Reclaiming a Social Justice Framework for Public Health: Dialogue as a Vehicle for Change Doak Bloss...
-
Upload
mary-perkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Reclaiming a Social Justice Framework for Public Health: Dialogue as a Vehicle for Change Doak Bloss...
Reclaiming a Social Justice Frameworkfor Public Health:
Dialogue as a Vehicle for Change
Doak Bloss Ingham County Health Dept.
May 7, 2013
Distinguishing Disparity from Inequity
Health Disparity
A disproportionate difference in health between groups of people.
Health Inequity
Differences in population health status and mortality rates that are systemic, patterned, unfair, unjust, and actionable, as opposed to random or caused by those who become ill.*
Distinguishing Disparity from Inequity
(By itself, disparity does not address the chain of events that produces it.)
*Margaret Whitehead
What Does a Social Justice Framework for Public Health Look Like?
Primary Prevention
The prevention of diseases and conditions before their biological onset.
Conventional Interpretation
Preventing Environmental
Exposures
Improving Resistance To Disease
Education to Reduce Risky
Behaviors
e.g. Food & Water Safety… … Immunizations… …Smoking cessation
Social Justice Interpretation
Attending to the “Social Determinants of Health”
Confronting“Root Causes”
Explicitly
Social Determinants of Health
The economic and social conditions that influence the health of individuals, communities, and jurisdictions as a whole.
They include, but are not limited to:
SafeAffordableHousing
SocialConnection
& Safety
QualityEducation
Job Security
LivingWage
Access toTransporta-
tion
Availabilityof Food
Dennis Raphael, Social Determinants of Health; Toronto: Scholars Press, 2004
What Does a Social Justice Framework for Public Health Look Like?
SafeAffordableHousing
SocialConnection
& Safety
QualityEducation
Job Security
LivingWage
Access toTransporta-
tion
Availabilityof Food
However,If we reduce disparities at the level of Social
Determinants of health, will we be reducing health inequity?
Root Causes
Power and Wealth ImbalanceLABOR
MARKETS
GLOBALIZATION&
DEREGULATIONHOUSINGPOLICY
EDUCATIONSYSTEMS
TAXPOLICY
Social Determinants of Health
Disparity in the Distribution of Disease, Illness, and Wellbeing
InstitutionalRacism
Class OppressionGender
Discriminationand Exploitation
SOCIAL NETWORKS
SOCIALSAFETY
NET
SafeAffordableHousing
SocialConnection
& Safety
QualityEducation
Job Security
LivingWage
Transportation Availabilityof Food
Psychosocial Stress / Unhealthy Behaviors
Adapted from R. Hofrichter, Tackling Health Inequities Through Public Health Practice.
Changing the QuestionsInstead of only asking:
Why do people smoke?
Perhaps we should also ask:
What social conditions and economic policies predispose people to the stress that
encourages smoking?
Changing the QuestionsInstead of only asking:
Who lacks health care coverage and why?
Perhaps we should also ask:
What policy changes would redistribute health care resources more equitably in our
community?
Changing the QuestionsInstead of only asking:
How can we create more green space, bike paths, and farmer’s markets in vulnerable
neighborhoods?
Perhaps we should also ask:
What policies and practices by government and commerce discourage access to
transportation, recreational resources, and nutritious food in neighborhoods where
health is poorest?
The Workshops40 Workshops
800 – 825 participants
Public health staff, community members, other service providers
Evolution of the Workshop
2005: Internal Social Justice Dialogue Project
2000: Community Voices
2008: Social Justice Facilitator Training
2009: Four-Day HESJ Workshops
Strategic goal: to provide participants with language and conceptual frameworks that REVEAL rather than disguise modern forms of oppression and their impact on health.
CONVERSATION about Race, Class, Gender, etc.
DEBATE about Oppression, Privilege, and the role of Public
Health
TRAINING in Cultural Competency, Diversity, etc.
One way to explain what we mean by dialogue is to compare to what it is not.
It is NOT…
The Workshop is Dialogue-Based
Dialogue as the Vehicle for Change
Dialogue is different from CONVERSATION
Conversation Dialogue
Casual, undirected exploration
Marginalizes difference
Consensus approach
Vigorous and directed exploration
Welcomes difference
Collective approach
Derived from William Issacs, “Taking Flight: Dialogue, collective Thinking, and Organizational Learning”
Dialogue as the Vehicle for Change
Dialogue is different from DEBATE
Debate Dialogue
Highlights competing factions
“Best” solution
Emphasis on persuading
Highlights commonality of purpose
Multiple, complementary solutions
Emphasis on listening
Dialogue as the Vehicle for Change
Dialogue is different from TRAINING
Training Dialogue
Unilateral exchange of information
Embraces what is known
Teaches new solutions
Mutual exchange of information
Embraces what is not known
Discovers new solutions
Workshop Structure / Content
Core Concepts ofHealth Equity
(Finding a Common Vocabulary)
ExploringUnearned Privilege
Day 1 Day 2
Seeing the HealthConsequences of
Privilege and Oppression
Creating Health Equity
Day 3 Day 4
Two-week Interval between Days 2 and 3
The Workshop is Dialogue-Based
Dialogue Triggers are generally of Three Types:
The Lived Experienceof Participants
Constructs thatEnable Dialogue on
Oppression & Privilege
Analysis & ApplicationTo Real-LifeScenarios
What’s in a Name?
“I Remember”
Privilege Walk
Where is Your Power?
Target & Non-Target Identities
4 Levels of Oppression and
Change
Modern vs. Traditional Forms
Unnatural Causes
Case Study Scenarios
ChallengingConversations
Four Levels of Oppression & Change
Feelings, beliefs, values
Personal
Interpersonal
Institutional
Cultural
Actions, behaviors, language
Rules, policies, practices
Collective ideas about what is normal, true, right, beautiful
Adapted from Dr. Valerie Batts, “Is Reconciliation Possible? Lessons from Combating Modern Racism”
Four Levels of Oppression and Change
Feelings, beliefs, values
Personal
Interpersonal
Institutional
Cultural
Actions, behaviors, language
Rules, policies, procedures
Collective ideas about what is normal, true, right, beautiful
Adapted from Dr. Valerie Batts, “Is Reconciliation Possible? Lessons from Combating Modern Racism”
Early Work
Workshops
Workshops
Decision to examine and
challenge one’sown beliefs and
assumptions
Recognizing opportunities to
model one’s own work for others
Respectfully challenging others’ assumptions, actions, beliefs
Recognizing one’s own powerto challenge or change policiesand practices
Establishingpolicies and
practices thatpromote
equity whilerespectingindividuals’personal
resistance
Modeling policies and practicesthat promote equity.
Messages thatreverse prevailingoppressive norms
Messages that promotechallenging
dialogue
Building powerIn the public
arena to advance newnorms that challengeinequity
Illuminating inequityfor those with thepower to change
policies and practice
Messages thatchallenge inequitable
policy and practiceMessages that
encourage self-examination ofassumptions, actions, beliefs
Organized action to challenge and change inequitablepolicy and practice
Personal Interpersonal
Institutional Cultural
Pathways to Change across
Four Levels
Organizational practice encourageschallenging dialogue
Decision to examine and
challenge one’sown beliefs and
assumptions
Recognizing opportunities to
model one’s own work for others
Respectfully challenging others’ assumptions, actions, beliefs
Personal Interpersonal
Institutional Cultural
The Personal / Interpersonal
Pathway(Dialogic)
Decision to examine and
challenge one’sown beliefs and
assumptions
Respectfully challenging others’ assumptions, actions, beliefs
Recognizing one’s own powerto challenge or change policiesand practices
Establishingpolicies and
practices thatpromote
equity whilerespectingindividuals’personal
resistance
Illuminating inequityfor those with thepower to change
policies and practice
Personal Interpersonal
Institutional Cultural
The Interpersonal / Institutional Pathway
Organizational practice encourageschallenging dialogue
Modeling policies and practicesthat promote equity.
Messages thatreverse prevailingoppressive norms
Building powerIn the public
arena to advance newnorms that challengeinequity
Organized action to challenge and change inequitablepolicy and practice
Personal Interpersonal
Institutional Cultural
The Organizing Pathway
Recognizing one’s own powerto challenge or change policiesand practices
Illuminating inequityfor those with thepower to change
policies and practice
Decision to examine and
challenge one’sown beliefs and
assumptions
Respectfully challenging others’ assumptions, actions, beliefs
Establishingpolicies and
practices thatpromote
equity whilerespectingindividuals’personal
resistance
Messages thatreverse prevailingoppressive norms
Messages that promotechallenging
dialogue
Messages thatchallenge inequitable
policy and practiceMessages that
encourage self-examination ofassumptions, actions, beliefs
Personal Interpersonal
Institutional Cultural
The Cultural Pathway
“Trying on” Ideas about Power
“Powerless” “Power Over”(coercive power)
Powerthe ability to
get what you want
“Selfless” “Selfish”Self-Interest
what you want, based on your values & experience
Power is neither good nor bad. It is neutral.
Power is not given by others. It is claimed or built (with others).
Power is a product of relationship.
Power is most effective when it is focused and channeled.
Communities where people have strong relationships with one another are more powerful than communities where relationships are fragmented.
Pre/Post Questionnaire FindingsConceptual Questions (“I have a clear understanding of”):
“Health Disparity” “Health Inequity”
“Social Justice”“How SJ relates to my work”
44% 84% 31% 68%
26% 69% 28% 68%
Awareness Questions—Social Determinants:
“Individual behaviors and lifestyle”
“Access to quality medical care”
“Things like access to affordable housing, transportation and an adequate living wage”
“How well we give everyone the opportunity to achieve power and wealth regardless of race, class, gender and other forms of difference”
71% 33%
82% 80%
87% 91%
63% 75%
(“The health of our community is determined by…”)
Pre/Post Questionnaire FindingsAwareness Questions—Oppression:
“Gender”
“Class / SES”
“Race”
58% 78%
80% 85%
70% 85%
“Comfortable Talking” Questions:
“Gender
“Class / SES”
“Race”
68% 78%
64% 78%
62% 61%
(“I am comfortable talking with others about discrimination or prejudice based on…”)
(“In our community, people are discriminated against on the basis of their…”)
Is Institutional Change Happening?
Post workshop statements:
Introspection: “Notice my own thoughts and biases.”
Education: “Point out inequality when I see it, without blaming or shaming.”
Voice: “Speak up to those making oppressive remarks.”
Reform: “Influence policy decisions—be mindful of their impact on social justice.”
Departmental Changes, 2009 - 2013
Funding & Hiring of Environmental Justice Coordinator
Community Health Assessment based on SJ Framework
New Health Officer appointed October 2011
Workshops for other departments, other disciplines
Equity Action Circle conceived
Alignment of Public Health and Community Organizing