Reference List - University of the...

Reference List Page 357

Reference List Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2007). On the role and use of “theory” in science education

research: A response to Johnston, Southerland, and Sowell. Science Education, 91(1), 187–194. doi:10.1002/sce.20189

Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach (p. 264). New Jersey: John Wiley& Sons, Incorporated.

Agresti, A. (2013). Introduction: Distributions and inference for categorical data. In Categorical Data Analysis (3rd ed., pp. 1–35). New Jersey: John Wiley& Sons, Incorporated.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4

Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013

Aldous, C. (2004). Science and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of C2005 in Mpumulanga secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 65–76.

Alessi, S. M., & Trollop, S. R. (1991). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development (pp. 483–489). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103–1110. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004

Amory, A., & Mars, M. (1994). Evaluation of the efficacy of multi-media learning: Project development and strategies. In P. Alexander (Ed.), Conference proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-assisted Education and Training in Developing Countries (pp. 1–6). Midrand.

Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams, C. (1999). The use of computer games as an educational tool: Identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311–321. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00121

Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., … Wittrock, M. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman Publishers.

Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology & Standards Watch, February 2, 1–64. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf

Andrew, L. (2007). Comparison of teacher educators’ instructional methods with the constructivist ideal. The Teacher Educator, 42(3), 157–184. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08878730709555401

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006

Angelo, T. A. (1993). A “teacher’s dozen”: Fourteen general, research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms. AAHE Bulletin, 45(8), 3–13. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/~lsederberg/ceeoc/teachers_dozen.pdf

Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

Arnott, A., & Kubeka, Z. (1997). Mathematics and science teachers: Demand, utilization, supply and

training in South Africa. EduSource: Johannesburg, 97/01.

Art Movements - artists, styles, techniques and ideas. (2013).

Austin, K. A. (2009). Multimedia learning: Cognitive individual differences and display design techniques predict transfer learning with multimedia learning modules. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1339–1354. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.017

Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed., pp. 1–733). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Ayayee, E. K. (2012). Identifying and addressing factors affecting academic success of at-risk biology students: Attitudes, work habits and metacognitive knowledge (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za//handle/10539/11887

Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700. doi:10.1002/acp.1343

Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory (pp. 556–559). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load—recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139–146. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00021-4

Barton, R. (1997). How do computers affect graphical interpretation? School Science Review, 79(287), 55–60.

Bartsch, R., & Cobern, K. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & Education, 41(1), 77–86. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00027-7

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546. Retrieved from http://editlib.org/p/4728

Bauer, N. (2011). Rescue plan for teacher laptop project in the works. Mail & Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2011-09-20-rescue-planned-for-teacher-laptop-programme

Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1

Bear, J. H. (n.d.a). Kerning and tracking: All spaced out type composition. Desktop Publishing. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/typespacing/a/kerningtracking.htm

Bear, J. H. (n.d.b). Setting leading in desktop publishing software: Reading (the space) between the lines. Desktop Publishing. Retrieved June 14, 2006, from http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/typespacing/a/leading.htm

Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 1–31. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/

Bekebrede, G., Warmelink, H. J. G., & Mayer, I. S. (2011). Reviewing the need for gaming in education to accommodate the net generation. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1521–1529. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.010

Belo, N. A. H., van Driel, J., van Veen, K., & Verloop, N. (2014). Beyond the dichotomy of teacher- versus student-focused education: A survey study on physics teachers’ beliefs about the goals and pedagogy of physics education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–13. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.008

Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. E. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0

Reference List 59

technologies in higher education: A collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524–534. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.022

Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bezuidenhout, W., Clark, A., Engelbrecht, R. & Wilson, B. (2005). Oxford Successful Life Sciences Grade 10 Learner’s Book. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd.

Bialobrzeska, M., & Cohen, S. (2005). Managing ICTs in South African schools: A guide for school principals (pp. 1–136). South African Institute for Distance Education. Retrieved from http://www.saide.org.za/Resources/SearchOurDatabase/SearchResults/tabid/1488/mctl/Details/id/38390/Default.aspx

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Essentials of grounded theory. In Grounded theory: A practical guide (pp. 1–14). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage.

Blignaut, A. S., Hinostroza, J. E., Els, C. J., & Brun, M. (2010). ICT in education policy and practice in developing countries: South Africa and Chile compared through SITES 2006. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1552–1563. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.021

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1 - cognitive domain (p. 207). London: Longman Group. doi:10.1007/BF00373956

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15.

Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4

Boucheix, J.-M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 123–135. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015

Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177–198. doi:10.1080/09523987.2010.518811

Bretz, R., & Johnson, L. (2000). An innovative pedagogy for teaching and evaluating computer literacy. Information Technology and Management, 1(4), 283–292. doi:10.1023/A:1019185311206

Brockmann, R. J. (1991). The unbearable distraction of colour. Transactions on Professional Communication, 34(3), 153–159.

Brodie, K., Lelliott, A., & Davis, H. (2002). Forms and substance in learner-centred teaching: Teachers’ take-up from an in-service programme in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(5), 541–559. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00015-X

Brown, M. (2008). Interactive learning environments: Review of an old construct with a critical new twist. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 231–248). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Brunken, R., Plass, J., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7

Busa, D. (2011). Mindset Network is eTransforming Africa. Digital Learning Resources. Retrieved May 06, 2012, from https://edutechdebate.org/digital-learning-resources/mindset-network-is-etransforming-africa/

Butcher, N. (2003). Intel Teach to the Future Evaluation Year One Interim Report. Retrieved August 22, 2008, from http://www.intel.com/corporate/education/emea/eng/za/pdf/IntelEval.InterimReport.pdf

Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning.

Educause Quarterly, 25(2), 22–28.

Caliendo, S. M., & Kyle, W. C. (1996). Establishing the theoretical frame. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 225–227.

Castro, M. de F. D., & Alves, L. A. (2007). The implementation and use of computers in education in Brazil: Niterói city/Rio de Janeiro. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1378–1386. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.002

Cechinel, C., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & García-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Statistical profiles of highly-rated learning objects. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1255–1269. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.012

Chen, C.-H. (2008). What they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

Chen, R.-J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55(1), 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.015

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9(3), 88–113. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002

Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). New Jersey: Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://www.public.asu.edu/~mtchi/papers/ChiGlaserRees.pdf

Chiero, R. (1997). Teachers’ perspectives on factors that affect computer use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 133–145.

Chigona, A., & Chigona, W. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting the use of ICT for curriculum delivery in the Western Cape, South Africa. In 18th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–12). Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2010/13327457

Chisholm, L. (2005). The making of South Africa’s National Curriculum Statement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 193–208. doi:10.1080/0022027042000236163

Chisholm, L., Volmink, J., Ndhlovu, T., Potenza, E., Mahomed, H., Muller, J., … Mphahlele, L. (2000). A South African curriculum for the twenty-first century: Report of the review committee on Curriculum 2005. Pretoria, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.polity.org.za/govdocs/reports/education/curric2005/curric2005.htm

Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170217

Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35.

Coakley, C. W., & Heise, M. A. (1996). Versions of the sign test in the presence of ties. Biometrics, 52(4), 1242–1251.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1980). Research methods in education. London: Croom Helm.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Color blindness. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_blindness

Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43(1-2), 17–33. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.018

Cox, M. J., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59–70. doi:10.1007/s10639-007-9032-x

Reference List Page 361 Cox, M., Preston, C., & Cox, K. (1999). What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in

their classrooms? British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm

Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). PowerPoint presentation technology and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31(3), 147–160. doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9017-5

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

Cutrimschmid, E. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553–1568. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.005

Davidson, J., & Olson, M. (2003). School leadership in networked schools: Deciphering the impact of large technical systems on education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 261–281. doi:10.1080/1360312032000138692

Davis, E. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90(2), 348–375. doi:10.1002/sce.20110

de Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312(5773), 532–533. doi: 10.1126/science.1127750

Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching and learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 43–62). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Dekkers, P., & Mnisi, E. (2003). The nature of science – do teachers have the understandings they are expected to teach? African Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7, 21–34.

Denby, D. (2003). Using modern technologies in 14-19 science. School Science Review, 85(310), 41–46.

Department of Education. (1997). Implementing OBE—Book 4, Philosophy. Pretoria: Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2003). Life Sciences National Curriculum Statement Grades 10-12. Pretoria: Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2004). White Paper on e-Education: Transforming learning and teaching through information and communication technologies (ICTs). Government Gazette (Vol. 26762, pp. 3–46). Pretoria: Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2011). National Education Infrastructure Management System Reports May 2011 (pp. 1–27). Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.za/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=hHaBCAerGXc%3D&tabid=358&mid=180

Devolder, A., Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeϋr, J. (2010). Identifying multiple roles of ICT coordinators. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1651–1655. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.007

Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221–239. Retrieved from http://sdexter.net/xyz/JRCE_catalyst.pdf

Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024–1033. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003

Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their

classroom practice. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1469–1483. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.014

Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Peled, Y. (2002). Characteristics of science teachers who incorporate web-based teaching. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 511–547.

Draper, S. (1997). Niche-based success in CAL. Computers & Education, 30(1-2), 5–8.

Drenoyianni, H., & Selwood, I. (1998). Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers’ perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 3(2), 87–99.

Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001

Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45–52.

Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education – A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006

Echeverría, A., García-Campo, C., Nussbaum, M., Gil, F., Villalta, M., Améstica, M., & Echeverría, S. (2011). A framework for the design and integration of collaborative classroom games. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1127–1136. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.010

Ely, M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

Ertmer, P. A., & Hruskocy, C. (1999). Impacts of a university-elementary school partnership designed to support technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(1), 81–96.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5).

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Evans, C., & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1147–1160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.008

Fabry, D. L., & Higgs, J. R. (1997). Barriers to the effective of technology in education: Current status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 385–395.

Feifer, R. G., & Tazbaz, D. (1997). Interface design principles for interactive media. Telematics and Informatics, 14(I), 51–65.

Ficklen, E., & Muscara, C. (2000). Harnessing technology in the classroom. American Educator, 25(3), 22–29.

Fisher, B. (1997). Computer modelling for thinking about and controlling variables. School Science Review, 79(287), 87–90.

Fisher, T. (2006). Educational transformation: Is it, like “beauty”, in the eye of the beholder, or will we know it when we see it? Education and Information Technologies, 11(3-4), 293–303. doi:10.1007/s10639-006-9009-1

Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 117–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reference List Page 363 Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2),

219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363

Fong, D. Y. T., Kwan, C. W., Lam, K. F., & Lam, K. S. L. (2003). Use of the sign test for the median in the presence of ties. The American Statistician, 57(4), 237–240. doi:10.1198/0003130032422

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fried, C. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006

Frost, R. (1997). Computer software for science teaching – choosing and using. School Science Review, 79(287), 19–24.

Gagne, R.M. & Briggs, L.J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, P. J. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman Publishers.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.

Gauteng Provincial Government. (2001). No Title. Retrieved August 5, 2007, from http://www.dwaf.gov.za/ communications/OtherSpeeches/2002/MbekiSoN8Feb02.doc.

Gibson, P. a., Stringer, K., Cotten, S. R., Simoni, Z., O’Neal, L. J., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2014). Changing teachers, changing students? The impact of a teacher-focused intervention on students’ computer usage, attitudes, and anxiety. Computers & Education, 71, 165–174. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.002

Goodlad, J. I., Klein, F. M., & Tye, K. A. (1979). The domains of curriculum and their study. In J. I. Goodlad (Ed.), Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. NewYork: McGraw Hill.

Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). A third methodological movement: Challenging the dominance of single methods. In Combining Methods in Educational and Social Research (pp. 1–12). Berkshire: Open University Press.

Gower, P., & Hoffman, R. (2009, March 6). State teachers go digital. Mail&Guardian, p. 11.

Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010

Greco, M., Stucchi, N., Zavagno, D., & Marino, B. (2008). On the portability of computer-generated presentations: The effect of text-background color combinations on text legibility. Human Factors, 50(5), 821–833. doi:10.1518/001872008X354156

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi:10.3102/01623737011003255

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 311–33). Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Gunter, H., Rayner, S., Thomas, H., Fielding, A., Butt, G., & Lance, A. (2005). Teachers, time and work: Findings from the evaluation of the Transforming the School Workforce Pathfinder Project. School Leadership & Management, 25(5), 441–454. doi:10.1080/13634230500340781

Gϋlbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4), 943–956. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.002

Haelermans, C., & Blank, J. L. T. (2012). Is a schools’ performance related to technical change? – A

study on the relationship between innovations and secondary school productivity. Computers & Education, 59(3), 884–892. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.027

Hannafin, M. J., & Hooper, S. (1989). An integrated framework for CBI screen design and layout. Computers in Human Behavior, 5(3), 155–165. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(89)90009-5

Harlen, W. (1996). The teaching of science in primary schools (2nd ed.). London: D. Fulton Publishers.

Harris, B. (1994). The future curriculum with IT - implications for science education. School Science Review, 76(275), 15–25.

Harris, E., Mkhomazi, C., Misser, R., & Sitsha, M. (2003). Observations of science teacher practice with regard to learner-centred activities. In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 101–106). Mbabane.

Harris, L. (2006, November). Let them eat dial-up. Brainstorm magazine. Retrieved from http://www.brainstormmag.co.za

Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., Mcfarlane, A., et al. (2002). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. Learning. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1572/1/becta_2002_ImpaCT2_Strand1_report.pdf

Hartley, J. (1987). Designing electronic text: The role of print-based research. Educational Communication and Technology, 35(1), 3–17.

Hasler, A. S., & Kersten, B. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 713–729. doi:10.1002/acp

Hattingh, A., & Aldous, C. (2004). Factors influencing the quality and quantity of practical work in science classrooms. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 351–355). Cape Town.

Hattingh, A., Rogan, J. M., Aldous, C., Howie, S., & Venter, E. (2005). Assessing the attainment of learner outcomes in Natural Science of the new South African curriculum. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 13–24.

Hausfather, S. (2001). Where’s the content? The role of content in constructivist teacher education. Educational Horizons, 79(1), 15–19.

Haythornwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155–192. doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961

Hermans, R., Tondeϋr, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2006). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.08.001

Heyden, R. J. (2004). Approaches to cell biology: Developing educational multimedia. Cell Biology Education, 3, 93–98.

Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards.


Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225. doi:10.1080/17439880701511040

Höffler, T., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013

Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. (1986). Variables affecting the legibility of computer generated text. Journal of Instructional Development, 9(4), 22–28.

Hornby, A. S. (Ed.). (1998). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hossain, S., & Brooks, L. (2008). Fuzzy cognitive map modelling educational software adoption. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1569–1588. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.002

Howie, S. J. (2010). ICT-supported pedagogical policies and practices in South Africa and Chile: emerging economies and realities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 507–522. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00377.x

Hsieh, P.-A. J., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2025–2038. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002

Huang, Y.-M., Chiu, P.-S., Liu, T.-C., & Chen, T.-S. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2291–2302. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.023

Hull, C.L. (1952). A behavior system: An introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism (pp 327-346). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Imhof, B., Scheiter, K., Edelmann, J., & Gerjets, P. (2013). Learning about locomotion patterns: Effective use of multiple pictures and motion-indicating arrows. Computers & Education, 65, 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.017

Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004

Inan, F. A., Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, D. (2010). Pattern of classroom activities during students’ use of computers: Relations between instructional strategies and computer applications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 540–546. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.017

Intel Teach: Essentials. (2009). Retrieved February 08, 2009, from http://www.intel.com/cd/corporate/ education/emea/eng/za/elem_sec/teach/341215.htm

Isaacs, G. (1987). Text screen design for computer-assisted learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 39–51.

Isaacs, S. (2007). ICT in education in South Africa. Africa (Vol. 2, pp. 1–29). Cape Town: J.C. Juta. doi:10.1080/02680930903314269

ISAD PLAN. (2012, December). doi:10.1093/her/cys121

Jackson, R., & Bazley, M. (1997). Science education and the Internet - cutting through the hype. School Science Review, 79(287), 41–44.

Jacobs, M. (2013). Education report stipulates tech standards. ITWeb. Retrieved July 14, 2013, from http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=65461

Jacobson, M. J., So, H.-J., Teo, T., Lee, J., Pathak, S., & Lossman, H. (2010). Epistemology and learning: Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1694–1706. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.014

Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022

Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case

study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36(2), 183–204.

John, P., & La Velle, L. (2004). Devices and desires: Subject subcultures, pedagogical identity and the challenge of information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 307–326. doi:10.1080/14759390400200185

Johnson, R. B., & Ongwuebuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

Johnson, S., Scholtz, Z., Botha, T., & Hodges, M. (2003). An approach to delivering sustainable teacher development in large science classes. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 7, 85–96.

Johnson, S., Scholtz, Z., Hodges, M., & Botha, T. (2002). A study of the use of curriculum materials introduced to science teachers in the Western Cape. In C. Malcolm & C. Lubisi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 146–151). Durban.

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Special Education (Vol. 16, p. 0). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/learning-with-technology-a-constructivist-perspective/

Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581–597.

Kalyuga, S. (2007). Enhancing instructional efficiency of interactive e-learning environments: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 387–399. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9051-6

Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Mcmillan Culp, K. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313–329.

Kang, I., Choi, J.-I., & Chang, K. (2007). Constructivist research in educational technology: A retrospective view and future prospects. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 397–412.

Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: Potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17–27.

Karasavvidis, I. (2009). Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53(2), 436–444. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.003

Karplus, R. (1971). Some thoughts on science curriculum development. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), Confronting curriculum reform (pp. 56–61). Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

Kasanda, C. D., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Kapenda, H. M., Kandjeo-Marenga, H. U., & Gaoseb, N. (2003). Learner-centred teaching – the rhetoric and practice: the case of Namibia. In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), roceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 132–137). Mbabane.

Kayle, A. (2009). E-learning boost for Cape school. ITWeb.

Keengwe, T., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565.

Keller, J.M. & Suzuki,K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227–241. doi:10.1080/17439880701511073

Reference List Page 367 Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). Analysing the use of interactive

technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 61–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x

Khanya annual report for the period March 2007 – April 2008. (2008) (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from http://www.khanya.co.za/projectinfo/docs/khanya_annual_rep_2008.pdf

Khoali, T. (2012). Assisting teachers through curriculum change: Teachers’ use of support materials for teaching about smoking-related matters Volume 1. (Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg).

Khoza, Z. (2004). The extent to which mathematics learning outcomes are reflected in Grade 9 assessment tasks. In A. Buffler & L. R. C (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology (pp. 480–487). Cape Town.

Khulisa Management Services. (2002). Evaluation of Curriculum 2005 implementation in Gauteng province – challenges, constraints, innovations and successes of 1998 to 2001. Gauteng Institute of Curriculum Development Conference. South Africa.

Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1–10.

Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 321–331). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitudes and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115–126.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? (J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop, Eds.)Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

Koehler, M. J., Bouck, E. C., Mishra, P., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., & Tae, S. S. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st century teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 146–163.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012

Kong, S. C. (2011). An evaluation study of the use of a cognitive tool in a one-to-one classroom for promoting classroom-based dialogic interaction. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1851–1864. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.008

Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–15.

Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative analysis of policies for ICT in education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 1083–1096). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(11), 911–930. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005

Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational

Research, 75(3), 285–328. doi:10.3102/00346543075003285

Kulas, J. T., Stachowski, A. A., & Haynes, B. A. (2008). Middle response functioning in Likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 251–260. doi:10.1007/s10869-008-9064-2

Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 7(1-2), 75–94. doi:10.1016/0747-5632(91)90030-5

Lai, K. (2008). ICT supporting the learning process: The premise, reality, and promise. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 215–230). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Lai, K., & Pratt, K. (2004). Secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.

Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.

Lea, S., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond “educational boulimia”? Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 321–334.

LeCompte, M., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Designing & conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek (CA): Alta Mira.

Lee, S. H., & Boling, E. (1999). Screen design guidelines for motivation in interactive multimedia instruction: A survey and framework for designers. Educational Technology, 39, 19–26.

Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research: Planning and design. New York: Macmillan.

Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.001

Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 93–105. doi:10.1080/14703290601081407

Leutner, D. (2002). The fuzzy relationship of intelligence and problem solving in computer simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6), 685–697. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00024-9

Leutner, D. (2013). Motivation and emotion as mediators in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 4–5. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.004

Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 281–307. doi:10.1080/14759390500200208

Lewis, S. (2003). Enhancing teaching and learning of science through use of ICT: Methods and materials. School Science Review, 84(309), 41–51.

Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2011). A framework for developing pre-service teachers’ competencies in using technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 69–83. doi:10.1080/09523987.2011.576512

Lim, C. P., Nonis, D., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00531.x

Liu, T.-Y., & Chu, Y.-L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630–643. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023

Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Ümarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education, 58(2), 808–817.


doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.005

Looi, C., Lim, W.-Y., & Chen, W. (2008). Communities of practice for continuing professional development in the twenty-first century. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 489–505). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Enacting a technology-based science curriculum across a grade level: The journey of teachers’ appropriation. Computers & Education, 71, 222–236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.006

Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 225–244.

Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7

Maddux, C. D. (2003). Twenty years of research in information technology in education: Assessing our progress. In D. L. Johnson & C. D. Maddux (Eds.), Technology in education: A twenty-year retrospective (pp. 35–48). New York: The Hawthorne Press.

Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2006). Type II applications of information technology in education: The next revolution. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 1–5. doi:10.1300/J025v23n01_01 1

Mahara: Open source eportfolios. (n.d.).

Mahlong, A. (2009, June 29). Schools ditch Gauteng Online. iWeek.

Mama, T., & Hennessy, S. (2013). Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT. Computers & Education, 68, 380–387. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.022

Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1993). Computers and teachers: Factors influencing computer use in the classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(2), 220–237.

Marcinkiewicz, H. R. (1994). Differences in computer use of practicing versus preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(2), 184–197.

Marcovitz, D. (2000). The roles of computer coordinators in supporting technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 259–273.

Marcus, A. (1992). Graphic design for electronic documents and user interfaces. New York: ACM Press.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.

Martinblas, T., & Serrano-Fernandez, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in physics. Computers & Education, 52(1), 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005

Martinovic, D., & Zuochen, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the teacher education programme: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 461–469.

Mashalaba, P., & Sanders, M. (2003). An investigation of natural science textbooks as support materials for activity-based lessons. In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 402–409). Mbabane.

Mathison, S. (1988). Triangulation. Educational Researcher, March, 13–17.

Matimolane, M. (2004). The lesson planning practices of Natural Science teachers implementing Curriculum 2005. Unpublished MSc research report. University of the Witwatersrand. Retrieved from http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&s

Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review,

62(3), 279–300. Retrieved from http://her.hepg.org/index/8323320856251826.pdf

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Conceptual framework: What do you think is going on. In J. Maxwell (Ed.), Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (pp. 33–59). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.09.001

Mayer R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.

Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 169–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 183–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2005c). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 201–214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.2.390

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87–99. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4

Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–812. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.806

McCarney, J. (2004). Effective models of staff development in ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 62–72.

McClelland, J. A. G. (1982). Ausubel’s theory of learning and its application to introductory science: Part 1 Ausubel's theory of learning. School Science Review, 157–161.

McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. (1997). The learner-centred classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McElduff, F., Cortina-Borja, M., Chan, S.-K., & Wade, A. (2010). When t-tests or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests won’t do. Advances in Physiology Education, 34(3), 128–33. doi:10.1152/advan.00017.2010

McGrath, J., Karabas, G., & Willis, J. (2011). From TPACK concept to TPACK practice: An analysis of the suitability and usefulness of the concept as a guide in the real world of teacher development. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.sicet.org/journals/ijttl/issue1101/1_Willis.pdf

McKenney, S. (2013). Designing and researching technology enhanced learning for the zone of proximal implementation. Research in Learning Technology Supplement 2013, 21: 17374.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Designing qualitative research: Evidence-based inquiry. Research in Education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Mertens, D. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. California: Sage Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Millar, N. (1996). Computer modelling of biological molecules: Free resources on the Internet. School


Science Review, 78(282), 55–60.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. Retrieved from http://www.musanim.com/miller1956/

Miller, G. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101(2), 343–352. doi:10.1037/h0043158

Mingers, J. (1989). An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine Learning, 4, 227–243.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mitchell, P. D. (1997). The impact of educational technology: A radical reappraisal of research methods. Research in Learning Technology, 5(1), 48–54. doi:10.1080/0968776970050108

Mohlala, T. (2010, August 3). Teachers still lack laptops. Mail & Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2010-08-03-teachers-still-lack-laptops

Mooij, T., & Smeets, E. (2001). Modeling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Computers & Education, 36(3), 265–281. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00068-3

Moos, D. C. (2010). Nonlinear technology: Changing the conception of extrinsic motivation? Computers & Education, 55(4), 1640–1650. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.006

Morar, T. (2004). Implementing Curriculum 2005: Dilemmas of four rural mathematics teachers. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 685–691). Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117–125.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(3), 35–45. doi:10.1007/BF02504796

Morse, L. (1971). Specimen identification and key construction with time-sharing computers. Taxon, 20(2/3), 269–282.

Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003

Muller, J. (1998). The well-tempered learner: Self-regulation, pedagogical models and teacher education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 177–193. doi:10.1080/03050069828261

Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096

Munro, R. (2010). Setting a new course for research on information technology in education. In A. McDougall, J. Murnane, A. Jones, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), Researching IT in education (pp. 46–53). Oxon: Routledge

Neie, V. E. (1974). How significant are nonsignificant differences? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(4), 377–378. doi:10.1002/tea.3660110410

Newell, B. I. M. (1970). Construction and use of tabular keys. Pacific Insects, 12(May), 25–37.

Newton, L., & Rogers, R. (2003). Thinking frameworks for planning ICT in science lessons. School

Science Review, 84(309), 113–120.

Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(2), 243–264.

Nie, Y., & Lau, S. (2010). Differential relations of constructivist and didactic instruction to students’ cognition, motivation, and achievement. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 411–423. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002

Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15–31. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00036-6

Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2001). 113 design guidelines for homepage usability. Nielsen Norman Group: Evidence-based user experience research, training, and consulting. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/113-design-guidelines-homepage-usability/

Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2008). Site map usability. Nielsen Norman Group: Evidence-based user experience research, training, and consulting. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/site-map-usability/

Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2010). Closeness of actions and objects in GUI design. Nielsen Norman Group: Evidence-based user experience research, training, and consulting. Retrieved March 11, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/closeness-of-actions-and-objects-gui/

Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2012). Serif vs. sans-serif fonts for HD screens. Guidelines for multimedia on the web. Retrieved March 10, 2013, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/guidelines-for-multimedia-on-the-web/

Nisan-Nelson, P. D. (2001). Technology integration: A case of professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 83–103.

Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 178–197.

Nunes, M. B., & McPherson, M. (2007). Why designers cannot be agnostic about pedagogy: The influence of constructivist thinking in design of e-learning for HE. Studies In Computational Intelligence, 62, 7–30.

Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 8–22. Retrieved from http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/gen/aset /ajet/ajet11/su95p8.html

Olsen, S., & Wilson, D. (1985). Designing computer screen displays. Performance and Instruction, 24(1), 16–17.

Olson, J., James, E., & Lang, M. (1999). Changing the subject: The challenge of innovation to teacher professionalism in OECD countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 69–82. doi:10.1080/002202799183304

Osodo, J., Amory, A., Graham-Jolly, M., & Indoshi, F. C. (2010). Visualization skills and their incorporation in biology curriculum. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(6), 282–291.

Ottevanger, W. (2002). Teacher support materials as a catalyst for science curriculum implementation in Namibia. In C. Malcolm & C. Lubisi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 313–320). Durban.

Oud, J. (2009). Guidelines for effective online instruction using multimedia screencasts. Reference Services Review, 37(2). doi:10.1108/00907320910957206

Ozok, A. A., & Salvendy, G. (2004). Twenty guidelines for the design of Web-based interfaces with consistent language. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.012

Paas, F. G., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement


as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71.

Paas, F. G., van Gerven, P. W. M., & Tabbers, H. K. (2005). The cognitive aging principle in multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 339–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pabale, M. F., & Dekkers, P. (2003). Science teachers’ views on outcomes-based education: Partial evaluation of UNIN’s advanced certificate in education programme. In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 734–740). Mbabane.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170741

Pajares, M. F. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004

Paris, C., & Combs, B. (2006). Lived meanings: What teachers mean when they say they are learner-centred. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 571–592.

Pastoor, S. (1990). Legibility and subjective preference for colour combinations in text. Human Factors, 32(2), 157-171.

Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications.

Payne, S. L. (1951). The art of asking questions. New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.

Peeraer, J., & van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1247–1259. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.015

Peers, C. E., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 89–110.

Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37(2), 163–178. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8

Peterson, R. A. (1973). A note on optimal adopter category determination. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(3), 325–329. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3149704

Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Pillay, R., & Sanders, M. (2002). Some teacher factors likely to affect the implementation of Curriculum 2005. In C. Malcolm & C. Lubisi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 326–332). Durban.

Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 781–794. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.001

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424843

Presidential National Commission on Information Society & Development. (2005). Retrieved March 18, 2009, from http://www.pnc.gov.za//index.php?option=com_content&task=category&sectionid=5&id=20&Itemid=

38

Priest, J., Coe, R., Evershed, B., & Bush, N. (2004). Report for British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. Retrieved from www.becta.org.uk/research

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/ lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Prince_AL.pdf.

Puntambekar, S., & Stylianou, A. (2005). Designing navigation support in hypertext systems based on navigation patterns. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 451. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1276-5

Quick, D., & Davies, T. G. (1999). Community college faculty development: Bringing technology into instruction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 23, 641–653.

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed., Vol. 24). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2009). Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning: Effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 411–422. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.008

Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Sangin, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instructional Science, 38(5), 471–485. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6

Reed, S. K. (2006). Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 87–98. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_2

Reeves, T. C. (1993). Evaluating technology-based learning. In G. M. Piskurich (Ed.), The ASTD handbook of instructional technology (pp. 15.1–15.32). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Reeves, T. C. (1994). Text design guidelines. Retrieved August 22, 2007, from http://mime1.marc.gatech.edu/tim/mm_tools/TDG.html

Reeves, T. C., & Harmon, S. W. (1994). Systematic evaluation procedures for interactive multimedia for education and training. In S. Reisman (Ed.), Multimedia computing: Preparing for the 21st Century (pp. 472–505). Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. (2003). A pragmatic rationale for evaluation. In T. C. Reeves (Ed.), Interactive learning systems (pp. 1–26). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.

Reeves, T. C., & Marlino, M. (1997). Evaluating interactive learning. Retrieved April 29, 2009, from www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/workshops/reeves.html.

Reeves, T. C., McKenney, S., & Herrington, J. (2011). Publishing and perishing: The critical importance of educational design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 55–65. doi:http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/reeves.html

Renkl, A. (2010). The expertise reversal effect and worked examples in tutored problem solving, 289–307. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9107-8

Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2013). e-Learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Reynolds, L. (1979). Legibility studies: Their relevance to present-day documentation methods. Journal of Documentation, 35(4), 307–340.

Rieber, L. P. (1994). Computers, graphics and learning. Madison: Brown and Benchmark.

Rieber, L. P. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 45–56. doi:10.1007/BF02300481

Riel, M., & Becker, H. J. (2008). Characteristics of teacher leaders for information and communication technology. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary educationandbook of (pp. 397–417). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Reference List Page 375 Roberts, J. (2011). Strategic Review of SchoolNet South Africa (pp. 1–28).

Roca, J., Chiu, C., & Martinez, F. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003

Rodrigues, S. (1997). The role of IT in secondary school science: An illustrative review. School Science Review, 79(287), 35–40.

Rodríguez-Miranda, F. P., Pozuelos-Estrada, F. J., & León-Jariego, J. C. (2014). The role of ICT coordinator: Priority and time dedicated to professional functions. Computers & Education, 72, 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.009

Rouet, J., & Potelle, H. (2005). Navigational principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 297–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rogan, J. M. (2003). Out of the frying pan…? The implementation of Curriculum 2005. In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 740–748). Mbabane.

Rogan, J. M. (2004). Out of the frying pan ...? Case studies of the implementation of Curriculum 2005 in some science classrooms. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(2), 165–179.

Rogan, J. M., & Aldous, C. (2004). Predicting classroom innovation in science classrooms. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 860–870). Cape Town.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Rogers, L. T. (1995). The computer as an aid for exploring graphs. School Science Review, 76(276), 31–39.

Rogers, L. T., & Finlayson, H. (2003). Does ICT in science really work in the classroom? Part 1: The individual teacher experience. School Science Review, 84(309), 105–112.

Rosinski, P., & Squire, M. (2009). Strange bedfellows: Human-computer interaction, interface design, and composition pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 26(3), 149–163. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.05.004

Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Self-explanation in a multi-media context. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 271–286). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.

Russell, G., & Bradley, G. (1997). Teachers’ computer anxiety: Implications for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 2(1), 17–30.

Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310. doi:10.1177/0022487103255985

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937–945. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.001

Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers'. Educational Technology, 5(2), 14–23.

Sahin, I., & Thompson, A. (2006). Using Rogers’ theory to interpret instructional computer use by COE faculty. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(1), 81–104.

Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle

using TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1632–1640. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.011

Sander, F., Schecker, H., & Niedderer, H. (2002). Computer tools in the lab - effects linking theory and experiment. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (pp. 219–230). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sanders, M. (2006). What exactly do I have to do? Understanding the requirements of the new curriculum. Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference of the South African Association for Science and Technology Educators (pp. 139–150). Durban, South Africa.

Sanders, M., & Ayayee, E. K. (1997). Engaging learners in computer-aided learning: Putting the horse before the cart. In Proceedings of the fourteenth Annual Convention of the Association for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 528 – 537). Perth, Australia.

Sanders, M., & Kasalu, L. (2004). Lack of understanding of policy as a factor affecting the theory-practice gap in implementing Curriculum 2005. In A. Buffler & R. C. Laugksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 917–925). Cape Town.

Sanders, M., & Mokuku, T. (1994). How valid is face validity? In M. J. Glencross (Ed.), Second annual meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 479–489). Durban: South African Association for Reseach in Mathematics and Science Education.

Sandholtz, J. H., & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teacher’s College Record, 106(3), 487–512.

Schaeffer, N. C., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 65–88. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.110702.110112

Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2010). Cognitive and socio-motivational aspects in learning with animations: There is more to it than “do they aid learning or not.” Instructional Science, 38(5), 435–440. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9118-5

Schibeci, R., MacCallum, J., Cumming?Potvin, W., Durrant, C., Kissane, B., & Miller, E. (2008). Teachers’ journeys towards critical use of ICT. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 313–327. doi:10.1080/17439880802497065

SchoolNet SA. (2003). Retrieved February 08, 2009, from http://www.schoolnet.org.za/edn/modules.htm

Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education, 71, 247–256. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016

Schumacher, S., & McMillan, J. H. (1993). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: HarperCollins Publications.

Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkoff (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 229–249). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: Learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005

Schwarz, N., Hippler, H.-J., Deutsch, B., & Strack, F. (1985). Response scales: Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(3), 388–395.

Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem? International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 425–432. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.03.005

Selwood, I., & Pilkington, R. (2005). Teacher workload: Using ICT to release time to teach. Educational Review, 57(2), 163–174. doi:10.1080/0013191042000308341

Selwyn, N. (1999). Differences in educational computer use: The influence of subject cultures. The


Curriculum Journal, 10(129), 29–48.

Sentech annual report. (2007). Johannesburg. Retrieved from http://www.sentech.co.za/about/ annual-report

Serrao, A. (2009, July 29). Gauteng Online a R3bn flop. The Star. Johannesburg.

Shannon, S. J., & Doube, L. (2003). Predicting the future use of web-teaching tools by academic staff. In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 696–699). Adelaide, Australia.

Sheedy, J. E., Subbaram, M. V., Zimmerman, A. B., & Hayes, J. R. (2005). Text Legibility and the Letter Superiority Effect. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(4), 797–815. doi:10.1518/001872005775570998

Shrigley, R. L. (1990). Attitudes and behaviour are correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 97–113. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270203

Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defining attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 659–678.

Shuell, T. (1988). The role of the student in learning from instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(3), 276–295. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(88)90027-6

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. New York: University of Manitoba. Retrieved from http://umanitoba.ca/learning_technologies/cetl/HETL.pdf

Sikwane, B. (2007). GautengOnline responsibility shifted. iWeek. Retrieved from http://www.iweek.co.za/ViewStory.asp?StoryID=171457

Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage Publications.

Sims, R. (1997). Interactivity: A forgotten art? Computers in Human Behavior, 13(2), 157–180. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00004-6

Sinclair, M. (2007). A guide to understanding theoretical and conceptual frameworks. Evidence Based Midwifery, 5(2), 39.

Smith, P., Rudd, P., & Coghlan, M. (2008). Harnessing technology: Schools survey 2008. Educational Research, (September), 1–62. Retrieved from http://www.becta.org.uk

Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N. (1986). Guidelines for designing user interface software (pp. 1–384). Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://www.userlab.com/Downloads/Smith_Mosier_guideline_.pdf

Sorcinelli, M. D. (1991). Research findings on the seven principles. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Fall 1991(47), 13–25. doi:10.1002/tl.37219914704

Spiegel, M. R. (1988). Schaum’s outline of theory and problems of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext. Educational Technology, 31(9), 22-25.

Squires, D., & McDougall, A. (1994). Choosing and using educational software: A teachers’ guide. London: The Falmer Press.

Stemler, L. K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3/4), 1–16.

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. Retrieved from http;//www.jstor.org/stable/1671815

Stoffels, N. T. (2005). “Sir, on what page is the answer?” Exploring teacher decision-making during

complex curriculum change, with specific reference to the use of learner support material. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(5), 531–546. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.02.004

Stopher, P. (2012). Design of survey instruments. Collecting, managing and assessing data using sample surveys (p. 165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/10533316?ppg=165

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Stronkhorst, R., & Van den Akker, J. (2006). Effects of in-service education on improving science teaching in Swaziland. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1771–1794.

Strudler, N., & Hearrington, D. (2008). Quality support for ICT in schools. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 579–596). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4

Tabbers, H. K., & de Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38(5), 441–453. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9119-4

Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: the rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tapscott, D. (1999). Educating the net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 6–11.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Tebbutt, M. (1997). Word-processors in science teaching – why? School Science Review, 79(287), 91–99.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. California: Sage.

Ten Brummelhuis, A., & Kuiper, E. (2008). Driving forces for ICT in learning. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 97–111). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

The geometer’s sketchpad. (n.d.).

Thornton, D., & Phillips, R. (1997). Evaluation. In R. Phillips (Ed.), The developer’s handbook to interactive multimedia: A practical guide for educational applications (pp. 127–146). London: Kogan Page.

Tilling, S. (1984). Keys to biological identification: Their role and construction. Journal of Biological Education, 18(4), 293–304.

Tondeϋr, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51(1), 212–223. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003

Tversky, B., Bauer-Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1017

Tynjala, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357–442. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00012-9

Van Braak, J. (2001). Factors influencing the use of computer mediated communication by teachers in


secondary schools. Computers & Education, 36(1), 41–57. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00051-8

Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIX(4), 407–422.

Van Laren, L., & James, A. (2008). Selected teachers’ understanding of assessment four years after the implementation of the New Assessment Policy. Africa Education Review, 5(2), 288–303. doi:10.1080/18146620802449944

Van Nes, F. L. (1986). Space, colour and typography on visual display terminals. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5(2), 9–118.

Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2014). Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.007

Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1339–1350. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.007

Vandeyar, S., & Killen, R. (2007). Educators’ conceptions and practice of classroom assessment in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 27(1), 101–115.

Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of research on technology in education, 36(3), 253.

Voogt, J. (2010). Teacher factors associated with innovative curriculum goals and pedagogical practices: Differences between extensive and non-extensive ICT-using science teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 453–464. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00373.x

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Walter, D. E., & Winterton, S. (2007). Keys and the crisis in taxonomy: Extinction or reinvention? Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 193–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151054

Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2008). Translating ICT strategic policy into action: Reaching for the wrong fruit. Computers in New Zealand Schools, November, 52–61.

Ward, L., & Parr, J. M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.011

Watkins, A. E., Scheaffer, R., & Cobb, G. (2008). Statistics in action: Understanding a world of data (2nd ed.). California: Key Curriculum Press.

Watson, D. (Ed.). (1993). The IMPACT Report: An evaluation of the impact of information technology on children’s achievements in primary and secondary schools. London: King’s College.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004

Wellington, J. (1999). Integrating multimedia into science teaching: Barriers and benefits. School Science Review, 81(295), 49–54.

Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Continuum.

Wellington, J. (2005). Has ICT come of age? Recurring debates on the role of ICT in education, 1982–2004. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/02635140500068419

White, L., & Aldous, C. (2003). Process skills: Are teachers equipped and ready to implement? In B. Putsoa, M. Dlamini, B. Dlamini, & V. Kelly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 763–768). Mbabane.

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor,

and a taxonomy. Learning Technology, 2830(435), 1–35. doi:10.1002/stab.200710001

Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307–320.

Windschitl, M. (2000). Using the WWW for teaching and learning in K-12 classrooms: What are the interesting research questions? CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 3(1), 89–96.

Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 449–457. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.004

Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication & Information, 5(2), 183–206. doi:10.1080/14636310500186214

Worst, H. (2010, August 16). Training part of the teacher laptop initiative. Mail & Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2010-08-16-training-part-of-the-teacher-laptop-initiative

Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1784–1794. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.009

Yusuf, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2623–2626. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.158

Zammit, S. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools. Educational Research, 34(1), 57–66.

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2005). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 1–12). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00170

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

Reference List - University of the...

Documents

Transcript of Reference List - University of the...