A year-long process carefully planned the Presidential Committee for the G20 Summit (composed of both government officials and pri-
vate experts) constant communication with member coun-
tries (60 face-to-face meetings, video conference, tele-
conference) preparing for the events in previous (venue, transportation, security, media, delega-
tion) Private sector participation (Seoul Summit emblem competition, 7,500 volu-
teers, Youth G20)
4
Ⅱ. Outcomes of the G20 Seoul Summit
Bridge-Builder between AEs and EMEs
Legacy Agenda G20 Framework for Strong, Sustainable and
Balanced Growth
IMF Reform
Financial Regulation
Korea Initiatives Global Financial Safety Nets
Development
5
Ⅱ. Outcomes of the G20 Seoul Summit
G20 Framework for SSB Growth Indicative Guideline : enhanced mutual assess-
ment process Seoul Action Plan : each country’s commitments
for SSB Growth
IMF Reform under-represented and emerging countries
quota increase shift of two chairs of advanced Europe to
emerging countries
Financial Regulation Basel Ⅲ, measures to better regulate SIFIs macro-prudential policy, EMDC issues, shadow
banking
6
Ⅱ. Outcomes of the G20 Seoul Summit
Global Financial Safety Nets Key agenda as a non key currency country
Agreement on enhancing the FCL and establish-
ing the PCL
Development Focus on the capacity building of DCs and LICs
Seoul Development Consensus for Shared
Growth
7
Ⅲ. Assessment on the G20 after Seoul
Recent criticism over the G20 “Premier forum of the global economic cooper-
ation”
VS
“Glorified talk shop”
What matters? Initiatives of the Chair are overemphasized
(France: IMS, Commodity Price / Mexico: DRM, Fi-
nancial Inclusion) Credibility is hampered by the delay of imple-
mentation
(DDA, IMF quota reform, Quota formula review)
8
Ⅳ. Expectation & hope for Aus-tralia
Agreements at the previous Summits should be implemented
The best way to gain credibility
Views from AEs and EMEs should be re-flected in a balanced way
Legitimacy and representativeness of the G20
Communiques should not be lengthy, un-focused and issued too often
Clear message to markets
Thank you!