Regional Integration in South Asia by Trio94
-
Upload
avinno-faruk -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
900 -
download
2
Transcript of Regional Integration in South Asia by Trio94
Regional Integration in South AsiaTrio94
PART ONE:
A CASE FOR REGIONAL INTEGRATION
PRESENTER: NAOWAR MOHIUDDIN
The Region That is South Asia▷ South Asia is a term used to
represent the southern region of the Asian continent, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
▷ S outh Asia Vs Rest of the World:
Po
pu
lati
on
GD
P
2.2%
Glo
ba
l Tra
de
1.7%
= S
ou
th A
sia
So
urc
es:
Wik
ipe
dia
; Ali
, E.,
& T
alu
kd
er,
D. K
. (2
00
9).
Pre
fere
nti
al
tra
de
am
on
g t
he
SA
AR
C c
ou
ntr
ies:
pro
spe
cts
an
d c
ha
lle
ng
es
of
reg
ion
al i
nte
gra
tio
n in
So
uth
Asi
a. J
OA
AG
, 4(1
), 4
7-5
9.
What is Regional Integration?
Economic Growth
By improvement in efficiency through exploitation of comparative advantage.
Economiesof Scale
By gaining access to larger markets, firms can raise output and thus lower their LRACs.
▷ Regional integration is a process in which neighboring states enter into an agreement in order to upgrade cooperation through common institutions and rules, e.g. EU, ASEAN, NAFTA etc.
▷ Benefits of Regional Integration:
Standardof Living
Via wider consumer choice and higher quality products due to increased competition.
So
urc
es:
Wik
ipe
dia
; EB
RD
Tra
nsi
tio
n R
ep
ort
20
12
, C
ha
pte
r 4
.
The Theory of Comparative Advantage
▷Comparative advantage is the ability to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer.▷A hypothetical example:
Country
Opportunity Cost (OC) of:
Cotton Textile Fibres
Bangladesh 4 ¼
India 2½
▷Here, Bangladesh has a lower OC of producing textile fibres and India has a lower OC of producing cotton. Thus they should specialize in those.
Economies of Scale
▷ Economies of scale occur when its Long Run Average Costs (LRAC) fall with increasing output, as fixed costs are spread out over more units of output.
▷Therefore increasing production leads to increasing returns to scale and there is greater efficiency.
▷ Larger population (22%) creates larger markets, allowing firms to lower LRACS and charge lower prices to consumers.
▷Higher output also translates into a rise in GDP.
Un
it C
ost
s
Level of Output
Eco. of Scale
Constant Returns to Scale
Diseco. of Scale
Long-Run ATC
Standard of Living (SoL)
▷SoL refers to the level of wealth, comfort, material goods and necessities available to a certain socioeconomic class in a certain geographic area. It is closely related to quality of life.
▷ The baseline measure is real national output per head of population or real GDP per capita.
▷Consumers benefit from cheaper imports, wider choice of products and higher quality output, due to greater competition and if LRAC cost savings are used for product development.
Analysing the affects to Mexico as a projected resemblance to Bangladesh.▷Maquiladors (Mexican assembly plants that take in imports components and produce goods for exports) sector have increased by 15.5% after the implementation of NAFTA in 1994.
▷From 1994 to 2001, exports increased by 9.4% and imports increased by 6.9%.
▷According to Economic Policy Institute, 700,000 jobs have been created in Mexico due to NAFTA.
▷FDI has increased manifolds.
A real life comparison with a similar FTA deal -NAFTA
So
urc
e: W
ikip
ed
ia.
Regional Integration in South AsiaTrio94
PART TWO:
THE JOURNEY SO FAR...
PRESENTER: AVINNO FARUK
8 membersAfghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan & Sri Lanka
SAFTA TLPA commitment towards a top-down reduction of tariffs.
SAFTASouth Asian Free Trade Agreement (2006); Key Features:Trade Liberalization Programme (TLP), Treatment of Sensitive Goods & Rules of Origin (ROO).
South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
▷SAFTA TLP Overview:
Country Category
1st Stage 2nd Stage
LDCs(BGD,BTN, MDV, NPL)
From existing tariff to 30% over 2 years
(By 2008)
From 30% or below to 0-5% over 8 years (By 2016)
Non-LDCs(IND,PAK,
LKA)
From existing tariff to 20% over 2 years
(By 2008)
From 20% or below to 0-5% over 5 years
(By 2013)
▷Lack of explicit commitment regarding negative lists & Non-Trade Barriers (NTBs), unlike ASEAN.▷Confined only to trade in goods, need to incorporate trade in services and investment.
Sources: Weerakoon, D. (2010). SAFTA: Current status and
prospects. Promoting Economic Cooperation in South Asia:
Beyond SAFTA. Washington, DC: World Bank and New Delhi:
Sage Publications India Ltd; Raihan, S. (2008). SAFTA and the
Bangladesh Economy: Assessments of Potential Implications.
Dhaka, Bangladesh: South Asian Network on Economic
Modeling (SANEM), SANEM Discussion Paper, (3).
Key FeatureAround 49 per cent of the SAARC intra-region trade is BBIN intra-region trade.
The DealAny member nation will be allowed to use roads of other members to transport goods and passengers paying fees and charges to be fixed later.
BBIN MVAMotor Vehicles Agreement for the Regulation of Passenger, Personal and Cargo Vehicular Traffic Between Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal.
Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal (BBIN) Initiative
▷A six-month action plan,July’15-Dec’15.Takes effect from Jan’16.
▷30 economic corridors (7 in Bangladesh).
▷This will potentially increase intraregional trade within South Asia by almost 60% & with the rest of the world by over 30%.
▷Expected to help land-locked Nepal and Bhutan to get access to Chittagong, Mongla and Kolkata sea ports.
▷Bangladesh’s strategic location could make it a land bridge between South Asia and economically vibrant Southeast Asia.
▷Large amount of investments in infrastructural development will shift PPC curve outward.
So
urc
es:
Th
e F
inan
cia
l E
xp
ress; T
he In
de
pe
nd
en
t; T
he D
aily
Sta
r; B
dne
ws2
4.c
om
BBIN MVA Overview
7 membersBangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka & Thailand.
Big Numbers▷ A market of 1.6 billion people,
about a fifth of the global population.
▷ Intra-BIMSTEC trade was US$ 74.63 bn (2013), up from US$ 25.16 bn (2005).
OriginIt stemmed from India’s Look East policy and Thailand’s Look West policy.
Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC)
▷Effective Implementation of BIMSTEC FTA will make trade go up by US$43 bn to US$59 bn.
▷65 projects to be implemented costing around US$15 Billion(16 in Bangladesh).
▷Roads are a priority in the BIMSTEC region as 70% of trade here moves by road and the roads are bad. Railways need to be standardized & deep waters ports need to be constructed.
▷Urging reduction or elimination of NTBs.
▷Economic and nationalistic considerations still prevent trade relations from blossoming.
So
urc
es:
BIM
ST
EC
we
bsite
; N
ew
In
dia
n E
xp
ress.
Key Features & Scope
6 membersBangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal & Sri Lanka.
Priorities▷ Energy, Transport & Trade
Facilitation.
▷ Also supports regional initiatives in ICT.
SecratariatAsian Development Bank (ADB)
South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) Program
▷34 regional projects.
▷SASEC investment since 2001 amount to more than US$6 Billion.
▷Under SASEC program funded by ADB, Chittagong port has improved its container handling facility.
▷Freight movement to Kolkata and Haldia ports in West Bengal has been eased.
▷US$100 Million SASEC assistance to improve airports.
▷However, lacks sub-regional characteristics in many ways. For instance, two island countries are there who couldn't be connected through land or rail links.
So
urc
es:
Wik
iped
ia; T
he F
inan
cia
l E
xp
ress.
Major Achievements
Regional Integration in South AsiaTrio94
PART THREE:
WHAT’S NEXT?
PRESENTER: SADMAN SHAFIQ
Outlook▷In the last quarter of 2014 South Asia was already the fastest-growing region in the world.
▷Regional growth is projected to steadily increase from 7% in 2015 to 7.6% by 2017 through maintaining strong consumption and increasing investment.
▷Largest concentration of youth (aged 15-24, as defined by the UN),representing 45% of the population.
So
urc
es:
Wo
rld
Ba
nk
; Th
e H
uff
ing
ton
Po
st.
Barriers:1. Traditional Trade Regime 2. Investment Climate is behind Border Issue3. ConnectivityInference: Lack of concrete achievements, points to the need for greater political will and clarity of purpose.
Barriers & Challenges
“Trade potential of the four countries has been limited by inadequate trade infrastructure, dearth of supply chain network, tariff and non-tariff barriers and absence of regional cooperation.”
Important Arguments Against Integration:
SAARC is neither integrated, nor do the economies complement one another. In many areas, in fact, they compete in global markets.
For instance, Bangladesh’s apparent lack of comparative advantage viz a viz India.
So
urc
es:
Wo
rld
Ba
nk
; Dh
ak
a T
rib
un
e; T
he
Wa
ll S
tre
et
Jou
rna
l.
As per Philippe Le Houérou, Vice President for the World Bank’s
South Asia Region
DCCI President Hossain Khaled
Some Future Prospects I:South Asia’s Currency Union
Reduced risks
Low Transaction costs
Discipline &
Transparency
Macroeconomic stability
Boost for trade
FDI & Jobs
SoL will improve for over a billion people.
Benefits
However, apart from loss of policy autonomy, having a common currency does not necessarily promote greater economic integration, nor does not having one prevent integration.
Sources: The Wall Street Journal; Saxena, S. C. (2005). Can South Asia adopt a common currency?. Journal of Asian Economics, 16(4), 635-662; Bdnews24.com.
Some Future Prospects II:Jt Venture Power for BBIN
▷Nepal and Bhutan have significant untapped hydropower potential, while Bangladesh and India are two energy starved countries.
▷Bangladesh can import 8,000-megawatt (MW) power, especially hydropower, from three BBIN countries Bhutan, India, and Nepal by 2035.
0
5000
10000
2020 2025 2030 2035
Po
we
r (M
W)
Year
BD’s Power Import Potentials from BBIN
▷JICA has proposed and offered support to Bangladesh for joint venture investment in power production in BBIN.
▷If the JICA helps, it will be easy for Bangladesh to invest in the BBIN countries for generating power aimed to ensure energy security of the country.
So
urc
es:
WB
BIN
: Su
b-R
eg
ion
ali
sm in
th
e S
AA
RC
by
Dr.
Am
it
Ku
ma
r, IC
WA
; Th
e F
ina
nci
al E
xpre
ss.
Few Proposed Solutions
▷Proactive participation of Pakistan
▷Enhance connectivity to exploit supply chain potentials
▷Enhance opportunities in investment & servicesectors
▷Explicit agreement to lower NTBs
▷Appointing influential observer states
Conclusions▷South Asia’s intra-regional trade accounts for just 5% of total trade, compared to 25% in ASEAN.
▷Regional integration could enhance stability in this volatile region -- which is home to 44% of the world’s poor.
▷Reducing intra-regional trade costs (85% higher than those in East Asia) can lead to a 250% increase in intra-regional trade.
▷Comparative advantage is not static and is changing all the time.
▷From SAFTA, the region can achieve considerable gains due to enhanced bargaining powers.
▷In reality, the progress is very slow.
▷Overall, we believe, although integration might bring few drawbacks for Bangladesh, it can be inferred from the data provided that the benefits are even greater.
Sources: World Bank; The Huffington Post; Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal Motor Vehicles Agreement: Unlocking the
Potential for Vibrant Regional Road Freight Connectivity by Pritam Banerjee, CUTS International; Ali, E., & Talukder, D. K.
(2009). Preferential trade among the SAARC countries: prospects and challenges of regional integration in South Asia.
JOAAG, 4(1), 47-59; Weerakoon, D. (2010). SAFTA: Current status and prospects. Promoting Economic Cooperation in
South Asia: Beyond SAFTA. Washington, DC: World Bank and New Delhi: Sage Publications India Ltd.
Credits
Special thanks to all the people who made and released these awesome resources for free:▷ Presentation template by SlidesCarnival
▷ Photographs by Unsplash
▷ Map of South Asia with Countries - Single
Color by FreeVectorMaps.com