Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting...

13
Smart Vent® Hazard Evaluator Beta v. 1.3.2 Page 2 of 11 Smart Vent® Hazard Evaluator Beta v. 1.3.2 Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli, P.E. | Managing Partner Revised December 20, 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY According to statistics from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), floods are the number one natural disaster in the United States 1 . Additionally, from 2011 to 2015 the average flood claim was over $46,000 and the total flood insurance claims annually exceeded $1.9 billion dollars (U.S.). Understanding proper methods of mitigating flood damage to the structural stability of an enclosure (basement and/or crawl space) that complies with national standards and best engineering practice has never been more important to the building owner, contractor and regulator. Agnoli Engineering, LLC, in evaluating the Smart Vent® engineered, mechanically operated flood vents, reviewed available guidelines and engineering data related to their performance. What was not available was a simple method to evaluate the expected performance of Smart Vents® for a specific property with a standard rate of rise and fall of flood water of 5.0 feet per hour (1.52 meters per hour) per ASCE 24-14 2 . This paper presents a tool developed by Agnoli Engineering with Microsoft® Office Excel® 2007 that allows an evaluator with minimal background in flood control and a basic understanding of a property to determine the sizing and level of protection provided by the Smart Vent® flood vents. The tool includes a conservative discharge coefficient of 0.44 as required by Table 2-2 in ASCE 24-14 and the minimum of one vent for every 200 square feet in the ICC Evaluation Service (ES) Report 3 . The tool also allows the evaluation of alternative openings, including non-engineered openings. In the attached Appendix A, findings from the use of non-engineered openings, including a failure to meet ASCE 24-14 guidelines when set at the allowable 12 inches above grade, are discussed in detail. Additionally, non-engineered vents also failed to meet ASCE 24-14 guidelines if blocked by debris at nearly any degree (percentage). 1 Federal Emergency Management Agency. "Flood Risks Nationwide." September 2013. 2 American Society of Civil Engineers. "Flood Resistant Design and Construction (ASCE 24-14)" 3 ICC Evaluation Service. "ESR-2074 Smart Vent Automatic Foundation Flood Vents." February 2015 (exp. Feb. 2017)

Transcript of Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting...

Page 1: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page2of11

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2RedefiningtheproperevaluationofsafefloodventingNicholasAgnoli,P.E.|ManagingPartnerRevisedDecember20,2016

EXECUTIVESUMMARYAccording to statistics from the Federal EmergencyManagement Agency (FEMA) NationalFlood Insurance Program (NFIP), floods are the number one natural disaster in theUnitedStates1. Additionally, from2011to2015theaveragefloodclaimwasover$46,000andthetotal flood insurance claims annually exceeded $1.9 billion dollars (U.S.). Understandingproper methods of mitigating flood damage to the structural stability of an enclosure(basementand/or crawl space) that complieswithnational standardsandbestengineeringpracticehasneverbeenmoreimportanttothebuildingowner,contractorandregulator.Agnoli Engineering, LLC, in evaluating the Smart Vent® engineered,mechanically operatedfloodvents,reviewedavailableguidelinesandengineeringdatarelatedtotheirperformance.WhatwasnotavailablewasasimplemethodtoevaluatetheexpectedperformanceofSmartVents®foraspecificpropertywithastandardrateofriseandfalloffloodwaterof5.0feetperhour (1.52metersperhour)perASCE24-142. Thispaperpresentsa tooldevelopedbyAgnoliEngineeringwithMicrosoft®OfficeExcel®2007thatallowsanevaluatorwithminimalbackgroundinfloodcontrolandabasicunderstandingofapropertytodeterminethesizingand level of protection provided by the Smart Vent® flood vents. The tool includes aconservative discharge coefficient of 0.44 as required by Table 2-2 in ASCE 24-14 and theminimumofoneventforevery200squarefeetintheICCEvaluationService(ES)Report3.The tool also allows the evaluation of alternative openings, including non-engineeredopenings. In the attachedAppendixA, findings from the use of non-engineeredopenings,includingafailuretomeetASCE24-14guidelineswhensetattheallowable12inchesabovegrade,arediscussed indetail. Additionally,non-engineeredventsalso failed tomeetASCE24-14guidelinesifblockedbydebrisatnearlyanydegree(percentage).

1FederalEmergencyManagementAgency."FloodRisksNationwide."September2013.2AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers."FloodResistantDesignandConstruction(ASCE24-14)"3ICCEvaluationService."ESR-2074SmartVentAutomaticFoundationFloodVents."February2015(exp.Feb.2017)

Page 2: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page3of11

Currently,theSmartVent®istheonlyengineeredventthathasasoftwarespreadsheetthatcanproduceastagehydrographforenclosureflooding,headdifferentialsalonganenclosurewall,and/orproduceanexternalhydrostaticpressurecurve.Thesetoolsarevaluabletothevarious interests related to real estate ownership, including insurance and mortgagecompaniesaswellasconstructioncodeofficials.

Page 3: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page2of11

1.0INTRODUCTIONThepurposeof thisWhitePaper is toprovide themethodologyand test case resultsof theSmartVent Hazard Evaluator Beta developed by Agnoli Engineering, LLC. The Hazard Evaluator wasdevelopedtoprovidedesigners,owners,contractors,regulatorsandinsurerswithatooltoevaluatetheperformanceofaproposedSmartVentconfigurationagainstnational standards. Theprincipaldesigncriteriaincluded:

ü Easeofuseandeaseofincorporatingfielddataü Transparency(equationsandmethodology)ü Flexibilityfordifferentanduniquesystemlayoutsandconfigurationsü Detailedoutputsforengineersandregulators

2.0LITERATUREREVIEWAgnoliEngineeringsoughttoreviewbothliteratureavailabledirectlyfromSmartVentProducts,Inc.specifictothedimensionsandintendedperformanceoftheSmartVent®devicesbutalsoavailableliteratureonfederalrequirementsandthird-partytesting:

ü AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers."FloodResistantDesignandConstruction(ASCE24-14)."(2014). This document provides criteria for design as well as expected performance ofengineeredopeningsinSection2.7.2.2.

ü ICCEvaluationService. "ESR-2074SmartVentAutomaticFoundationFloodVents."February2015.ThisdocumentprovidesanevaluationofphysicaloperationandwaterflowthroughtheSmartVent® floodvents. It includestheminimumcoverage (square feet)providedbyeachmodelnumber.

ü FederalEmergencyManagementAgency."TechnicalBulletin1,OpeningsinFoundationWallsandWallsofEnclosures."August2008.ThisbulletinprovidesguidanceontheNationalFloodInsuranceProgram(NFIP)regulationsconcerningtherequirementforopeningsinbelowBaseFloodElevation(BFE)foundationwallsandwallsofenclosuresforbuildings located inFloodZonesA,AE,A1-A30,AR,AO,andAH.

3.0SOLUTIONTheSmartVentHazardEvaluatorBetatoolwasdevelopedusingMicrosoft®OfficeExcel®tosimplifythe experience for novice users. The tool consists of three worksheets: Smart Vent® Tool,ModelLookup,andCalculations.3.1SmartVent®ToolWorksheetTheSmartVent®Toolworksheetprovidestheuseraninputinterfaceandreturnstheresults.Therequiredinputsinclude:

ü SmartVent®ModelorNon-EngineeredOpeningType;

Page 4: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page3of11

ü NumberofVents;ü FloodWaterProperties(freshwaterorsaltwater);ü PercentObstruction;ü InstalledHeightAboveGrade;ü SmartVent®DischargeCoefficientü Non-EngineeredOpeningParameters(width,height,cover)ü EnclosureArea;ü EnclosureDepthBelowGrade;ü EnclosureHeightAboveGrade;ü GradeElevation;ü BaseFloodElevation;andü RateofFloodRise.

MostoftheinputscanbeobtainedfromastandardFEMAElevationCertificateandratemap. TherateofriseofsurroundfloodwaterisgivenasfivefeetperhourperASCEStandard24-14;however,it canalsobeobtained fromanavailablehydraulicanalysis. Theevaluation time incrementcanbeadjustedtoencompassthefullflooddurationasneeded.TheSmartVent®modelnameisapulldownmenuthatpopulatesthedimensionsprovidedontheModelLookupWorksheet.Thenumberofventsand installedheightabovegradearethetwoprimarydesignparameters.Theusercanadjusttheseparametersuntiltheminimumdesigncriteriaaremet:

ü Minimumnumberofvents(2)perTechnicalBulletin1:"eachenclosedareaisrequiredtohaveaminimumoftwoopeningsonexteriorwallstoallowfloodwaterstoenterdirectly."

ü MinimumnumberofventstomeettheareacoverageratingperventasprovidedinTable1ofICC-ESReportESR-2074.

ü MaximumheightofopeningabovegradeperTechnicalBulletin1:"thebottomofeachopeningistobelocatednohigherthan1footabovethegradethatisimmediatelyundereachopening."

ü Maximumhead differential requirements per ASCE 24-14: "the performance of engineeredopeningsshallensurethatthedifferencebetweentheexteriorandinteriorfloodwaterlevelsshallnotexceed1foot."Tocheckthisrequirement,thetoolverifiesthatthemaximumheadonthewallabovegradepriortoequalizationislessthan1foot.Whenfloodwatersrisetotheadjacentgradeelevationpriortothefloodventactivation,theenclosurewouldbeginasdry.Theadditionalloadingonthewallbeyondthetypicalfoundationdesignwouldbeexpectedtooccurwhenthefloodwatersareabovetheadjacentgrade.Therefore,thetoolchecksthattheSmartVent®configurationenteredbytheuserallowstheenclosuretofillupfastenoughfortheheaddifferentialbetweentheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevelstobelessthan1foot.

TheSmartVentToolworksheetprovidesthefollowingresults:

ü OrificeDischargeCoefficientusedinthecalculationsü Timeforenclosurefloodingtoequalizewithexternalfloodü Timetofilltheenclosureü Maximumenclosureflooddepthü Maximumheaddifferentialbetweenfloodlevelsinternalandexternaltowall

Page 5: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page4of11

ü Maximumheadonwallabovegradeü Maximumheadonwallabovegradepriortoequalizationü Maximumupliftpressureü Maximumlateralhydrostaticforceonenclosurewallü Lateralhydrostaticforceonenclosurewallduringmaximumheaddifferentialü Maximumuplift(buoyancy)forceduetohydrostaticpressureü Stagehydrographfigureü Headdifferentialbetweenfloodlevelsinternalandexternaltowallfigureü Externalhydrostaticpressureabovegradefigure

Ifadesigncriterionisnotmet,thetoolprovidessuggestionstotheusertomodifytheconfiguration(i.e.addventsoradjustinstalledheightabovegrade).3.2ModelLookupWorksheetTheModelLookupworksheetprovidesthelookuptableofdimensionsforeachSmartVent®model.Thedimensionsincludethewidth,ventopeningheightsaboveandbelowthedoor,ventdoordepth,andheightaboveventinvertforactivation.ThedimensionsassociatedwiththeSmartVent®modelchosenbytheuserarepopulatedontheSmartVent®ToolworksheetandCalculationsworksheet.3.3CalculationsWorksheetTheCalculationsWorksheetcontainsthecalculationsperformedbythetool.ThetoolevaluatestheperformanceoftheSmartVent®configurationenteredbytheuserwithaquasi-unsteadyapproach.Thetoolcalculatestherisingfloodelevation,inflowthroughthevents,andresultantflooddepthintheenclosureforeachtimestepduringthefloodriseuntilthefloodlevelintheenclosureequalstheexternal floodelevation.Once the internal andexternal floodelevationsequalize, the internal andexternal floodelevation riseat the same rate for the remainderof the simulation.Basedon theseresults,thetoolcalculatestheresultsprovidedontheSmartVent®Toolworksheet.The tool calculates the flowthrougheachSmartVent®ateach timestep.The flow foreachSmartVent® is thenmultiplied by the number of vents to calculate the total inflow into the enclosure.When the Smart Vent® is activated, the door swings open to provide a lower and an upper slotopening. Figure 1 below provides typical dimensions of the openings through Smart Vent® whenactivated.

Page 6: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page5of11

Figure1–SmartVentDimensions

ThetoolwasdevelopedtoconsiderthechangingflowconditionsthatwouldbeexpectedthroughtheSmartVentasthefloodlevelrises,theventactivates,floodwatersflowthroughfirstthelowerslotthenupperslot,and theenclosure fills.TheSmartVentactivateswhen the flood level reaches1.5inchesabovetheinvertofthevent.Whenthefloodlevelislessthan1.5inchesabovetheinvertofthevent,theventisassumedtobeclosedandthetoolassumesnoinflowforthetimestep.For time steps when the Smart Vent® is activated and the flood level is below the top of a slotopening(eitherlowerorupper),thetoolassumesweirflowthroughtheappropriateopeningusingthebroad-crestedweirequation4:

Q=2.64b*h3/2 Equation1Where: Q=discharge(cfs) b=widthofslottedopening h=head(feet)Thedischargecoefficient(2.64)acrosstheweirwasselectedasthemostconservativefora"broad-crested"weirfromthereferencebelow(4).However,theweirdischargecoefficientisadjustedwhenascreenisinstalledontheopening.Whentheuserselects"Yes"regardingascreeninplace,thetooladjuststheweirdischargecoefficient(CW)withthefollowingequation:

CW=COSx2.64 CORWhere: CW=Weirdischargecoefficient COS=Orificedischargecoefficientofanopeningwithascreen(0.2) COR=Orificedischargecoeff.ofarectangularopeningwithalonghorizontalaxis(0.4)The tool thereforeusesaweirdischargecoefficientof2.64whennoscreen is inplace,andaweirdischargecoefficientof1.32whenascreenis inplace.TheweirdischargecoefficientadjustmentisprovidedincellH23onthecalculationssheet. 4KingandBrater."HandbookofHydraulics."1977(5thEdition).

Reference:SmartVent,Inc.:CertificationofEngineeringOpening(July,2007)

Page 7: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page6of11

When the flood level is above topof a slot (eitherupperor lower) the tool treats each slot as anorificeusingtheequation5:

Q=Co*A(2gH)1/2 Equation2Where: Q=discharge(cfs) Co=dischargecoefficient(0.6)perTable2-2,ASCE24-14 A=OpeningArea(squarefeet) g=accelerationduetogravity(32.2.feet/second2) H=head(feet)ThecoefficientofdischargefromTable2-2inASCE24-14normallyusedfora“Rectangular,longaxishorizontal, shortaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesign flood,” isdesignatedas0.4. However,afootnote allows for “different coefficients of discharge … (1) where a designer has performeddetailed, opening-specific calculations, a coefficientof dischargeup to10%different thangiven inTable2-2shallbepermitted;or(2)wherelaboratorytestingornumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeninghasbeenconducted,theresultingcoefficientofdischargeshallbepermitted.Innocaseshallacoefficientofdischarge>0.60bepermitted.”Unsubmergedorifice coefficients are typically 0.60 to0.61 for fully contractedorificeopenings forcircular, squareor rectangular shape4The toolallows theuser to selecta coefficientof0.44,0.60,and0.20toevaluatethesensitivityof thedischargecoefficientontheirselectedconfiguration. Ifanon-engineered opening is selected, the model will not use the Smart Vent discharge coefficientparameter.The user can also select non-engineered rectangular, square, circular, and other shaped floodopenings from the pull-down list in addition to Smart Vent products. When a non-engineeredopeningisselected,theusermustenterthenon-engineeredopeningparametersincludingthewidth,height, net opening area, andwhether the opening has a cover. The toolwill then use the non-engineeredopeninginputparameterstoselecttheappropriatedischargecoefficientperASCE24-14as shown in Table 1 below. Per ASCE 24-14, an opening shall be classified as partially obstructed(dischargecoefficientof0.20)iflouvers,blades,screens,grilles,faceplates,orothercoversordevicesarepresentduringthedesignflood.Therefore,ifthereisacoverontheopening,thetoolwillselectadischargecoefficientof0.20regardlessoftheopeningshape.Otherwise,ifthereisnocoverontheopening, the tool will select the appropriate unobstructed discharge coefficient based on theopening’sshapefromTable1. Themodelwillnotusethenon-engineeredopeningparametersifaSmartVentproductisselected.

5Asabove(Ref.4)

Page 8: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page7of11

Table1–FloodOpeningCoefficientofDischargea(ASCE24-12Table2-2)OpeningShapeandCondition C

Circular,unobstructedduringdesignfloodb 0.6

Rectangular,longaxishorizontal,shortaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.4c

Square,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.35

Rectangular,shortaxishorizontal,longaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.25d

Othershapes,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.3

Allshapes,partiallyobstructedduringdesignflood 0.2a Different coefficients of discharge shall be permitted: (1)where a designer has performed detailed, opening-specificcalculations, a coefficient of discharge up to 10% different than given in Table 2-2 shall be permitted; or (2) wherelaboratorytestingornumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeninghasbeenconducted,theresultingcoefficientofdischargeshallbepermitted.Innocaseshallacoefficientofdischarge>0.60bepermitted.

b Openings shall be classified as partially obstructed if louvers, blades, screens, grilles, faceplates, or other covers ordevicesarepresentduringthedesignflood.

cWhenthehorizontaldimensionistwiceormoretheverticaldimension,use0.4;asthedimensionsapproachasquare,interpolatefrom0.4to0.35.

d When thehorizontaldimension ishalfor less theverticaldimension,use0.25;as thedimensionsapproachasquare,interpolatefrom0.25to0.35.

Reference:ASCE24-12Table2-2Theusercanevaluateiftheopeningweretobeobstructedbyenteringthepercentobstruction(typeindecimalformat)intothetool.PerASCE24-14andasshowninTable1,adischargecoefficientof0.20 should be used for all shapes when partially obstructed. When the user enters a percentobstruction greater than zero, the tool assigns a discharge coefficient of 0.20. The percentobstructionenteredbytheuseristhenusedtoreducetheopeningareausedintheorificeequationandopeningwidthusedintheweirequation.Fornon-engineeredopenings,thepercentobstructionwillreducethetotalopeningareabytheuserinputvalue.ForSmartVentopenings,lowerandupperopeningsareeachreducedbyhalfof the totalpercentobstructionby theuser inputvalue.Duringweir flow, thepercentobstructionreduces theopeningwidthby theuser inputvalue to representthereducedconveyancethroughthevent.ThetoolprovidesnumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeningandchecksthatthemodeledflowcalculatedusingEquation2, is lessthantheidealflow.Ifthemodelflowislessthantheidealflow,then the discharge coefficient used in themodel flow calculation (Equation 2) is appropriate. TheidealflowequationforarectangularorificepertheHandbookofHydraulics(BraterandKing)isgivenas:

Qt=2/3*L*(2g)0.5*(h23/2–h13/2) Equation3Where: Qt=discharge(cfs) L=WidthofOrifice(feet) g=accelerationduetogravity(32.2.feet/second2) h1=headabovetopoforifice(feet)

h2=headaboveinvertoforifice(feet)

Page 9: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page8of11

The tool calculates the ideal flow for the lower slot opening and upper slot opening for eachtimestep.Theseflowsarethencombinedtoprovidethetotal ideal flowthroughasinglevent.Thetoolthenchecksiftheidealflowisgreaterthanthemodelflow.Thisanalysisshowsthatthemodelflow is less than the ideal flow. Therefore, Agnoli Engineering, LLC recommends that dischargecoefficientof0.6isappropriateforSmartVentProducts,Inc.Themaximumhydrostatic/uplift pressure andmaximum lateral hydrostatic force on the enclosurewallarecalculatedusingtheequations inFigure2below.Themaximumlateralhydrostaticforce istheresultant lateralforceduetohydrostaticpressureforthefullheadfromtheBFEtothebaseoftheenclosurewall. The toolalsouses theequation inFigure2 to calculate the lateralhydrostaticforceontheenclosurewallduringthemaximumheaddifferential.Thisvaluesprovidestheuserwiththemaximumlateralforceactingexternallyonthewallduringthefloodeventpriortoequalizationoftheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevels.Thetoolalsocalculatestheresultantvertical(buoyant,oruplift)forceduetohydrostaticpressureontheenclosureusingtheequationsinFigure3below.Theuserhastheoptiontoselectfreshwaterorsaltwaterforthehydrostaticpressureandloadingcalculations.Thetoolwillusetheappropriatespecificweightofwaterbasedontheuser’sselection(62.4lb/ft3forfreshwaterand64lb/ft3forsaltwater).Figure2–LateralHydrostaticPressureandForce

Reference:FEMANFIPTechnicalBulletin1-93(1993)

Page 10: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page9of11

Figure3–Uplift/BuoyancyForce

Reference:FEMANFIPTechnicalBulletin1-93(1993)

Page 11: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page10of11

4.0TESTINGANDVALIDATIONTheSmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetawasrunwitheighttestcasestoevaluatevariousenclosureconfigurations.Table1summarizestheenclosureconfigurationsassumedineachtestcase.

Table2–TestCases

TestCase Diagram*Heightof

Enclosure(feet)Subgrade(feet)

1 2 8 0.42 2 8 3.33 9 3 0.84 9 3 1.65 9 3 0.56 7 6 07 7 8 08 8 3 0

*FEMAElevationCertificateBuildingDiagramNumber

Thefollowingparameterswereassumedforallofthetestcases(Table3):

Table3–InputParametersEnclosureArea: 1,000 squarefeetGradeElevation: 100 feetBaseFloodElevation: 105 feetRateofFloodRise: 5 feet/hourFloodWaterType: FreshWater

Thenumberofventsand installedheightabovegrade inputswereadjustedtomeet theminimumdesigncriteriaforeachtestcase.The results of the test case runs are provided in Table 4. For each run, various combinations ofnumberofventsand installedheightabovegradewereevaluatedto find theminimumnumberofventsrequiredtomeetthedesigncriteria.PerESR-2074,theenclosedareacoverageperventis200squarefeet.Thetestcasesassumeda1,000squarefeetenclosedareaandgiventherecommendedcoverageinESR-2074,aminimumof5vents.TheresultssupportthecoverageprovidedinESR-2074foreachtestcasewiththeappropriateinstalledheightabovegradechosenbythedesigner.

Table4–Results

Page 12: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page11of11

TestCase

HeightofEnclosure(feet)

Subgrade(feet)

NumberofVents

InstalledHeightAbove

Grade(inches)

MaxHeadonWallAboveGradePriortoEqualization

(feet)

TimeforEnclosuretoEqualizewithExternalFlood(minutes)

1 8 0.4 5 8 0.9 122 8 3.3 5 7 1.0 133 3 0.8 5 8 1.0 114 3 1.6 5 8 1.0 125 3 0.5 5 8 1.0 126 6 0 5 8 1.0 07 8 0 5 8 1.0 08 3 0 5 8 1.0 0

Figure2–TestCase1ScreenImageoftheSmartVentHazardEvaluatorBeta

Page 13: Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting Nicholas Agnoli ... "Technical Bulletin 1 ... , the tool assumes weir flow through

SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page12of11

5.0CONCLUSIONSTheSmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetaisabletoverifythatthecurrentsizingpracticefortheSmartVent®product is adequate. Duringa rateof floodwater riseof5 feetperhour recommendedbyASCE 24-14, the tool shows that with the appropriate configuration, the Smart Vents® allow theenclosuretofillupfastenoughfortheheaddifferentialbetweentheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevelsto be less than 1 foot. This small differential will significantly reduce the potential for structuraldamage as a result of hydrostatic pressureon an enclosurewall. Theuser can further refine theiranalysiswiththistoolbyusingarateofrisebasedonahydraulicmodel.ThistoolshouldbeusedtoevaluatesitespecificdeploymentofeachSmartVent®productandcanbeusedtoquantifythelikelyreductioninstructuraldamagetoanenclosureandreductioninfinancialloss.Additionally, the tool can be used to evaluate existing installations that include non-engineeringopeningsandtheneedforadditionalventingtomeettheaboverequirements.