Creating The Life You Want: Achieve Your Goals, Redesign Your Life
Redesign Program Keys and Goals
-
Upload
jacinda-sanchez -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Redesign Program Keys and Goals
Engaging Students in New Ways of
Learning
Phoebe Rouse
Louisiana State University
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS
Redesign Program Keys and Goals
• R2R: Roadmap to Redesign (Fall 2004-Spring 2007)
• Goals of Redesign: To use technologyTo reduce personnel costs To continue/improve current success rates
• Pedagogical Keys of Redesign:Active Student Learning Experience Personalized, Individualized Instruction Immediate Feedback Repetition to Mastery
Courses and EnrollmentCollege Algebra (3 credit hours)• 1800 Fall• 400 Spring• 200 Summer
Trigonometry (3 credit hours)• 1000 Fall• 1000 Spring• 200 Summer
Precalculus (College Algebra and Trig, 5 credit hours)• 400 Fall• 50 Spring
Flexible Lab Model(Fall and Spring only)
Class at fixed time• CA – 1 hour per week – 40 students• Trig – 1 hour per week – 160 students• Precalculus – 2 hours per week – 40 students• Review and connecting of concepts, working
examples with most difficult skills
Lab at flexible times (open 60 hours each week)• CA – 3 hours minimum each week• Trig – 3 hours minimum each week• Precalculus – 5 hours minimum each week• Do homework, do quizzes, read ebook, watch videos
Assignment SettingsHomework• Unlimited attempts prior to due date• Help, Examples, Videos, eBook, and Tutors available• Practice Homework for each section without due dates
Quizzes• Ten attempts for each quiz, 75 minute time limit• Restricted re-access• Keep best score• Not proctored or password protected• Tutorials available on review
Tests• One attempt, 90 minute time limit• Non-restricted re-access• Proctored and password protected
Tools of Engagement Pre-semester contact
First Day Drop Policy
10% Participation Grade (5% class and 5% lab)
Math Lab IP Restrictions and Rules
AccuTrack, NPC for Lab Hours
LSU Videos, Flexible Test Scheduling
MML and Lab Page Customization
College Algebra, Trig, PrecalculusFall Participation Grades
Class and LabParticipation % A B C D F W
70-100%62%
10%
0-69%10% 18%
College Algebra, Trig, PrecalculusSpring Participation Grades
Class and Lab Participation % A B C D F W
70-100% 50% 19%
0-69% 7%
24%
Contact Info
Phoebe Rouse LSU
NCAT Redesign ScholarMyMathLab Faculty Advocate
College Algebra Fall Results
Semester and Delivery Model(s)
# ofstudentsenrolled
ABCRate
Fall 2001 Traditional Sections 3115 66%
Fall 2002 Traditional Sections 3188 64%
Fall 2003 Traditional Sections 3211 68%
Fall 2004 Traditional & LL Sections with MML 3347 71%
Fall 2005 Trad, LL with MML, & R2R with MML # 2506 54%
Fall 2006 R2R Sections with MML ^ 1724 75%
Fall 2007 R2R Sections with MML * 1739 67%
Fall 2008 R2R Sections with MML 1772 68%
Fall 2009 R2R Sections with MML 1556 72%
Permanent Changes: # MACT >24 given credit ^No partial credit on any assessments *Course rigor increased
College Algebra Spring Results
Semester and Delivery Model(s)
# of studentsenrolled
ABC
Rate
Spring 2001 Traditional Sections 1223 50%
Spring 2002 Traditional Sections 1191 54%
Spring 2003 Traditional Sections 1066 53%
Spring 2004 Traditional Sections 1025 64%
Spring 2005 Trad & R2R Pilot 806 61%
Spring 2006 R2R Sections with MML ^ 567 59%
Spring 2007 R2R Sections with MML 384 55%
Spring 2008 R2R Sections with MML 418 53%
Spring 2009 R2R Sections with MML 435 55%
Permanent Changes: ^ No partial credit on any assessments
TrigFall Results
Semester and Delivery Model(s)
# of studentsenrolled
ABC Rate
Fall 2001 Traditional Sections 1277 59%
Fall 2002 Traditional Sections 1150 56%
Fall 2003 Traditional Sections 1015 62%
Fall 2004 XLg Lecture w/ MapleTA ^ 892 61%
Fall 2005 XLg Lecture w/ MML 1350 55%
Fall 2006 XLg Lecture w/ MML 1234 63%
Fall 2007 R2R Sections with MML 1168 64%
Fall 2008 R2R Sections with MML 1231 69%
Fall 2009 R2R Sections with MML 1131 69%
Permanent Changes: ^ No partial credit on any assessments
TrigSpring Results
Semester and Delivery Model(s)
# of studentsenrolled
ABC
Rate
Spring 2001 Traditional Sections 1304 65%
Spring 2002 Traditional Sections 1451 63%
Spring 2003 Traditional Sections 1490 63%
Spring 2004 Traditional Sections 1477 69%
Spring 2005 XLg Lecture w/ MapleTA ^ 1252 69%
Spring 2006 XLg Lecture w/ MML 1030 57%
Spring 2007 R2R Sections with MML 967 62%
Spring 2008 R2R Sections with MML 791 60%
Spring 2009 R2R Sections with MML 1075 58%
Permanent Changes: ^ No partial credit on any assessments