References · 2020. 2. 3. · Avram, Larisa 1994 A contrastive analysis of modals in English and...

25
References Abraham, Werner 2001 Modals: toward explaining the 'epistemic non-finiteness gap'. In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Reimar Müller and Mar- ga Reis (eds.), 7-36. Hamburg: Buske. 2002 Modal verbs. Epistemics in German and English. Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System, Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), 19-50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Abusch, Dorit 1997 Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy 20:1-50. 1998 Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. Events and Gram- mar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 13-33. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Acker, Marianne van 1981 ‘Must’ and ‘have to’. A dynamic perspective. Ph.D. diss., University of Antwerp (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 22). Adger, David 2005 Pronouns postpose at PF. Available at: ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000162. Agbayani, Brian, and Ed Zoerner 2004 Gapping, pseudogapping and sideward movement. Studia Linguistica 58: 185-211. Akmajian, Adrian, and Thomas Wasow 1975 The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the verb 'be'. Linguistic Analysis 1: 205-45. Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele, and Thomas Wasow 1979 The category AUX in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 1- 64. Alboiu, Gabriela 2003 The features of movement in Romanian, University of Bucharest, Available at: www.unibuc.ro/eBooks/filologie/alboiu/main_set.htm. Alboiu, Gabriela, and Virginia Motapanyane 2000 The Generative Approach to Romanian grammar. In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, Gabriela Alboiu and Virginia Motapan- yane (eds.), 1-48. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Ariel, Mira 1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents: London: Routledge.

Transcript of References · 2020. 2. 3. · Avram, Larisa 1994 A contrastive analysis of modals in English and...

  • References

    Abraham, Werner 2001 Modals: toward explaining the 'epistemic non-finiteness gap'. In

    Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Reimar Müller and Mar-ga Reis (eds.), 7-36. Hamburg: Buske.

    2002 Modal verbs. Epistemics in German and English. Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System, Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), 19-50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Abusch, Dorit 1997 Sequence of tense and temporal de re. Linguistics and Philosophy

    20:1-50. 1998 Generalizing tense semantics for future contexts. Events and Gram-

    mar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 13-33. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Acker, Marianne van 1981 ‘Must’ and ‘have to’. A dynamic perspective. Ph.D. diss., University

    of Antwerp (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 22). Adger, David 2005 Pronouns postpose at PF. Available at: ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000162. Agbayani, Brian, and Ed Zoerner 2004 Gapping, pseudogapping and sideward movement. Studia Linguistica

    58: 185-211. Akmajian, Adrian, and Thomas Wasow 1975 The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the

    verb 'be'. Linguistic Analysis 1: 205-45. Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele, and Thomas Wasow 1979 The category AUX in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 1-

    64. Alboiu, Gabriela 2003 The features of movement in Romanian, University of Bucharest,

    Available at: www.unibuc.ro/eBooks/filologie/alboiu/main_set.htm. Alboiu, Gabriela, and Virginia Motapanyane 2000 The Generative Approach to Romanian grammar. In Comparative

    Studies in Romanian Syntax, Gabriela Alboiu and Virginia Motapan-yane (eds.), 1-48. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Ariel, Mira 1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents: London: Routledge.

  • References 233

    Asudeh, Ash, and Crouch, Richard 2002 Derivational parallelism and ellipsis parallelism. West Coast Confer-

    ence on Formal Linguistics 21: 1-14. Avram, Larisa 1994 A contrastive analysis of modals in English and Romanian. Revue

    Roumaine de Linguistique 39: 267-284. Awad, Maher 1995 Complementizers and modality. Chicago Linguistic Society 31: 16-

    27. Aygen, Gülsat 2002 Epistemic modality/mood as finiteness and clausal dependency

    marked with subject-case agreement. Chicago Linguistic Society 38: 47-61.

    Baker, Carl L. 1991 The syntax of English 'not': The limits of core grammar. Linguistic

    Inquiry 22: 387-429. Baker, Mark 1988 Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2003 Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cam-

    bridge University Press. Baltin, Mark and Leslie Barrett 2002 The null content of null case. Ms. New York University. Barbiers, Sjef 1995 The Syntax of Interpretation.vol. 14: HIL dissertations. The Hague:

    Holland Academic Graphics. Barbiers, Sjef, and Rint Sysbema 2004 On the different verbal behavior of auxiliaries. Lingua 114: 389-98. Barnes, Janet 1984 Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. IJAL 50: 255-71. Bartos, Huba 2000 VP-Ellipsis and verbal inflection in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica

    Hungarica 47: 3-23. Battistella, Edwin L. 1991 The treatment of negation in double modal constructions. Linguistic

    Analysis 21: 49-65. Bech, Gunar 1949 Das semantische System der deutschen Modalverba. Traveaux du

    Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, 3-46. Beck, Sigrid 1996 Wh-constructions and transparent Logical Form. Doctoral disserta-

    tion, University of Tübingen. 2003 Eine semantische Erklärung für Interventionseffekte. Paper presented

    at the University of Tübingen, July 2003.

  • 234 References

    Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell 1997 Distributivity and negation: the syntax of 'each' and 'every'. In Ways

    of Scope Taking, Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), 71-107. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Belletti, Adriana 2001 Aspects of the low IP area. Ms. University of Siena. Beths, Frank 1999 The history of 'dare' and the status of unidirectionality. Linguistics

    37: 1069-1110. Beukema, Frits, and Wim van der Wurff 2002 Modals, objects and negation in late Middle English. In Modality

    and its Interaction with the Verbal System, Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beu-kema, and Wim van der Wurff (ed.), 75-102. Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 1999 Adverbs: the hierarchy paradox. Glot International 4: 27–28. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. and Höskuldur Thráinsson 1998 Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1: 37-71. Boškovic, Željko 1994 D-Structure, Theta-Criterion, and movement into theta-positions.

    Linguistic Analysis 24: 247-86. 2001 On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface, Cliticization and

    Related Phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Bosque, Ignacio, and Violeta Demonte (eds.) 1999 Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa. Bowers, John 2001 Predication. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory,

    Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 299-333. Oxford: Blackwell. 2002 Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183-224. Breitbarth, Anne 2004 Early Modern German Auxiliary Ellipsis and the role of the T/C-

    system. Paper presented at the University of Utrecht. Brennan, Virginia M. 1993 Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs. Ph.D. diss., University of

    Massachusetts. Bresnan, Joan 1970 An argument against pronominalization. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 122-

    123. 1971 A note on the notion “identity of sense anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry

    2: 589-597. 1976 The form and functioning of transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 3-

    40.

  • References 235

    Broekhuis, Hans, and Kees van Dijk 1997 The syntactic function of the auxiliaries of time. In Linguistics in the

    Netherlands 1995, Marcel den Dikken and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), 37-48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Brown, Keith 1991 Double modals in Hawick Scots. Dialects of English. Studies in

    Grammatical Variation, Peter Trudgill and J.K. Chambers (eds.), 74-103. London: Longman.

    Butler, Jonny 2003 A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 867-996. Bybee, Joan L 1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form.

    Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2003 Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In The New Psychology

    of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language

    Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 145-67. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca 1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Lan-

    guages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Carden, Guy, and David Pesetsky 1977 Double-verb constructions, markedness, and a fake co-ordination.

    Chicago Linguistic Society 13: 82-92. Chao, Wynne 1988 On Ellipsis. New York: Garland. Chierchia, Gennaro 1985 Formal semantics and the grammar of predication. Linguistic Inquiry

    16: 417-43. Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co. 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press. 1971 Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. Seman-

    tics, Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), 183-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    1981 Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Ber-lin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: Ma.: MIT Press. 2000 Minimalist inquiries: The Framework. In Step by Step, Roger Martin,

    David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 89-156. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

  • 236 References

    Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik 1993 The Theory of Principles and Parameters. In Syntax: An Interna-

    tional Handbook of Contemporary Research, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), 506-569. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw, and James McCloskey 1995 Sluicing and Logical Form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239-282. Church, Alonzo 1941 The Calculi of Lambda Abstraction. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Uni-

    versity Press. Cinque, Guglielmo 1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.

    New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001 'Restructuring' and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. In

    Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), 137-55. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Comrie, Bernard 1985 Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Condoravdi, Cleo 2002 Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for

    the past. In The Construction of Meaning, D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. Clark and L. Casillas (eds.), 59-88. Standford: CSLI Publications.

    Coppock, Elizabeth 2001 Gapping: In defense of deletion. Chicago Linguistic Society 37: 133-

    147. Cormack, Annabel, and Neil Smith 2002 Modals and negation in English. In Modality and its Interaction with

    the Verbal System, Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), 133-63. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Cornilescu, Alexandra 2000 The double subject construction in Romanian. In Comparative Stud-

    ies in Romanian Syntax, Gabriela Alboiu and Virginia Motapanyane (eds.), 83-133. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van 2004 Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Ph.D. diss., Leiden University. Csúri, Piroska 1995 'One'-anaphora and residual DRS's. Berkeley Linguistic Society 21:

    60-71. Culicover, Peter W. 2001 Parasitic gaps: a brief history. In Parasitic Gaps, Peter W. Culicover

    and Paul M. Postal (eds.), 3-68. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press. Culicover, Peter W., and Paul M. Postal 2001 Parasitic Gaps. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

  • References 237

    Cyrino, Sonia M.L. 2004 Null complement anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese. Ms. University

    of Londrines UEL/CNPq. Cyrino, Sonia M.L., and Gabriela M. Matos 2002 VP-ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese - a comparative

    analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 177-95. Darlrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber, and Fernando C.N. Pereira 1991 Ellipsis and higher order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14:

    399-452. Decklerck, Renaat 1991 Tense in English. Its structure and use in discourse. London/New

    York: Routledge. Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria 2000 The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step. Essays on

    Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin and Juan Uriagereka (eds.), 157-85. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    2004 The syntax of time adverbs. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), 143-80. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Denison, David 1985 The origins of periphrastic ‘do’, Ellegard and Visser reconsidered. In

    Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguis-

    tics, Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman and Frederike van der Leek (eds.), 45-60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    1992 Counterfactual 'may have'. In Internal and External Factors in Syn-tactic Change, Marinel Gerristen and Dieter Stein (eds)., 229-56. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    2000 Combining English auxiliaries. In Pathways of Change: Grammati-calization in English, Olga Fischer (ed.), 114-47. Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Depiante, Marcela A. 2000 The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Com-

    plement Anaphora and Stripping/ Bare Argument ellipsis, Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut.

    Depiante, Marcela A., and Pascual Masullo 2004 Gender is in the lexicon, number is in the syntax: Evidence from

    nominal ellipsis in Spanish. Paper given at GLOW 27, Thessaloniki. Di Sciulo, Anna-Maria 1996 Modularity and X°/XP Asymmetries. Linguistic Analysis 26: 3-28. Doron, Edit 1999 V-Movement and VP ellipsis. Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and

    Gapping, ed. by Elabbas Benmamoun and Shalom Lappin, 124-140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • 238 References

    Drubig H. Bernhard 1992 On topicalization and inversion. In Who Climbs the Grammar Tree,

    Rosemary Tracy (ed.), 375-422. Tübingen: Max-Niemeyer. 1994 Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association

    with focus. In Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungbereichs 340, Be-richt Nr. 51, University of Tübingen/ University of Stuttgart.

    1998 Modalität und Polarität. Eine Skizze. Ms., University of Tübingen. 2001 On the syntactic form of epistemic modality. Ms. Sonderforschungs-

    bereich 441 Linguistische Datenstrukturen. University of Tübingen. 2003 Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41:

    1-50. 2007 Towards a phase-based theory of information structure. On Informa-

    tion Structure, Meaning and Form, Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (eds.), 33-66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Bejamins.

    Duffley, Patrick J. 1997 Problems concerning the negation of the modal auxliary 'must' in

    English. In The 23rd LACUS Forum, Alan K. Melby (ed.), Chapel Hill, NC: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States.

    Dvořák, Boštjan 2003 Elliptische Prädikatisierung enklitischer Personalpronomina im Slo-

    wenischen. Philologie im Netz: 4: 37-61. Dvořák, Boštjan, and Remus Gergel 2004 Slovenian clitics: VP ellipsis in yes/no questions and beyond. ESSLLI

    16, Proceedings: Workshop on the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmat-

    ics of Questions, Ileana Comorovski and Manfred Krifka (eds.), 85-91.

    Ehrich, Veronika 2001 Was ‚nicht müssen’ und ‚nicht können’ (nicht) bedeuten können:

    Zum Skopus der Negation bei den Modalverben des Deutschen. In Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Reimar Müller and Mar-ga Reis (eds.), 287-318. Hamburg: Buske.

    Eide, Kristin M. 2002 Norwegian modals, Ph.D. diss., Linguistics Department, NTNU,

    Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Ellegård, Alvar 1953 The Auxiliary Do: The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in

    English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer 2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555-595. Emonds, Joseph E. 1970/6 Root and structure preserving transformations. Indiana University

    Linguistics Club: Bloomington. 1978 The verbal complex V-V´in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 151-175.

  • References 239

    1994 Two principles of economy. In Paths towards Universal Grammar. Studies in honor of Richard Kayne, Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi and Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.). Wash-ington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    2000 Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Engdahl, Elizabeth 1985 Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns and subject extractions. Linguis-

    tics 23: 3-44. Epstein, Samuel D., Erich M. Groat, Ruriko Kawashima and Hisatsugu Kitahara 1998 A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford

    University Press. Ernst, Thomas 1991 On the scope principle. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 750-756. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May 1994 Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1995 Response to Edwin William's Review of Indices and Identity. Lan-

    guage 71: 794-801. Fintel, Kai von 1995 The Formal Semantics of Grammaticalization. North-Eastern Lin-

    guistic Society 25: 175-189. Fintel, Kai von, and Sabine Iatridou 2003 Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 173-198. Føllesdal, Dagfinn 1974 Reprint. Quine on Modality. In Readings in Semantics, Farhang

    Zabeeh, E.D. Klemke, and Arthur Jacobson (eds.), 817-27. Ur-bana/Chicago/London: University of Illinois Press. Original, Syn-these 147-157.

    Fox, Danny 1995 Economy, Scope and Semantic Interpretation - Evidence from VP

    Ellipsis. North-Eastern Linguistic Society 25: 143-157. 1999 Focus, parallelism and accommodation. SALT 9, 70-90. Ithaca, NY:

    CLC Publications. 2003 On Logical Form. Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.). Ox-

    ford: Blackwell. Fox, Danny, and Howard, Lasnik 2003 Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: the difference be-

    tween sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143-54. Fox, Danny, and Jon Nissenbaum 2003 VP ellipsis and the position of adverbs. Snippets 7: 7-8. Frampton, John and Sam Gutman 1999 Morphological well-formedness as a derivational constraint on syn-

    tax: verbal infection in English. Ms. Northeastern University.

  • 240 References

    Frank, Robert 2002 Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies. Cam-

    bridge, Ma.: MIT Press. Frazier, Lyn, and Charles Clifton Jr. 2001 Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy α. Syntax 4: 1-22. Fu, Jingqi, Thomas Roeper, and Hagit Borer 2001 The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP

    anaphor ‘do so’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 549-582.

    Gamut, L.T.F. 1991 Logic, Language and Meaning, vol.2. Intensional Logic and Logical

    Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Geilfuß, Jochen 1992 Ist 'wollen' ein Kontrollverb oder nicht? Arbeitspapiere des Sonder-

    forschungsbereichs 340. University of Tübingen/ University of Stutt-gart, 29-51.

    Gelderen, Elly van 2003 ASP(ect) in English Modal Complements. Studia Linguistica 57: 27-

    43. Gergel, Remus 2003 Modal syntax: Detecting its parameters with VP ellipsis. SKY Jour-

    nal of Linguistics 16: 27-56. 2004 Short-distance reanalysis of Middle English Modals: Evidence from

    Ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 58: 53-87. Gergel, Remus, Kirsten Gengel, and Susanne Winkler 2007 Ellipsis and inversion: A feature-based focus account. In On Infor-

    mation Structure, Meaning and Form, Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (eds.), 301-322. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Gergel, Remus, and Jutta Hartmann 2004 Role modal 'wollen': Volitional modality, theta-assignment and rais-

    ing. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Modal Verbs and Modality, University of Tübingen./ Ms. University of Tübingen and Tilburg University.

    Giorgi, Allesandra, and Fabio Pianesi 1996 Verb movement in Italian and syncretic categories. Probus 8: 137-

    160. Göbbel, Edward 2003 Syntactic and Focus-Structural Aspects of Triadic Constructions.

    Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 2004 Focus and marked positions for VP adverbs. In On Information

    Structure, Meaning and Form, Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (eds.), 275-300. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Goosens, Louis 1987 The auxiliarization of the English modals. A functional grammar

    view. In Historical development of auxiliaries, Martin Harris, and Paolo Ramat (eds.), 111-144. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Green, Lisa J. 2002 African American English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press. Grice, Herbert P. 1989 Reprint. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard

    University Press. Original edition, Logic and Conversation, 1967. Grinder, John, and Paul M. Postal 1971 Missing antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 269-312. Haan, Ferdinand de 1997 The Interaction of Modality and Negation. A Typological Study.

    New York & London: Garland. Haegeman, Liliane 1982 The use of ‘will’ and the expression of futurity in present-day British

    English. Ph.D. diss., Brussels University. 1995 The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Haegeman, Liliane, and Jacqueline Guéron 1999 English Grammar. A Generative Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell. Haider, Hubert 1997 Projective economy: on the minimal functional structure of the Ger-

    man clause. In Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340: 'Sprachtheoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik' Univer-sity of Tübingen/ University of Stuttgart, 31-54.

    Haik, Isabelle 1987 Bound VPs that need to be. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 503-30. Hall, Daniel C. 2002 A subject must scope. Snippets 6: 8-9. Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag 1976 Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391-428. Hardt, Daniel F. 1993 Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing, Ph.D. diss.,

    University of Pennsylvania. Harley, Heidi B. 1995 Subjects, events and licensing. Ph. D. diss., MIT. Harris, Alice C., and Lyle Campbell 1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cam-

    bridge University Press.

  • 242 References

    Hartmann, Jutta 2003 Levels of Representation in Syntactic Theory: Investigating D-

    structure from a Derivational and a Representational Perspective. Tübingen-Linguistik-Report, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, 4.

    Hegarty, Michael 1992 Adjunct extraction and chain configurations, Ph.D. diss., MIT. 2005 Feature-Based Functional Categories: The Structure, Acquisition,

    and Specific Impairment of Functional Systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Hegarty, Michael, Jeanette Gundel, and Kaja Borthen 2001 Information structure and the accessibility of clausally introduced

    referents. Theoretical Linguistics 27: 163-86. Heim, Irene 1997 Predicates or formulas? Evidence from ellipsis. SALT 7: 197-221. Henry, Alison 1995 Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Pa-

    rameter Setting. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Heycock, Caroline, and Anthony Kroch 1993 Verb movement and coordination in a dynamic theory of licensing.

    The Linguistic Review 11: 257-283. Higgins, F. R. 2000 Vicarious ‘do’ and the auxiliary. Ms. University of Massachusetts at

    Amherst. Hirschbühler, Paul 1982 VP-deletion and across-the-board quantifier scope. North-Eastern

    Linguistic Society 12: 132-139. Hofmann, T. Ronald 1976 Past tense replacement and the modal system. In Syntax and Seman-

    tics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground, James McCawley (ed.), 85-100. New York: Academic Press.

    Hoji, Hajime 2003 Surface and deep anaphora, sloppy identity, and experiments in syn-

    tax. Anaphora: A Reference Guide, Andrew Barss and D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), . Malden, Ma.: Blackwell.

    Hollander, Robert M. 1999. Might: evidence and argument from negation and conjunction for

    anepistemic modality and its logical structure, Ph.D. diss., CUNY. Holmberg, Anders 2001 The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55: 140-74. Hornstein, Norbert 1990 As Time Goes by: Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, Ma.:

    MIT Press. 1999 Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69-96.

  • References 243

    Howard, Harry 1994 Focal Movement and Mood in English. Ms. Tulane University. Huddleston, Rodney 1976 Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua

    40: 331-83. Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.) 2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge:

    Cambridge University Press. Iatridou, Sabine 1990 About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551-77. 2000 The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry

    31: 231 270. Ijbema, Aniek 2002 Grammaticalization and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. Ph.D.

    diss., Utrecht University. Jackendoff, Ray 1971 Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 12-35. 1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Ma.:

    MIT Press. Jespersen, Otto 1978 Reprint Growth and Structure of the English Language, 9. ed., Ox-

    ford: Blackwell; [original Leipzig: Teubner, 1905.] Kyle, Johnson 1991 Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-

    636. 1996 In search of the English middle field: Ms., University of Massachu-

    setts, Amherst. 2001 What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why. In The

    Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 439-79. Oxford: Blackwell.

    2003 Phonological projections. Paper presented at the University of Tübingen.

    Julien, Marit 2002 Optional 'ha' in Swedish and Norwegian. The Journal of Compara-

    tive Germanic Linguistics 5: 67-95. Karttunen, Lauri 1974 Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-

    193. Katz, Graham 1997 Modality and stativity. Ms. University of Tübingen. Katz, Jerold J., and Paul M. Postal 1964 An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, Ma.:

    MIT Press.

  • 244 References

    Kayne, Richard 1971 A pronominalization paradox in French. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 237-

    241. 1993 Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica

    47: 3-41. Kearns, Kate 2000 Semantics. Basingstoke/New York: Macmillan Press. Kehler, Andrew 2000 Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 533–575. Kehler, Andrew, and Ward, Gregory 1999 On the semantics and pragmatics of ‘identifier so’. In The Seman-

    tics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, Ken Turner (ed.), 233-256. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    van Kemenade, Ans 1994 The history of the English modals; a reanalysis. Folia Linguistica

    Historica XIII: 143-166. 1999 Functional categories, morphosyntactic change, grammaticalization.

    Linguistics 37: 999-1010. Kenesei, István 2001 Criteria for auxiliaries in Hungarian. Argument Structure in Hungar-

    ian, István Kenesei (ed.), 79-111. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. Kennedy, Christopher 1997 VP-deletion and 'nonparasitic' gaps. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 697-707. Kim, Soowon, and James Lyle 1996 Parasitic gaps, multiple questions, and VP ellipsis. WCCFL 14: 287-

    301. Kimball, John 1973 Get. Syntax and Semantics 2, John Kimball (ed.), 205-215. New

    York: Academic Press. É. Kiss, Katalin 2002 The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kiss, Tibor 1995 Infinitive Komplementation. Neue Studien zum deutschen verbum

    infinitum. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Klein, Ewan, and Kate Stainton-Ellis 1989 A note on multiple VP ellipsis. Linguistics 27: 1119–1124. Klein, Wolfgang 1993 Ellipse. In Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer

    Forschung, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow and Theo Venne-mann (eds.), 978-987. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    1994 Time in Language. London: Routledge.

  • References 245

    Klima, Edward S. 1964 Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor,

    and Jerold J. Katz (eds.), 246-323. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Kratzer, Angelika 1981 The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts,

    Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer, and Hannes Rieser (eds.), 38-74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    1991 Modality. Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. by Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich, 639-50. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gen-naro Chierchia, and Godehard Link

    1995 Introduction. In The Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson, and Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), 1-124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Kroch, Anthony S. 1974 The semantics of scope in English. Ph.D. diss., MIT. 1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language

    variation and change 1: 199-244. 2001 Syntactic Change. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic

    Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds), 699-730. Oxford: Blackwell.

    2002 Modeling language change. Paper presented at the 7th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference, Girona.

    Kroch, Anthony S., and Ann Taylor 2000 The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English. Kroch, Anthony S., Ann Taylor, and Donald Ringe 2000 The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language

    contact and language change. In Textual Parameters in Old Lan-guage, Susan Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schoesler (eds.), 353-391. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Kuno, Susumo 1974 Lexical and contextual meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 469-477. Laenzlinger, Christopher 1996 Adverb syntax and phrase structure. Configurations. In Essays on

    Structure and Interpretation, Anna M. Di Sciullo (ed.), 99-127. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.

    Laka, Itziar M. 1990 Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projec-

    tions. Ph.D. diss., MIT. Langedoen, Terence D. 1970 The 'can't seem to' construction. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 25-35. Larson, Richard 1988 On the double-object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.

  • 246 References

    Lasnik, Howard 1972 Analyses of Negation in English. Ph.D. diss., MIT. 1995 Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Pro-

    gram. In Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero, Héctor Campos and Paula Kempchinsky (eds.), 251-275. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    1997 A Gap in an ellipsis paradigm: some theoretical implications. Lin-guistic Analysis 27: 166-185.

    1999 Pseudogapping puzzles. In Fragments. Shalom Lappin and Elabbas Benmamoun (eds), 141-175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Lasnik, Howard, Juan Uriagereka, and Cedric Boeckx 2005 A Course in Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Lees, Robert 1960 The grammar of English nominalization. Ph.D. diss., MIT. Lees, Robert B., and Edward S. Klima 1963 Rules for English pronominalization. Language 39: 17-28. Levin, Nancy S. 1978 Some identity-of-sense deletions puzzle me. Chicago Linguistic

    Society 14: 229-240. Lewis, David K. 1973 Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell. Lightfoot, David 1974 The diachronic analysis of English modals. In Historical Linguistics

    I. Syntax, Morphology, Internal and Comparative Reconstruction, John M. Anderson and Charles Jones (eds.), 219-49. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    1982 The Language Lottery: Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Lobeck, Anne C. 1993 Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in Eng-

    lish. Linguistics 31: 777-811. 1995 Ellipsis. Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification. Oxford:

    Oxford University Press. 1999 VP Ellipsis and the Minimalist Program: Some speculations and

    proposals. In Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping, Elabbas Benmamoun and Shalom Lappin (eds.), 98-123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Llombart-Huesca, Amália 2002 Anaphoric ‘one’ and NP-Ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 56: 59-89. López, Luis F. 1995 Polarity and predicate anaphora. Ph.D. diss., Cornell University.

  • References 247

    2001 Verb phrase ellipsis and Discourse-Linking. Lingua 110: 183-213. 2003 Complex dependencies and the person-number restriction in Ice-

    landic. Working Papers in Scandinavia Syntax 18: 55-90. 2004 A-Dependencies and the Architecture of CHL. Ms., University of

    Illinois at Chicago. López, Luis F., and Susanne Winkler 2000 Focus and Topic in VP-anaphora constructions. Linguistics 38: 623-

    664. 2003 Variation at the syntax-semantics interface: Evidence from Gapping.

    The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, ed. by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 227-248. Amsterdam/ Phila-delphia: John Benjamins.

    Marrano, Ann M. 1998 The Syntax of modality: A comparative study of epistemic and root

    modal verbs in Spanish and English. Ph. D. diss., Georgetown Uni-versity.

    Martin, Roger 2001 Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141-66. May, Robert 1985 Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT

    Press. McCawley, James 1971 Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in Linguistic Seman-

    tics, Charles Fillmore and Terence D. Langendoen (eds.), 96-113. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    1974 English as a VSO language. In Semantic Syntax, Pieter A. M. Seuren (ed.), 75-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    McCloskey, James 1991 Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85:

    259-301. 1997 Subjecthood and subject positions. Elements of Grammar: Hand-

    book of Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 197-235. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    2005 A Note on predicates and heads in Irish clausal syntax. Verb First: On the syntax of verb-initial languages, ed. by Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley and Sheila Ann Dooley 155–174. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    McDowell, Joyce P. 1987 Assertion and Modality. Ph.D. diss., University of Southern Califor-

    nia. McGregor, William 2003 The nothing that is, the zero that isn't. Studia Linguistica, 57: 75-119.

  • 248 References

    Merchant, Jason 2001 The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis.

    Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003 Subject-auxiliary inversion in comparatives and PF output con-

    straints. The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Struc-tures, ed. by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 55-77. Amster-dam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Ms. University of Chicago. forth. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Topics in Ellipsis, Kyle John-

    son (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miller, James 1993 The Grammar of Scottish English. In Real English: The Grammar of

    English Dialects in the British Isles, James Milroy and Leslie Milroy (eds.), 99-138. London: Longman.

    Milsark, Gary 1977 Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential con-

    struction. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1-30. Molnár, Valeria, and Susanne Winkler (eds.) 2006 The Architecture of Focus. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Monachesi, Paola 1999 The syntactic structure of Romanian auxiliary (and modal) verbs. In

    Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Seman-

    tics, Gosse Bouma, Erhard Hinrichs, Geert-Jan M. Kruijff, and Rich-ard Oehrle (eds.), 99-115. Stanford: CSLI publications.

    Mondadori, Fabrizio 1978 Remarks on tense and mood: The perfect future. In Studies in Formal

    Semantics: Intensionality, Temporality, Negation, Franz Guenthner and Christian Rohrer (eds.), 223-48. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Moody, Simanique 2004 Negation in double modal constructions. Paper presented at the

    Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C.

    Motapanyane Virginia, and Larisa Avram 2001 The syntax of 'putea' and its mixed typology. Belgian Journal of

    Linguistics 14: 149-65. Murguia, Elixabete 2004 Syntactic identity and locality restrictions on verbal ellipsis. Ph.D.

    diss., University of Maryland. Neidle, Carol 2000 The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and

    Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

  • References 249

    Ngonyani, Deo 1996 VP ellipsis in Ndendeule and Swahili applicatives. UCLA Working

    Papers in Syntax and Semantics 1: 109-28. Nunes, Jairo 1998 The copy theory of movement and linearization of chains in the

    Minimalist Program. Glot International 3: 16-20. Öhlschläger, Günther 1989 Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen. Tübin-

    gen: Niemeyer. Oehrle, Richard T. 1987 Boolean properties in the analisis of gapping. Syntax and Semantics

    20, Geoffrey Huck, and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.), 201-240. SanDiego: Academic Press

    Oku, Satoshi 2001 A minimalist theory of LF copy. The Minimalist Parameter, Galina

    M. Alexandrova and Olga Arnaudova (eds.), 281-94. Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Ortiz de Urbina, Jon 2003 Semiauxiliary verbs, Modal particles. In A Grammar of Basque, José

    Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz de Urbina (eds.). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Palmer, Frank R. 1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997 Negation and modality in the Germanic languages. In Modality in

    Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan and Olaf J. Westvik (eds.), 133-149. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Papafragou, Anna 1998 Inference and Word Meaning: The Case of Modal Auxiliaries. Lin-

    gua 105: 1-47. Partee, Barbara H. 1973 Some Structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English.

    The Journal of Philosophy 70: 601-609. Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall 1993 Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Penka, Doris, and Arnim von Stechow 2001 Negative Indefinita unter Modalverben. Modalität und Modalverben

    im Deutschen, ed. by Reimar Müller and Marga Reis, 263-86. Ham-burg: Buske.

    Perlmutter, David 1970 The two verbs 'begin'. In Readings in English Transformational

    Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), 107-119. Boston: Ginn.

  • 250 References

    Pesetsky, David 1998 Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the Best

    Good Enough? ed. by P. Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, and David Pesetsky, 337-83. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego 2001 T-to-C movement: causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: a life in

    language, Michael Kenstowicz (eds.), 355-426. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    2004. Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), 495-537. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Petronio, Karen M. 1993 Clause structure in American Sign Language. Ph.D. diss., University

    of Washington. Phillips, Collin 2003 Linear Order and Constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37-90. Picallo, Carme 1990 Modal verbs in Catalan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8:

    285 -312. Pintzuk, Susan 1995 Variation and change in Old English clause structure. Language

    Variation and Change 7: 229-260. Plank, Frans 1984 The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8: 305-364. Polinski, Maria, and Eric Potsdam 2002 Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry, 33: 245-282. Pollock, Jean-Yves 1989 Verb movement, UG, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20:

    365-424. 1997 Notes on clause structure. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of

    Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 237-279. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Postal, Paul M. 1966 On the so-called pronouns in English. In An Introduction to General

    Linguistics, ed. by Francis P. Dinneen. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

    2001 Missing parasitic gaps. Parasitic Gaps, Peter W. Culicover, and Paul M. Postal (eds.), 403-417. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1999 African American Vernacular English is not Standard English with

    mistakes. The Working of Language: From Prescription to Perspec-tives, Rebecca S. Wheeler (ed.), 39-58. Westport: Praeger.

  • References 251

    2000 Hankamer was! Webschrift for Jorge Hankamer. Web-accessible at: ling.ucsc.edu/Jorge/pullum.html.

    Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Deirdre Wilson 1977 Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53:

    741-788. Quine, Willard V. 1974 Reprint. Reference and modality. In Readings in Semantics, Farhang

    Zabeeh, E.D. Klemke, and Arthur Jacobson (eds.), 777-799. Ur-bana/Chicago/London: University of Illinois Press. [Original in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.]

    Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New

    York: Longman. Radford, Andrew 1997 Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Ap-

    proach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004 English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Press. Ramat, Paolo 1987 Introduction. Historical development of auxiliaries, Martin B. Harris

    and Paolo Ramat (eds.), 3-19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Reichenbach, Hans 1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press. Reis, Marga 2001 Bilden Modalverben im Deutschen eine syntaktische Klasse? In

    Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, Reimar Müller and Mar-ga Reis (eds.), 287-318. Hamburg: Buske.

    2003 On the form and interpretation of German wh-infinitives. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 155-201.

    Riemsdijk, Henk van 2002 The unbearable lightness of GOing. The projection parameter as a

    pure parameter governing the distribution of elliptic motion verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 143-196.

    Rigau, Gemma 1999 Relativized impersonality: Deontic sentences in Catalan. In Semantic

    Issues in Romance Syntax, Esthela Treviño and José Lema (eds.), 193-229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Rivero, Maria Luisa 1994 Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans.

    Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63-120.

  • 252 References

    Rizzi, Luigi 1978 A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. Recent Transformational Stud-

    ies in European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 113-158. Cam-bridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    Roberts, Ian G. 1985 Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxil-

    iaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58. 1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. A Comparative History of English and

    French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1998 Have/Be Raising, Move F, and Procrastinate. Linguistic Inquiry 29:

    113-125. Roberts, Ian G., and Anna Roussou 2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization.

    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rooth, Mats E. 1992 Ellipsis Redundancy and Reduction Redundancy. Proceedings of the

    Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbe-reichs 340: Sprach-theoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguis-tik. No. 29, Steve Berman and Arild Hestvik (eds.). University of Stuttgart/ University of Tübingen.

    Ross, John R. 1969 Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1: 77-

    102, ed. by J. Todd. Evanston, Ill.: Great Expectations. Rostila, Jouni 2001 In search of invisible prepositions. Connections between Funktions-

    verbgefüge and aspectual periphrastics. Studia Slavica Oldenburgen-sia 8: 125-65.

    Rydén, Mats, and Sverker Brorström 1987 The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. Stockholm:

    Almqvist & Wiksell. Sag, Ivan 1976 Deletion and Logical Form. MIT, Ph.D. Dissertation. [Published

    1980. New York: Garland.] 1979. The nonunity of anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 152-64. Schachter, Paul 1977 Does she or doesn´t she? Linguistic Inquiry 8: 763-67. 1978 English propredicates. Linguistic Analysis 4: 187-224. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984 Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure.

    Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. Siegel, Muffy E.A. 1987 Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries. Linguistics and

    Philosophy 10: 53-76.

  • References 253

    Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 1996 Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian

    Syntax 57: 1-46. Solà, Joan, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, and Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.) 2002 Gramàtica del català contemporani. Barcelona: Empúries. Stalnaker, Robert T. 1973 Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 77-96. Stechow, Arnim von 1995 The proper treatment of tense. SALT 5: 362-386. 2003 Feature deletion under semantic binding: Tense, person, and mood

    under verbal quantifiers. North-Eastern Linguistic Society 33: 397-403.

    Stechow, Arnim von, and Wolfgang Sternefeld 1988 Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Steele, Susan, Adrian Akmajian, Richard Demers, Eloise Jelinek, Chisato Kita-

    gawa, Richard Oehrle, and Thomas Wasow 1981 An Encyclopaedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence.

    Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. Sternefeld, Wolfgang 1995 Voice Phrases and their specifiers. Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft.

    SfS-Report-05-95. University of Tübingen. 2006 Syntax. Eine merkmalbasierte generative Analyse des Deutschen.

    Tübingen: Stauffenburg. Stejapanovic, Sandra 1998 On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from VP ellip-

    sis. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 527-537. Stowell, Tim 1982 The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561-570. 1996 The phrase structure of tense. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon,

    Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), 277-291. Dordrecht: Klu-wer.

    2004a Tense and modals. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), 621-35. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.

    2004b Tense/modal scope reversals and sequence of tense: The case of the English perfect modal. Paper presented at the Workshop on Modal Verbs and Modality University of Tübingen.

    Sundén, Karl 1904 Contributions to the Study of Elliptical Words in Modern English.

    Upsala: Almqvist & Wiksells. Surányi, Balázs 2004 Differential quantifier scope: Q-raising versus Q-feature checking. In

    Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 5. Proceedings of CSSP

    2003, Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), 215-40.

  • 254 References

    Svenonius, Peter 2002 Subject positions and the placement of adverbials. In Subject, Exple-

    tives, and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (eds.). New York: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

    Sweetser, Eve 1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge

    University Press. Tancredi, Christopher 1992 Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition, Ph.D. diss., MIT. Thomason, Richmond H., and Robert T. Stalnaker 1973 A semantic analysis of adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 195-220. Thompson, Ellen 1996 The syntax of tense. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland. Thráinsson, Höskuldur, and Sten Vikner 1995 Modals and double modals in the Scandinavian languages. Working

    Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 51-88. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjec-

    tification in semantic change. Language 65: 31-55. 1999 Why ‘must’ is not ‘moot.’ Paper presented at the Fourteenth Interna-

    tional Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada. Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Ekkehard König 1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. Ap-

    proaches to Grammaticalization, Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), 189-218. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Travis, Lisa 1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Ph.D. diss., MIT. Uriagerkeka, Juan 1999 Multiple Spell-Out. In Working Minimalism, Samuel Epstein and

    Norbert Hornstein (eds.), . Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press. Valmala Elguea, Vidal 1996 VP Anaphor, the SIH, and the ISH: The Case of Infinitives. Belgian

    Journal of Linguistics 10: 123-137. Vikner, Sten 1988 Modals in Danish and event expressions. Working Papers in Scandi-

    navian Syntax 39: 1-33. Visser, Frederikus Th. 1963-73 An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E.J. Brill. Warner, Anthony R. 1992 Elliptical and impersonal constructions: Evidence for auxiliaries in

    Old English. In Evidence from Old English: Material and Theoreti-cal Bases for Reconstruction, ed. by F. Colman, 178-210. Edinburgh: John Donald.

  • References 255

    1993 English Auxiliaries: Structure and History: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    1995 Predicting the progressive passive: parametric variation within a lexicalist framework. Language 71: 533-557.

    Wasow, Thomas 1972 Anaphoric Relations in English. Ph.D. diss, MIT. 1979 Anaphora in Generative Grammar. Ghent: Story-Scientia. Webber, Bonnie L. 1978 A formal approach to discourse anaphora. Ph.D. diss., Harvard. Werner, Tom 2003 Deducing the future. North-Eastern Linguistic Society 33: 445-461. Westmoreland, Robert R. 1998 Information and intonation in natural language modality. Ph.D. diss.,

    Indiana University. Westney, Paul 1995 Modals and Periphrastics in English: An Investigation into the Se-

    mantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and

    their Periphrastic Equivalents. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Williams, Edwin 1977 Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 103-39. 1994 A reinterpretation of evidence for verb movement in French. Verb

    Movement, David Lightfoot and Norbert Hornstein (eds.), 189-205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Winkler, Susanne 1997 Focus and Secondary Predication. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de

    Gruyter. 2000 Silent copy and polarity focus in VP ellipsis. Ellipsis in Coordina-

    tion, ed. by Kerstin Schwabe and Niing Zhang, 221-47. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    2003 Ellipsis at the Interfaces: An Information Structural Investigation of Sentence-Bound and Discourse-Bound Ellipsis in English, University of Tübingen: Habilitationsschrift.

    2005 Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mou-ton de Gruyter.

    2006 Ellipsis. In The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Keith Brown (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Winkler, Susanne, and Kerstin Schwabe 2003 Exploring the interfaces from the perspective of omitted structures.

    In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler (eds.), 1-26. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Wright, Georg H. von 1951 An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

  • 256 References

    Wurmbrand, Susanne 1998 Infinitives. Ph.D. diss., MIT. 1999 Modal verbs must be raising verbs. WCCFL, 18: 599-612. 2001 Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin/New York:

    Mouton de Gruyter. Zagona, Karen 1988 Proper Government of antecedentless VP in English and Spanish.

    Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 95-128. Zanuttini, Raffaella 2001 Sentential negation. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic

    Theory, Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), 511-535. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Zeijlstra, Hedde 2004 Sentential negation and negative concord. Ph.D. diss., University of

    Amsterdam. Zeisler, Bettina. 2004 Relative Tense and Aspectual Values in Tibetan Languages. Ber-

    lin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa 1982 On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Ph.D. diss., MIT. Zwicky, Arnold, and Geoffrey K. Pullum 1983 Cliticization versus inflection: English n't. Language 59: 502-513.