Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based...
-
Upload
cornelius-mccormick -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based...
![Page 1: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reasoning and Proof
Chapter 2
![Page 2: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2.1 Use Inductive ReasoningConjecture- an unproven statement based
on an observationInductive reasoning- finding a pattern in
a specific case and then writing a conjecture for the general case (like a theory)
Counterexample- a specific case which makes a conjecture false
![Page 3: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2.4 Using Postulates and DiagramsRuler PostulateSegment Addition PostulateProtractor PostulateAngle Addition Postulate
![Page 4: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Through any two points there exists exactly one line.
A line contains at least two points.If two lines intersect, then their intersection is
exactly one point.Through any three noncollinear points there exists
exactly one plane.A plane contains at least three noncollinear points.If two points lie in a plane, then the line containing
them lies in the plane.If two planes intersect, then their intersection is a
line.
![Page 5: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Diagrams
![Page 6: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2.2 Analyze Conditional StatementsConditional statement- a logical
statement that has 2 parts, “If p, then q.” hypothesis (p) and
conclusion (q)
If the animal is a poodle, then it is a dog.
If the quadrilateral has 4 right angles, then it is a rectangle.
![Page 7: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Negation- the opposite of the original statement, not p or ~p
The quadrilateral does not have 4 right angles.
![Page 8: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Conditionals have truth values.To be true, the conclusion must be true
every time the hypothesis is true.To be false, you need only one counter
example.
![Page 9: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Related conditionalsConditional - p→q
Converse- q→p
Inverse- ~p →~q
Contrapositive- ~q→~p
![Page 10: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Equivalent statements- same truth value conditional and contrapositive converse and inverse
Definition can be written in if-then form. In this case, all four statements are true.
![Page 11: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Biconditional- a statement with the phrase “if and only if” used when both conditional and converse are true
p if and only if q, p iff q, p↔q
Perpendicular lines- two lines that intersect to form a right angle
Two lines are perpendicular if and only if they intersect to from a right angle.
![Page 12: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2.3 Apply Deductive ReasoningDeductive Reasoning- using facts,
definitions, accepted properties and laws of logic to form a logical argument.
![Page 13: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Law of DetachmentIf the hypothesis of a true conditional
statement is true, then the conclusion is also true.
Example: If 2 angles are right angles, then they are congruent. <C and <D are right angles. Conclusion ?
![Page 14: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Law of SyllogismIf p then q
These statements are
true.If q then rYou can conclude: If p then _____
![Page 15: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Truth Tables-conditional, converse, conjunction, disjunction
T T p
T TT FF TF F
![Page 16: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
More truth tables-inverse, contrapositive
T TT FF TF F
![Page 17: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
And more truth tables
T T TT T FT F TT F FF T TF T FF F TF F F
![Page 18: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2.5 Reasons Using Properties for AlgebraSee handout
![Page 19: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
2.6 Prove Statements about Segments and AnglesProof- a logical argument that shows a
statement is trueTwo column proof- numbered statements
and corresponding reasons in logical order
![Page 20: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2.7 Prove Angle Pair RelationshipsRight Angle Congruence Theorem- All
right angles are congruent.Given: Prove:
![Page 21: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Linear Pair PostulateIf two angles form a linear pair, then they
are supplementary.
<1 and <2 form a linear pair def. of linear pair
<1 and <2 are supplementary Linear Pair Post.
m<1 + m<2 = 180o def. of supplementary
2 1
![Page 22: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Vertical Angles TheoremVertical angles are congruent.
432
1
![Page 23: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Congruent Supplements TheoremIf two angles are supplementary to the
same angle (or to congruent angles), then they are congruent.
3
21
34
21
![Page 24: Reasoning and Proof Chapter 2. 2.1 Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on…](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062317/5a4d1c167f8b9ab0599f8fde/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Congruent Complements TheoremIf two angles are complementary to the
same angle (or to congruent angles), then they are congruent.
3
4
21
321