REDDSoC Project - Reducing Day of Surgery Cancellations
-
Upload
informa-australia -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
512 -
download
7
description
Transcript of REDDSoC Project - Reducing Day of Surgery Cancellations
Presented by: Annie Williams,
Manager of Innovation & Improvement – Goulburn Valley Health
Shepparton, Victoria
REDDSoC: REDucing Day of Surgery Cancellations Project
Goulburn Valley Health - main campus at Shepparton, Northern Victoria -
with additional campuses at Tatura and Rushworth
Innovation & Improvement Unit @ GVH: established
November 2009
Multiple Surgical Services reviews [internal and
external]
Project Scoping commenced Jan 2010
RHCP funding approved – scope confirmed
“Review the journey of Elective and Emergency Patients, from the time of being confirmed for surgery to entering Recovery”
Branded as the REDDSoC Project
Background:
GVH Redesign Methodology
What did the data say?
Raw data was available…
Which we followed up with process mapping, patient tracking, and
extensive stakeholder communications and interviews.
Number of DOS cancellations GVH for period July 09 to Jun 10
ED patients
Reasons for cancellations
Wait list management
Theatre Utilisation
“No Beds”
Staffing
Issues
Anecdotal evidence was provided:
We had a problem to solve…
REDDSoC @ GVH: • Aim 1: Identify unproductive
activity within OT processes –
to improve capacity within
existing resources
• Aim 2: Reduce ED LOS for
pts awaiting emergency
surgical procedures
• Objective 1: Reduce DOS
cancellations, (planned and
unplanned surgery), by 30%
by 31/12/10
What did we ask of our stakeholders?
We have people
arriving everyday
in our ED that will
require surgery...
What plans do we
have in place?
When the patient is
confirmed for
surgery, how long do
they wait?
What are the
impacts on
patients when
their surgery is
cancelled?
What is it like
for our patients
to wait for a
long time for
their surgery?
Understanding the emergency demand…
What did we learn from the data?
Period: 2 months
Jul/Aug 10
Total Time
[mins]
Median mins
[Range:
mins]
Average OT time
Orthopaedic 14228 155
[58 – 370]
26.95 hrs/week
Gen Surgery 14935 100
[15 - 350]
28.28 hrs/week
Obs/Gynae
3512 84
[35 – 84]
6.65 hrs/week
Vascular 1500 80
[21 – 150]
2.84 hrs/week
Various 1273 2.41
hours/week
Historical
Allocation
4 hrs +
1 hr/day
4 hrs +
1 hr/day
nil
nil
nil
Emergency demand
We did know what coming in from the Emergency Department!
What did our patients tell us?
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Access to Care Respect for
patients values,
preferences
and expressed
needs
Coordination
and integration
of care
Information
and education
Transition and
continuity
Physical
comfort
Emotional
support and
alleviation of
fear and
anxiety
Involvement of,
and support for
families and
carers
Positive
Sometimes/MixedNegative
01/09/2010
“the staff have been good and
the Doctors are great – No
Problems”
“About 10pm, they looked at the
X ray and said I wouldn’t get to theatre
tonight. It would probably be late
tomorrow”
He was very good with his
communication, but I felt he
was interrupted by the
senior medical officer
“She was very uncomfortable and feeling a bit faint,
so I went up and asked if there was somewhere
Isabelle could lie down. She said there are 3 seats
there together, so lie down there. We didn’t mind
waiting, but She just couldn’t sit”
“Didn’t see a soul until I
managed to get a
nurse…..
Not a good way to spend
the night in this bed”
“It was a long night in the
ED”
“The staff that
looked after
me were
brilliant”
“They kept me informed about
what was going on”
“A doctor
came and
saw me
straight away.
He was
awesome
considerate
and nice”
Impacts of Emergency Demand…
Emergency Surgical Patients
Emergency
Department
Elective Surgical Patients
ED Time to OT - Jul Aug 2010 [by specialty]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
General Surgery O /& G Orthopaedic
Specialty
Pa
tie
nts
ED < 8 hrs
ED > 8 hrs
Emergency Demand July Aug 2010
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mon
day
Tue
sday
Wedn
esda
y
Thu
rsday
Frid
ay
Saturda
y
Sun
day
Day of the week
pati
en
ts
Emergency Admissions
Emergency Procedures
Linear (Emergency
Admissions)
Project Diagnostics:
Capacity did not meet current, or
would not meet future demand!
Limited existing physical and staff
resources
Emergency activity 1/3 of all GVH OT
procedures
Emergency demand was predictable
Limited existing capacity or planning
for emergency demand
Current allocations process did not
maximise existing limited resources
Variation in data entry and
documentation
Elective surgical management
meeting KPIs
REDDSoC Diagnostic Summary
1. Capacity based on demand, both emergency and elective 2. Allocations made to Surgical Specialities 3. Capacity for General Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery daily [M-F] 4. Capacity created for recruitment for additional surgical specialties – including those to address areas of high elective demand e.g. ENT 5. Approved set of Business Rules for OT allocations, including regular reviews But not all changes were in response to the ‘Hard data’! Public Dental List: many patients are paediatric or have special needs – previous allocations on Friday afternoon had led to long waits and even longer fasting times; and often created challenges in patient management But Now dental sessions Monday morning Children and special needs patients are first on the list, and reports are that there is significant improvement in the processes and positive impacts on patient experience
Some Features of the REDDSoC Model:
4 week planner
2010 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
am am am am am
0830 start 0830 start 0830 start 0830 start 0900 start
Theatre 1 Mr Heinz Mr Kamenjarin Mr Hunt Mr Dalton General
rotating
Theatre 2 Mr Abdullah Orthopaedics Dr Teale Dr Stegeman Orthopaedics
rotating rotating
Mr Kennedy mthly Clarnette mthly
Theatre 3 Dr Ilic - Jeftic LUSCS Mr Safdar mthly Mr Uren mthly LUSCS
Higher risk pts (Lithotripsy mthly) Mr Forbes mthly Low risk
Mr Mortensen mthly vacant
0830 start 0830 start 0830 start 0830 start 0900 start
Treatment Flexible Cystoscopy Dr Nana Mr Abdullah Mr Kamenjarin Mr Dalton or
Room TRUS Mr Heinz mthly Dr Sawhney
pm pm pm pm pm
1300 start 1300 start 1300 start 1300 start 1300 start
Emergency
Theatre 1 Mr Heinz Mr Kamenjarin Mr Hunt 3 wks Mr Dalton General
scopes in 4th w k rotating
Mr Safdar mthly
Emergency
Theatre 2 Mr Horton Orthopaedic Mr Critchley Mr Chew Orthopaedic
rotating rotating
Mr Kennedy mthly Mr Uren mthly
Theatre 3 Dr Barmare Dental
Mr Mortensen Mr Mortensen Gynae Registrar
3 w eeks 3 w eeks
1300 start 1300 start 1300 start 1300 start 1300 start
Treatment Mr Eastman Mr Dalton Dr Harris M. Kamenjarin 1w k Dr Sandhu 2/52
Room A. Testro 2 w k Mr Dalton 2/52
1430 mthly HUNT Mr Heinz 1 w k
Reviewed for 5th September
REDDSoC Version A.1.3.3 - Proposed OT Schedule Model
THR 1 THR 2 THR 3 T/ROOM THR 1 THR 2 THR 3 T/ROOM THR 1 THR 2 THR 3 T/ROOM THR 1 THR 2 THR 3 T/ROOM
7.30 ECT ECT ECT ECT
8.00 G/S OBS/GYN DENTAL G/S ORT OBS/GYN G/S OBS/GYN DENTAL G/S ORT OBS/GYN
8.30 [HEINZ] [ILIC] URO [HEINZ] [BARMARE] [ILIC] URO [HEINZ] [ILIC] URO [HEINZ] [BARMARE] [ILIC] URO
9.00 [MORT] [MORT] [MORT] [MORT]
9.30
10.00
10.30
11.00 C/O TIME C/O TIME
11.30 ORT ORT
12.00 C/O TIME C/O TIME [BARMARE] C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME [BARMARE] C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME C/O TIME
12.30 **DOS **DOS **DOS C/O TIME **DOS
13.00 G/S C/O TIME G/S G/S G/S
13.30 EASTMAN EASTMAN EASTMAN EASTMAN
14.00 [HUNT 1in8]
14.30
15.00
15.30
16.00
16.30
17.00
17.30
18.00
18.30
19.00
19.30
20.00
20.30
21.00
21.30
22.00
22.30
On-call>
EMERG
AFTER
HOURS
START
TIME
WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3
EMERG
AFTER
HOURS
EMERG
AFTER
HOURS
EMERG
AFTER
HOURS
MONDAY
WEEK 4
‘Quarantined’ Emergency Allocations
Ensure capacity every day for orthopaedic and general surgery session
All lists have emergency allocations to meet 80% of predicted demand [
Previous emergency allocations were limited to general surgery
Flexibility within the lists to treat emergency cases based on clinical need
Review of emergency cases booked after 1800hrs to see if clinically they could
be moved to the next elective list
Electronic data report to capture pending OT patients
Validation of predictability of Emergency demand…
Some Key Project Outcomes:
We have seen…
Reduction in DOS Cancellations [app.
50%]
Decreased LOS for Emergency Surgical
patients within the ED [improved
communication, management and transition]
Electronic documentation of pending OT
patients
Less after hours emergency cases =
decreased overtime [$]
Greater predictability for OT medical and
nursing staff
Greater planning for emergency demand
allows more effective management of
resources [e.g.: anaesthetic rostering, CSSD,
cleaning]
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
GS ORT GYN
Num
ber o
f Pat
ient
s
Surgical Specialty
ED SURGICAL PATIENTS[ED ADMISSION TO PROCEDURE]
July 2010 TO Aug 2010
ED < 8 hrs
ED > 8 hrs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
GS ORT GYN
Nu
mb
er o
f P
atie
nts
Surgical Specialty
ED SURGICAL PATIENTS[ED ADMISSION TO PROCEDURE]
July 2010 TO Aug 2010
ED < 8 hrs
ED > 8 hrs
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
GS ORT GYN
Nu
mb
er o
f P
atie
nts
Surgical Specialty
ED SURGICAL PATIENTS[ED ADMISSION TO PROCEDURE]
Sept 2011 to Oct 2011
ED < 8 hrs
ED > 8 hrs
The impact upon ED surgical patients:
Secrets of our success:
1. Great Executive Sponsorship
2. Clinical leadership
3. Extensive stakeholder
engagement
4. Extensive consultation and
planning – utilising AIM
implementation approach
5. Great project support
6. Communication & branding
Next steps:
Patient Flow Collaborative
Redesign Project
Thank you…
Contacts:
Anne Williams,
Manager of Innovation, GV Health, Shepparton
Jenny Lia - Redesign Project Facilitator
Cheryl Lancaster- Redesign Support
GVH Executive, Operational management, medical officers
and staff of GVH
Victorian Dept of Health – RHCP
NSW Health Centre for Healthcare Redesign