0 07

01]S H 3 S

FS34REMEDIAL RESPONSE BRBK

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

224724

engineersPlannersEconomistsScientists

February 3. L993

GLO656L6.DE.DE

Ms. Deborah OrrRegional Project ManagerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Region 577 West Jackson Blvd. (5HSRL-6J)Chicago. IL 60604-3590

Dear Ms. Orr:

Subject: Revisions to Technical Memorandum Dated January 25. 1993Carter-Lee Lumber Site. Indianapolis, IndianaContract No. 68-W8-0040. W.A. No. 49-5LBD

Enclosed for your review are the revised tables for the Technical Memorandum dated January 25.1993. which summarizes the Preliminary Site Characterization Phase of the Remedial Investigation atthe Carter-Lee Lumber site. Tables 2. 3. 4. and 5 were revised based on comments from ourJanuary 29 meeting. The order of appearance of the 10'" and 10"4 cancer risk and Hazard Indexcolumns was made consistent throughout the tables. Also enclosed is Table 2-5 which summarizes thesoil analytical results for 's garden. This table may be inserted at the end ofAttachment 2.

Please distribute the revised tables to the appropriate people.

Sincerely.

CH2M HILL

Laura PetersonAssistant Site Manager

100115C6.GLOEnclosurecc: Stephen Nathan/PO/U.S. EPA;

Region 5 (w/o enclosure)James Willis/CO/U.S. EPA/Region 5

(wo enclosure)Denise Boone,Chemist/U.S. EPA/

Region 5 (w/o enclosure)Bob Schaible/IDEM (2 copies)Alpheus Sloan IlI/PM/MihvaukeeIke Johnson/APM-OPNS,MilwaukeeJohn Fleissner, QAM/Milwaukee

Phil Smith/RTL/QC RVW/MilwaukeeCindi Cruciani/QC RVW/MilwaukeeCherie Wilson/PA-Milwaukee

(wo enclosure)Elaine Steiner/MilwaukeeRandy Videkovich/DaytonPixie Newman/ChicagoJoe Sandnn/MilwaukeeDale Cira/St. LouisDan MacGregor,Milwaukee

>2M H Milwaukee Office 310 Wesf Wisconsin Avenue. Suite 700 4 id 272.2426PO Sox2090Milwaukee. Wisconsin 5J2C/-2090 rax4 'A272

Table 2OFFSITE vs ONSITE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR METALS

SUMMARY TABLEPiulimmary Site Investigation

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Metals (mfl/kfl)AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickalPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

AvsweQOOftaM* Onalle

0824 4344

37 3930 120

029 300

001 051

0 02 0 40

35186 94850

147 187

07 5 /

43 8 20 7

14854 15825

05 7 33 411283 20883

500 440010 011

159 187

899 027031 0360 48 0 50

13127 11286024 01721 1 146

10577 6878

Mailmum

ValueOtfelte Onslte

10000 14900

39 10142 1tt/198 328

2 151

50 1 3

128000 236000

48 9 439

169 153

6970 114

36400 161000

493 37639400 59000

1400 1280

0 38 0 45333 173

2130 12501 35

099 24

1510 332

042 04545 9 88 6424 564

MinimumValue

Offslte Onslta2400 109(1

34 33!)012 24

149 1 2

021 011

042 OO/

2250 4460

0 7 4 8

31 22

8 3 3 7

6570 5150

101 34

1480 605

252 204

006 005

09 20433 169011 011

0 42 0 42

28 2 29 3

01 0183 53

231 131

T-leel

P(T<t)

00150 18

00120 10bOb/

046

00041

033

024

0 11

081018

0020

031047

032001025

025

0058

0025

022

10-0Cancer

Risk

0 16J

--

10-4Cancer

Risk--------

162/0

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

--

..

..

--

Huardlndei-1

140

(Oh

i'4J)00

t/'jO

1/b

1/bO 4

yjVM

JbOOO

105

/OOO

1/M)

1/tX)

•J4M/OOOU

T-test at 95-percent confidence level

a Assumes Chromium VI

BGVSOS XLS

Table 3OFFSITE vs ONSITE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS

SUMMARY TABLEPreliminary Site Investigation

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Compound

Volatile* (ug/kg)Methytene ChlorideAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)TncMoroetheneTolueneCMorobenzeneEthylbenzeneXytene (mixed)

Semi-volatile* (ug/hg)Naphthalene2-MetnybMphthaleneAcenaphlhyteneAcenaphtheneDibenzofuranDwthytphthalaleFluorenePhenanthreneAnthraceneCarbazoleDi-n-burylphthalateFluoranthenePyreneButyltoenzylphthalate3.3-DichlafabenzidineBenzo(a|anlhraceneChrysenebw<2-Ethylhexyl)phihalateDi-n-octytphtTMlateBenzo(b)fluoranlheneBenzo|k]fluoranlheneBertzo[a]pyrenelndeno|1 ,2.3-cd]pyreneDibenz(a,h|anlhraceneBenzo|g,h.i]perytene

GeometricAverage

OlMte Oncite

130 927.9 14857 6.157 5561 9257 5757 5249 58

131.5 20731281 18021299 13401476 16681431 14482181 23961684 14726088 54372291 25211756 15961233 1157596 5 679 3750 4 774 32181 25212161 25215250 47686510 51542368 23341536 18586371 66184726 39075749 45864771 29632195 24313922 3420

MaximumValue

OHsile Oncile

42 5519 170

65 3165 85160 13065 8565 8565 65

2900 22002400 1400590 1800

1700 16001800 12001850 16003500 610

22000 65004900 12002000 5801850 1800

18000 840020000 15000

1850 36001850 36008700 53009100 64001850 36001850 36005400 120005900 57006600 78003300 36001850 36002800 6200

MinimumValue

OltKile Onsite

6 255 555 555 2

1 255 555 2

2 2

21 3425 2824 2128 3230 19

175 6438 2328 6039 4542 4220 2029 7428 74

175 170175 17022 5935 7028 3932 19

175 130175 170175 58140 2923 78

120 84

T-testP(T<t)

035

005059

04S

044

08S

01'041

OK02'

092069

097063

071083

07S

077

08f077

095047

047

082057

096055092

055

056

01'07t

066

10-6Cancer

Risk

93333-

63636--

-

----

...

--

-----

-

--

35000--

-

---

155696

9650000

—

96

96

96

9696

96

10-4Cancer

Risk

9333333-

--6363636

-

--

-—

----

----

----

--

3500000-

-

---

15555695899589

5000000—

958995899589958995899589

Hazardlndex-1

2100000C3500000017500000

7000000C700000C

3500000(700000000

1400000C-

-2100000C

-

28000000G14000000

-

105000000-

350000001400000C1050000070000000

.

-

70000007000001

.

Page 1 of 2 TBL 3 XLS

TaWe3OKFSITE vsONSITt ANALYTICAL RtSULTS KDR ORGANICS

SUMMARY TABLEPreliminary Site Investigation

Curler-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Compound

HaptacNoiHaptacMoi •powd*4.4- ODE

EndimEndoauNanll4.4-000EndMuVan MJlfato4.41 DDTMriftoMycMo;EndrinMom•Ipha-ChlaidMw (•)gamma-CNMdafw (•)Afoctof 1254(b)

OMdWUIC

Awwag*MM* On«t«

10 1110 1219 2129 2823 2319 1919 2127 4077 10719 2310 1610 16

168 199

MUiimumVafcM

OMMU OnWU

12 421 2 S622 4611 1b

65 2122 4622 2885 14012 46

22 331 2 3S1 2 4072 3b

MMMmum

VAfcM

OrikMt OnkN*

00 Ob09 00

a ///7

9

1 /09 00

09 00

16 17

T^.U

P(T<0

10 «

CancerHlth

IbttII

XfM

M\l

MM

bJO

bJO91

104Cditcftf

Risk

lt.bb./6W^

.t>saa2

^UltMi/

WSBB^

b.MJ4b

bJ84b0001

Hazardlndci-1

17«XX4J>i(

lObOOt

1/bOOt

^I00(^ioo(

• Chtof dww lowtuty u**d

b PCBUMuryuMd

Page 2 of 2 TBL 3XLS

Table 4GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSES

Pfeliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Station Location

Sample NumbtH

Dale Sampled

Media

Volatile* |ugM|

Chkxoloiin

Semi-volatilM (ug/l)

Phenol

Naphthaline

Owlhylphlhalale

PhenanOiiene

Oi n DutylpMhalale

luofanlhane

Pyiene

Ui(2 ElhfihexyOpMhalale

PesticMetlPCBi (ugft|

induMjIfan fcuttate

Inoiganlci (ugA.)

AJumimufn

Ai&enic

Baium

Beiyllium

Calcium

Chromium

CobaH

Coppw

lion

Lead

ylagneMum

ManganeM

iteicury

Nickel

•>ula&S4um

Selenium

Sodium

Ihalhum

Vanadium

Zinc

Upgradient

CLMM01

ELG3/

1 1 5 92

Walei

<10

<IO

<IO

<IO

00

<10

<io<IO

<10

<OI

12.1

<1

<112

<1

HIM*<;

<So

27*

1.4

M4M

4*.7

<02

11.t

1*4*14

42MO

<

<;

f.4

CLMVM1

ELGM

11 793

Watt

1

1

<1(

<1C

<1t

<1C

<lfl<1(•J

<01

<24

1.*

n.»< '

117MI

<

<S<,

«i

<

124M

7J

<0i

11.4

44M

l.i

112M

14<;

<;

Oowiigndleill

CiMMtnE1G66

11*92

Wtalv

<10

<10

<10

<10

•*•J

<2

•J

1

•JJ

M.i

1.1

•74

1.1

18MM

<;

<5<t

1M

U

MM*

224

<02

•J

4*70

1.1

441M

1J<

4.«

CLMWM

ELG4/

11692

Walai

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<IO

<10

<10

<10

<01

<24

1.1

44J

<1

1M4M

<;<5

<4

214<1

4«2M

114

<02

<5

44M

U

U2M<

<;

<;

CLMMOS

ELGtt

11-692

Walei

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<10

<0t

<24

1.S

W.t

<1

1»7*M<;

<S<i

11.«

U

MM*

N4

<02

11.4

U4»

1.7

24M*

<

<;

<;

CLOMM1

ELG51

11 692

Walei

<to

<10

<10

<10

<10

1

<10

<10

<10

<OI

«24

<1

M.I

<1

112M*<;<•<t

142<•

J»1W

•11

<02

74

412*

1i

4MM<

<;

4«

CLORM2

ELG49

11 692

VValui

<IO

2

2

*.*

*.*<2

<10

<IO

<10

<01

M.1

<1

*§J

1.1

iiim<^

«j<^in<i

ItMl

12t

<02

<&

444*

2.7

4MM

<'

* <;

l.l

CLOMM1

ELG48

11 6-92

Walei

<10

1

<10

<10

<10

<I8

<to<to<10

<01

»./<1

M.1

<1

1UM*

<;

22A<4

17M

1J

MM*

•wi*<02

11.4

4*7*l.i

4MM<

<;

24J

CLGRB04

ELG30

11/4/92

Walei

<1C

<1C

<H

<1(1

<1fl

Ob

<10

<10

<u

<01

114MJ

1*7

2M

14

2»7MI

ft.*

MJ

N.1

M1M

4*.7

«U*C

17M

*.f

ttJ

>1M

2J

47*M

«1

44.t

Ml

Average Compaf imons

Geomitoic

Average

42

36

tb4 1

32

18

42

4 1

33

01

392

1 1

775

07

1599730

22

60

31933

12

380001

151 J

01

92

44194

22

420528

06

22

69

Maximum

Value

f>

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

022

11400

107

253

15

257000

519

308

993

64100

497

68300

1790

056

658

6160

3 7

53200

1 4

466

389

Minimum

Value

1

1

2

09

06

05

1

08

06

OUi

12

05

448

05

11 7000

1 b

25

2

3

05

30BOO

78

01

2b

3840

1 3

248UU

Ob

1 b

1 b

Water IngemlMn Criteria

MCLl

4

50

2000

4

100

1300

15

2

100

50

2

Cancet

104ft**

4S91

2044

0 I6JS

00665

Cancel

1*-4nmk

4691

2044

1635

665

Healtk

lndei-1

Jbu

2IUUU

I4UU

28UUU

JbUU

HCKJ

1030

/UU

10 b

24bl>

l/b

1/b

12»b

Jbou

101

/UU

I /-J

jr>/(««!

I he pietu ~<~ indicates the compound wat not Jeweled al 01 above the method driTftK"i limn

TU1. 4 . Xl.i]

I able bGHOUNDWAH H SAMMI L HLSUI IS f OH INORGANICS

Preliminary Sit* InvestigationCartel IM I umtMK

Indianapolife, Indiana

tUUon LocationSampta NumbwUataSwnpladMadttInotoanlca (ug>l)AkMiMMumAnamonyAlMMC

BauumBaryMumCadmiumCalciumChfomtumCobak"".JWW^M

*"*p*p**«

dontaadM«gn«ii>imManpanaaaMaicury

NX**HgtMammSatartumbrtvarSodiumrnaftumVanadium/meCyamda

UP<iirttam

CLIMMOIMEKA37n-ft-n

WatM

US•32«l

«112«1<4

111000O«ft44

!••14

144MMl<02

<»M40

14<4

42*00«l<3<;

<10

CUMMIMUMM11-7«

<2t021.1•1«l44

11700*«?<J«««<1

S240071

<02114

44M1

«1120C

1.4<;<;

<10

tutmnMUUM11-MB

M.t021»•71.1<4

1t>000<3«S<4

1001.2

aMlMfl

224<OJ

• •4070

1.1<4

40100104.000

CUMMMMEKA47114V02

WakH

«26«321.1

44.0<l<4

104000•3<a«4

210«1

4020011.0«02

<54400

1J<4

U200<1<3<;

<10

CtlMWOAMtKAAS11-0-02

yUaBBBBBl

<»

<321.0

000<1«4

107000O<5<4

1101 2

J000C000<021141040

17<t

j glK<1<;«;

<10

cioHaoiUtKAM

11 * 02WakM

«2ft*32«l

00.0«1<4

112000O•ft44

14241

1010001040274

41201.044

•llOtM4|

4)

40410

CIGNB02MEKA40It 0-92

WakM

Ml4)2

41

Ml1 1

44144000

43

12244

1M4|

10000120402

4ft

44M2744

404(M41

4301410

CIGHH03MLKA4011-0-02

WafeM

207<324|

M.I41

44

1000M43

22044

17M1

MMO1010<02114

40702044

40MO41

43

240410

CtUHBIMMtKAX

11 402W««M

1I4M4321072011144

2070MOilMlMl

04100407

MMO17MON00101M

21<t

47000«'

401Ml<1(

Avciaga CumfxiiiuntOaomaUlcAwataga

4010

1/7

12

1MV732ft3

M1

30001148

00

441022

4200312e«

•UiMnumValua

114001011iiJ

22

257000ft231BV

A4IOOM

683001790

1M

010042

332001

47300

•

MmunumValua

IJIfl

149

12

11/0002i

t^

13CMKX

«C1

384C

1

t2480Q

1

'tt«,

W«ta« ingaaHon CfiMtx

MCI •

«M)

2OOO

45

100

1300

1b

7too

M)

2

^00

Cane a*104 ink

OOJJJ

00081

Cane**10-4 ink

2 3J

081

HaaIntfa

Bold lypa uidic«lai compound detected abova matttod datocoon bmM

Tha piahx '<* mdicalM lha compound was not dateclad at o* abova lha malhod datection kmrt

IUL

Table 2-5SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR 'S GARDEN

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis, Indiana

Station Location CLSS04

Sample Number ELG31

Date Sampled 11-4-92

Media Soil

Volatile* (ug/kg)

Methylene Chloride

Toluene

Xylene (mixed)

Semi-volatile* (ug/kg)

Naphthalene2-Methylnapnthalene

Dibenzofunn

Phenanthrene

Anthracene

Di-n-butylphthalate

"luoranthene

Pyrene

Benzo(alanthracene

Chrysene

bis(2-Ethylhexy<)phthalate

Oi-n-octylpnthalate

Benzo[b]fluoninthene

Benzo[k]fluoranthene

PestteMea/PCBs (ug/kg)lair^tarhlnrntpucnior

Hopt&cfttor •poxxto

4,4--DDE

4,4'-OOT

alpha-Chtordene

jcVTifra-Chlordflnt

8

5

4

87

140

55

310

39

40

290.

280

160

220

250

60

180

91

3 4.1

15

27

46

110

88

Metals (mg/kg)

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Nickel

PotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadium7lnr.•JIR*

Cyanide

6820

79

133

0.78

2.2

5000

12.3

9

40.3

13900

138

2190

731

0.24

ie1050

0.51

0.97

62.1

0.32

21.5307«^U(

0.61

ILARSLT.XLS

M E M O R A N D U M

. -v.TO: Deborah OrrRPM/EPA Region 5Bob SchaibleJDEM

COPIES: Phil Smith/CH2M HILLCindi CrucianLCHZM HILL

FROM: Dale Cira/CH2M HILL Site ManagerLaura PetersoaCHZM HILL Lead Hydrogeologist

DATE: January 25, 1993

SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Characterization and Data Evaluation

PROJECT: GLO65616.DE.DE

Introduction

The purpose of this technical memorandum is to provide a summary of data collectedduring the preliminary site characterization phase of the remedial investigation at theCarter-Lee Lumber (CLL) site in Indianapolis, Indiana. Data collected during thepreliminary site characterization consist of the following:

• Groundwater grab sample analytical results

• Monitoring well groundwater sample analytical results

• Monitoring well water levels

• Offsite sou" sample analytical results

• Onsite sofl sample analytical results

The objective of the preliminary site characterization phase is to collect and evaluatedata to support a decision regarding the need to conduct a Phase 2 RJ at the site.The decision requires definition of site contamination relative to offsite concentrationsin the industrial urban environment Should a Phase 2 investigative effort be deemedappropriate by EPA, this memo will help to focus the work on identified areas ofconcern and will aid in the collection of additional data appropriate for developing arisk assessment and remedial action alternatives.

M E M O R A N D U MPage 2January 25, 1993GLO65616.DE.DE

Field Work Activities

Field work took place between November 2 to 7, 1992, and consisted of the followingactivities:

• Onsite soil sampling

• Offsite soil sampling

• Monitoring well installation

• Groundwater sampling

Laura Peterson/CH2M HILL was the field team leader and provided oversight for thedrilling and monitoring well installation. Field team members were Dale Cira, TimHarrison, and Aaron Petri, all CH2M HILL

Onsite Soil Sampling

Soil borings were advanced to their target depth using 4.25-inch O.D. hollow-stemaugers and were continuously sampled using 3-inch O.D. split spoons. The boringswere logged by the CH2M HILL hydrogeologist. Immediately upon opening the splitspoon, the soil sample was screened with an HNu. The soil was disturbed using adecontaminated, stainless steel trowel. The tip of the HNu was placed near the soilsurface and the highest reading recorded. SoU samples were then collected based onvisual and/or HNu readings. Samples were selected from intervals representing thehighest HNu readings for a target depth interval and/or were selected because oftheir distinguishing odor or appearance. For example, "red" soil, if encountered, wascollected to represent the upper interval of that boring. The filled jars were placedon ice in a cooler pending shipment to the laboratory.

Soil samples were collected from borings drilled to the water table, boringsrepresenting shallow depths (0 to 4 feet), and borings representing surficial drainageareas. Table 1 lists the soil samples collected and their depths. Figure. 1 shows theonsite soil locations. Three soil samples were collected from the water table boringsand from borings CLBK01 and CLSB12 at the following approximate depth intervals:0 to 4 feet, 10 to 12 feet, and 16 to 18 feet. One soil sample was collected from theshallow soil borings from the 0- to 2-foot depth interval. A second sample from the2- to 4-foot depth interval was also collected from 4 of the 7 shallow borings. Threelocations representing onsite drainage swales were sampled (see Figure 1), with two.

1SOL SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR

CHEMICAL ANALYSES3'eirninary Site investigation

Carer-Lee LjmoerIN

BonngLocation

CLS301

CLS302

CLS8C3

CLSB04

CLSBOS

CLSB06

CLS807CLSB08CLSB00

CLS810

CLS811CLSB12

CLBK01

CLBK02CLBK03

o^tm

•8-20•3-2

•8-203-28-10•6-18

8-1014.160-22-40-22-40-20-20-22-42-4

44

0-1 58-1016-18

Oat*

v.,64211*9211.6/9211&92

11*92

11/5*211S9211/44211/442

11*9211*9211*9211*9211*9211*9211*9211*9211*92

11/4*211/4*211/4*2

Parameter*

VOA. BNA. PEST.PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST,f>CB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA, PESTJPC8. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANIDE

VOA, BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOEVOA, BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOEVOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA, PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOEVOA. BNA, PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

0-2 1 1 /S*2 VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE64 11/5*2 !

14-16 11/5*21 MS 11/3*2 VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANIDE

NSCLBKD4 MS 11/3*2 VOA, BNA. PEST/PC8. METALS. CYANlOECLBKDS M.S 11/3*2 VOA, BNA, PEST/PCS. METALS. CYANIDECLSKD8 NSCLBMJ7CLBWD8

MS 11 1*2 VOA. BNA. PEST/PC8. METALS. CYANlOEMS 11/3*2 BNA. METALS

CUM» MS 11.1*2 BNA. METALSOJK10 MS 11/342 BNA. METALSOJK11 MS 11/3*2 BNA. METALSCLBK12 CMS 11.142 BNA, METALSCLBK13 MS 11.142 BNA. METALSCLBK14 MS 1M42 BNA. METALSCLBK1S 045 11.142 BNA. METALS

CLBK17CLSS01

CLSS02

CLSSC3

3-0504505-104505-1MS05-1

11.1921114211/34211/34211/34211/34211192

BNA. METALSVOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PC8. METALS. CYANlOE

VOA. BNA. PEST/PCB. METALS. CYANlOE

NS - NOt ConnM oxtt not 0* ottatwo.

Art,'<J whoro 'icd soil1

was lespiead (I'jtf/ ' i andcovered with b" topfulland 6"

iIT

NOTES: Locations are approximate• indicates backgroundmonitoring well

The railroad tracks areuluvalud about 6 8 ftabove ttio [ulative groundsui1ac«

Approxnnato "iod "jOil"L)tO(..K[)ile aiua (Nov 19U4)

Iftincli

® CMW 1

A CLSBO^'

• i . l : . H O S

O < • ! HK04

Fence

Hailroad

Asphalt

Lumber WarehouseBuildings

Cioss SectionLocation

Surface DrainageFlow Direction

Monitoring Wull

Vv'aiui lauiu Bonny

Shallow Soil Boring

Ottsilo SoilSample

Drainage Swale SoilSample

FIGURE 1Phase 1 Field Investigation

Monitonng Well, Cross Section,and Soil Sample Locations

Carter I ee LumberIndianapolis, IN

M E M O R A N D U MPage 3January 25, 1993GLO65616.DE.DE

samples collected from each location—one from 0 to 0.5 foot below ground surface(bgs) and the second from 0.5 to 1 foot bgs.

Offsite Surface Soil Sampling

Offsite soil samples were collected to compare the concentrations of potential sitecontaminants with surrounding site conditions. The area in which the Carter-LeeLumber site is located has been and is currently heavily industrialized. The offsitesamples will help to determine the concentrations of inorganic and polynucleararomatic hydrocarbon organic fractions that may be attributable to this industrialsetting rather than to identifiable site-related sources.

Samples were collected from locations representing nearby residential settings,proximate to city streets and intersections, proximate to railroad lines, and fromvacant urban properties. Fifteen offsite soil samples were collected from locationswithin one-half mile of the CLL site. Samples were collected from the upper 0- to0.5-foot depth interval (see Figures 1 and 2) with a stainless steel soil auger, cleanedbetween each collection point. A list of samples collected to represent offsiteconditions is provided in Table 1, designated with a CLBK prefix (CLBK01 throughCLBK17). Soil samples were not collected from locations CLBK03 and CLBK06 eastof the site because access was denied by Conrail.

Monitoring Well Installation

Five monitoring wells were installed at the locations shown in Figure 1. WellsCMW-1 and CMW-2 were installed to provide water quality data from an apparentupgradient location. Wells CMW-3, CMW-4, and CMW-5 were installed to representapparent downgradient conditions. The wells were constructed with 10-foot screensthat intercepted the water table.

The borings were advanced using 4.25-inch I.D. hollow-stem augers and were sampledcontinuously at 2-foot intervals. Where soil samples were collected for chemicalanalyses, a 3-inch O.D. split spoon was used. Where soil samples were not collectedfor chemical analyses, a standard 2-inch O.D. split spoon was used. Samples werelogged by the CH2M HILL hydrogeologist. Attachment 1 contains copies of the soilboring logs.

Wells were constructed as described in the Work Plan, with 2-inch Schedule 40 PVCriser with a 10-foot length of 0.010-inch factory-slotted screen. Following screen andriser installation, a medium-grained sand pack was placed in the annulus of theborehole to a height of 2 feet above the top of the screen. Fine sand was placed to a

IOliver Ave.

CARTER-LEELUMBER YARD

1000-

APPROXIMATESCALE IN FEET

LEGEND

Ra-lroad

Carter-Lee Lumber NPL Site

Carter Lee Lumber Yard

CLBK16 O Soil Sample Location

FIGURE 2Oftslte Soil Sample Locations

Carter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis. IN

M E M O R A N D U MPage 4January 25, 1993GLO65616.DEDE

height of 2 feet above the filter pack. Granular bentonite was placed above the sandpack to a height of 4 feet bgs. The wells were completed with a concrete surfaceseal. CMW-2 was completed as a flush-mount. The remaining four wells werecompleted with 4-inch-diameter locking, steel-protective casing. Monitoring wellconstruction details are shown in Figure 3.

The completed wells were developed using a suction pump until the pumped waterwas substantially free of sediment

Groundwater Sampling

Groundwater samples were collected from the water table borings and the monitoringwells using a stainless steel bailer. Prior to sampling, depth to water and to thebottom of the well were recorded and the volume of water within the well casing andscreen was calculated. A minimum of five well volumes was removed from the welland collected in 55-gallon DOT drums. Following sample collection, sample bottleswere stored in a cooler on ice.

Surveying

Coordinates and elevations for the monitoring wells and the water table soil boringswere established during the week of November 8, 1992. Vertical locations for thewells were surveyed to the nearest 0.01 foot Indiana Flood Control and WaterResources Commission bench marks were used for vertical control. Horizontallocations for the welb and soil borings were surveyed to the nearest foot Theproperty fenceline was used for horizontal control

Investigation Results

Site Stratigraphy

Geologic information obtained from the soil borings was used to prepare several crosssections of the geology beneath the site. Figure 1 shows the locations of the crosssections, and the cross sections are presented in Figures 4, 5, and 6.

The cross sections indicate that much of the area where the red soil was respread in1987 is underlain by 12 to 16 feet of fill. The fill consists of sandy gravel; clayey, siltysand; and miscellaneous debris (wood, concrete, and bricks). A black, dense, compactsilty sand (similar in appearance to foundry sand or cinders) was encountered atborings CLSB01, CLSB02, CLSB03, and CLSB10. The sand appeared to be mixed

a

A Top of PVC Caring

B Ground Surfaca s^6m

C Top of Granular Banlonlla j

D Top of Sand Pack

E Top of Wall Scraan jj

IIi!

1

F Boliom of Wall Scraan |lG Bottom of Boring " i;

-A

j t

> '

I \I.I

/

I

I

•

.- Wall Cap

/ 4" Start Prolacllva.S caring; 7-loollong

ijfa

! .. Concrala

Vitt

tty^ r PVC Caalng

/

Granular Banlonlla

^ ""wISl1"8 A B C D E F G

CMW-1 697.18 695.18 69118 682.15 67815 66815 66765

CMW-2* 696.56 697.14 693.14 681.14 67714 66714 66664

CMW-3 694.33 692.55 68855 681.55 67755 667.55 66705

1 CMW-4 694.04 691.91 687.91 681.91 677.91 667.91 667.41Sand Pack

} /^ CMW-5 69263 690.72 686.72 681 72 67772 66772 66722

\ tA.i iAnii«unK«ii EtovallonaaralnlaatandararafarancadtoMSL/ " rPW Scraan "CMW-2 la a Kuan mount

]

FIGURE 3 ^^^Monitoring Well Construction Details BHH

Carter 1 fifi 1 iimhrr ^ S^SSSS

Indianapolis, IN ^^^^_

TOO

MO-

8 JO-

/DO

6KO

brt)

•CM4MFUT

Will U<«JwJ i>«Kl Mid UfUMl

Uomly UKIVH) t *

ECU

V

•HwlUotf'

Ul«* bWy build

CUlyny Sand

Wul Suiwn

NuvwKxK iyWdhll I uvul

llflk) Illliilval HGURfc4

Geologic Cro** Seclion A lo A*

BNorth

Bf

South

700 —i

690-

680-

670-

CMW-1 CLSB01 CLSB10 CMW-3

LEGEND

Orange Clay

Grey Clay

EOBEOB

s

660-1

Asphalt

Well-Graded Sand and Gravel

Sandy Gravel Fill

Poorly-Graded Sand

Silt

Clay

so

"Red Soil"

Black Silty Sand

Clayey Sand

End of Boiring

Well Screen

November 1992Water Level

Soil Sample Interval

SCALE IN FEET

FIGURE 5Geologic Cross Section B to B'

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, IN

cNorthwest

C'Southeast

FormerTrench

700 -I

690 -

680 -

670 -

660

FtodBnckCLSB02 CISD03 CLSB04

CLSB11CMW5

(CLSB12)

LEGEND

EOB

OB

Asphalt

Well-Graded Sand and Gravel

Sandy Gravel Fill

Poorly-Graded Sand

Silt

Clay

"Red Soil" SCALE IN FEET

Black Silly Sand

Clayey Sand

End of Bolring

Well Screen

November 1992Water Level

Soil Interval

FIGURE 6Geologic Cross Section C to C'

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. IN

M E M O R A N D U MPage5January 25, 1993GLO65616.DE.DE

with fly ash. This black sand was found from depths of 7 to 16 feet at CLSB01 andfrom 2 to 11 feet at CLSB02. At boring CLSB02, some wood fragments wereencountered within the black sand interval. The thickness of the unit pinched out atborings CLSB03 and CLSB10. Traces of fly ash were found at most borings acrossthe site within the upper 10 feet. A mothball-like odor was detected at CLSB02.

A thin lens of red soil (3 to 6 inches) was encountered at CLSBOl about 6 inchesbelow the ground surface where that soil had apparently been respread and extendedeast to monitoring well CMW-4. The thickness of the red soil increased to about 2.5feet toward CMW-4 (Figure 4).

A clayey, silty, sand unit was encountered beneath the sand and gravel fill atmonitoring well CMW-1. It is uncertain whether this unit is native to that location oris fill. This clayey sand was also encountered within the fill area at borings CLSB02,CLSB03, CLSB04, and CLSB11. The clayey sand and fill is underlain by coarse-grained sand and gravel at depths from about 7 to 16 feet. Discontinuous silt andclay deposits above the sand and gravel unit were encountered in borings across muchof the site and are consistent with the regional geology described in the PreliminarySite Evaluation Report for the Carter-Lee Lumber site (CH2M HILL May 1992).

Site Hydrogeology

Groundwater level data obtained from the five monitoring wells during November1992 were used to produce a phreatic surface map for the site (Figure 7). Thegeneral direction of groundwater flow is to the southeast. This corresponds withregional information that depicts groundwater flow in the western half of MarionCounty to the east-southeast toward the White River and toward a cone of depressionabout one-half mile southeast of the CLL site. The cone of depression is the result ofextensive pumping by area industries. A more complete discussion of the regionalhydrogeology is presented in the Preliminary Site Evaluation Report.

Soil Analytical Results

The analytical results for the onsite and offsite soil samples were tabulated. Thegeometric average and the maximum and minimum concentrations of each compoundanalyzed were calculated for each data set (i.e., the onsite sample set and the offsitesample set). Where a compound was reported as undetected, half of the detectionlimit of that compound was used in the calculations.

The data were then analyzed to determine whether there was a statistical differencebetween the onsite and offsite analytical results. The student's t-test at the 95 percent

Area whuie ' tod ::,i>il"was it.'bpiuad ( rJU/jCuvetod with fj" topsuand 6" gravel

CMW-2'(CLBK01)

(675.ar MSL)

Apfiroxuiiato "rod soil"stockpile area (Nov 19B4)

Lui;;iliuii

100'

SCALE IN FEET

LEGEND

675.0

® CMW 1

• CISBO?

A CLSB05

O CLBK04

D CLSS03

Fanco

Hailruad

Asphalt

Lunitxjr WaiotiousoBuildings

Water Table ConlomRelorunco to MSL in ft

Surface DrainageFlow Direction

Monitoring Well

Water Table Boring

Shallow Soil Bonng

Background SoilSample

Drainage Swale SoilSample

NOTES: Locations are approximate• indicates backgroundnujnilonng well

The railroad tracks areelevated about 6 8 habove Itte ground surface

e

FIGURE?Phase 1 Field Investigation

Water Table Surface MapCarter Lee Lumber f»^17T7*]77f

Indianapolis, IN

M E M O R A N D U MPage 6January 25, 1993GLO65616.DE.DE

confidence level was used in the analysis. The analytical and statistical results aregiven in Tables 2-1 through 2-4 in Attachment 2. The right-hand column of thesetables provides a "P" value. This value indicates the probability that the mean offsiteconcentration is significantly different than the onsite concentrations of the sameparameter. The "P" value, if less than 0.05, indicates a significant difference betweenthe two concentrations.

Inorganic

Table 2-1 in Attachment 2 summarizes the offsite analytical results for metals. Thetable does not include the sample results for those borings located near railroads.Those results are shown in Table 2-3A for borings CLBK09 and CLBK17. The onsiteanalytical results for metals are summarized in Table 2-2 in Attachment 2.

The results of the student's t-test indicate that arsenic, calcium, and magnesiumconcentrations were statistically greater onsite than offsite. The higher arsenic levelscould be associated with storage of treated wood since arsenic is often used as a woodpreserving agent. Concentrations of aluminum, potassium, and vanadium weregreater offsite than onsite (see Table 2). The results indicated no statisticaldifference between onsite and offsite concentrations for the remaining inorganiccompounds. A summary of the statistical results for the onsite and offsite data ispresented in Table 2-2.

Organic

Table 2-3 in Attachment 2 summarizes the offsite analytical results for organics andpesticides/PCBs. Again, the table does not include the sample results for thoseborings located near railroads. Those results are shown in Table 2-3A for boringsCLBK09 and CLBK17. The onsite analytical results for organics and pesticides/PCBsare summarized in Table 2-4 in Attachment 2.

The results of the student's t-test indicate no statistical difference between onsite andoffsite soil concentrations for VOCs and SVOCs. The t-test was not applied to thepesticides/PCBs at this time. A summary of the statistical results for the onsite andoffsite data is presented in Table 3.

Groundwater Analytical Results

The groundwater analytical results for organics and pesticides/PCBs are summarizedin Table 4. The table includes the geometric average and maximum and minimumvalues of each compound detected. Also included in the table are the adult

Table 2ONSITE vs OFFSITE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR METALS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Metals (mg/kg)

AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

AverageOffeMe OnsKe

0824 434437 3930 120

828 MO001 061002 048

35188 94850147 18787 67

438 20.714854 15825

OS 7 33411283 20883

600 440010 011169 187899 027031 030048 050

13127 11280024 01721.1 140

10577 0878

MailmumValue

Oftslle Onslte

10000 1490039 10

142 197198 328

2 16160 13

128000 230000489 439109 163

0970 11430400 101000

493 37039400 690001400 1280038 046333 1732130 1250

1 35099 241510 332042 04645.9 880424 604

MinimumValue

OffsMe Onslte

2400 109034 336

012 24149 12021 0.11042 0072250 4400

07 4831 2283 37

0670 5160101 341480 005262 204

000 00509 29433 1090.11 0.110.42 0.4226.2 29.30.1 018.3 53

23 1 131

T-testP(T<t)

0015018

00120105057040

00041033024011081018

0029031047032001025025

00580026022

10-4Cancer

Risk---—

18.279

--

—.-

—..

--

~

..

..

~

..

..

..

..

..

••

..

••

10-8C sneer

Risk----

—0.163

—

—..

—

—.,

—..

—

~

—..

..

.»

_,_

_

--

Hasardlndex-1

—1 40E + 02

1 06E »02

2 46E »04

176E «03

1 /BE t02..

1 766 (03 a_

1.30E * 04..

..

—

3 bOE « 04

1 Obt t 02

7 OOE (03_

1 76E t03

1 76E «03„

„

2 4 6 E « 0 3

7 OOE i 04-percent confidenceChromium VI

BGVSOSXLS

Table 3OFFSITE vs ONSITE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS

SUMMARY TABLEPreliminary Site Investigation

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Compound

/olatllM (ug/kg)itothytone ChtorktoKcatonaBulanoM (MEK)

rnchtoroeuMTM'oluena

Ettiyibenzwte

ytoiM (mtod)

tonl-volatilM (ugykg)

2-MethytnaphthatomaphlhykNW

Kcmphthene)ltenzofuranDMhylpMhalate

Ptwnanthrene

AnthracMMCartMzote

Dt-n-butylprilhalateluoranttMM

Pyren*Butyfcenzylphthatale3.3>-Dtehtofoto«nzkJln*tonzo(a]anUirac«Mhryverw

bte(2-Elriylhexyl)phthalateDi-n-octylphtnalateBenzofbjfluorantheneBenzo(k|fluorantrMfwB«ao(a]pyrwM

Indenofl,2>cd]pyreneDibenz(a,h)anthracene

Benzo(g,hli]pefylene

OMMIMtrtC

Average

13.07.95.75.70.15.75.74.9

131.512011299147.0143.12101160.4600.0229.11756123.3506.5750.4210.1210.1525.0651.02360153.0637.1472.6574947712195392.2

9214.00.15.59.25.75.25.0

207.3100.2134.0106.0144.0239.6147.2543.7252.1159.0115.7679.3774.3252.1252.1476.0515.4233.4105.0661.0390.7450.62903243.1342.0

MaximumVahM

OIUM« Onalte

42190.5051606.5656.5

290024005901700160010503500220004900200010501000020000105010500700910010501050540059006600330010502000

55170310.5130050.565

2200140010001000120010000106500120050010000400150003000360053006400360030001200057007000360036006200

MinimumValue

OfUM* On«Ua

655555.5

15.55.5

2

21252428X

17530203942202920

17517522352032

ITS17517514023

120

34282132196423604542207474

17017059703919

13017050297884

T-tect

0350050590490.440890140.41

0160.240920690.970630710830.790.770.660.770960.470470.82057096055092055056014076068

10-4Cancer

Risk

9.33E + 06

6.36E + 06

3.60E + 06

1.66E + 069.69E + 039.S9E + 036.00E + 06

9.69E + 039.59E + 039.69E + 039.69E + 039.69E + 039.69E + 03

10-6Cancer

Risk

9.33E + 04

6.36E + 04

3.60E + 04

1.66E + 039.69E + 019.69E + 016.00E + 04

9.69E + 019.69E + 019.69E + 019.69E + 019.59E + 019.69E + 01

Hazardlndex-1

2.10E + 073.60E + 071.76E + 07

7.00E + 077.00E + 063.60E + 077.00E + 08

1.40E + 07

2.10E + 07

2.80E + 081.40E + 07

1.05E + 08

3.60E + 071.40E + 07LOSE+ 077.00E + 07

7.00E + 067.00E + 06

Page 1 TBL 3.XLSfv\

Table 3OFFSITE va ONSITE ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR OROANICS

SUMMARY TABLEPreliminary Slle Investigation

Carter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Compound

rtaptachtafhMjptacntor epodda4.4--OOE

EndrtnEndoauNanll4.4--000EndoauNanauNate4.4--DOTMlathoKycntoEndrinkatonatfpha-Cntordana (a)

ArocloM2S4(b)

OiamilrkAverage

oaMte OnaNa

1.0 1110 1210 2120 2023 2310 1010 2127 4077 10710 2310 16t l> 4 at

168 100

VakM

12 4212 6622 4611 16

6.6 2122 462.2 2666 14012 46

22 331.2 361 9 AAf 4O22 36

MinimumVakM

Offafte OnaNa

00 0000 00

7777770

1700 00Q v ON16 17

£1 10-4Cancer

Rlak

1 66E«047 69E»03206E»Ob

-..

2 92E tOb_

2.06E»Ob_

_

638E + 046.38E f 04909E»03

104Cancer

Rlak

1.66E »027 69E *012.06E « 03_

..

2.92E »03_

2 06E+03__

S.38E«026.38E » 02909E t 01

Hatardlnden-1

1.76E + 064.66E »03

..

1 06E t Ob......

1 7bt tOb._

2 IDE »042.10E « 04

a CMontanaloHMyuaMlb PCB loaca> uMd

Page 2 TBL 3 XLS

Table 4GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSES

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis, Indiana

Station Location

Sample Number

Date SampledMedia

Volatile* (ug/1)Chloroform

Semi-volatiles (ug/1)PhenolNaphthaleneDiethylphthalatarnoininuirinol

Oi-n-butylphthalateFluoranthenePyrenebi*(2-EthylhexyOphthalate

Peaticidee/PCBa (ug/1)Ehdoautfan surtate

AluminiumAraenicBariumBerylNumCalciumChromiumCobatCflooerWHppOT

IronLeadMagnesiumManganeeeMercury^ Ideal'otaaalumSeleniumSodiumThaMumVanadiumZinc

UpgradientCLMW01

ELG37

11-5-92Water

<1C

*1 Q

*10*10

<1Q

*10

<10*10

«0.1

324<1

<112<1

131000<3<5<4

27414

JjatalaM

40.7<0.2114304014

42000<1<j

04

CLMW02

ELG68

11-7-92Water

1

3<10<1t

<1C<10<1004

<0.1

<2<1.0

07.0<1

117000<3<5<t

<fl<1

3240074<0.2114440034

3120014

<3<3

CLMW03

ELG66

11-6-92Water

<10

<10<10<10

04<2

041

042

2041.3

07.01.1

103000<3<5<4

10.014

30000224<0.2•4

407014

401001.0<3

4.0

CLMW04

ELG4711-6-92

Water

<10

<10

<10<1C

*1C^10^10^1 G

«0.1

<241.1

444<1

104000<3<S<4

234<1

40200114<0.2

<s440014

83200<1

<3<3

Oowngradient

CLMW08

ELG6S

11-6-92Water

«10

<10<10<1C

<10<1€<10<10

<0.1

<2414

004<1

107000<3<5<4

11414

30000•04<0.211430403.7

24000<1<3<3

CLGRB01

ELGS1

11-6-92Water

«10

<10<10<1C

1<1C<10<10

<0.1

<24<1

•44<1

132000<3<5<4

142<1

30100•30<0.274

412014

430M<1<3

44

CLGRB02

ELG49

11-6-92Water

«10

22

04A Ao.e

<10<10<10

<0.1

304<1

0041.1

144000<3

124<4

130<1

38*00320<0.2

<S44002.7

40400<1

<304

CLGRB03

ELG48

11-6-92Water

«10

1<10<1<

<T<<K<10<10

<0.1

20.7<1

004<1

188000<3

224<4

17N1.0

303001010<0.2114407024

40300<1<3

244

CLGRB04

ELG30

11/492Water

«10

<1Q

<10«10

0.5

<10<10<10

<0.1

11400.010.728314

287000814304H.3

•41004».7

••30017M0.0

(•4•1M24

47MO<1

404311

Bold type indicate* compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix '<* indicate* the compound waa not detected at or above the method detection Dm*.

Pagel

Table 4GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR CHEMICAL ANALYSES

Preliminary Site investigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

VakM VahM

btQutfoii Cfttwte

MCU W-4 ft*HMKhMu-1

V

CMOfOfOffit

(ugfl)

42

364541

164241

33

0.1

1.177507

1599730

SO11

93.3

022

114001072531.5

257000

Mwcwy

Zinc

LI151.7

0.19-2

4419.422

42052.6062769

30898J

6410040.7

6630017901!O.S6 I8586160

3.7^?y?o

1.4

46.6369

12

090.6OS

10806

005

12OS

4460.5

117000IS2.5

23

0.5

780.12.5

384013

24800OSIS15

4891 4691

20.44 2044

350

210001400

28000

350014001050700

SO

2000

4

100

1300

15

100

SO

2

0.1635

0.0885

16.35

6.65

10.52450

175

175

1295

350010.5700

175

2457000

Pa«>2

M E M O R A N D U MPage?January 25, 1993GLO65616.DE.DE

occupational 10"* and 10"6 cancer risks where risk levels have been established.Table 5 summarizes the results of groundwater analyses for inorganics.

Summary

This preliminary site investigation focused on potential source areas previouslyidentified during the preliminary assessment/site investigation (PA/SI) phaseconducted by FIT contractors in 1985. The investigative activities performed duringthis phase attempted to obtain samples representative of potential source areas,locations outside the source areas, the offsite conditions, andupgradient/downgradient groundwater conditions.

The preliminary site information indicated the primary compounds of concernincluded metals and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PNAs). These samecompounds are also commonly found in urban industrial settings from ubiquitoussources such as emissions from manufacturing, vehicle emissions, railroad operations,and asphaltic paving. For that reason, a number of offsite samples were collected forcomparison with onsite samples to determine if a statistically significant difference inconcentrations existed.

In reviewing the analytical results and the statistical comparisons of those results forinorganic compounds, it appears arsenic may be found onsite at concentrationsgreater than those found offsite. Further, the concentrations of arsenic found onsiteat three locations — CLSB02-3, CLSB08-1 in the vicinity of the red soil disposal area,and CLSB05-1 in the western portion of the site — appear to be isolated "hot spots".The generally higher arsenic concentrations found onsite may be attributable to thestorage of arsenic-containing preserved wood products onsite. Beryllium was alsofound onsite at higher concentrations at the same locations, which may indicate a hotspot for arsenic and beryllium. The average and hot spot concentrations are less thanthe hazard indexes and the 10"4 cancer risk levels for either beryllium or arsenic. Theremaining inorganic compounds were not statistically different compared with offsiteconcentrations of the same compounds.

The average concentrations of PNAs onsite were not significantly different than theconcentration found offsite. The concentrations of PNAs at some onsite and offsitelocations, however, were found to be above the 1 in 1 million (10"6) cancer riskprediction concentrations for an adult occupational exposure scenario. The PNA andmetal concentrations found onsite and offsite are well below the 1 in 10,000 (10"*)cancer risk prediction concentrations for an adult occupational exposure scenario.

Table 5GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis, Indiana

Santpw NIXTMT

CLMWV01

M€KA37

11-5-92

CUMMQ

MEKMfl

11 -7

CUI4W03

MEKA06

11-6-92wav

CLMW04

MEKM7

11-642

CIMWOS

MEKA65

11-6-92WMr

CLGR801

MEKAS1

11-642

CLGR802J

MEKA49

11-642

CUGRB03

MEKA49

11-6-92Wattr

CLGRBO

MEKA30

11-4-92Witw

toorgamcs (uojflMumnun 324

<32

townSvyttwnCMmunC*cunCfranum

14C7

2C4<3214•71.1<4

«2S<321.1

<2S<3214

«25<32

34J•02

M.7<32

U

Coppv <4

M4

<3<Sc4

M412

<4

••<3

<4

294

<4m<3

«4114

1.1<4

<3<S<4

142

M1M

122<41»

1S«000<3

224<4

17M1

JtJ 7J X24 114Mnwy

3

<4312M

14«4

14<4

74412*

14

3J2fl

<5

THriMn<3<3

1

<3| O<3

<3O

<344

<3•4

Cywdt

10*O^114

447*24

11400<3210.72S314<4

2S700*

30J99.3

(41004».7

17N041M4

24

47MO

<3244 JW

iM.

Table 5GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis, Indiana

Station Location

Sample Number

Date Sampled

Media

Inorganic* (ug/l)

Aluminium

Antimony

Arsenic

Barium

BerylliumCadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobaft

CopperIron

leadMagnesium

Manganese

MercuryNickelPotasalum

Selenium

Silver

Sodium

ThaMumVanadium

ZincCyanide

Average Comparisons

Geometric

Average

40161

7712

159973

253

881

38008

14808

4419

22

420531285

Maximum

Value

11400

1611

25322

257000

523199

6410050

66300

17901

666160

42

532001

47389

5

Minimum

Value

131«1

451A

11700022

22

130800

aG1«

384014

24800

1225

Water Ingestton Criteria

MCU

-6

SO2000

4

5-

100-

1300-15--2

100-50--2--

200

Cancer104rlak

--

2.33-

0.81-------

'

-----------

Cancer10-4 riak

--

0.0233-

0.0081-------------------

Health

lndex-1

_14

10.5

2450

17.5

17.5-

175-

1295

---

3500

10.5

700-

175175--

2457000700

Bold type indicates compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix "<* indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 2

M E M O R A N D U MPageSJanuary 25, 1993GLO65616JDE.DE

Onsite, the highest concentrations of PNAs were identified in soil in or around thearea where the red soil was first spread and were limited to the upper 6 to 8 feet.This area roughly corresponds with the portion of the site found to be "filled" with avariety of materials, including black sand, bricks, and other construction debris. Fillmaterial can often be high in metals and PNAs. Samples from intervals below 8 feetwere typically well below the 10* cancer risk levels.

Although there is not a sufficient number of groundwater samples to allow statisticalcomparisons, there appears to be no difference in contaminant concentrations insamples collected from upgradient and downgradient positions. The concentrations ofall parameters analyzed were found to below the Iff4 cancer risk predictionconcentrations for an adult occupational exposure scenario and did not exceed theMCLs.

In general, it appears the concentration of contaminants in the site soil are similar tothose identified in the surrounding urban, industrialized setting. There does notappear to be an impact on the shallow groundwater at the site from sitecontaminants.

100114C&GLO

Attachment 1SOIL BORING LOGS

3(

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER

/ C

SOIL BORING LOG

btr LOCATION Aril. 04- «.-!•<

DPlL-iNG CONTRACTOR

-PILING METVCC AND EQUIPMENT

«AT£a_£VELS START i>/3/f A. FINISH 'lllsjlj .,/ * / J OGGER

w t)< »

p nu

SU

HfA

C

SAMP.E

VA

UJ>3ji-22

ii

cr'jj

S-A.SCAPO6HFTUTO

^EST1ESU.TS

N)

SOIL CESCRIP^ON

SOL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY SOIL STRUCTURE-MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASiNG. DRILLING RATE.ORILL94G FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

(,'T

10

1"'

tr,^

011-J

•y/y-r

1.7 3-7--7-C

O-s-J-3

Sa«r>c dUosc-

8 MlREV n 39?CRM 0<5d(

I^Liftj !«//'*

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER

&L-O (pS(t>Lf- f^O-^S CsfTlvJ-l ' SH£=T ^ CF ^?

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT Car^*r- ^-<*- /U.mt"' LOCATION AJar+i ~Ctrt4nJL fsiJL of S.'lt-

ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR /ZTE'C^

DRILLING METHOD ANO-EQUIPMENT /7?oW.lt A -It 1

WATPP 1 FVFI <?

DE

PT

H B

ELO

WS

UR

FA

CE

(FT

)

Ha'

-

& ~

-

—

—

-

AS'

SAMPLE

INT

ER

VA

L

**

*»

»•*

UJoca.UJ>

l\ RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT

)

A*

'

„

,,

>

P,

START H/3/9A FINISH /I / .3 79 J i nrsGER ^.Pt-l-frso*

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

6' -6' -6'(N)

C#£)

9;r";:"5-7-«?-/y

O<<)

"£

9-iM7-£

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME, USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY

P^-g^ •""*

an 4 ScAWfx^M/U"" g'&v«-k •

5am/. ^sw^- ^p wet- .

S^ CS^, ^

rS gHS:jbA^As . | ^O4 ^ *7-S"'

•

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

-

JZ.

-

(8.30)REV 11,89 FORM D1S36

3:

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBERSHEET

SOIL BORING LOG

DflHL_*G MET-nCC AND EQUIPMENT

EVELS

DHILL.NG CONTRACTOR

<77ab.U ^>^». s/Vv*'

LOCATXDN

A-rgC

START u r9a . FINISH

3" V*Vi, Igj»* LOGGER JL-Pt+trto^

W )H

lHtM

JiU

MM

SAMPLE

VA

U

NUMH

ERA

ND

TY

PE

RE

CO

VE

RY

STANDARD

TESTRESULTS

6--S--6*

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLORMOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILUNG RUIO LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

= 0

0\ I.*

/•*

1.1

CL47

1* ~]

i-S-v-3 *'""'

03(8301

REV II 89PORMOlSae

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER

SHEET

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT

ELEVATION -^

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVELS

DRILLING CONTRACTOR

LOqATION

A-T£ g,

START II ) C / 9 P FINISH' i • ~

IDfifigR

OW

FT

)D

EP

TH

BE

SU

RF

AC

E

SAMPLE

ER

V

NU

MB

ER

AN

D T

YP

E

RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT)

STANDARDENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

6'-6--6-

(N)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING, DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

I"

T.f>

t3tf>

- 4 <?"/.r a. J"

A* /.*mtd 5o«n<.

.-# 7-8--/I/-J3

• SxW. On*. Cant*. .«, H((f,,

30

(8.30)REV 11.89 FORM 0^536

$-

Ul

i

Ulxa.as —-iz< E

CO

VE

RY TeS"

BESULTS

iN)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SCHL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING R.UIO LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

= O «2 POf*

**••

/(pOO - S-/t«r-*- bo*-. t«,

0A/

•1 •

0 •

b* A* 0-7-fr-JCo«.t -

S».r»U.

lO

AJo

/a 'f

14

HEV 11 89FOSM01S3I

•a

•

^S PROJECT NUMBER

GrLob^bib.Fo. FSBORING NUMBER

£/Hu/-_3 SHEET <^. CF^

^^™ SOIL BORING LOG1PROJECT ^VcV«<- JL«*. i.u«*<O«/* LOCATION S«w»-Vt- f *o4<&_^ Art flL *£ Sf/-*_

ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR /} 1* £ C-

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT /X?ab.l«_ &-W. */ VY * ^S* *3~.~nrh "5^'' *"• -5-^a*^

WATPR 1 PVPI 5

DE

PT

H B

ELO

WS

UR

FAC

E (F

T)

-

n

K~_

^™

—

-

SAMPLE

INTE

RV

AL

,,

,!-»

-

^

^

NU

MB

ER

AN

D T

YP

E

RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT)

'

0

p

,.r

• * '

START {(Julqj. FINISH M/.»/fj inrtGEH /-re^ryaA

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

6--6--S'(N)

'-

"5T,.,,,..,/I'lM tl1/

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOMOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE COR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTUMINERALOGY

:2SS??rtr3

L. COLOR.JENSITYRE.

-

—

1 , Con**.

•< **tl?.~

—

—

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

7

:

«.^ -

(8-30)REV 11/89 FORM 01586

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER5HEE c^

SOIL BORING LOG

= .£.»* CM DRILL VG CONTRACTOR

\G UETXC AND EQUIPMENT <7)»ta. <«. 3-1^1 . V/y*

LOCATION £*.**"Aree.

pardon

START . 1/3 /f FiMSH

SAMP-.EN

UM

BE

RA

ND

TY

PE

HF

CO

VE

RY

(M)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MCHSUjRE CONTENT RELATIVE OENSrTYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.M.NERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASiNG. DRILLING RATEDRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

6f * «-3 ppot

r

3*7*

.(,*

nflo.vf.

< '5A*i>

3, <-<

1 <• 3-3-J-3''U»

of

If

rf?'H-** l.f

8301BEV ll,89FORMOiSi

IW.ISIII9

PROJECT

ELEVATION

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBERSHEET

SOIL BORING LOG

DRILLING CONTRACTOR

LOCATION

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LFVFIS

DE

PT

H B

ELO

WS

UR

FA

CE

(F

T)

((/ -

-

_

*~.

fH'

i :

SAMPLE

INT

ER

VA

L

,,„

,-

,-

„

NU

MB

ER

AN

D T

YP

E

RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT)

'•'

„

*

,..

START \( ] 3/9^1 FINISH il/3j/QJ- i nr,GER Z. Pe^?r<-*<.

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

(N)

'»>"

"«>"

m*-***c/o

,,r

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

/SV.

l ilr

***.Cs^, -

tp^J^vtr

—

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

I

—

—

fl

V

•(8.30)

REV 11,89 FORM 01536

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER

SOIL BORING LOG

LOCATION

CP-L-iNG CONTRACTOR

EQUIPMENT

.VA~a.=vE'_S START /-> > 3 FINISH LOGGER

l>t»

MM

lit IO

WS

UH

fAC

t(H

) SAMP-.E

ERVA

L za.;U>

la

EC

OV

tRY PENETRATIONTES-

SC'L CESCRIP'HON

SCH. NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MCHSTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE OENSPTYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

//*/*.

c? (ol /o 38 ^^j

Ci)

- 66-

•J-fc

66-

sr__rtfo.-4-L

dto)

It i".

1-3 r /».,**««*- o»~

(830)REV •

I+W.ISUIM

PROJECT NUMBER

. FO -

BORING NUMBER

SHEET OF

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT

ELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR

LOCATION

>4-TgC

COf)*f ./-I

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT (71 oV>. If &-(f\

WATER LEVELS

DE

PT

H B

ELO

WS

UR

FA

CE

(F

T)

-

\t

A>

9}

'

SAMPLE

INT

ER

VA

L

,.-^,.-p.

NU

MB

ER

AN

D T

YP

E

,v(j

RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT

)

,.»

'

/-'

l -S

START |||^j

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

6--6'-6-(N)

7^

7T*.»*,,

73r

9*. FINISH uMj/92 inrsfiER ^ Pi-krso*SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GR<MOISTURE CONTENT,OR CONSISTENCY, SCMINERALOGY

Ut4.VVou>- P*"»UK\t

5"fth.vt\x. L S^JI/ — ^^^ ^

noC\ iot^tA*£ O^A*^^*

?A w*1 m ^ ^ \j|y Q IxJj

QkoA. *^**%' f^»4. du?»<*«. a-cawtl. 5»»tM.

DUP SYMBOL, COLOR.RELATIVE DENSITYIL STRUCTURE,

/^: ;

i C^uO, 6<ow<\n*t. O1«.nu p«VjtfSI

—

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

r „ :

-

:

i

(830)REV 11,89 FORM 01536

PRO.ECT NUMBER BORING NUMBERSHEET I CFj

SOIL BORING LOG

LOCATION

CPiL- NG CCN'PACTCR A"^

EQUIPMENT . 'V '/v • . 3S-ART ^FINISH

NU

MH

UI

AN

D 1

VH

cov

6-S--6'N)

SOU DESCRIPTION

SOU. NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYCR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

66"

01

(*«

10

H

-H-b

/ 3

r-A

SO.C ?

Of- COCV

18 30)REV IT 89PCRM "'536

PROJECT NUMBER

G-uo bBORING NUMBER

CLS&O/ SHEET

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT

ELEVATION

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

LOCATION

DRILLING CONTRACTOR A-"7"gC-

WATER

o*-'2t°*h-U.

a.ccoco

/(f

~

—

-

• :

LEVELS

<

_i

trLU1—

*"*

,,»

SAMPLE

LUceo.UJ>ffl^20

ii

«

(XLU

o

SE

A

*

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

(N)

(4>)

C*(*l

START /l/^/*i FINISH /I/

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME, USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

,*'»=

**^o<»^V/*i»*H7vS nr'8li^-~EM!nM:-

c\ot*t ftcrCwt-aiTi 8\»*K. j.«t «^iAvfr[^o\j^« ^C^5 .» I

r . v^ t t -

^ ..,w :

—

i» /*"J- i nr,GER /• PA'HrSov^

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS,TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

&"

—

* :

—

—

(830)REV 11 89 FORM Oi535

PROJECT NUMBER BCAING NUMBER

SOIL BORING LOG

P«C.£" -VAT* V-JtS'

;= L. V3 UE-VGC AND EQUIPMENT

-£a 1SVE-.S

DRILL NG CONTRACTOR

START

LOCATCN

FINISH !»//>/«.» LCX3GER

$-

VA

UN

I

£3.

O —23 C

OV

E H

V

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SC«L NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL COLOR.MC*STURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING 'H.UIO LOSS.TESTS ANC NSTRUMENTATION

PP*

0\ }•*

4

u

01

00

60

C«-A

"» r«A $«.L

- /oho*- bl*f<

of-

I4! 3-35 WC-/3)

oJlor

-- 66-

(830)REV I! 39sCPMO-53!

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER

Cut, Bo^. SHEET OF

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT _

ELEVATION

LOCATION &rcux,L re<L So I

DRILLING CONTRACTOR A-f£ C

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVELS

2*SirOc/>

/<f-

-

?*'-

:

SAMPLE

INTE

RV

AL

*

*»

NU

MB

ER

AN

D T

YP

E

0

RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT

)

,,

„

START iJ^/9,1 FINISH U/^/41. inr,GER /-P*bfrse>*

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

(N)

7,T

(.*</}

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME, USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY

5av?\/_ £Sf-6v«A wwv o^ot*-

UtU . r&AtiL ^<»\fi. aii Qrtkv<(. C^" •<j**S' VuzV. o«~*.»> t. vvotfiiv>4. 'Bo'(f»«w (<*'

li Kj'«4'«

*-— \

£06

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

*-•••• ""

^ *..*.'-.

—

—

*(8-30) REV 11.89 FORM 01536 ,

PROJECT NUMBER BCRlNG NUMBER

CcS fe o 3

SOIL BORING LOG

LGCATCN

=-£.** CM CRiL-.NG CONTRACTOR

D« L- NG V£~-CC *NC EQUIPMENT J"START FMSH )l/S/ fJ LOGGER

o.z 2C

ii6'4'-5-

V

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY SOL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

OMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

n. B6- '- o- 9

0' 1-3Q

.»-S.V.

*.C V.-K-r

i-H

V«'1•K

1>K

|0

c.o

3"V»

(830) i: 89=CPMD'5a6

unit

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBERSHEET

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT LOCATION

ELEVATION

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVELS

DRILLING CONTRACTOR

/n.wu 12-k' . 4V 3"START FINISH

' *LOGGER

*S£ZQ-CCUJ3Qo:

SAMPLE

(TUJ

uiceo.UJ>fflHII

HI

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

(N)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY, SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

codL Z

ftt ru»-•pK.-troUrt.Wtt-.

3,5

(8.30)REV 11.89FORM01536,

. . . .

START liyW/+.» FINISH It N/9 J LOGGER Z

SAMP-.E

RV

A

NIIM

BC

HA

NU

1YP

E z_:

O

TEST

fr-sr-er(Nl

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SO<L NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

/3-U-/-S-S3

0-3

jjjC

CU-"•«TJ

o\ 13

(,-* /•-I9-94

f

•- 4.vu. ^-nA

•yI.L,

'*

!830189 FORM 0153i

PROJECT NUMBER BORING NUMBER. SHEE1 A.

SOIL BORING LOG

PROJECT AairWr- Jj,, LOCATION Tre. neELEVATION DRILLING CONTRACTOR A--

DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT

WATER LEVELS START \\J<4j<r,* PII

rec~

HISH M^AoJ 1C.lOfiFR L.- ra4er- e> *

5-

r— U.Q.I

QCO

-

;—

-

SAMPLE

INT

ER

VA

L

„.

UJ(TO.

mi-

11 RE

CO

VE

RY

(FT)

/.r

STANDARDPENETRATION

TESTRESULTS

(N)

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SOIL NAME. USCS GROUP SYMBOL, COLOR,MOISTURE CONTENT, RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE.MINERALOGY

ofV^*^ A OA/f • /*• /-<XcV. uUC <( TVHatrtf'

€^0<5

COMMENTS

DEPTH OF CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILLING FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

—

—

(830)REV 11,89 FORM 01536

NUMBER BCRlNG NUMBED

SOIL BORING LOG

UE--CC AND EQUIPMENT

CONTRACTOR

. V'/y"

S'ART PMSH

$-

r<

z

o

s=s6"=**O»"£5"

6--0--6'N;

SOL DE5CRIPT1ON

5OiL NAME, USCS GROUP SYMBOL. COLOR.MOISTURE CONTENT. RELATIVE DENSITYOR CONSISTENCY. SOIL STRUCTURE,MINERALOGY

COMMENTS

DEPTH OP CASING. DRILLING RATE.DRILUNG FLUID LOSS.TESTS AND INSTRUMENTATION

O<T> orJ- W. k Of Cofti..

ol (of

Vsr-cK

Iff <*'

1

830)39-C

Attachment 2ANALYTICAL/STATISTICAL RESULTS

Table 2-1OFFSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR METALS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberInianapolis. Indiana

Sample No.

Metals (mg/kg)AluminumAntimonyArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobaK

CopperIronLeadMagnesiumManganeseMercuryNickelPotassiumSeleniumSilverSodiumThalliumVanadiumZinc

Cyanide

CLBK01-01

•MA<77

. 14.2070.t0.1

0.40

1300010,2

7.1

20.2

12000•0.4

{OOP

MO0.0*

1(.»•MO.M0.4>

000.2020.2

•0

<06

CLBK01-02

•120<7.6•.70

•1.2O.f

0.4*22M

0.7

7.2

12.1

1130010.0

14SO

701

O.M10.1

•02<0240.41

210.20

11.144

<06

CLBK01-03

2400<602.00

1«.1

0.20.42

120000•.7

3.1•.3

M7010.1

3A£Ofl

404o.oc<••

433

0.230.42100•M•.323

<053

CLBKS02

11000<7.54.M

100.00.7

0.4764460i«..««.o21J

HMO•7.1

22MO14MO.M21.41730

<0250.47117

OJ731.3

73n.a.

CLBKS04

2MO<69

O.M

17.C0.3

0.431070M

O.I

3.«

U70.0

71M

30.230400

271O.M

11.0•M

0.220.431M9M10.7M

n.a.

CLBKSOi

70M<75•.M

M.2O.I

0.47774M

41.07.1

M.«

203M170.01«MO

4M0.3121.210M

0.2B0.471M

•MM.1111ItM.

CLBKS07

••30<72

0.2>

••••o.«0.4*

moo1C.O

«.4

2<.317100

1«.«

40M

370

O.M

14.3

M7<0230.4«

41<0232«J

124

n.a.

CLBKSOI

10100<75

•.4000.1o.c

0.4064900

14.47.2

27.2K100

42.2170M

•02O.OC

14.0

14M0.3*O.M

•80.2021.1

•2

n.a.

CLBKS10

12400<73

<023114.0

0.10.40

100003S.20.1

U.I

21MO101.0•SM

7CO0.1«2«.31*100.240.4«10>

0.1232.0104

n.a.

CLBKS11

7220<76

<024

01.71.0

0.4130400

18.3c.c

•1.030400M.I

•7(0•37

0.1414.«703

0.240.412M

0.203».1241

n.a.

t •

CLBKS12

•310<75O.SO

•6.21.2

0.4731200

11.61.0

01.0

1MOO

230.011300

460

0.27

20.1

OM0.02

0.47

17102C

22.*100

n a.

CLBKS13

2*20<68

7.0014.00.3

0.4210(000

7.0

3.3

13.27>M14.«

31100212

O.M

7.0(4«

0.310.42IK

0.1010.1

2»

n.a.

n.a. = not available

Bold type indicates compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit

Pagel

Table 2-1OFFSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR METALS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberInlanapolls, Indiana

SamplaMo.

AluminumAntimonyAraantoBaiiumBan/mumCadmiumCalciumChromiumCobalCopparIronLaadMagnaaiumManoanaiaMwcuryNlcMPotaaalumOalanlumSKvarSodiumThaMumVanadiumZlnoCyanlda

CUK614

MM*«73

12.MIMA

1AI.M

137M29.311.1M.I

33M*1I1A43M6466.1333.321366.M6.46111164241.6128n.a.

CLBKI1I

7826<734.M62A6.8

648444M

16.764

26.712M61M.6166M

M26.M16.1616643646217

6.2611.1113n.a.

CLBK816

6126«72

13.26M.16.6

641723M

11.18.6

284136M

87.6281M

3646.1313.66366411.46123

6.3317.6226n.a.

Avaraga Compaf laona

OaumatitcAvaraaja

682437

36762906

062361M

14787

43814864

86711283

908010159699031048131

02421 1108

029

MaximumValua

1800039

14201980

20660

128000469169

6970036400493039400

1400038333

21301000991610042489424030

fcJinartaaam•waftwnuvfj

Valua

246034

012141102

0422290

673183

6570101

1460252

00889433Oil042

280106323

026

8oM lnga»llon Cf llai laCancaf

164 rltk

327-

1 33-•---.-..--.-----.-...._

..

..

—

Cancaf16-4 ritk

„

32 /-

133

-----__

-......

•-

HaaMhlndai-1

140

105

245001750

175-•

1750-

12950..

..

35000105

7000-

17501750

..

..

2450700007000

n • • not avariaMa

Bold type indicates compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit

Page 2

Table 2-2ONSITE SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Sample No. CLSSI1-A

totals (mg/ka)Aluminum U70Antimony <72Arsenic 12JBarium «3Beryllium 0.4«Cadmkun <0.90Calcium 12200*Chromium 41Cobai 4.4Copper 21.*Cyanide na.Iron 1MOOLead 232Magnesium M100Manganese 404Mercury 0.41Nickel 14.1Potassium 77iSelenium 0.37Silver <090Thallium 0.44Vanadium 10.4Zinc M.2

CLVM1-B

noo<7010J7«J0.7

<O.M11MOO

•0.17.2

41.0n.a

44700121

11000•77

0.4CM.3N2•.•

<0960.4*1iJ124

CLSS02-A

MM<7.27J41

040<0.tt

102MO20.71.7

2».«n.a.

14 MO•4.2

37MO401O.M11.3•JO0.34

<089<022

107«.«

CLSS02-B

1020<694.1

14.«0.21

<086M900

•.32.1

14.7n.a.

MM14.4

2«100220

<011•J313

<0.22<0.86<0.22

7.427.4

CLSS03-A

3030<7.014.420.00.411.2

10400017.3

422Jn.a.

70M4C.7

27IM27C

tO.110.0•330.24

<O.S7OJ40.7124

CLSS03-B

•MO<7.1•.74«

0.13<0.8972000

14.1iA

30.0n.a.

14100M.4

1MM3(4

<0.111S.1••••.37

<069OJ71l.i72.«

CLSB01-1

44M•••

11.321

O.»1O.I

047M1300.3

23.*n.a.

M7M•0.2

1120077«

0.0«i•3.2•3(

0.33O.C

OJ712.147.i

CLSB01-2

•MOJ.»

11.2••.•0.410.44

1200M10.0•.4

10.3n.a

152001M

34MO•00

O.OSS17.0

10200.3>0.440.2220.4M.3

CLSB01-3

20103.38•.3

11.10.270.42

1300007.1

411.7n.a

•MO4.2

•3100232

O.OM7.0MO

0.240.42

0.10S•••

27 .•

CLSB02-1

4400<7317.4M

0.<2<066•MOO

4*.3•.7

39.2<0572MOO

10011000

7310.212».4M2

0.34<091<0231t.72(7

Page 1 of 4

Table 2-2ONSITE SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

CLSBQ4-4

Mummumtnttmony

lortumtaryaumCadmium

Chromium

Copper

ranoadAflQnMkifn

Mercury

PtfMwiumMtwfUUffl

TnattumVonodfemZinc

•761343M

11.3

M7M114•.1

7M

<06B202M

333741*4330.11113

11M1.2

<OM•4131.3

11M

M.1M4•.11•43

41M•77•.1

4«.7•41

<OM

•7M

•.7714•.M

«002

MM

74174•M

<OM

•IM«72•.2

M4•43

•OK)•71M

•4•.7

124na

•7

144•41

4.1

Ml•.•M

407•41•43•.11

M.1

M41«7M

M>•.11

•.3M4

<057131M

IM

11

134<OS2

44M.7

<OM

MM<ao1.7

•44

1010M•.!44

1*4<002

•24<O.M•4C114M.7

•.11114•71•.33

•092•44

17M.7

•4M*4M

11.7•14•.M

«0«•02111.1314

M42)MO

4M

13.7•43

<0.23•0.80<023144•14

•4

<002.4•4

0.2104t

2)MM442.41.2

<053•IM•4

1*711»1.2

0.41

<01211.7134•.37

<025U.I41.1

171

•4M7

0.23<065<021

74144

M.414.1114na

1*10001t.7

3040

1020O.MM412M0.2114

•.12M4171

2)203.4I)

14.10.3

•4211)000

•.)4.4

10.1

na

77M

422M312

O.M10.)471O.M•42•.21•4

2)4

Page 2 of 4

Table 2-2ONSITE SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Sample No. CLSBOf-1

totals (mg/kg)Aluminum 0200Antimony 3.*Arsenic 0.1Barium 47.3Beryllium «.MCadmium 0.41Calcium 11400Chromium 03.3Cobai 11.2Copper 21Cyanide n.a.Iron 2IMOLead 24.7Magnesium 17000Manganese 12MMercury 0.0*Nickel 07.2Potassium 7«0Selenium 0.20Silver 0.41Thallium 0.12Vanadium 21.1Zinc 1M

CL&BU-z

•3M3.0

11.0S4.f•M1.1

7120010.00.0

30.4n.a.

10400137

240000170.41

10•40•M0.400.12

20120

CLSB07-1

7140

3.00.7

30J0.40043

7020013.074

10.1n.a.

12400104

241004310.001730000.330430.1120.2404

CLSBN-1

00003.1

00.01.2101

0.44•UoUA

22.30.1

70Jn.a.

32000370

1CAAAIWW

404

04210.17000.00

0440.1124.7304

CLSBOO-1

4030

3.f0.0

•0.20.040.44

7120011.00.7

20.3n.a.

10400

00.220100

3140.0014.00470.320440.1110.070.3

CLSBOO-2

04003.07.0

•7.40.010.4«

10300010.20.0

10.3n.a.

13000«.»

10000300

0.2C11.710200.300400.1224.270.0

CLSB10-1

20CO•.•123

13.30.«70.07

1000004301i.3

21.7na.

14300010.4•Of

10000.001111U3.«

2.40.30•.3

23.3

CLSB10-2

40703.<24

44.1O.t

0.43OC700

11.11.0

20.3n.a.

13100•<4

37800

3170.1*22.00410.340.430.111M77.0

CLSB11

•010

<71

1C.31SO

0.37<08900000

11.2•.1

17.2<05610000

IOC3SOOO

3020.42

14.1

MO0.32

<089<02210.2140

CLSB12-1

2310

<72

11427. »0.20

<090160000

20.13.3

30.2<057•S10•7.4

••000201

0.12• 14010.3

<090<023

».1100

VJI Page 3 of 4

Table 2-2ONSITE SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS FOR INORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

iampta No. CLMII-I

Aluminum 1100Antimony <7 1Araanto 64Barium 10.7BaryHum «022Cadmium «008Calcium 141008Chromium 0Cobal 1.7Coppar 4.JCyanWa <021Iron 6300Laad IJMagnatium 10100Manama* 170Mercury <0 1 1Nttkal 7.1Potatalum tMSatoMum <022SHvar <068Thaium 0.nVanadium 8.4Zinc 16.6

CLSS)1Z>

1000<6920.104

«0,22«OM

2088880.11.11.7

<06404M

1442700

2M<011

2.0280

<022<0666.227.1

11.

Avar aoa Comparliont

Avar aoa

434436

120380061048

8466016767

20703

15825334

20663446Oil1676270360.8001714.6666

Maiimum

1480010

18732616113

238000438153114

062161000

37650000

1260046173

12803524

04666.6864

VakM

10003352412

Oil0074480

482237

Oil5150

3460620400628168Oil0420163

131

•on Inottllon crNarla

104 HU

mm

-327

-

1 33--_

--_

-„-__

H_____

-

Cancar104 risk

_

-327-

133-.-_

--_

-..-~_

H_

~__

„

-

Ind Tl

_

140105

245001750

176--

1750..

129507000

-..--

35000105

7000„

17501750_

245070000

Page 4 of 4

Table 2-3SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS - OFFSITE LOCATIONS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

»arnple NumberMedia

Volatile* (u«/kg)Methytene ChlorideAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)rrichtoroetheneTolueneChtorobenzeneEthyOjenzeneXytone (mixed)

Semi-volatile* (ug/kg)Naphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneAcenaphthyleneAcenaphtheneDibenzofuranDiethylphthalateFluorene•*«_ ..rnenanuveneAnthraceneCarbazole3t-n-butylphthalate"kioranthenePyreneButylbenzylphthalate3.7-DichlorobenzidineBenzo{a)anthraceneChrysene

ois(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateDl-n-octyiphthalateBenzo|blfluorantheneBenzo(kinuorantrwneBenzo[a]pyrenelndeno(1 .2.3-cd]pyreneDibenz|a.h]anthraceneBenzotg.h.i]perylene

CLBK01-1Soil

14<13<13<131M<13

<!'

4063

<4402030

<44042

MO0444

<Mt\

CM430

<440<4402703M0132

2M2M

<440140

<440<440

CLBK01-2SoU

<12<12<12<12<12<12

<"

<390<390090<390<390<390<390<390<390<390<"W

2020

090<390090<39023036

090090090090090<390

CLBK01-3SoU

0<11<11<11

0«11

<!!050<350<350

050<350<350<350<350050O50

«yfc

<350O50OSO<350OSO<350

2036

OSOOSO050OSO050<350

CLBK02Soil

1210

<11<11

C«11

<!!2120

O704041

O7047

2M0742

<17A

3703M

O70O702403M406

O703102402201M1M120

CLBK04SoH

14<11<11<11<11<11

<!!O60

20<3BO<360<3GO<360<360

20060ooo1M\

4372

<360<360

2230

<360<360O60O60O60O60O60<360

CLBKOCSoU

42<11<11<11

2<11

2

200024MCM

17M10M

07003600

220M4000

20M^17fVt

1000020000

O700<370007M01M

O700

10M6400MMMM31M

O700

27M

CLBK07Soil

121C

<11<11

1<11

<!!362704CO30

O70CO

70010070

130014MO70070OM7M410

<370OMMO0404M

O70370

CLBKOOSoil

-----—

-

O90<390

20O90<390<390<390

02<390090

_ _ _

<300

O60<390<390

100210

090<3902401M22021042

140

CLBK10Soil

------

-

170100200230140

<380200

3MO030C60

270030M<380

<3BO10003000020

<3BO

32M24M2600200013002000

CLBK11Soil

------

-

07100240043

O7030

00010070

•4CA1OM060

1000<370

<370670700

O70O70000460600400

O70360

CLBK12Soil

I

' '-----

-

10022041

<3flO

<380<380

30100010006

030010

<380<380

600070

<380<380

630460400400

00270

CLBK13Soil

-------

-

<350<350

40<350<350<350050

17030

<3SO47

320400

<350

<350310400

<350050

3002403102*0

23210

Bold type indicates compound detected aboveThe prefix "<" indicates the compound was not

method detection limit.detected at or above the detection limit.

Page 1 of 4

Table 2-3SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR OROANICS • OFFSITE LOCATIONS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

•MVtoNumtoMUala A

PnUcMM/PCta (ugftg)HoptacNoiHoplacMor *poj«d«4.4-DOEEndrinEndMuNwtll4X-DODEndMutan Mtate4.4--DOTMUlMMycltorEndrin Mon*riphfrCNoidiM

tractor- 1254

CLMW1-1Ml

«24«24«447.S

«44«44<44•7<24

*A A* •!

<24O4^* ^

<44

CLMM14Ml

<2<2<4•4«4«4<4<4

<20

<2<2^«

<40

CLMU14Ml

«ta<iaoeoeoe06oeo*<ia*i A<a.o<ia<1 A^ 1 •

on

CLM<aiaan

<19«1906U

oeoeoeoeoe*\ A<3.O

<ie«l A^ i ••

oa

CLMU4eon

<ia<ia«3«oeoeoeoeoe<ie*\ a* J V

<ia<i a^ 1 V

oe

CLMCM6oN

<10<ieoaoa•.a

oaoaoe<ierf* •< j fj

<19<1 fi^ 1 .•

oe

CLM(I7SON

<19<19oa

11oaoaoeS.I<19-« A< j g

<19<1 A^ i •

oe

CLBKMSON

---------

_

-

CLBK19SON

-----••----

..

••

CLBK11SoN

••-------•-•

..

-•

CLBK1JSON

•

~-----

..

CLBK1)Soil

-

Bold type indicates compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the detection limit.

Page 2 of 4

Table 2-3

SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS - OFFSITE LOCATIONS

Preliminary Site Investigation

Carter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis. Indiana

Sample NumberMedia

V olalUee (ugftg)fethytane ChlorideAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)T 1 II ^k>

TolueneChlorobenzene—.. —ttnpDenzeneXytone (mixed)

Semi-volatile* (ug/kg)Naphthalene2-MethytnaphthaleneAcenaphthytene

DlbenzoluranDMhylphthalateFkMrene'henanthreittAnthraceneCartazotoDt-n-butylphihalate'kjoranthenePyreneButytttenzylphthalaleJ.S-Dfchtorobenzidine

Chiycane)to(2-Ethylhexyl)DhlhaJataDt-ri-octylpnmaMeBefizofbjfluorantnaneBenzo(KJfluofantheneBenzo(a|pyrenelndeno[1 ,2.3-cd|pyreneDibenz(a>h]anthraceneBenzofg.h.ljpefytene

CLBK14SaN

-

—-

_

---

1M

1M

<390

•2<390<390

•3M21

•30710

<390O90

*fUt,*TO

•70

•40

<390

3M330

3M370

O90240

CLBKKSON

-_-

„--—

2M

1M

3M

2M

O50470

4aTAJk2 §00MO370

05023M

MM0500509MhAza«e3MO050OSO2MO12M21M1MOMO

12M

CLBKKSOD

---

M---

1M140340TJM• OT

4M

O60

MO

MM1400

12M41

2MO12000

O60060A^dM•9Q171M

22*060

MM

13MMM33M7M

22M

GeometricAverage

1304

793

570I7n9. i V

6.115.705.704.94

13212813014AITO

143218

168

609229176123597750

218218etc525651237154637473575477220392

MaximumValue

4219

65ftlo.u1606.5

65

6.5

29002400590

180018503500

22000490020001850

1800020000

18501850•7/W\8700910018501850540059006600330018502800

MinimumValue

65555e c9.3

1

5.555

2

2125

24

3017538283942202928

17517522352832

17517517514023

120

Hazardlndex*1

2.1E + 073.6E + 071.8E + 073 CC » AC.DC T UO

7.0E + 077.0E + 063.6E + 077.0E + 08

1.4E + 07

2 1 p j. m.1 t T U /

2.8E + 081.4E + 07

1.4E + 07_

3.BE + 071.4E + 071.1E + 077.0E + 07-

7.0E + 067.0E + 06

_H

^

_

-

Bold type indicates compound detected above

The prefix "<" indicates the compound was notmethod detection limit.

detected at or above the detection limit.

Page 3 of 4

Table 2-3SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR OROANICS • OFFSITE LOCATIONS

Preliminary SMe InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Media

P UM/PC..,.**

1 MpUCfMOf

HaptacMw •pod*4.4--DDEEndrtn

EndoauNanll4.4--DODEndosuNan autfata4.4--DOTlA^AiV^^—— , akidUMaMnOatycnQT

Endrtn MOM•pia-CMerdana

Aractor-1254

CLaWttMl

^

----------

-

CUK16to*

**

--------_-

-

CUKM

~

----------

-

Avwtftt

f\ Q7U ml

007101203226101101271766101007A a?U ml

I860

M^T1 *1*122211

es222.26ft122212t <%f

22

V*M

U 800ii

00A AU •

16

HUM4

I ttC x A£.at t o»46E + 03

-

I.IEtOt--_

I.SEtOI__

2 IE t 042 t C A. A J.1C T U*J

Bold type Indicates compound detected above method detection limit.The prefix "<" Indicates the compound was not detected at or above the detection limit.

Page 4 of 4

Table 2-3AOFFSITE RAILROAD SVOC RESULTS

Preliminary Site InvestigationIndianapolis, Indiana

SanvlaNun*arS«mi-voUtite* (uq/Vg)

Naphthalene

2-MethylnaphthalenaAcenaphthylerwAcanaphtherw

Dibanzofuran

FluorenaPhananthrenaAnthracana

CarbazolaFluor anth«na

PyranaBanzotalanthracanaChr/Mncbi«<2-Ethylhaxy1)phthalataBanzo(b|fluoranthanaBanzo(k]fluoranthanaB«nzo(a]pyrtnalndano(1 ,2,3-cdlpyranaDibanz(a,h]anthracanaBanzolg.h.ilparylana

CLBK09

<120000

< 120000

1900020000

900030000

3700007000049000

790000•00000360000410000

1400029000029000036000090000

< 120000140000

CLBK17

260

420

390

340

190160

5000790

470

9100

7600

52005900•60

5200340044003700•30

2400

GeometricAverage

3950

5020

27222608

13082191

430127436

4799

847887797443287

491833470

388333140139799182487057

18330

MaximumValue

60000

600001900020000

900030000

3700007000049000

790000

800000360000410000

140002900002900003600009000060000

140000

MinimumValue

260

420

390

340

190

1605000

790

470

9100760052005900860

5200340044003700

8302400

Bold type indicates compound detected above method detection limitThe prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit

Table 2-4ONSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR OROANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

kwnpM NunwofHtdH

MKhytww CMoridaACOtoM

2-BuUnoM (MEK)

TrfcNoiaothOfw

TofcioittAl-l i-

LMOroOOnZWW

EthyftMruorwX*OT» (fitted)

Soml-vaMNM (uaftQ)NapMlwlorw

AcoiMphlhylMMACOMpMhWM

(MionzofuranDMIhytpMlwM*

FkiorwM

Ptwmnllvwtt

ArthracoMCarbuoteDt-n-bulylpMhalal*FknranlhorMPyraMBulyttMnzylpMtwM*3.7-DtoNorotaoniUiMBonzo|a|an<hracoMChrytoMMt(2-Elhytwxyl)phlhalalaDt-n-octytpttfhaM*Bonzo|b|nuoranlhMMBonso|k|flua(anlhorMB«nzo|a)pyrafMlnd*no( 1 ,2,3-cd|pyrMMDib*nz|a,h)anlhrac«rMB«nzo|g.h,i]p*ryl*n«

CLSM1-ASoM

17M

«13•13

a— *»• i j•13• 13

34

M•741

<440•7

MO210M23

14M13M<440•440MO•70

<440<440

7204M020OM

<440•30

CLSM14Ml

M<12«12•12•12

•12••12

M

1101401MMIM

20M•20240

08020M2MO<3000901MOIMSOM<3M12M1MO14M12M0001100

CLSM2-ASON

10«ii<n<ii<iiA \ \•1 1

<11

•It

2M

IMM

110<370

407M170M44

•MMO

O70O70710MO

O70O701MO070070•M

O70•30

CLSM2-B

SoN

4<11«11

24II' '

<t1•11

OOO

<300

•300

000•300

<300

M<300

<300

<300

7474

•300

<300

M70

000<300

<300

<300

••080OOO<300

CL»M3^

SON

M<11•11• 11

•ItII' *

• 11•11

u

MM

••070

•311M2M•12«

14M1MOO70O707M740

070O70MO0107104M

0703(0

CLSM34SON

u<14<14•14• 14u

• <14• 14

140

1103203

•46042

OMIM04M

1MO•70

•460•4607M

•1*•460•46011M410OM4M

•4504M

CLSBOMSON

<n<n<tt•it•it<i t• ••11•it

•300

223010

00034

4101104227

7707M

000•300

4M3M

•300

104703203M

OOO000

M

CLftBOI-2

SON

30170• It•It

•-i |' '

<tt• 11

•3000

<3000

•3000

220•3000

2301MO4202M

•3000

1MO41MMM3MO1MO

•4200

•7200

•7200

•7200

•7200

•7200

•7200

•7200

•7200

CLftBOI-3

SoM

301

<tt<tt

•<i i* 1 1• It«tt

OSO

• 3SO•350

•350

OSO•350

OSO•350

OSO•350

•350

•350

OSOOSOOSO•3SO

•350

•350OSOOSO•350

•350

OSOOSO

CL8B02-1

SoM

33<11<1t< t t

0< 1 1' '• 11

• 11

11047AIf •

24004

130<300

031100

31011032

27M3700

000•300

1MO21Mooo•300

27M12M2000

<380

<380

040

CLSB02-2

SON

31• 12

• 12«12

0< 19

»12

••

710

1003«0310

<390

400WOOMO12033

12M12MO90OUO•70•10

090<3UO

4M370400220

O90140

CLSB02-1•oM

»M*)1«n»ti<n< 1 1

'<n<n

OSO

<3SO

<3SO

OSO<3SO

OSO<350

OSOOSO

31OSO<3SO

OSO<3SO

<JSO

<3bO

OSOObOObO<3bO

ObO<3bO

<3SO

<3bO

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 1 of 6

Table 2-4ONSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Sampte NumberMtdix

Pecticid**/PCB* (ugJk«)HeptecNorHeptachk* epoxkte4.4--DDEEndrinEndMulfan II4.4-DDDEndosulfan sullate4.4--DDTMeUwxychlorEndrin kotoneilpha-Chtordaneganvm-ChlordaneAroctor-1254

CLSS01-ASON

ijIA

<4.4tJt

<4.4<4.4<4.4

14

<24<44

24

21<44

CISM1-88oN

.

tt2J

0.8<3.0M

<3.80.8<39<20<391.11A<39

CLSS02-ASON

<1.8<1.80.7M

0.70.7O.7O.7<180.7<1.8<1.9<68

CLSM2-BSoN

<18<18<36•4

O6O60.6•.•<18

oe<1.8<1.8O6

CLSS09-ASoH

<19

2

O.71934

0.7

0.7

07

<18O.7

1213

O7

CLSS03-BSoH

<32

O.2<44

1«

<44

<44

<44

2.2

<24

<4.4O.2

O.2<44

CLSB01-1SoH

<19

<19O6

O.6

<3.6O.6

<36

•7<19

<3.6<19

<1.9<70

CLSB01-2SoU

<19

<19<36

<36

06

<36

O6

•J

4>1t

<19

<1.9<36

CLSBOISoH

<19

<1.9O.5OS

OS

<3.50.5OS

06

O.S<19

1:1<35

CLSB02-1SoU

<2

<2<38

<38

<38<38

O.8

11<20

O8<2

<2<38

CLSB02-2SoH

1 .

<2

«2

O909

09

09

1.2

14

<20•.4

<2

<2<39

CLSB02-3SoU

<19<19

0505

OS

<35

O5

05

<18<35

<1 9<1 9<35

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 2 of 6

Table 2-4ON8ITE SOIL RESULTS FOR OROANICS

Preliminary SMa InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

OanvteNumborMo*a

Acotona2-Bulanona (MEK)i ncfwnMvwnv

fOibn i i

tinyajanianaXytana (mtaad)

NapMhatona2 MathytoaptthaXoaAcanaphftytanaAcanapMiianaDtoanzofuranDMhytphlhalataFkioranatMnanttvana

CwfeartaDi-n-butylphthalalaFL i«irai«JOi»n«ir MOftwmnvF»^yrvnv

),3M>cNarabanzttlna

ChSlT "Ma<2-Ethy«)axyl)phthalalaDt-n-ootytphthalata

Banzo|a)pyranalnd*no(1 ,2,3-cd|pyrwMDibanz|a,h)anlhfacanaBanzo(g,h.l]p«rylana

CLSOjM-1aoN

nn

«n1 1

«11— f 4

111

oeo<300

2407M

oeoM

2M07

oao11M11MxtMi%<JW

000mmmMl

Ma30

<360•MVAV

3200203M

<3ao2M

CLMSa-laoN

r«ii411

* 1

C

I*

":„070O70O70O70O70O70O70

O70070070

140120

<^M%J» 1

070

70070O70

ISA• «W

070M20

O70070

SON

«10•to•10«IO^IW

4«m

:;;040•340O40O40<340O40O40*i \<MO

<340O40O40O40<340•t^ttfl*JW

040^%*f•94VO40040<340<U0*»J I

<340040O40<340<340

CLSOJ04-1aoN

1223

<11* 1

(

II

'

:„2MIM42

270IM

O70270

%ala^al20M040270

0702MO2MO«17A*Jfi

O7041VAJ170110MO70

21MAA• ^07013MO70O70O70

aoH

727

«12|M

4|»

:»<410<410«4tO«410<410<410<410*A\f«4H<410

<410<410•410<410*A\tl* ll

<410«41(<410<410«410«^4A*^ll

<410<410<410<410<410

aoN

<10* to4lQ

4in^ IV

1*1

4

<340<340<340O40<MO<340<340^*L l<MO<340040O40«340040~**f•3*1

040O40<340<340O40«VJA*iJ l

<340<340040<340O40

CLSOJM-1SON

<!2«12<12<1 5

•1 M

:,2oaooao<300oaooaooaooao*i &<Mt

oao<3eooeooaooao« W*9OIoaooat<3ao<3oO

22rftaV

oao<300<3ao<300<3ftO

CLSBM-2SON

<ii10

«ii<1 1

<iiII

:!!<360<3SO<390OSO<040<840<840

^ j/<<a4o

42021

OSO<3SO1C/1<JOt

OSO<3SO<360OSOOSOIKA<JOl

<360<350OSOOSO<3SO

CLSBM-1SON

3

IM

<13<1 3

72| •

:\l<420<420

20<420<420<420

23•jkj3OI

03

M<420OM

*A1f<4M

<420330410

<420<420

m A*•4O

<4203M

<42003

<420

CLSBM-2SON

21M31

< 1 1

41*|

«t1

4240

214044IM40

mmM•M

1001M20

12M000

*74IA</Ol

«780431000IMIM•auk•M

10M44010070

IM

CLOB47SON

a<ti«ii<ti130< 1 1

.„

110130170

«1100IM

<110000

4 AJUlow20000

<1100

24M03M

* < 4 /V<1 11*

010021M20M

01000100

A VAJ4701<11002400

01000100

1400

CLSBMOoH

00

24

«11<1 t

110«l 1* 1 1

0

000<300080<300000OOO<300

OOO<300

21IM200

* 1JU1«JOt,<300

04120

00001

14MIII<300

130<30U<360<3flO

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

C Page 3 of 6

Table 2-4

ONSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS

Preliminary Site Investigation

Carter-Lee Lumber

Indianapolis. Indiana

Sampta NumberMadia

Paclicidat/PCB* (ug/kg)Heptachtor"loptAchlor •poxkto4.4--DDEindnnEndosultanll4.4-DODEndosuHan suMala4.4--DDT

Endrin ketoneilpha-ChtordmBanwra-Chlordww*rodor-12S4

CLSB03-1SON

uM

<3.6

•0.6O8<3.6t.1<i*^ 1 V

0.6U4«

<36

CLSBtt-2•OH

1 >

<1.8<1.90.7<37<3707O7O7<ifi^ 1 9

07<1»<1.9O7

CLSBM-3Sol

<19<1.»0.5O.SO.5O.SO.S0.5<m^ IV

0.5<19<1904

CLSB04-1SaM

O.N2.4

O.711

O.7O.7O.77J<1O^ ••O7

2121

07

CLSB04-2SON

<21<2.1

<410<4.10<410<4.10<4.10<4.10

<">\^*i<4.10<2.1<21<41

CLSB04-3SON

<1.9<19O.S0.50.50.50.50.5<m^ 100.5<19<19O4

CLSBOf-1SoN

<2<2

0.80.80.8<3.808O.8<on***M

0.8<2<2

OS

CLSBOf-2SoN

<1.9<1.9<35O.5O.SO.5O.S0.5«T^ACJO

0.5<19

<1.9<35

CLSBOC-1Soil

<22<22

<42<42

<42

<42

<42

<42**yy<££

<42<2.2<22<42

CLSBOf-2Soil

<2

<24.3

<38

<38

4.t

O.8•.•

rfOfl<AJ

1.»<2

<2<38

CLSB07SoH

t •

<19<190.7O74.S

07O7

12^•10<iy

<37<19

<1 9<37

CLSBOtSoil

<1 9<1 906

<36<36

06

<36

12^t ft<10

<36

<i a<1 6<36

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.

The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 4 of 6

Table 2-4ONSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR OROANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis, Indiana

Sampte Numbw

VolrtNM (ugftng)/Mliytan* ChtoiMttatora2-Butanww (MEK)•ftaMwMttMM

TofcMfWf*hl li T •

unufounufu

XytoM(mMd)

S«nl-«oMlto« (ua/kfl)tapMIUlMM

2-ftMtiylnapMhBtamAecMpMhylMWAocnapMhwwDttwnzofuranDMtylpMhalateFluomw

AnttwBMmOwtMiotoW-n-butylpMtMlaUFhjoranttwn*Pyran*BulyttMnsylpMlMM*l.ar-MoNorolMniMlM

ChcyMn*>ta<2-EthyttMxyl)f>hmatt*DI-n-odylphUwM*B«nza(b)fluoranttwn«BwuoJk)AuanMharMBwua(a)pyraMIndMwfl .2.3<d|pyrafttOHMnzta.h|anlhraoMMB«nza(g,h,l|(Mrytww

cLao»jM

«iin

•11«n

s«< •*i i«• i• i

<1100«1100<MOO

2MIM

<1100248

>^^M•M

748248

<110026MSMS

<1100<1100

21M<1100<1100a4M

<110021M

<1100•IS

ISM

CtMMS-2

rIM

7«11M

tf fl •*1 1

a

IMIM48

SMMS

<1100

44^M42WIMS878

<11004SMS7M

<1100<1100

2MS«1100

<1IOO41MISMMM

<1100

<1100IMS

CLSI1S-1

4MS<17<1728««

<!5<660<660<SSO<560<MO<660<seo

32882

«860SM

11M«560•680

4M<560<sao7MMSMS

<560<560<S60

CLM)16-2

122>8.8<11IM* t

7

22M14MMS278

12M<1900

2M^•^^•M8

MSIM

MM1MM<1900<1900sllalaiV9VI

S4M<1900<19001MMS7M7MSMM2MS•2M

CLM)11

21<11«11«11<11« 1 1w 1 1

<n

ISMMS

<740418278

«7404M

V^^hA«2MMSSIS

<740SMS42M«740<740

MM2MIM

24MMM21M878

<7404M

CIM12-1

18«12•12<12

S«il9

•

oeo82

<380<380

M080<380

m^^aM48

080oeo2M218

<380«380

2M<380O80MS

<380080IM

0801M

CL8S12-2•oM

418

«10<to

S4t1fl

2

<340<340<340O40<340<340<340

^ f/><340<340«340<340040<340<340<340

040<340<340O40<340<340<340<340<340

CL8B12-a•oM

a<ii<ii<it

2<i i* 1 1

<!!«3SO<350<360<3SO060O60O60-i mfO6t060060060060O50O60O60

«360«350060<350<350<350050050050

OMNiMtrk

92148615592ft 79 •

ft ">9 £

68

207180134167145240147£.4*644252160tie679774252252

5152331MM2391459296243342

MaiimumVtltM

661703106130n m

66

220014001600180012001800610

a1C4W\65001200580

18008400

1500036003600

640036003600

1200057007800360036006200

MinimumVateM

i

26S22

5«

34202132Iti642J6(4642207474

170170Ml170

3919

13017050297084

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 5 of 6

Table 2-4ONSITE SOIL RESULTS FOR ORGANICS

Preliminary Site InvestigationCarter-Lee LumberIndianapolis. Indiana

Samp)* NumberMedia

Pe»licidec/PCB* (ug/kg)HepUchtoflortyhtof 0poxkte

4.4--DDEEndrinEndoculfanll4.4--DDDEndocuMan sulfateK-OOTMethmychlorEndrin ketonetipha-CNordanegamma-ChlordaneArodor-1254

CLSBO»-1SoH

<1.8<1.9O.6O.60.6o.e<3.6•.1<ia0.6<1.9<19<36

CLSBOt-2SoN

<19<1.90.70.7<3.7<3.70.70.7<190.7<19<1.9O7

CLSB10-1SON

O.OO.O<58<S.6<S.8<S.6<5«<5fl<29<5.80.00.0<S6

CLSB10-2SoH

<1.9<1 9

4<O.7

21O.7

21144<1933

<1.9<1.9O7

CLSB11SON

4JO.MO.7•J4.1

O.70.7

•<19O.74.1

1.M<64

CLSB12-1SoU

2.2<2

<38•J

O.8O.80.8O8

10O.8

<2<2

<38

CLSB12-2Soil

<1.9<1 9O.5O.5O.5O.5OSO.5<18OS<19<19<34

CLSB12-3Soil

1.»<1 80.5OSO.5O.50.50.5<18O.5<i.a<1.9<35

GeometricAverage

1.11.22.128

2319

214.0

107

2316

16199

MaximumValue

4.25.6

46IS

214.628

14046

33

354035

Minimum. Value1 1

09

09

1.71.7

1.71.71.71 7

9

1.709

0917

Bold type indicates compound detected above detection limit.The prefix "<" indicates the compound was not detected at or above the method detection limit.

Page 6 of 6