gTg* * " ' ' ^ ^ ' : ' * - ' - ^ ^ - * ^ * " " * * ^ ' ^ ' ^ ^^ wf<fr- v.--">^ •-•y'^t'-^-y-^W---"* -<-y-«f''«v^>--it..;jf^^vT| i >>7g»j»«WT'v.--jri»' ^-y.

References

REFERENCES

Achuff & Lila (1988). The effect of combined parent-child tutoring on the

achievement of urban primary grade students. Dissertation Abstracts

International, 49, 139.

Adams, C. R. & Singh, K. (1998). Direct and indirect effects of school learning

variables on the academic achievement of African American 10^''graders.

The Journal of Negro Education, 67(1), 48-66.

Adazu, K. & Vargas, S. (2002). Is it education, wealth, and/or family size? The

effects of family size, parents' education, and wealth on school attainment

in a rural Ghanaian district. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the

Population Association of America, May 10, 2002, Atlanta, GA.

Ahsan. K. (2005). Influence of personal, social and institutional factors on the

academic achievement of senior secondary school students. Unpublished

M.Ed. Dissertation, Aligarh Muslim University (A.M.U.), Aligarh.

Akande, A. (1990).Influence of urban-rural upbringing on Nigerian students' test

anxiety. Psychological Reports, 67, 1261-1262.

Alam, M. M. (2001). Academic achievement in relation to socio-economic status,

anxiety level and achievement motivation: A comparative study of muslim

and non-muslim school children of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Educational

Abstracts, 6 (2), 42-43.

Ali, A. & Elfessi, A. (2004). Examining students' performance and attitudes

towards the use of information technology in a virtual and conventional

setting. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2 (3).

Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont,

CA: Wadsworth, Inc.

AUport, G.W. (1935). Attitudes. In CM. Murchenson (Ed.) Handbook of social

psychology. Warcester, Mass: Clark University Press.

Al-Methen, A. E. & Wilkinson, W. J. (1988). In support of a sociological

explanation of sex differences in science and mathematics achievement:

Evidence from a Kuwaiti study of Secondary School Certificate

Examinations. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6 (1), 91-

101.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science

for all Americans (Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science,

Mathematics, and Technology). Washington, DC, AAAS.

American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (AAUW).

(1992).How schools shortchange girls: Executive summary. Washington,

DC: Author.

American Psychological Association (APA). (1999). Standards for psychological

testing. Washington, DC

American Sports Institute (1996). Promoting achievement in school through sport.

Four-year impact study and summary report covering data from 1991-92,

1992-93, 1993-94, and 1994-95 school years. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED401241)

Amundsen, C. & Sohbat. (2001). An empirical investigation of instructors using

computer conferencing in higher education. Paper presented at the

American Educational Research Association, April, Seattle, WA.

Anderson, R. E., Hansen, T. P., Johnson, D. C. & Klassen, D. L (Eds.). (1979).

Minnesota Computer Literacy and Awareness Assessment. St Paul, MN:

Minnesota Education Computing Consortium.

Angrist, J. & Lavy, V. (1999). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil

learning. NBER Working Paper 7424. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau

of Economic Research.

Astone, N. M. & McLanahan, S.S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and

high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309-320.

201

Bacharack, V. R., Baumeister, A. A & Furr, R. M. (2003). Racial and gender

science achievement gaps in secondary education. The Journal of Genetic

Psychology, 164 (I), 115-126.

Baharudin, R. & Luster, T. (1998). Factors related to the quality of the home

environment and children's achievement. Journal of Family issues. 19(4),

375-403.

Bandalos, D. & Benson, J. (1990). Testing the factor structure invariance of a

computer attitude scale over two grouping conditions. Educational and

Psychological Measurement, 50, 501-505.

Bankston, C. L., & Caldas, S. J. (1998). Family structure, schoolmates, and racial

inequalities in school achievement. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 60,

715-724.

Barron, A. E. & Orwig, G. W. (1995). Multimedia technologies for training.

Libraries Unlimited Inc., Englewood, CO.

Barry, J. (2005). The effect of socio-economic status on academic achievement. A

thesis submitted in fulfillment of Ph.D. degree in Wichita State University.

Bates, A.W. (1997). Restructuring the University for Technological Change.

Paper presented to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of

Teaching: What kind of University? Vancouver, BC.

Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. 0., MuUis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A. &

Kelly, D. L. (1996a). Science Achievement in the Middle School Years:

lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

(Boston, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational

Policy, Boston College).

Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. 0., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L. &

Smith, T. A. (1996b) Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School

Years: lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

(Boston, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational

Policy, Boston College).

202

Becker, B. J. (1990). Coaching for the scholastic aptitude test: Further synthesis

and appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 60, 373-417.

Beckers, J. & Schmidt, H. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor

model. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 35-49.

Beichner, R., Bemold, L., Bumiston, E., Dail, P., Felder, R., Gastineau, J.,

Gjersten, M., & Risley, J. (1999). Case study of the physics component of

an integrated curriculum. Physics Education Research, American Journal

of Physics Supplement, 67, 16-24.

Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (1996). The 1991 International Assessment of Educational

Progress in mathematics and sciences: The gender differences perspective.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 365-377.

Berger, C. F.; Lu, C. R.; Beltzer, S. J. & Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the uses

of technology in science education. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed.). Handbook of

Research in Science Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, 466-

490.

Bernstein, B. (1971): Class, Codes and Control. Routledge, London.

Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of

science and mathematics degrees. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.

Best, J. W. (1997). Research in education. Prantice Hall, New Delhi.

Bhaskara, D. R. (1990). A comparative study of scientific attitude, scientific

aptitude and achievement in Biology at secondary school level. Ph.D., Edu,

Osmania University. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in

Education, VoUI. NCERT, New Delhi.

Bhushan, V. & Sachdeva, D. R. (1999). An introduction to sociology. Kitab

Mahal, 22-A, Sarojini Naidu MARG, Allahabad.

Blatchford, P.; Burke, J.; Farquhar, C, Plewis, I. & Tizard, B. (1985).Educational

achievement in the infant schools: The influence of ethnic origin, gender

and home on entry skills. Educational Research, 27(1-3), 52-60.

Blaxter, L.; et al. (2002). How to research. Viva Books Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

203

Bostock, S.J. (1998).Constructivism in mass higher education: A case study.

British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 225-240.

Bozic, D. & Bozic, P. (1985). Influence of family circumstances on school

achievement in the first phase of secondary education. Nastava I vaspitanje,

br. 3, 447-458.

Branson, J. & Miller, D. B. (1979). Class, sex and education in capitalist society.

Melbourne: Sorett Publishing, 75.

Brock, D. B. & Sulsky, L. M. (1994).Attitudes toward computers: Construct

validations and relations to computer use. Journal of Organizational

Behaviour, 15(1) 17-35.

Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., Flor, D. (1995) Linking family process an academic

competence among rural African American youths. Journal of Marriage &

the Family, 57, 567-579.

Broh, B. A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic

achievement: Who benefits and why? [Electronic version]. Sociology of

Education, 75, 69-96.

Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scienfific literacy and

discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science

learning. Science Education, 89, 779-802.

Browne, N. & Ross, C. (1991). Girls' stuff, boys' stuff: Young children talking

and playing. In N. Browne (Ed.), Science and technology in the early years.

Buckingham: Open University Press.

Bryk, A. S.; Lee, V. E. & Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic Schools and the Common

Good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bybee, R. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. Scientific

literacy: science education and secondary school student. In W. Graber &

C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy: An international symposium Kiel,

Germany: IPN, 37-67.

204

Calsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle

grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (3), 243-257.

Carpenter, P. C. & Hayden, M. (1987). Girls' academic achievements: Single-sex

versus co-educational schools in Australia. Sociology of Education, 60,

156-157.

Carter, T. (2005). The effect of single-sex schooling on girls' achievement in

physical science. Unpublished Dissertation. University of South Africa.

Chang, C. (2001) Comparing the impact of problem-based computer-assisted

instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science

achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10,147-153.

Cheung, D.S.P. et al. (2003). Evaluation on the Implementation of the Medium of

Instruction Guidance for Secondary Schools. Hong Kong Institute of

Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. September

24, 2003.

Chopra, S. L. (1964). A study of relationship of socio-economic factors with

achievement of students in secondary schools. Buch, M.B. (ed. First

Survey of Research in Education, NCERT, New Delhi.

Chrispeels, J. (1992) Purposeful Restructuring: Creating a Culture for Learning

and Achievement in Elementary Schools (Bristol: Palmer Press).

Chubb, J. E. and Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools.

Washington, DC: The Brookings Institutio).

Clewell, B.C. & Ginorio, A. B. (1996). Examining women's progress in the

sciences from the perspective of diversity. In C. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S.

HoUenshead, B. B. Lazarus, P. M. Rayman, & Associates. (Eds.), The

equity equation: Fostering advancement of women in the sciences,

mathematics and engineering. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass, 163-231.

Cloward, R. A. (1974). Socioeconomic position and academic underachievement.

In W. M. Cave & M. A. Chesler (eds). Sociology of education. New York:

Macmillan Publishing, 134-148.

205

Coffin, R. & Maclntyre, P. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related

affective status. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 549-569.

Coleman, J. et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington. D.C.:

US Government Printing Office.

Coleman, J. S. & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The Impact

of communities. New York: Basic Books.

Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. and Kilgore, S. (1982) High School Achievement:

Public, Catholic, and Private Schools Compared .New York: Basic Books.

Colley, A.M., Gale, M.T. & Harris, T.A. (1994) Effects of Gender Role Identity

and Experience on Computer Attitude Components. Journal of Educational

Computing Research, 10, 2, 129-137.

Comelius, M. L. & Cockbum, D. (1978). Influences on pupil performance.

Educational Research, 21(1), 48-53.

Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. NewYork: Longman.

Cooper, H.; Valentine, J. C; Nye, B. & Lindsay, J. J. (1999). Relationships

between five after-school activities and academic achievement. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 91, 369-378.

Corwyn, R. F. & Bradley, R. F. (2003) Family process mediators of the relation

between SES and child outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, University of

Arkansas at Little Rock.

Crawford, R. (1997). Managing information technology in secondary schools.

Routledge, New Fetter Lane, London, 194

Cronbach, L. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological

Bulletin, 456-473.

Crow, L. D. & Crow, A. (1960). Introduction to education. American Book

Company, New York, 53-55.

Cuttance, P. (1992). Evaluating the effectiveness of schools. In D. Reynolds & P.

Cuttance (Eds.), School effectiveness: Research, policy and practice.

London: Cassell, 71-95.

206

Dale, R.R. (1969). Mixed or single-sex school? London: Routlege and Kegan

Paul.

Daiz, A. L. (2006). Personal, family, and academic factors affecting low

achievement in secondary school. Electronic Journal of Research in

Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy, 1, 1, 43-66.

(www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org)

Dambrot, F. H.; Watkins-Malek, M. A.; Silling, S. M.; Marshall, R.S. & Garver ,

J. A. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward involvement

with computers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 27, 71-86.

Dange, J. K. & Vijayalakshmi (2006). Study-habits and achievement in physics of

students of class XII-A study. School Science, 44, 3, 54-57.

Daniel, J. S. (1999). Mega universities & knowledge media. London: Kogan Page

Limited.

Darling, N.; Caldwell, L. L. & Smith, R. (2005). Participation in school-based

extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment [Electronic version].

Journal of Leisure Research, 37, 51-77.

Das, J. & Naval, G. (2001). Achievement of standard VIII students in Hindi with

respect to their socio-economic status, caste and sex. Journal of Education

and Psychology, 59(4), 27-37.

Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005) The influence of parent education and family income on

child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home

environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19,2, 294-304.

Davis-Kean, P. E., Malanchuk, O., Peck, S. C. & Eccles, J. S. (2003) Parental

influence on academic outcomes: do race and education matter?, paper

presented at the Society for Research on Child Development, Tampa,

Florida.

Deeson, E. (1999). Communication on information technology. British Journal of

Educational Technology, 30(4), 369-370.

207

Delgado-Hachey, M.; Evans, J. H.; Hunley, S. A.; Krise, J.; Rich, T. & Schell, C.

(2005). Adolescent computer use and academic achievement. Adolescence.

(http://www. encyclopedia, com).

Delibasic, R. (1970). Influence of some non-school factors on school success.

Nastava i vaspitanje, br. 3, 302-312.

De Young, A. J. & Lawrence, B. K. (1995). On Hoosiers, Yankees and

Mountaineers. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED, 383-508

Dijkstra, A. B. and Peschar, J. L. (1996). Religious determinants of academic

attainment in The Netherlands. Comparative Education Review, 40(1), 47-

66.

Dhindsa, H. S. & Chung, G. (2003). Attitudes and achievement of Bruneian

science students. InternationalJournal of Science Education, 25(8), 907-922.

Dillon, C, Greene, B. & Cryness, B. (2001). Technology-based distributed

learning in post secondary education: learner differences in strategy use and

achievement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research

Association, April, Seattle, WA.

Dimitrov, D.M. (1999). Gender differences in science achievement: differential

effect of ability, response formats and strands of learning outcomes. School

science and mathematics, 99 (8), 445-450.

Din, F. S. (2006). Sport activities versus academic achievement for rural high

school students. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal-

Electronic, 19, 3E.

Donnel, V. (2004).The relationship between Student and faculty attitudes toward

computer technology in advanced arts classes. Tennessee State University.

Document accessible at the following URL address: http://e-

research. instate, edu/cgi/query. cgi.

Drew, D. E. (1996). Aptitude revisited: Rethinking math and science education for

America's next century. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University

Press.

208

Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2003). The effectiveness of public and private schools

from a comparative perspective. San Domenico di Fiesole (Fi): European

University Institute. EUI working paper SPS 2003/13.

(http://www. iue. it/Personal/Dronkers/ English/pisaprivate.pdj)

Duncan, T. (1989). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach.

Papers 586, Yale- Economic Growth Order.

Dwivedi, R.D. (2005). Influence of school environment and approval motive on

academic achievement of students. Ram-Eesh Journal of Education, 2(2),

101-107.

Eamon, M. K. (2005). Social-demographic, school, neighbourhood, and parenting

influences on academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal

of Youth and Adolescence, 34(2), 163-175.

Eccles, J. S. (1993) School and family effects on the ontogeny of children's

interests, self perceptions, and activity choice, in: J. Jacobs (Ed.) Nebraska

symposium on motivation, 1992: developmental perspectives on

motivation, Lincoln, NB, University of Nebraska Press.

Eccles, J.S. (1999). The development of children ages 6 to 14. Future of Children,

9, 30-44.

Eccles, J. S. & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball or

marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal

of Adolescent Research, 14, 10-43.

Eccles, J. S., & Blumenfield, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student

gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L. C. Wilkinson & C.

B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction New York:

Academic Press, 79-114.

Edington, E. D. & Martellaro, H. C. (1984). Variables affecting academic

achievement in New Mexico schools. Las Graces: New Mexico Gentre for

Rural Education. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. 271 261).

209

Egan, M. B. & Bunting, B. (1991). The effects of coaching on 11+ scores. British

Journal of Educational Psychology, 61 (1), 85-91.

Elijio, A. & Dudaite, J. (2005). Social, economical, and educational factors in

relation to mathematics achievement, (http://scholar.google.com)

Ellekkakumar, B. and Elankathirselvan, N. (2001). Achievement Motivation of

Higher Secondary Students and their Achievement in Physics. Journal of

Educational Research and Extension, 38, (1).

Elsworth, G.; Day, N.; Hurworth, R. & Andrews, J. (1982). From school to tertiary

study. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Elwood, J. & Gipps, C. (1999). Review of recent research on the achievement of

girls in single-sex schools. Great Britain: Institute for education, University

of London.

Emmanuel, J. & Lockheed, M. E. (1988). The relative effectiveness of single-sex

and coeducational schools in Thailand. Policy, Planning and Research

Department working papers, \, WPS 29.

Erdogan, Y.; Bayram, S. & Deniz, L. (2008). Factor that influence academic

achievement and attitudes in web based education. International Journal of

Instruction, 1 (1), 31-48.

Eriba, J. O. and Ande, S. (2006). Gender differences in achievement in calculating

reacting masses from chemical equations among secondary school students

in Makurdi Metropols. Educational Research and Reviews, 1 (6), 170-173.

Erickson, G. A., & Erickson, L. J. (1984). Achievement: Evidence, explanations,

and implications. Science Education, 68, 63-89.

Esquivel, J. M. & Brenes, M. (1988). Gender differences in achievement in Costa

Rican students: science, mathematics and Spanish. Paper presented at the

Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science

Teaching (Lake of the Ozarks, MO, USA). ERIC ED 292 637.

Evans, W. N. & Schwab, R.M. (1996).Who benefits from a catholic school

education? Mimeo, University of Maryland, July.

210

Eylon, B.S., Ronen, M., & Ganiel, U. (1996). Computer simulations as tools for

teaching and learning: Using a simulation environment in optics. Journal of

Science Education and Technology, 5 (2), 93-110.

Farkas, G., Lleras, C. & Steve, M. (2002). Does oppositional culture exist in

minority and poverty peer groups? American Sociological Review, 67, 148-

55.

Farooque, U. & Viswanathappa, G. (2006). Influence of parental occupation on

learners achievement in English medium primary schools in Kerala.

Journal of Community Guidance & Research, 23, 1, 58-64.

Fernandez, R.M. and Nielsen, F. (1986). Bilingualism and Hispanic scholastic

achievement: some baseline results. Social Science Research, 15, 43-70.

Fink, A. (1998). Conducting research literature reviews: From paper to the

internet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Forrest, G. M. (1993). Gender differences in school science examinations. Studies

in Science Education, 21, 87-122.

Francis, L. J. & Evans, T. E. (1995). The reliability and validity of the Bath

County computer attitude scale. Journal of Educational Computing

Research, 12(2), 135-146.

Eraser- Abder, P. (1990). Determinants of science achievement at elementary level

in a 'minority' population. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the

National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Atlanta, GA, USA).

ERIC ED 326 435.

Eraser, B J. (1986). Classroom environment. Kent, UK: Croom Helm.

Eraser, B.J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B.J.

Eraser & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation,

antecedents and consequences. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3-27.

Eraser, E. D. (1969). Home environment and the school, London: University of

London.

211

Frear, V. and Hirrachbuhl, J. J. (1999).Does interactive multimedia promote

achievement and higher level thinking skills for today's science students?

British Journal of Educational Technology, 30 (4), 323-329, USA

Freedman, K. & Liu, M. (1996). The importance of computing experience,

learning processes, and communication patterns in multicultural

networking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(1),

43-59.

Fujita, K. (2006). The effects of extracurricular activities on the academic

performance of junior high school students. Undergraduate Research

Journal for the Human Sciences, 5.

Gafoor, A. K. & Muhammad, S. (2007). Effect of private tuition on achievement

in science of secondary school pupils. Journal of Community Guidance &

Research, 2^ 0),?>\6-Z25.

Gandell, T.; Weston, C; Finkelstein, A. & Winer, L. (2000). Appropriate use of

the web in teaching in higher education in B Mann (ed).Perspectives in web

course management Canadian Scholar's Press, Toronto, 61-68.

Ganguly, M. (1989). Socio-economic status and scholastic achievement. Indian

Educational Review, 24(1), 84-94.

Gardner, J., Morrison, H., Jaman, R., Reilly, C. & McNally, H. (1994) Learning

with portable computers. Computers and Education, 22, 1/2, 161-171.

Garg, V. P. & Chaturvedi (1992). Intelligence and socio-economic status as

correlates of academic performance: Some field evidences. Indian

Educational Review, 27(3), 107-110

Gastright, J. (1983). An experimental study intensive test wiseness instruction on

the reading gains of disadvantaged elementary school pupils.

Gerber, S. (1996). Extracurricular activities and academic achievement. Journal of

Research and Development in Education, 30: 42-50.

Giddens, A. (1997): Sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge.

212

Gipps, C. (1994). A fair test. In: P. Ramroop (Ed). A gender inclusive

multidimensional approach to the empowerment of learners in science

education. Mauritus: M.I.E. Publishers.

Ghosh, G. P. (1985). A study of the achievement of the students in chemistry and

finding relationship with some of its determinants. Buck, M.B. (ed.) Fourth

Survey of Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning

outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18(8), 519-521.

GOI (1985). Challenge of Education: A Policy Perspective. New Delhi: Ministry

of Education, Government of India.

Goldberg, F. (1997). Constructing physics understanding in a computer-supported

learning environment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 399, 903-911.

Govinda, R. and N.V. Varghese (1993). Quality of primary schooling in India: A

case study of Madhya Pradesh, Paris: International Institute for

Educational Planning, and New Delhi: National Institute of Educational

Planning and Administration (NIEPA).

Gamoran, A. (1996) Student achievement in public magnet, public

comprehensive, and private city high schools. Educational Evaluation and

Policy, 18(1), 1-18.

Gonzalez, E. J. & Smith, T. A. (1997). User guide for the TIMSS International

Database— primary and middle school years 1995 assessment: lEA's Third

International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (Boston, Center for

the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College).

Good, C.V. (1973). Dictionary of education. McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc.,

New York.

Gorard, S., Salisbury, J. & Rees, G. (1999). Reappraising the apparent

underachievement of boys at school. Gender and Education, 11(3).

213

Goyette, K. and Y. Xie. (1999). Educational expectations of Asian American

youth: Determinants and ethnic differences. Sociology of Education, 72, 22-

36.

Grayson, D. & McDermott, L. (1996). Use of the computer for research on student

thinking in physics. American Journal of Physics, 64, 557-565.

Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement and attitudes.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 901-933.

Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest

and participation. Science Education, 81, 259-276.

Gressard, C. P. & Loyd , B.H. (1986). The Nature and Correlates of Computer

Anxiety in College Students. Journal of Human Behaviour and Learning,

3, (2), 28-33.

Griffin, N., Chassin, L., & Young, R.D. (1981). Measurement of global self-

concept versus multiple role-specific in adolescents. Adolescence, 16, 49-

56.

Grounlund, N. E. (1973). Preparing criterion referenced tests classroom

instructions. The McMillan Co., New York.

Gupta, B. S. (1983). Equality of educafional opportunity and muslims: A

comparative study of rural schools of four districts in U.P. with reference to

school culture, textbooks and facilities for teaching urdu and through urdu.

Indian Education Review, 18, (2), 84-83.

Gupta, K. L. (2003). Advanced statistics: Quantitaive analysis. Navyug Sahitya

Sadan, Lohamandi, Agra, 2.

Gupta, M., (1988).Two strategies of computer assisted instruction in Chemistry.

Mukhapadhyay, M. (ed.) Educational Technology Year Book, All India

Association for Educational Technology, New Delhi.

Hall, 0. M. (1934). Attitudes and unemployment: A comparison of the opinions

and attitudes of employed and unemployed men. Archives of Psychology,

165,46

214

Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia,

PA .-Temple University press.

Harding, J. (1983). Switched-Off: Science education for girls. London: Longmans.

Hariharan; Meena; Das, A. S. & Acharya, S. (1987). School, grade, sex and

academic achievement differences in peer rating. Journal of Education and

Psychology. Vol. XXXXV(l), April.

Harikrishanan (1992). A study of academic achievement of the students of the

higher secondary stage in relation to achievement motivation and socio­

economic status. M. Phil, Education, Annamalai University, Buch, M.B.

(ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Harker, R. (2000). Achievement, gender and single-sex/coed debate. British

Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (2), 203-218.

Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer self-efficacy beliefs.

Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 443-450.

Hauser, R. M. & Sewell, W.H. (1983). A model of the stratification process with

response error in social psychological variables. Sociology of Education,

56, 20-46.

Head, J. (1999). Understanding the boys: Issues of behaviour and achievement.

London: Palmer Press.

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores,

variability, and numbers of high scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.

Heinssen, R. K.; Glass, C. R. & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety:

development and validity of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers

in Human Behaviour, 3, 49-59.

Heyneman, S. & Loxley, W. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on

academic achievement across twenty nine high and low income countries.

American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162-1194.

Heyns, B. & Catsambis, S. (1986). Mother's employment and children's

achievement: A critique. Sociology of Education, 59, 140-151.

215

Hiltz, S.R. & Johnson, K. (1990). User satisfaction with computer-mediated

communication systems. Management Science, 32(6), 739-764.

Hochschild, J. L. (2003). Social class in public schools. Journal of Social Issues,

59(4), 821-840.

Hoff, E., Laursen, B. & Tardif, T. (2002) Socioeconomic status and parenting, in:

M. Bomstein (Ed.) Handbook of parenting, 2: biology and ecology of

parenting Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hofman, R. H. (1995) Contextual influences on school effectiveness: the role of

school boards. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(4), 308-

331.

Hoffman, D. L., Kalsbeek, W. D., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Internet and Web use in

the United States: Baselines for commercial development. Retrieved

September28,2000,from:http://commerce/vanderbilt.edu/baseline/Internet.d

emos.july9.1996.html.

Holland, A. & Andre, T. (1987). Participation in extracurricular activities in

secondary school: What is known, what need to be known. Review of

Educational Research, 57, 437-466.

Holmes, M. & Croll, P. (1989). Time spent on homework and academic

achievement. Educational Research, 31 (1), 36-45.

Hong, K-S; Ridzuan, A. A. & Kuek, M-K (2003). Students' attitudes toward the

use of the internet for learning: A study at a university in Malaysia.

Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 45-49, (ISSN 1436-4522)

Hooker, M. (1997).The transformation of higher education in Oblinger, D. and

Rush, S. (eds) The Learning Revolution. Anker Publising Company, Bolton,

MA, 20-34.

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2002). Scientific and technological literacy for

all—an important philosophy for the teaching of science subjects. In K.

Ninisto, H. Kukemelk, & L. Kemppinen (Eds.). Developing teacher

education in Estonia. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.

216

Ho, S. C. (2006). High status testing and its impact on students and schools in

Hong Kong: What we have learned from the PISA studies. KEDI, Journal

of Educational Policy, 1(1), 69-87.

Ho, S. C. and Willms, J. D. (1996). The effects of parental involvement on eighth

grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69 (2), 126-41.

Hounsheil, P.B., & Hill, S.R. (1989). The microcomputer and achievement and

attitudes in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

26(6), 543-549. EJ 401 364.

Hudiburg, R. A. (1989). Psychology of computer use: VII. Measuring

technostress: Computer-related stress. Psychological Reports, 64,161-112.

Houtz, L. E. & Gupta, U. G. (2001). Nebraska high school students' computer

skill and attitudes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (3),

316-326.

Hunt, H. D. (2005). The effect of extra-curricular activities in the educational

process: Influence on academic outcomes? Sociological Spectrum, 25(4),

417-415.

Indira. (1991). A study of the relation of social class, religion, family size and

birth order to academic achievement of high school students. Buch, M.B.

(ed. Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Isaac, S. & Michael, W. B. (1972). Handbook of research and evaluation. San

Diego, California, Robert R. Knapp Publishers, 18

Ishida, H., Muller, W., & Ridge, J. M. (1995). Class origin, class destination, and

education: A cross-national study of ten industrial nations. American

Journal of Sociology, 101, 145-193.

Islam, R. (2008). A study of the post graduate students attitude towards computer

in relation to their gender, religion, parental education and occupation,

computer knowledge and academic achievement. Unpublished M.Ed.

Dissetation, Aligarh Muslim University (A.M.U.), Aligarh.

217

Israel, G.D. et al. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on

educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66 (1), 43-68.

Iverson, B. K. & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Home environment and school learning: a

quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 144-

152.

Jackson, L. A.; Eye, A. V.; Biocca, F. A.; Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y. & Fitzgerald, H.

E. (2006). Does home internet use influence the academic performance of

low income children? Developmental Psychology, 42, 3, 429-435.

James, R. & Lamb, C. (2000). Integrating science, mathematics, and technology in

middle school technology-rich environments: A study of implementation

and change. School Science and Mathematics, 100, 27-36.

Jain, M. (2004). Teaching of science at the elementary stage: Observations from a

qualitative study. Journal of Indian Education, 29(2), 7-22.

Jawahar, I. M. & Elango, B. (2001). Predictors of performance in software

training: Attitude toward computers versus attitudes toward working with

computer. Psychological Reports, 83, 227-233.

Jegede, O. J. (1987). Socio-cultural correlates of anxiety in science classroom: A

Preliminary Report. Paper presented as a contribution to the International

Roundtable Exchange at the National Convention of the Science Teachers'

Association. Washington, DC, March 26-29.

Jegede, O. and Inyang, N. (1990). Gender differences and achievement in

integrated science among junior secondary science students: A Nigerian

Study. International Review of Education, 36 (3), 364-368

Jegede, 0. J. & Okebukola, P. A. 0. (1988). An educology of socio-cultural

factors in science classrooms. International Journal of Educology, 2, 93-

107.

Jelavic, F. (1985). Student and school achievement. Odgoj I skola. Zagreb:

Skolske novine, 163-173.

218

Jeynes, W.H. (2002).Examining the effects of parental absence on the academic

achievement of adolescents: The challenge of controlling for family

income. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(2).

Johnson, S. & Murphy, P. (1986). Girls and physics, APU occasional paper 4.

(London, Department of Education and Science).

Jordan, W. J. (1999). Black high school students' participation in school-

sponsored sports activities: Effects on school engagement and achievement.

The Journal of Negro Education, 68(1), 54-71.

Jovanovich, J., & Shavelson, S. K. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-

based science classroom: Who's doing the performing? American

Educational Research Journal, 35, 477- 496.

Kahle, I B., Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Riley. D. (1993). Gender differences in

science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28, 379-

404.

Kao, Grace and Marta Tienda. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The

educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76

(1), 1-19.

Kelly, A., ed. (1981). The missing half: Girls and science education. Manchester:

Manchester University Press.

Kelly, G. J., and Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer

representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 33, 693-707.

Kenny, D. T. & Faunce, G. (2004). Effect of academic coaching on elementary

and secondary school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 98,

109-126.

Kenny, D. T. & Stone, B. J. (2000). The effects of coaching on scholarship type

and academic performance of academically able students. Unpublished

paper.

219

Kerawalla, L. & Crook, C. (2002). Children's computer use at home and at school:

context and continuity. British Education Research Journal, 22.

Kesamang, M. E. E. & Taiwo, A. A. (2002). The correlates of the socio-cultural

background of Botswana junior secondary school students with their

attitudes towards and achievements in science. International Journal of

Science Education, 24, (9), 919-940.

Khanna, M. (1980). A study of the relationship between students' socio-economic

background and their academic achievement at junior school level. Buck,

M.B. (ed./ Third Survey of Research in Education, NCERT, New Delhi.

Khatoon, T. (1996). Minority students' attitude towards science and their

achievement: A comparative study. Indian Education Review, 31(1), 170-

177.

Kim, M. M. & Placier, M. (2004). Comparison of academic development in

Catholic uersus non-Catholic Private secondary schools. Education Policy

Archives, 12(5).

Kingdon, G. G. (1999) .How much do schools matter to pupil achievement in

India. Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford.

Klainin, S. & Fensham, P. J. (1987). Learning achievement in upper secondary

school chemistry in Thailand: some remarkable sex reversals. International

Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 1\1-121.

Kleinfeld, J. S. (1985). Alaska's small rural high schools: are they working? ISER

Report Series No. 58. Fairbanks: University of Alaska. (Eric Document

Reproduction Service No. 266 915)

Klein, S. P.; Jovanovic, J.; Stecher, B. M.; McCaffrey, D.; Shavelson, R. J.;

Haetel, E.; Flores, G. S. and Comfort, K. (1997).Gender and racial/ethnic

differences on performance assessments in science. Educational Evaluation

and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 83-97.

220

Kmeta, L.; Potkonjak, N. & Dordevic, J. (1973). Underachievement of students in

Belgrade primary secondary schools. Beograd: Porsvetno-pedagoski zavod

grada Beograda.

Lalithamma, K. N. (1975).Some factors affecting achievement of secondary

school pupils in mathematics. Buck, M.B. {td.) First Survey of Research in

Education, NCERT, New Delhi.

Lareau A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The

importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73-85.

Larose, F.; Lafrance, S.; Grenon, V.; Roy, G-R. & Lenoir, Y. (1998). Du discourse

officiel a la prise en consideration des attitudes des clienteles face a

I'informatique en pedagogic universitaire. Bilan d'une enquete menee a la

Faculte d'education de TUniversite de Sherbrooke. Educatechnologiques.

Document accessible at the following URL address:

http:/www.fse. ulaval. ca/fac/ten/reveduc/.

Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the

effective use of educational technology. Routledge, London.

Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1986). Effects of single-sex secondary schools on

student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology,

75(5), 381-395.

Levine, T. & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes and

knowledge: a causal analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 14, 125-

146.

Levin, T.; Sabar, N. & Libman, Z. (1991). Achievements and attitudinal patterns

of boys and girls in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28

(4), 315-328.

Lewin, C., Mavers, D., & Somekh, B. 2003. Broadening access to the curriculum

through using technology to link home and school: a critical analysis of

reforms intended to improve students' educations attainment. The

Curriculum Journal, 14(1), 23-25.

221

Lidell, C. (1994).South African children in the year before school: Towards a

predictive model of everyday behaviour. International Journal of

Psychology, 29, 409-430.

Liew, H. P. (2004). Math and science achievement in Malaysia. Suet-ling Pong.

Pennsylvania State University.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of

Psychology, 140-155.

Lipscomb, S. (2006). Secondary school extracurricular involvement and academic

achievement: A fixed effects approach. Department of Economics,

University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9210, USA.

Lindquist, E. (1953). Design and analysis of experiments. Boston: Houghton

Miffin.

Liu, L.; Johnson, D. L. (2001). Assessing student learning in instructional

technology: Dimensions of a learning model. Computers in the Schools, 18

(2/3), 79-95.

Liu, L.; Maddux, C. & Johnson, L. (2004). Computer attitude and achievement: Is

time an intermediate variable? Journal of Technology and Teacher

Education, 12.

Liu, X., Macmillan, R., & Timmons, V. (1998). Integrating computers into the

curriculum: How teachers may hinder students' use of computers. McGill

Journal of Education, 33 (1), 51-69.

Lockheed, M. E.; Fuller, B. & Ronald N. (1989). Family Effects on Students'

Achievement in Thailand and Malawi. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 239-

56.

Loyd, B. H. & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer

attitude scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.

Madigan, T. J. (1994). Parent involvement and school achievement. Paper

presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research

Association, New Orleans.

Ill

Ma, X. & Klinger, D. A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and

school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education,

25(1), 41-55.

Mahoney, J. L., & Cairns, R. B. (1997). Do extracurricular activities protect

against early school dropout? Developmental Psychology, 33, 241-253.

Mahoney, J. L.; Cairos, B. D. & Farwer, T. W. (2003). Promoting interpersonal

competence and educational success through extra-curricular activity

participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95,409-418.

Majoribanks, K. (1996). Family learning environments and students' outcomes.: A

review. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27(2), 373-394.

Mann, D. (1997). Technology and achievement. American School Board Journal,

184,7,22-23.

Manning, M. L. (1998). Gender differences in young adolescents' mathematics

and science achievement. Childhood Education, 74, 168-171.

Marsh, H. W. (1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the

traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 84, 553-562.

Marsh, H. W. & Keitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good,

the bad, and the non-linear. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 464-514.

Martin, M. 0., Mullis, I. V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L. &

Smith, T. A. (1997) Science Achievement in the Primary School Years:

lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

(Boston, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational

Policy, Boston College).

Mazumdar, A. (1992). A study of the relationship between attitude towards and

achievement in English of standard IX students in Guwahati City. M.Phil.,

North Eastern Hill University. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in

Education, VolII, NCERT, New Delhi.

1V>

McBride, S. H. & Nagle, L. M. (1996).Attitudes toward computers: A test of

construct validity. Computers and Nursing. 14(3), 164-170.

McLaughlin, M. W., Shepard, L. A., & O'Day, J. A. (1995). Improving education

through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of

Education Panel on Standards-based Education Reform. Stanford, CA:

Stanford University, The National Academy of Education.

McNeal, R. (1995). Extracurricular activities and high school dropouts. Sociology

of Education, 68, 62-81.

Mikk.J. (2007). Economic, educational and cultural predictors of science learning

in Lithuania and Estonia. Social Research, 9, 136-141.

Millard, C. V. (1930). The organization and administration of extracurricular

activities. New York: A. S. Barnes and Co.

Milne, A.M.; Myers,D.E., Rosenthal & Ginsburg (1986). Single parents, working

mothers, and the educational achievement of school children. Sociology of

Education, 59, 125-139.

Misra, M. (1986). A critical study of the influence of socio-economic status on

academic achievement of higher secondary students in rural and urban

areas of Kanpur. Ph.D. Kanpur University. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey

of Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Mitra, A. (1998). Categories of computer use and their relationships with attitudes

toward computers. Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 30 (3),

281-296.

Mitra, A., & Steffensmeier, T.(2000). Changes in student attitudes and student

computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on

Technology in Education, 32 (3), 417-433.

Mohapatra, M. and Mishra, J. (2000).Gender effect on achievement in science

with a special reference to mechanics from primary to secondary school

Years-A Study under Indian conditions. Journal of Educational Research

and Extension, 37(3), 1-7.

224

Monk, D. H. & Haller, E. J. (1986). Organizational alternatives for small rural

schools. Cornell: New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

at Cornell University, 1986. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. 281

694).

Moriana, J. A.; Alos, F.; Alcala, R.; Pino, M. J.; Herruzo, J. & Ruiz, R. (2006).

Extra-curricular activities and academic performance in secondary students.

Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, (ISSN. 1696-

2095), 4(1), 35-46.

Morrell, P. D., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). Students' attitudes toward school and

classroom science: Are they independent phenomena'? School Science and

Mathematics, 98, 76-82.

Mukhopadhyay, S. and Kumar, A. K. (2002). Quality profiles of secondary

schools. New Delhi: NIEPA.

Muller, C. (1993). Parent ties to the school and community and student academic

performance. Paper presented at the conference on Sociology of Education,

Asilomar, CA.

Muller, C. (1995). Maternal employment, parental involvement, and mathematics

achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57 (1), 85-100.

Muller, P. A.; Stage, F. K. and Kinzie, J. (2001). Science achievement growth

trajectories: Understanding factors related to gender and racial-ethnic

differences in precoUege science achievement. American Educational

Research Journal, 38(4), 981-1012.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L. &

Smith, T. A. (1997) Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School

Years: lEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS)

(Boston, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational

Policy, Boston College).

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. 0., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L. &

Smith, T. A. (1998) Mathematics and Science Achievement in the Final

225

Year of Secondary School: lEA's Third International Mathematics and

Science Study (TIMSS) (Boston, Center for the Study of Testing,

Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College).

Murphy, P. (1991). Gender differences in pupils' reactions to practical work. In B.

Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Murphy, P. (1997). Gender differences: Messages for science learning. In K.

Harnquist and A. Bergen (Eds.), Growing up with science: Developing

early understanding of science. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Mwamwenda, T.S. (1992). Cognitive development in African children. Genetic,

Social and General Psychology Monographs, 118, 5-72.

Mayer, S. E. & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighbourhoods: How

much does it matter? Science, 243, 1441-1445.

Nair, C. K. (1984). Factors related to underachievement in biology of secondary

school students. Ph.D., University of Calicut. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey

of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi

Narang. R. H. (1987). A comparative study of the socio-economic and home

factors affecting the academic achievement of boys and girls (10 and 11

years) in the rural and urban areas. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey of

Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Narsimhan, G. & Pillai, S.S. (1988).A study of the relationship between medium

of instruction and achievement. Independent study. Madras: Technical

Teachers Training Institute. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in

Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). Internet access in public

schools and classrooms: 1994-99. Stats in brief Washington, DC: U.S.

Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and

Improvement.

226

National Department of Education. (2005). Grade 6 intermediate phase systemic

evaluation report. Pretoria: Department of Education.

National Science Education Standards (1996). National research council.

Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Natarajan, R. (1992). School organizational climate and its relation to job

satisfaction of teachers and achievement of pupils. M.Phil., Annamalai

University. Buck, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11,

NCERT, New Delhi.

Ndunda, M. K. (1990). 'Because I am a woman': young women's resistance to

science careers in Kenya. International Journal of Science Education, 12,

297-307.

Neal, D. (1997). The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage

Differences. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 869-95.

Neathery, M. F. (1997). Elementary and secondary students' perceptions toward

science: Correlations with gender, ethnicity, ability, grade, and science

achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1), September.

(http://wolfweb. unr. edu)

Nessa, S. M. (1994).A study of factors affecting academic achievement of

Bangladeshi primary school children of Dhaka city. Ph.D. (Edu.), M. S.

University.

Nickell, G. S. & Pinto, J. N. (1986). The computer attitude scale. Computers in

Human Behaviour, 2, 301-306.

Nikolic, R. (1998). Continuity of school achievement in primary school. Beograd:

Institut za pedagogiju i andragogiju.

Noell, J. (1982). Public and private schools: A reanalysis of public and private

schools. Sociology of education, 55,123-132.

Northern Territory Department of Education (1992).Results of the primary

Assessment Program for 1991 in urban and non-urban schools. Curriculum

227

and assessment research and evaluation report Darwin, Australia ERIC,

Document Reproduction Service ED, 300-320.

Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Nwankwo, J. I. (1984). Mastering research in education and the social sciences: A

handbook for Thesis, Dissertation, Project and Term Papers. Ibadan: Bisi

Books, Nigeria Ltd., 51 -54.

Oblinger, D. & Rush, S. (eds) (1997).The learning revolution. Anker Publishing,

Bolton MA.

O' Connor, J. P. (2001). An overview of FEMSA. A paper presented at

FEMSA/AFCLIST Gender Workshop, Nairobi Kenya. December, 6-8.

OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework—mathematics, reading,

science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Retrieved December,

2005, from www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/14/3369488].pdf

Ogwu, S. (2004). Influence of parental socio-economic status on academic

performance of JSS students in Kano Metropolis: Implication for

educational planning and administration. Unpublished M.Ed Dissertation,

Department of Education, Bayero University Kano.

Okes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement and choice: Women and minority

students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16,

153-222.

Okpala, P. and Onocha, C. (1988). Student factors as correlates of achievement in

physics. Psychological Education, 23,361-364.

Olubadewo, S. A. & Ogwu, S. (2006). Influence of parents' socio-economic status

on students' academic performance: Implications for the Planning of

Universal Basic Education Programme, (www, euroiournals.com)

Onekutu, A. & Onekutu, P. 0. (2002). Gender differences in achievements in

junior secondary school examination in integrated science: Implication for

national development. In 0. 0. Okpeh (Ed). Review of Gender Studies in

Nigeria.

228

Ormerod, M. B. (1975). Subject preference and choice in co-educational and

single-sex secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology,

45, 257-267.

Owston, R. D. & Wideman, H. H. (2001). Computer access and student

achievement in the early schools years. Journal of Computer Assisted

Learning, 17,433-444.

Pandey, S. N. & Ahmad, M. F. (2008). Significance of difference between male

and female adolescents an academic performance, achievement motivation,

intelligence and socio-economic status. Journal of Community Guidance &

Research, 25(1), 34-39.

Palaigeorgiou, G. E.; Siozos, P. D.; Konstantakis, N. I. & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2005).

A computer attitude scale for computer science freshmen and its

educational implications. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 330-

342.

Papanastasiou, E. C. (2003). Science literacy by technology by country; USA,

Finland and Mexico. Making sense of it all. Research in science and

technology education 21 (2), 229-241.

Papanastasiou, E. C. & Ferdig, R. E. (2003). Computer use and mathematical

literacy. An analysis of existing and potential relationships. In Proceedings

of the Third mediterranean conference on mathematical education, Athens,

Hellas: Hellenic Mathematical Society, 335-342.

Papanastasiou, E. C; Zembylas, M. & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt

science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of Science

Education and Technology, 12 (3), 325-332.

Papanastasiou, E. C; Zacharia, Z.; & Zembylas, M. (2004). Examining when

instructional activities work well in relation to science achievement.

{www, iea. nl/fileadmin/user_upload/IRC)

229

Patnaik, N. P. (1986). Achievement in general science of class V children of

Berhampur, Orissa- A Research Study. School Science, No. XXIV (1), 47-

50.

Peixoto, F. (2004). What kinds of benefits students have from participating in

extracurricular activities? Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada,

Portugal, (www.self.uws.edu.au/conferences)

Pelgrum, W.J. & Anderson, R.E., (eds.) (1999) ICT and the emerging paradigm

for life-long learning: A worldwide educational assessment of

infrastructure, goals and practices. International Association for the

Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Amsterdam.

Peng, S. & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation of academic achievement of Asian

American students. Journal of Education Research, 87, 346-356.

Percival, f & Ellington, H. (1984). A handbook of educational technology. Great

Britain . Billings & Sons Ltd., Wovcester, 189.

Peterson, R. W. & Carlson, G. R. (1979). A summary of research in science

education. Science Education, 63, whole issue.

Pong, S. (1997). Family structure, school context, and eighth-grade math and

reading achievement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 734-746.

Pong, S. (1998). The school compositional effect of single parenthood on 10th-

grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 71, 23-42.

Popovich, P. M. ; Gullekson, N.; Morris, S. & Morse, B. (2008).Comparing

attitudes towards computer usage by undergraduates from 1986 to 2005.

Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 986-992.

Popovich, P. M.; Hyde, K. R.; Zokrajsek, T. & Blumer, C. (1987). The

development of the attitudes toward computer usage scale. Educational and

Psychological Measurement, 47, 261-269.

Pradhan, N. and Khirwadkar, A.R. (1999).Computer education in the Secondary

Schools of Baroda City. Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2).

230

Raizen, S. A. (1997). The general context for reform. In S. A. Raizen & E. D.

Britton (Eds.), Bold venturel, Patterns among U.S. innovations in science

and mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic

Publishers, 1, 19-42.

Rahman, A. (2003). Influence of attitude, gender, parental occupation, types of

school and coaching and guidance on academic achievement in

mathematics of Vth grade students. Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation,

Aligarh Muslim University (A. M.U.), Aligarh.

Rajput, B. M. (1985).Academic achievement as a function of some personality

variables and socio-economic factors. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey of

Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Raman,S. (1989). A comparative study of emotional problems in minority group

and caste Hindu children and their level of achievement motivation and

scholastic achievement. Ph.D., Jamia Millia Islamia, Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth

Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Rao, D. B. (1990). A comparative study of scientific attitude, scientific aptitude

and achievement in Biology at secondary school level. Ph.D., Edu,

Osmania University. Buch, M.B. (ed.j Fifth Survey of Research in

Education. Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Raveendranathan, A. K. (1983). A comparative study of the impact of medium of

instruction on the science achievement, science interest, mental health

status of secondary school students. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey of

Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Richter, T.; Nauman, J. & Groeben, N. (2000). Attitudes toward the computer:

Construct validation of an instrument with scales differentiated by content.

Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 473-491.

Robertson, S.; Calder, J.;Fung, P.; Jones, A. & 0 ' Shea, T.(1995). Computer

attitudes in an English secondary school. Computers & Education, 24, 73-

81.

231

Robertson, E.B., Ladewig, B.H., Strickland, M.P., & Boschung, M.D. (1987, May-

June). Enhancement of self-esteem through the use of computer-assisted

instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 314-16. EJ 358 691.

Rockman et al. (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: second year study of the

laptop program. SanFrancisco. (http://rockman.com/projects/laptop).

Rosenthal, A.S., Baker, K. & Ginsburg, A. (1983). The effect of language

background on achievement level and learning among elementary school

students. Sociology of Education, 56, 157-69.

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1991).Essentials of behavioural research:

Methods and data analysis (2"'* ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 10.

Rowell, J. A. (1971). Sex differences in achievement in science and the

expectations of teachers, 15, 16-29.

Rundquist, E. A. & Sletto, R. F. (1936). Personality in the depression Minneapolis.

Univ. Minnesota Press.

Sabapathy, T. (1986). A study of the relationship of manifest anxiety emotional

maturity and social maturity of standard X students to their academic

achievement, Ph.d., Education, Banglore University. Buch, M.B. (ed.)

Fourth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Saini, S. (2005). Family environment and academic achievement of adolescent

children of working and non-working mothers. Indian Educational Review,

41,(2), 87-94.

Sahni, D. (2000). Importance of education. World of Teens.

(http://www. boloji. com/teens/articles)

Sammons, P., West, A., & Hind, A. (1997). Accounting for variations in pupil

attainment at the end of Key Stage 1. British Educational Research

Jowrna/, 23, 489-511.

Sander, W. (1996). Catholic grade schools and academic achievement. Journal of

Human Resources, 31 (3), 540-48.

232

Sanquinetty, J. A. (1983). Academic achievement, school quality and family

background: Study in seven Latin American Countries. Paper presented at

the Annual Meeting of the Comparative and International Education

Society (27'\ Atlanta, GA, March 16-19).

Sansanwal, D. N. (1983). Sex-differences in attitude to, interest in and

achievements in science- a review of Indian research. Contributions to the

Second GASAT Conference, 152-162 (Oslo, Institute of Physics).

Saraswat, A. (1988).A differential study of achievement-motivation, occupational

aspiration and academic achievement of adolescents in different types of

school climate in Aligarh district. Ph.D., Agra University. Buch, M.B. (ed.)

Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Sarode, V. B. (1995). A study of impact of socio-economic status, study habits and

academic motivation on academic achievement of his/her secondary

students of rural areas. Ph. D.(Edu.).Pune University.

Satyanandam, B.D. (1969). A study of socio-economic status and academic

achievement. Buch, M.B. (ed.j Third Survey of Research in Education,

NCERT, New Delhi.

Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on

advanced mathematics achievement. Journal of educational Research,

95(5), 274-286.

Schibeci, R. A. & Riley, H. J. (1986). Influence of students' background and

perceptions on science attitudes and achievement. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 23, 177-187.

Schmid, C. L. (2001). Educational achievement, language-minority students, and

the new second generation. Sociology of Education, Supplement: Currents

of Thought. Sociology of Education at the Dawn of the 21st Century, 71-87.

Schweir, R. A. & Misanchuk, E. R. (1993). Interactive multimedia instruction.

Educational Technology Publications, NJ.

233

Sellitz, C.S.;Wrightsman, L.S. & Cook, S.W. (1981).Research methods in social

relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London, 190.

Selwyn, N. (1997). Students' attitudes toward computers; Validation of a

computer attitude scale for 16-19 education. Computer and Education, 28,

35-41.

Seyfried, S. F. (1998). Academic achievement of African American

preadolescents: The influence of teacher perceptions. American Journal of

Community Psychology, 26(3), 38-402.

Shajila, P. (1992). Influence of private tuition on science achievement of

secondary school pupils. Unpublished M.Ed Dissertation, University of

Calicut.

Sharma, B. (2004). Methodology of educational research. Vohra Publishers and

Distributors, 123-125.

Sharma, N. (1988). A study of factors in pupil academic achievement in different

streams of courses of the higher secondary stage. Ph. D. Agra University

Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT,

New Delhi.

Sharma, S. (1980): Influence of socio-economic background on development of

term-per mental characteristics among college female students. Indian

Journal Psychology, 55 (l-2),26-32.

Shashaani, L. (1997). Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among

collage students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 37-51.

Shaw, J. (1995). Education, gender and anxiety. Washington, D.C : Taylor &

Francis.

Shaw, D. E. (1998).Report to the president on the use of technology to strengthen

K-12 education in the United States: Findings related to research and

evaluation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1, 115-126.

Shneiderman, B. (1980). Software Psychology. Human factors in computer an

information systems. Cambridge, Mass. Winthrop Publishers.

234

Shukla, C. S. (1984). Achievement of primary school children in relation to their

socio-economic status and family size. Buck, M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey of

Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New Delhi.

Shwartz Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein A. (2005). The importance of involving high-

school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational

meaning of chemical literacy. International Journal of Science Education,

27(3), 323-344.

Siddiqui, U., (2002). Secondary students' attitude towards Information

Technology in relation to their gender, religion, academic achievement,

school type, parental education and occupation. Unpublished M.Ed.

Dissertation, A.M.U., Aligarh.

Silliker, S. A. & Quirk, J. T. (1997). The effect of extracurricular activity

participation on the academic performance of male and female high school

students. School Counselor, 44, 288-293.

Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement

motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six

through ten. Science Education, 69, 511-526.

Singh, H. K. (1988). Intelligence and creativity as predictors of scholastic

achievement in mother tongue and foreign language at different levels of

socio-economic status. Ph.D., Education, Punjab University, Such, M.B.

(ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Singh, R. & Varma, S. K. (1995).The effect of academic aspiration and

intelligence on scholastic success of XI graders. Indian Journal of

Psychometry and Education, 26, 43-48.

Sinha, N. (1991). A cross-sectional study of the impact of scientific attitude,

motivation and self-concept in science upon the achievement of students in

science. Ph. D. University of Kalyani, Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of

Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

235

Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools,

1990-1997, Software Publisher's Association, Washington, DC.

Sjoberg, L. (1984). Gender differences in middle grade science achievement:

Subject domain and course emphasis. Journal of Sociological Education,

60,613-650.

Smith, B.; Caputi, P. & Rawstome, P. (2000). Differentiating computer experience

and attitudes toward computers: an empirical investigation. Computers in

Human Behaviour, 16, 59-81.

Smith, M., & O'Day. (1991). Systemic school reform. In Fuhrman. S. K, &

Malen, B. (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing Briston, PA: The

Falmer Press, 233-268.

Snedecor, P. J. (1989). Coaching: Does it pay-revisited. The Journal of College

admissions, 148, 32-35.

Sowell, E. J. & Casey, R. J. (1982). Analyzing educational research. Belmont, C

A: Wadsworth.

Soyibo, K. (1999) Gender differences in Caribbean students' performance on a

test of errors in biology labelling. Research in Science and Technological

Education, 17(1), 75-82.

Srivastava, A.K. and Khatoon, R. (1980). Effect of difference between Mother

Tongue and Other Tongue as medium of instruction on achievement,

mental ability, and creativity of VIII standard children. In E. Annamalai

(ed.) Bilingualism and Achievement in School. Central Institute of Indian

Languages, Mysore.

Stables, A. (1996). Subjects of Choice. The process and management of pupil and

student choice. New York. Cassell.

Steedman, J. (1983). Examination results in mixed and single-sex schools.

London: EOC.

236

Stevenson, H. W.; Chen, C. & Booth, J. (1990). Influence of schooling and urban-

rural residence on gender differences in cognitive abilities and academic

achievement. Sex Roles, 23, 535-551.

Streitmatter, J. L. (1999). For girls only: Making a case for single-sex schooling.

USA: State University of New York.

Sucharita, S. (1999). A study of achievement in mathematics of students of class

eight of Baroda city with respect to certain variables. An unpublished M.Ed.

Dissertation, Baroda, The M. S. University of Baroda.

Sui-Chu, E. H. & Willms, J.D. (1996).Effects of parental involvement on eighth-

grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69,126-141.

Sultana, S., (2001).The attitude of IX Class students towards computer and their

achievement in Science. Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation, Aligarh Muslim

University, A.M.U., Aligarh.

Sultan, S. (1988). A study of school achievement among adolescent children with

working and non-working mothers. Ph.D.„Kurukshetra University. Buch,

M.B. (ed.) Fifth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New

Delhi.

Szydlowski, H. & Dudziak, G. (1986). Remarks about women's employment in

science and technology in Poland. In Dahms, M. et al., eds.. Women

Challenge Technology Conference Proceedings, 2, Denmark, Elisnore.

Taiwo, A. A.; Ray, H., Motswiri, M. J. & Masene, R. (1999). Perceptions of the

water cycle among primary school children in Botswana. International

Journal of Science Education, 21, 413-429.

Taiwo, A. A. & Tyolo, J. B. (2001). The effect of pre-school education in primary

school: A case study of grade one pupils in Botswana: International

Journal of Educational Development, 22(2), 169-180.

Tamir, P. (1988). Gender differences in high school science in Israel. British

Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 127-140.

237

Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P., & Smees, R. (1997). Differential

secondary school effectiveness: Comparing the performance of different

pupil groups. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 451-469.

Thompson, S. and Fleming, N. (2003). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement

in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002 (TIMSS Australia Monograph no. 6).

ACER: Camberwell, Vic.

Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2004). The significantly worse phenomenon: A study of

student achievement in different content areas by school location.

Education and Urban Society, 36 (4), 467-481.

Timothy, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian

perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634-1642.

Torkzadeh, G. & Koufteros, X. (1994). Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-

Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training. Educational and

Psychological Measurement, 54 (3), 813-821.

Trivedi, S. (1988). Scholastic achievement of adolescent children of working and

non-working mothers. Indian Educational Review, 23(3), 56-62.

Trollip, S. R. & Alessi, S. M. (1988). Incorporating computers effectively into

classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education.

Tsado, M.I. (1987). A study of women representation in employment and

academic enrolment. A case study of Federal University of Technology in

Minna. Journal of Science Technology and Mathematics, 1, 40-47.

Usha, P. (1992). A study of certain socio-familial correlates of secondary school

science achievement. Ph.D., University of Calicut. Buch, M.B. (ed.) Fifth

Survey of Research in Education, Vol.11, NCERT, New Delhi.

Vamadevappa, H.V. (2005). Study of the effectiveness of parental involvement on

academic achievement among higher primary students. Journal of

Educational Research and Extension, 42(2), 23-32.

238

van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of

chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education.

International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151-1168.

Van Heuvelen, A. (1997). Using interactive simulations to enhance conceptual

development and problem solving skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 399,

1119-1135.

Vaughn, R. J. (1951). The effects of various forms of item arrangements on test

performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3(4), 309-311.

Vellaisamy, M. (2007). Effectiveness of multimedia approach in teaching science

at upper primary level. Indian Educational Review, 43, (1), 125-133.

Ventura, F. (1992). Gender, science choice and achievement: a Maltese

perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (4), 445-461.

Verma, M. (1985). Factors affecting achievement: A cross sectional study of tribal

and non-tribal students at junior high school level in Uttar Pradesh. Buck,

M.B. (ed.) Fourth Survey of Research in Education, Vol.1, NCERT, New

Delhi.

Vimala, V. & Rina, B. (1989). School achievement, student motivation and

teacher effectiveness in different type of schools. Indian Educational

Review, 24(2), 25-36.

Von Seeker, C. (2004). Science achievement in social contexts: Analysis from

national assessment of educational progress. The Journal of Educational

Research, 29 (2), 67-78.

Wang, J. & Staver, J. R. (1995). An empirical study about China: gender equity in

science education. Journal of Educational Research, 90 (4), 252-255.

Wang, L.; Chen, Y. & Shi, J. (2007). Attitude toward computers: A new attitudinal

dimension. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour. 10(5), 700-704.

Wang, L. C, & Bagaka's, J. G. (2002). Understanding the dimensions of self

exploration in Web-based learning environments. Journal of Research on

Technology in Education, 34(3), 364-375.

239

Weaver, G.C. (2000). An examination of the National Educational Longitudinal

Study (NELS: 88).Database to probe the correlation between computer use

in school and improvement in test scores. Journal of Science Education and

Technology, 9,121-33.

Webster, N. (1981). New Webster's Dictionary of the English language. The

Delair Publishing Co, Inc., New York.

Weller, H.(1996). Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science.

Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 461-486.

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational

technology and student achievement in mathematics, ETS Policy

Information Centre-Research Division, Princeton, NJ.

Williams, T.; Clancy, J.; Batten, M. & Girling-Butcher, S. (1980). School, work

and career: 17-year-olds in Australia. Hawthorn: Australian Council for

Educational Research.

Williams, D. & Jacobson, S. (1990).Growth in maths skills during the intermediate

years: Sex differences and school effects. International Journal of Science

Education, 14, 157-174.

Willis, S. & Kenway, J. (1986).On overcoming sexism in schooling: to

marginalize and mainstream. Australian Journal of Education, 30(2), 132-

149.

Willms, J. D. (1984) School effectiveness within the public and private sectors.

Evaluation Review, 8(1), 113-135.

Witt, E. A.; Al-Abdulla, Y. & Ross, M. E. (1994). The effects of coaching for

aptitude tests: An updated meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Joint

Convention of the Association for Psychological and Educational Research

in Kansas and the Nebraska Psychological Society. Lawrence, KS.

Witte, J. F. (1996). School Choice and Student Performance. In Holding Schools

Accountable, ed. Helen F. Ladd, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

149-76.

240

White, F. J. (1992). Private school versus public school achievement. Are these

findings that should affect educational choice debate? Great Britain:

Economics of Education Review, 11(4), Elsevier Science Ltd.

White, K.R. (1982). The relation between socio-economic status and academic

achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.

Wobmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student

performance: the International evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and

Statistics, 65(2), 117-170.

Wolff, E. (2006). Background and history: Language and language in education

policies in Africa: Problems and prospects, in Alidou et al.

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Yalcinalp, S., Geban, O., and Ozkan, L (1995). Effectiveness of using computer-

assisted supplementary instruction for teaching the mole concept. Journal

of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 1083-1095.

Yip, D. Y.; Tsang, W. K. & Cheung, S. P. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of

medium of instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary

students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research

Journal, Summer.

Yang, Y. (2003). Dimensions of socio-economic status and their relationship to

mathematics and science achievement at the individual and collective

levels. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47 (1), 21-42.

Young, D. J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in

science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and

School Improvement, 9 (4), 386-418.

Young, D. J. & Eraser, B. J. (1990). Science achievements of girls in single-sex

co-educational schools. Research in Science and Technological Education,

8 (1), 5-20.

Young, D. J. & Eraser, B. J. (1992a). School effectiveness and science

achievement: Are there any sex differences? Paper presented at the Annual

241

Meeting of the National Association in Science Teaching. 21-25 March,

Cambridge Hyatt Hotel, Boston, Massachusetts.

Young, D. J. and B. J. Fraser (1992b). Sex differences in science achievement: A

multilevel analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American

Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 20-24.

Young, D. J. and B. J. Fraser (1993). Socioeconomic effects on science

achievement: An Australian perspective. Paper presented at the Annual

Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA,

April 12-16).

Zacharia, Z., & Anderson, R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based

simulation prior to performing a laboratory Inquiry-Based Experiment on

students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of

Physics, 71(6), 618-629.

Zajonc, R. B. (1976). Family configuration and intelligence. Science, 192, 227-

236.

Zakrajsek, T. D.; Watevs, L. K.; Popvich, P. M.; Craft, S. & Hampton, W. T.

(1990). Convergent validity of scales measuring computer related attitudes.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 343-399.

Zeegers, P. & Giles, L. (1996). Essay writing in Biology: an example of effective

learning. Research in Science Education, 26 (4), 437-459.

Zhang, Y. (1999). Gender differences in mathematics and science achievement.

roles of engagement in out-of-school activities and experimentation in

Science Lessons of Eighth Graders. (Statistics Canada, December 1999).

R-99-18E.

242