Perfect Fluid: flow measurements are described by ideal hydro
RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”
description
Transcript of RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”
![Page 1: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RECENT DEVELOPMENTOF HYDRO MODELAFTER “PERFECT LIQUID”
Heavy Ion Meeting, Yonsei UniversitySeoul, Dec. 10, 2011
T.H., P.Huovinen, K.Murase, Y.Nara (in preparation)
![Page 2: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline Introduction
Discovery of Perfect fluid Importance of initial fluctuation
Hydro-based event generator Initial state fluctuation Flow analysis Results
Conclusion
![Page 3: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Discovery of “Perfect Liquid”
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/pr_display.asp?prid=05-38
![Page 4: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Status as of Press Release
PHENIX, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 184 (2005)
Three pillars of modeling• QGP ideal
hydro• hadronic
cascade• Glauber type
initial conditions
![Page 5: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is missing in central collisions?
T.Hirano et al., Phys. Lett. B 636, 299 (2006)
Undershoot the data at midrapidity in central collisions Open question
![Page 6: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Importance of Fluctuation in Initial Conditions
𝜀 part>𝜀stdPHOBOS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 242302 (2007)
![Page 7: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fluctuation in Initial Conditions
B.Alver et al., Phys. Rev. C 77, 014906 (2008)
Elliptic flow is generated with respect to
participant plane (x’-y’ frame)
rather thanreaction plane
(x-y frame).
![Page 8: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Importance of PHOBOS finding• System could (hydrodynamically?)
respond to such a fine structure.• Is local thermalization achieved in
such a short length scale (~1 fm)?• Need event-by-event hydro
simulations?• Higher harmonics?
![Page 9: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Higher Harmonics is Finite!
Figures adapted from talkby J.Jia (ATLAS) at QM2011
• Two particle correlation function is composed solely of higher harmonics
• Away-side two bumps just from hydrodynamic responses?
![Page 10: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PHENIX v2 vs. v3 Argument
Analysis of v2 and v3 at once constrains the modelNew challenge to hydrodynamic models
![Page 11: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
HYDRO-BASED EVENT GENERATOR
![Page 12: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Current Status: E-by-E H2C
0collision axis
time
Au Au
QGP fluid
hadron gas
Hadronic cascade
3D ideal hydro
Monte Carlo I.C.(MC-KLN)
![Page 13: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Initial Density Fluctuation
1𝑁∑ initial condition single initial condition
conventionalhydro
event-by-eventhydro
![Page 14: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Event-by-event Fluctuation
Figure adapted from talkby J.Jia (ATLAS) at QM2011
Ideal, but unrealistic?OK on average(?)
Actual collision? Higher
order deformation
![Page 15: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Deformation at Higher Order
Figure adapted fromtalk by J.Velkovska at QM11
![Page 16: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Deformation in Model Calculations
𝜀𝑛=|⟨𝑟 2𝑒𝑖𝑛 𝜙 ⟩|
⟨𝑟2 ⟩
Sample of entropydensity profile in aplane perpendicularto collision axis
![Page 17: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
v2{***}v2{EP}, v2{2}, v2{4}, v2{6}, v2{LYZ}, …
Hydro-based event generator Analysis of the outputs almost in the sameway as experimental people do.
Demonstration of vn analysis according toevent plane method by ATLAS setup.E.g.) Centrality cut using ET in FCal region
ATLAS, arXiv:1108.6018
![Page 18: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Resolution of Event Plane
𝑅𝑛=√ ⟨cos [𝑛 (𝛹 𝑛❑1−𝛹 𝑛
2 ) ]⟩
Reaction (Event) plane is not known experimentally nor in outputs from E-by-E H2C. Event plane method
Event plane resolution using two subevents
𝑛𝛹𝑛=tan−1(∑ 𝐸𝑇 ,𝑖 sin𝑛𝜙𝑖
∑ 𝐸𝑇 ,𝑖cos𝑛𝜙𝑖)
c.f.) A.M.Poskanzer and S.Voloshin, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1671 (1998)
![Page 19: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Resolution of Event Plane from E-by-E H2C
ATLAS, arXiv:1108.6018
Even Harmonics Odd Harmonics
# of events: 80000 (Remember full 3D hydro+cascade!)Subevent “N”: charged, -4.8< h < -3.2 (FCal in ATLAS)Subevent “P”: charged, 3.2< h < 4.8 (FCal in ATLAS)
![Page 20: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
vn{EP}(centrality) vs. centrality (input) vs. centrality (output)
Response of the QGP to initial deformation roughly scales with
![Page 21: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Vn{EP}(h)
Even Harmonics Odd Harmonics
Not boost inv. almost boost inv. for epsilon
40-50%40-50%
![Page 22: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
vn{EP} vs. vn{RP}
Even Harmonics Odd Harmonics40-50% 40-50%
vodd{RP}~0veven{EP}>veven{RP}due to fluctuation
vn{RP}: vn w.r.t. reaction plane known in theory
![Page 23: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Vn{EP}(pT)0-10% 40-50%
v2{EP} ≈v3{EP} v2{EP} > v3{EP}
|𝜂|<1 |𝜂|<1
Note: e2>e3
![Page 24: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Comparison of vn with Data
Tendency similar to experimental dataAbsolute value Viscosity
Theory Experiment
![Page 25: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Impact of Finite Higher Harmonics• Only few people
believed hydro description of the QGP (~ 1995)
• Hydro at work to describe elliptic flow (~ 2001)
• Hydro at work (?) to describe higher harmonics (~ 2010)
𝑑≲5 fm
coarsegraining
sizeinitialprofile
𝑑≲1 fm
![Page 26: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
ConclusionPhysics of the quark gluon plasma• Strong coupling nature• Small viscosityPhysics of relativistic heavy ion collisions• Toward precision physics• 2nd order harmonics Higher order harmonics• Equilibration/coarse graining in a small system• Precise determination of transport coefficients
![Page 27: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
BACKUPS
![Page 28: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Response to Deformation
![Page 29: RECENT Development OF HYDRO MODEL AFTER “Perfect LIQUID”](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815fab550346895dcea7a5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CGC Initial Conditions
T.Hirano et al., Phys. Lett. B 636, 299 (2006)
CGC and perfect fluid,are they compatible?