Reduction in Stent Thrombosis – better tablets or better stents?
description
Transcript of Reduction in Stent Thrombosis – better tablets or better stents?
Reduction in Stent Thrombosis Reduction in Stent Thrombosis – better tablets or better – better tablets or better
stents?stents?
Dr James Cotton MD FRCPDr James Cotton MD FRCPHeart and Lung Centre
Wolverhampton
MY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE
• Speaker Fees/Honoraria/Travel Support– Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo– Schering-Plough– The Medicines Company– Medtronic
• Research Support– J&J Cordis
24
7.66
1.4 0.5 1.5 0.9 1.6 1 0.4 0.30
5
10
15
20
25
Serr
uys
1991
Rou
bin
1992
Scha
tz 1
991
Col
ombo
199
5Le
on M
B 19
98M
ouss
a 19
99C
utlip
200
1W
enaw
eser
200
5M
oren
o 20
06K
hedi
201
0St
one
2010
% S
ten
t T
hro
mb
osi
s
ASA and Oral Anticoag
ASA and Ticlopidine
ASA and Clopidogrel
New Generation DES
PrasugrelTicagrelor
Risk of Definite Stent Risk of Definite Stent ThrombosisThrombosis
Stable
Angina
UA/
NSTEMISTEMI
Bare Metal Bare Metal StentsStents
0-0.5% 1.4-1.6% 2.9%
Drug Drug Eluting Eluting StentsStents
0.3-0.4% 1.2-1.9% 3.1%
Cook, Windecker Circulation 2009
Angiographic DES Stent ThrombosisAngiographic DES Stent ThrombosisBern - Rotterdam Cohort StudyBern - Rotterdam Cohort Study
33
22
11
00
Days after stent implantation Days after stent implantation
Cu
mu
lati
ve p
rob
abiit
y o
f st
ent
Cu
mu
lati
ve p
rob
abiit
y o
f st
ent
th
rom
bo
sis
(%)
thro
mb
osi
s (%
)
Wenaweser et al. ESC, Barcelona Sept 2006
N = 8,146 Patients (SES=3875;PES=4271) N = 8,146 Patients (SES=3875;PES=4271)
Incidence = 1.3/100 pts year
Cumulative Incidence 1.1% 1.2% 1.7% 2.3% 2.9%
2.9 %2.9 %
N = 152 Patients N = 152 Patients
00 200200 400400 600600 800800 10001000 12001200
Early91 pts(60%)
Late61 pts(40%)
Between 30 days to 3 years
Between 30 days to 3 years
Slope = 0.6% / year
Slope = 0.6% / year
Better Drugs?
Discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy:Milan-Siegburg Cohort Study
Airoldi F et al Circulation 2007 116:745-54
Stent Thrombosis and 2C19 Stent Thrombosis and 2C19 polymorphismspolymorphisms
Mega J et al JAMA 2010, 304(16) 1829-40
-20.0-20.0
0.00.0
20.020.0
40.040.0
60.060.0
80.080.0
100.0100.0
Inh
ibit
ion
of
Pla
tele
t A
gg
reg
atio
n (
%)
Inh
ibit
ion
of
Pla
tele
t A
gg
reg
atio
n (
%)
Response to Response to prasugrelprasugrel
Response to Response to clopidogrelclopidogrel
clopidogrel responder
clopidogrel non-responder
*Responder = 25% IPA at 4 and 24 h
Clopidogrel (300 mg) vs. prasugrel (60 mg)Clopidogrel (300 mg) vs. prasugrel (60 mg)Phase I – healthy subjectsPhase I – healthy subjects
Brandt JT et al. Am Heart J 2007;153:66.e9-e16
Inh
ibit
ion
of
Pla
tele
t A
gg
reg
atio
n (
%)
Inh
ibit
ion
of
Pla
tele
t A
gg
reg
atio
n (
%)
Response to Response to prasugrelprasugrel
Response to Response to clopidogrelclopidogrel
0.00.0
20.020.0
40.040.0
60.060.0
80.080.0
100.0100.0
clopidogrel responder
clopidogrel non-responder
Clopidogrel (300 mg) vs. prasugrel (60 mg)Clopidogrel (300 mg) vs. prasugrel (60 mg)Phase I – healthy subjectsPhase I – healthy subjects
*Responder = 25% IPA at 4 and 24 h
-20.0-20.0
Brandt JT et al. Am Heart J 2007;153:66.e9-e16
TRITON-TIMI 38: Stent thrombosis ratesTRITON-TIMI 38: Stent thrombosis ratesat end of studyat end of study
All Stents Bare-metal Stents
0
1
2
3
4
Ste
nt
Th
rom
bo
sis*
(%
)
Drug-eluting Stents
2.35 2.312.41
N=6,422N=6,422 n=2,878n=2,878 n=3,224n=3,224
1.130.84
1.27
N=6,422N=6,422 n=2,865n=2,865 n=3,237n=3,237
clopidogrelprasugrel
52% RRR(1.2% ARR)
64% RRR(1.5% ARR)
48% RRR(1.1% ARR)P=0.0009P=0.0009P<0.0001P<0.0001P<0.0001P<0.0001
*Stent thrombosis defined as Academic Research Consortium definite plus probable
ARC = Academic Research ConsortiumARR = Absolute Risk ReductionHR = Hazard Ratio NNT = Number Needed to TreatPCI = Percutaneous Coronary InterventionRRR = Relative Risk Reduction Wiviott SD et al. Lancet 2008;371:1353-1363
P=NS
Life Threatening
P=NSP=0.002
IntracranialFatal Nonfatal
P=0.01
(n=6,716)
(n=6,741)
En
d P
oin
t (%
)
Subsets of Life Threatening Bleeds
n=85
n=56
0.9%
1.4%
n=5
0.1% n=21
0.4%
n=51
0.9% n=64
1.1%
n=17 n=19
0.3% 0.3%
both + aspirinboth + aspirin
Wiviott SD et al. New Engl J Med 2007;357:2001-2015
TRITON-TIMI 38: Life Threatening BleedsTRITON-TIMI 38: Life Threatening Bleedsat 15 months (All ACS)at 15 months (All ACS)
NS = Not Significant
Will duration of DAPT be key?
• DAPT - 2014
• REAL –LATE - 2011
• OPTIDUAL - 2013
Better Stents?
New stent New stent technologiestechnologies
Comparative Endothelial Cell CoverageComparative Endothelial Cell CoverageRabbit Denudation Model (14 Days) Rabbit Denudation Model (14 Days)
EC
Str
ut
Covera
ge (
%)
(14
Days)
EC
Str
ut
Covera
ge (
%)
(14
Days)
p=0.05 Express p=0.05 Express vs.vs. Liberte Libertep=0.001 Express p=0.001 Express vs. Element Element
ExpressExpress LibertéLiberté ElementElement
Ste
nt S
trut T
hickn
ess (µ
m)
Ste
nt S
trut T
hickn
ess (µ
m)
Soucy. EuroPCR 2010Soucy. EuroPCR 2010
SPIRIT IVSPIRIT IV
The Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer DES
PLA biodegradation and BA9™ elution
Abluminal biodegradable coating absorbed after 6-9 months*
19* In vivo testing in porcine model demonstrates abluminal coating is absorbed after 6 to 9 months - Data on file at Biosensors Intl
Leaders Trial - Stent thrombosis
Other Bioabsorbable polymer studies
• COSTAR – II
• ISAR-TEST 3
• ISAR TEST 4
• NOBORI CORE
• NOBORI-I
• RESELUTION
No reduction ST for DES BPVs DES PP
Salinas P Abs AHA 2010 6032
Genous- E-healing Registryn=4939
Acute Thrombosis
0.2%
Subacute thrombosis
0.7%
Late Thrombosis 0.2%
Silber S et al, Euro intervention In Press
Evolutions of Nevo Stent
• RES – 1 ( no coating)• 200 patients NO ST
• ? Heparin coating may improve haemocompatability
Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent
Granada, et al. CIRC Cardiovasc Interv, June 2010; 3
The Lancet The Lancet Vol 373 March 14 2009Vol 373 March 14 2009
Absorb: histology and OCTAbsorb: histology and OCT
Further studies?Further studies?
• Clinical trial aiming to demonstrate a reduction in ST from 0.4 to 0.2%
• 80% power
• 284,000 subjects!
? Training
THANKYOUTHANKYOU
ARC Definitions of STARC Definitions of ST
• Definite Stent Thrombosis– Angiographic or pathological conformation of partial or total
thrombotic occlusion within the peri-stent region AND at least one of:
– Acute ischaemic symptoms– Ischaemic ECG changes– Elevated biomarkers
• Probable Stent Thrombosis– Any unexplained death within 30 days of stent implantation– Any MI related to ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent
without angiographic conformation of ST
• Possible Stent Thrombosis– Any unexplained death beyond 30 days