Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting...
Transcript of Redefining the proper evaluation of safe flood venting the proper evaluation of safe flood venting...
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page2of11
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2RedefiningtheproperevaluationofsafefloodventingNicholasAgnoli,P.E.|ManagingPartnerRevisedDecember20,2016
EXECUTIVESUMMARYAccording to statistics from the Federal EmergencyManagement Agency (FEMA) NationalFlood Insurance Program (NFIP), floods are the number one natural disaster in theUnitedStates1. Additionally, from2011to2015theaveragefloodclaimwasover$46,000andthetotal flood insurance claims annually exceeded $1.9 billion dollars (U.S.). Understandingproper methods of mitigating flood damage to the structural stability of an enclosure(basementand/or crawl space) that complieswithnational standardsandbestengineeringpracticehasneverbeenmoreimportanttothebuildingowner,contractorandregulator.Agnoli Engineering, LLC, in evaluating the Smart Vent® engineered,mechanically operatedfloodvents,reviewedavailableguidelinesandengineeringdatarelatedtotheirperformance.WhatwasnotavailablewasasimplemethodtoevaluatetheexpectedperformanceofSmartVents®foraspecificpropertywithastandardrateofriseandfalloffloodwaterof5.0feetperhour (1.52metersperhour)perASCE24-142. Thispaperpresentsa tooldevelopedbyAgnoliEngineeringwithMicrosoft®OfficeExcel®2007thatallowsanevaluatorwithminimalbackgroundinfloodcontrolandabasicunderstandingofapropertytodeterminethesizingand level of protection provided by the Smart Vent® flood vents. The tool includes aconservative discharge coefficient of 0.44 as required by Table 2-2 in ASCE 24-14 and theminimumofoneventforevery200squarefeetintheICCEvaluationService(ES)Report3.The tool also allows the evaluation of alternative openings, including non-engineeredopenings. In the attachedAppendixA, findings from the use of non-engineeredopenings,includingafailuretomeetASCE24-14guidelineswhensetattheallowable12inchesabovegrade,arediscussed indetail. Additionally,non-engineeredventsalso failed tomeetASCE24-14guidelinesifblockedbydebrisatnearlyanydegree(percentage).
1FederalEmergencyManagementAgency."FloodRisksNationwide."September2013.2AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers."FloodResistantDesignandConstruction(ASCE24-14)"3ICCEvaluationService."ESR-2074SmartVentAutomaticFoundationFloodVents."February2015(exp.Feb.2017)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page3of11
Currently,theSmartVent®istheonlyengineeredventthathasasoftwarespreadsheetthatcanproduceastagehydrographforenclosureflooding,headdifferentialsalonganenclosurewall,and/orproduceanexternalhydrostaticpressurecurve.Thesetoolsarevaluabletothevarious interests related to real estate ownership, including insurance and mortgagecompaniesaswellasconstructioncodeofficials.
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page2of11
1.0INTRODUCTIONThepurposeof thisWhitePaper is toprovide themethodologyand test case resultsof theSmartVent Hazard Evaluator Beta developed by Agnoli Engineering, LLC. The Hazard Evaluator wasdevelopedtoprovidedesigners,owners,contractors,regulatorsandinsurerswithatooltoevaluatetheperformanceofaproposedSmartVentconfigurationagainstnational standards. Theprincipaldesigncriteriaincluded:
ü Easeofuseandeaseofincorporatingfielddataü Transparency(equationsandmethodology)ü Flexibilityfordifferentanduniquesystemlayoutsandconfigurationsü Detailedoutputsforengineersandregulators
2.0LITERATUREREVIEWAgnoliEngineeringsoughttoreviewbothliteratureavailabledirectlyfromSmartVentProducts,Inc.specifictothedimensionsandintendedperformanceoftheSmartVent®devicesbutalsoavailableliteratureonfederalrequirementsandthird-partytesting:
ü AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers."FloodResistantDesignandConstruction(ASCE24-14)."(2014). This document provides criteria for design as well as expected performance ofengineeredopeningsinSection2.7.2.2.
ü ICCEvaluationService. "ESR-2074SmartVentAutomaticFoundationFloodVents."February2015.ThisdocumentprovidesanevaluationofphysicaloperationandwaterflowthroughtheSmartVent® floodvents. It includestheminimumcoverage (square feet)providedbyeachmodelnumber.
ü FederalEmergencyManagementAgency."TechnicalBulletin1,OpeningsinFoundationWallsandWallsofEnclosures."August2008.ThisbulletinprovidesguidanceontheNationalFloodInsuranceProgram(NFIP)regulationsconcerningtherequirementforopeningsinbelowBaseFloodElevation(BFE)foundationwallsandwallsofenclosuresforbuildings located inFloodZonesA,AE,A1-A30,AR,AO,andAH.
3.0SOLUTIONTheSmartVentHazardEvaluatorBetatoolwasdevelopedusingMicrosoft®OfficeExcel®tosimplifythe experience for novice users. The tool consists of three worksheets: Smart Vent® Tool,ModelLookup,andCalculations.3.1SmartVent®ToolWorksheetTheSmartVent®Toolworksheetprovidestheuseraninputinterfaceandreturnstheresults.Therequiredinputsinclude:
ü SmartVent®ModelorNon-EngineeredOpeningType;
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page3of11
ü NumberofVents;ü FloodWaterProperties(freshwaterorsaltwater);ü PercentObstruction;ü InstalledHeightAboveGrade;ü SmartVent®DischargeCoefficientü Non-EngineeredOpeningParameters(width,height,cover)ü EnclosureArea;ü EnclosureDepthBelowGrade;ü EnclosureHeightAboveGrade;ü GradeElevation;ü BaseFloodElevation;andü RateofFloodRise.
MostoftheinputscanbeobtainedfromastandardFEMAElevationCertificateandratemap. TherateofriseofsurroundfloodwaterisgivenasfivefeetperhourperASCEStandard24-14;however,it canalsobeobtained fromanavailablehydraulicanalysis. Theevaluation time incrementcanbeadjustedtoencompassthefullflooddurationasneeded.TheSmartVent®modelnameisapulldownmenuthatpopulatesthedimensionsprovidedontheModelLookupWorksheet.Thenumberofventsand installedheightabovegradearethetwoprimarydesignparameters.Theusercanadjusttheseparametersuntiltheminimumdesigncriteriaaremet:
ü Minimumnumberofvents(2)perTechnicalBulletin1:"eachenclosedareaisrequiredtohaveaminimumoftwoopeningsonexteriorwallstoallowfloodwaterstoenterdirectly."
ü MinimumnumberofventstomeettheareacoverageratingperventasprovidedinTable1ofICC-ESReportESR-2074.
ü MaximumheightofopeningabovegradeperTechnicalBulletin1:"thebottomofeachopeningistobelocatednohigherthan1footabovethegradethatisimmediatelyundereachopening."
ü Maximumhead differential requirements per ASCE 24-14: "the performance of engineeredopeningsshallensurethatthedifferencebetweentheexteriorandinteriorfloodwaterlevelsshallnotexceed1foot."Tocheckthisrequirement,thetoolverifiesthatthemaximumheadonthewallabovegradepriortoequalizationislessthan1foot.Whenfloodwatersrisetotheadjacentgradeelevationpriortothefloodventactivation,theenclosurewouldbeginasdry.Theadditionalloadingonthewallbeyondthetypicalfoundationdesignwouldbeexpectedtooccurwhenthefloodwatersareabovetheadjacentgrade.Therefore,thetoolchecksthattheSmartVent®configurationenteredbytheuserallowstheenclosuretofillupfastenoughfortheheaddifferentialbetweentheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevelstobelessthan1foot.
TheSmartVentToolworksheetprovidesthefollowingresults:
ü OrificeDischargeCoefficientusedinthecalculationsü Timeforenclosurefloodingtoequalizewithexternalfloodü Timetofilltheenclosureü Maximumenclosureflooddepthü Maximumheaddifferentialbetweenfloodlevelsinternalandexternaltowall
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page4of11
ü Maximumheadonwallabovegradeü Maximumheadonwallabovegradepriortoequalizationü Maximumupliftpressureü Maximumlateralhydrostaticforceonenclosurewallü Lateralhydrostaticforceonenclosurewallduringmaximumheaddifferentialü Maximumuplift(buoyancy)forceduetohydrostaticpressureü Stagehydrographfigureü Headdifferentialbetweenfloodlevelsinternalandexternaltowallfigureü Externalhydrostaticpressureabovegradefigure
Ifadesigncriterionisnotmet,thetoolprovidessuggestionstotheusertomodifytheconfiguration(i.e.addventsoradjustinstalledheightabovegrade).3.2ModelLookupWorksheetTheModelLookupworksheetprovidesthelookuptableofdimensionsforeachSmartVent®model.Thedimensionsincludethewidth,ventopeningheightsaboveandbelowthedoor,ventdoordepth,andheightaboveventinvertforactivation.ThedimensionsassociatedwiththeSmartVent®modelchosenbytheuserarepopulatedontheSmartVent®ToolworksheetandCalculationsworksheet.3.3CalculationsWorksheetTheCalculationsWorksheetcontainsthecalculationsperformedbythetool.ThetoolevaluatestheperformanceoftheSmartVent®configurationenteredbytheuserwithaquasi-unsteadyapproach.Thetoolcalculatestherisingfloodelevation,inflowthroughthevents,andresultantflooddepthintheenclosureforeachtimestepduringthefloodriseuntilthefloodlevelintheenclosureequalstheexternal floodelevation.Once the internal andexternal floodelevationsequalize, the internal andexternal floodelevation riseat the same rate for the remainderof the simulation.Basedon theseresults,thetoolcalculatestheresultsprovidedontheSmartVent®Toolworksheet.The tool calculates the flowthrougheachSmartVent®ateach timestep.The flow foreachSmartVent® is thenmultiplied by the number of vents to calculate the total inflow into the enclosure.When the Smart Vent® is activated, the door swings open to provide a lower and an upper slotopening. Figure 1 below provides typical dimensions of the openings through Smart Vent® whenactivated.
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page5of11
Figure1–SmartVentDimensions
ThetoolwasdevelopedtoconsiderthechangingflowconditionsthatwouldbeexpectedthroughtheSmartVentasthefloodlevelrises,theventactivates,floodwatersflowthroughfirstthelowerslotthenupperslot,and theenclosure fills.TheSmartVentactivateswhen the flood level reaches1.5inchesabovetheinvertofthevent.Whenthefloodlevelislessthan1.5inchesabovetheinvertofthevent,theventisassumedtobeclosedandthetoolassumesnoinflowforthetimestep.For time steps when the Smart Vent® is activated and the flood level is below the top of a slotopening(eitherlowerorupper),thetoolassumesweirflowthroughtheappropriateopeningusingthebroad-crestedweirequation4:
Q=2.64b*h3/2 Equation1Where: Q=discharge(cfs) b=widthofslottedopening h=head(feet)Thedischargecoefficient(2.64)acrosstheweirwasselectedasthemostconservativefora"broad-crested"weirfromthereferencebelow(4).However,theweirdischargecoefficientisadjustedwhenascreenisinstalledontheopening.Whentheuserselects"Yes"regardingascreeninplace,thetooladjuststheweirdischargecoefficient(CW)withthefollowingequation:
CW=COSx2.64 CORWhere: CW=Weirdischargecoefficient COS=Orificedischargecoefficientofanopeningwithascreen(0.2) COR=Orificedischargecoeff.ofarectangularopeningwithalonghorizontalaxis(0.4)The tool thereforeusesaweirdischargecoefficientof2.64whennoscreen is inplace,andaweirdischargecoefficientof1.32whenascreenis inplace.TheweirdischargecoefficientadjustmentisprovidedincellH23onthecalculationssheet. 4KingandBrater."HandbookofHydraulics."1977(5thEdition).
Reference:SmartVent,Inc.:CertificationofEngineeringOpening(July,2007)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page6of11
When the flood level is above topof a slot (eitherupperor lower) the tool treats each slot as anorificeusingtheequation5:
Q=Co*A(2gH)1/2 Equation2Where: Q=discharge(cfs) Co=dischargecoefficient(0.6)perTable2-2,ASCE24-14 A=OpeningArea(squarefeet) g=accelerationduetogravity(32.2.feet/second2) H=head(feet)ThecoefficientofdischargefromTable2-2inASCE24-14normallyusedfora“Rectangular,longaxishorizontal, shortaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesign flood,” isdesignatedas0.4. However,afootnote allows for “different coefficients of discharge … (1) where a designer has performeddetailed, opening-specific calculations, a coefficientof dischargeup to10%different thangiven inTable2-2shallbepermitted;or(2)wherelaboratorytestingornumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeninghasbeenconducted,theresultingcoefficientofdischargeshallbepermitted.Innocaseshallacoefficientofdischarge>0.60bepermitted.”Unsubmergedorifice coefficients are typically 0.60 to0.61 for fully contractedorificeopenings forcircular, squareor rectangular shape4The toolallows theuser to selecta coefficientof0.44,0.60,and0.20toevaluatethesensitivityof thedischargecoefficientontheirselectedconfiguration. Ifanon-engineered opening is selected, the model will not use the Smart Vent discharge coefficientparameter.The user can also select non-engineered rectangular, square, circular, and other shaped floodopenings from the pull-down list in addition to Smart Vent products. When a non-engineeredopeningisselected,theusermustenterthenon-engineeredopeningparametersincludingthewidth,height, net opening area, andwhether the opening has a cover. The toolwill then use the non-engineeredopeninginputparameterstoselecttheappropriatedischargecoefficientperASCE24-14as shown in Table 1 below. Per ASCE 24-14, an opening shall be classified as partially obstructed(dischargecoefficientof0.20)iflouvers,blades,screens,grilles,faceplates,orothercoversordevicesarepresentduringthedesignflood.Therefore,ifthereisacoverontheopening,thetoolwillselectadischargecoefficientof0.20regardlessoftheopeningshape.Otherwise,ifthereisnocoverontheopening, the tool will select the appropriate unobstructed discharge coefficient based on theopening’sshapefromTable1. Themodelwillnotusethenon-engineeredopeningparametersifaSmartVentproductisselected.
5Asabove(Ref.4)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page7of11
Table1–FloodOpeningCoefficientofDischargea(ASCE24-12Table2-2)OpeningShapeandCondition C
Circular,unobstructedduringdesignfloodb 0.6
Rectangular,longaxishorizontal,shortaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.4c
Square,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.35
Rectangular,shortaxishorizontal,longaxisvertical,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.25d
Othershapes,unobstructedduringdesignflood 0.3
Allshapes,partiallyobstructedduringdesignflood 0.2a Different coefficients of discharge shall be permitted: (1)where a designer has performed detailed, opening-specificcalculations, a coefficient of discharge up to 10% different than given in Table 2-2 shall be permitted; or (2) wherelaboratorytestingornumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeninghasbeenconducted,theresultingcoefficientofdischargeshallbepermitted.Innocaseshallacoefficientofdischarge>0.60bepermitted.
b Openings shall be classified as partially obstructed if louvers, blades, screens, grilles, faceplates, or other covers ordevicesarepresentduringthedesignflood.
cWhenthehorizontaldimensionistwiceormoretheverticaldimension,use0.4;asthedimensionsapproachasquare,interpolatefrom0.4to0.35.
d When thehorizontaldimension ishalfor less theverticaldimension,use0.25;as thedimensionsapproachasquare,interpolatefrom0.25to0.35.
Reference:ASCE24-12Table2-2Theusercanevaluateiftheopeningweretobeobstructedbyenteringthepercentobstruction(typeindecimalformat)intothetool.PerASCE24-14andasshowninTable1,adischargecoefficientof0.20 should be used for all shapes when partially obstructed. When the user enters a percentobstruction greater than zero, the tool assigns a discharge coefficient of 0.20. The percentobstructionenteredbytheuseristhenusedtoreducetheopeningareausedintheorificeequationandopeningwidthusedintheweirequation.Fornon-engineeredopenings,thepercentobstructionwillreducethetotalopeningareabytheuserinputvalue.ForSmartVentopenings,lowerandupperopeningsareeachreducedbyhalfof the totalpercentobstructionby theuser inputvalue.Duringweir flow, thepercentobstructionreduces theopeningwidthby theuser inputvalue to representthereducedconveyancethroughthevent.ThetoolprovidesnumericalmodelingofflowthroughtheopeningandchecksthatthemodeledflowcalculatedusingEquation2, is lessthantheidealflow.Ifthemodelflowislessthantheidealflow,then the discharge coefficient used in themodel flow calculation (Equation 2) is appropriate. TheidealflowequationforarectangularorificepertheHandbookofHydraulics(BraterandKing)isgivenas:
Qt=2/3*L*(2g)0.5*(h23/2–h13/2) Equation3Where: Qt=discharge(cfs) L=WidthofOrifice(feet) g=accelerationduetogravity(32.2.feet/second2) h1=headabovetopoforifice(feet)
h2=headaboveinvertoforifice(feet)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page8of11
The tool calculates the ideal flow for the lower slot opening and upper slot opening for eachtimestep.Theseflowsarethencombinedtoprovidethetotal ideal flowthroughasinglevent.Thetoolthenchecksiftheidealflowisgreaterthanthemodelflow.Thisanalysisshowsthatthemodelflow is less than the ideal flow. Therefore, Agnoli Engineering, LLC recommends that dischargecoefficientof0.6isappropriateforSmartVentProducts,Inc.Themaximumhydrostatic/uplift pressure andmaximum lateral hydrostatic force on the enclosurewallarecalculatedusingtheequations inFigure2below.Themaximumlateralhydrostaticforce istheresultant lateralforceduetohydrostaticpressureforthefullheadfromtheBFEtothebaseoftheenclosurewall. The toolalsouses theequation inFigure2 to calculate the lateralhydrostaticforceontheenclosurewallduringthemaximumheaddifferential.Thisvaluesprovidestheuserwiththemaximumlateralforceactingexternallyonthewallduringthefloodeventpriortoequalizationoftheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevels.Thetoolalsocalculatestheresultantvertical(buoyant,oruplift)forceduetohydrostaticpressureontheenclosureusingtheequationsinFigure3below.Theuserhastheoptiontoselectfreshwaterorsaltwaterforthehydrostaticpressureandloadingcalculations.Thetoolwillusetheappropriatespecificweightofwaterbasedontheuser’sselection(62.4lb/ft3forfreshwaterand64lb/ft3forsaltwater).Figure2–LateralHydrostaticPressureandForce
Reference:FEMANFIPTechnicalBulletin1-93(1993)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page9of11
Figure3–Uplift/BuoyancyForce
Reference:FEMANFIPTechnicalBulletin1-93(1993)
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page10of11
4.0TESTINGANDVALIDATIONTheSmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetawasrunwitheighttestcasestoevaluatevariousenclosureconfigurations.Table1summarizestheenclosureconfigurationsassumedineachtestcase.
Table2–TestCases
TestCase Diagram*Heightof
Enclosure(feet)Subgrade(feet)
1 2 8 0.42 2 8 3.33 9 3 0.84 9 3 1.65 9 3 0.56 7 6 07 7 8 08 8 3 0
*FEMAElevationCertificateBuildingDiagramNumber
Thefollowingparameterswereassumedforallofthetestcases(Table3):
Table3–InputParametersEnclosureArea: 1,000 squarefeetGradeElevation: 100 feetBaseFloodElevation: 105 feetRateofFloodRise: 5 feet/hourFloodWaterType: FreshWater
Thenumberofventsand installedheightabovegrade inputswereadjustedtomeet theminimumdesigncriteriaforeachtestcase.The results of the test case runs are provided in Table 4. For each run, various combinations ofnumberofventsand installedheightabovegradewereevaluatedto find theminimumnumberofventsrequiredtomeetthedesigncriteria.PerESR-2074,theenclosedareacoverageperventis200squarefeet.Thetestcasesassumeda1,000squarefeetenclosedareaandgiventherecommendedcoverageinESR-2074,aminimumof5vents.TheresultssupportthecoverageprovidedinESR-2074foreachtestcasewiththeappropriateinstalledheightabovegradechosenbythedesigner.
Table4–Results
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page11of11
TestCase
HeightofEnclosure(feet)
Subgrade(feet)
NumberofVents
InstalledHeightAbove
Grade(inches)
MaxHeadonWallAboveGradePriortoEqualization
(feet)
TimeforEnclosuretoEqualizewithExternalFlood(minutes)
1 8 0.4 5 8 0.9 122 8 3.3 5 7 1.0 133 3 0.8 5 8 1.0 114 3 1.6 5 8 1.0 125 3 0.5 5 8 1.0 126 6 0 5 8 1.0 07 8 0 5 8 1.0 08 3 0 5 8 1.0 0
Figure2–TestCase1ScreenImageoftheSmartVentHazardEvaluatorBeta
SmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetav.1.3.2 Page12of11
5.0CONCLUSIONSTheSmartVent®HazardEvaluatorBetaisabletoverifythatthecurrentsizingpracticefortheSmartVent®product is adequate. Duringa rateof floodwater riseof5 feetperhour recommendedbyASCE 24-14, the tool shows that with the appropriate configuration, the Smart Vents® allow theenclosuretofillupfastenoughfortheheaddifferentialbetweentheinteriorandexteriorfloodlevelsto be less than 1 foot. This small differential will significantly reduce the potential for structuraldamage as a result of hydrostatic pressureon an enclosurewall. Theuser can further refine theiranalysiswiththistoolbyusingarateofrisebasedonahydraulicmodel.ThistoolshouldbeusedtoevaluatesitespecificdeploymentofeachSmartVent®productandcanbeusedtoquantifythelikelyreductioninstructuraldamagetoanenclosureandreductioninfinancialloss.Additionally, the tool can be used to evaluate existing installations that include non-engineeringopeningsandtheneedforadditionalventingtomeettheaboverequirements.