Reasearch pap er
-
Upload
kevinkruse13 -
Category
Documents
-
view
406 -
download
0
Transcript of Reasearch pap er
Kruse 1
Kevin Kruse
English 2950
Dr. Anderson Quinn
11 April 2011
Physician Aided Suicide: The Wrong Solution
In today’s medical world a heated debate rages on between the proponents and opponents
of PAS, also known as physician aided suicide or euthanasia. One side argues people should not
have to suffer if they wish not to. The other says when is it, if at all morally correct for one to
take their own life? Some argue with political reasons saying euthanasia could be used as health
care cost containment, some argue where the line should be drawn in regards to who has the right
to die and who doesn’t, and others argue that with modern medicine pain can be managed and
virtually eliminated. It is unjust and wrong for a person to take their own life. This is because in
today’s world that drastic of a step shouldn’t be necessary with modern technology and medical
advances. I feel that medicine can be used to manage pain, it is ethically and morally incorrect,
and it could be over used for health care cost containment.
When people are not fully informed of their options when suffering from a terminal
illness where death is inevitable and a there is no cure they make a hasty decision and quickly
side with the proponents of PAS. Its human nature to fear death and the possible pain and
suffering that goes along with it. It’s a hard time in a person’s life and many become depressed
and loose the will to live causing them to want to take the easy way out. In fact in a poll taken in
1997 70% of Americans wished to have the option of PAS when they were uniformed. In this
situation ignorance is not bliss. The same poll revealed that when Americans were fully informed
of their options 5-to-1 chose the option of comfort care and a natural death as opposed to a
Kruse 2
physician aided death. This type of care is called palliative care, in which a person comforts the
terminally ill when a cure is not possible through the use of modern drugs and medication. Most
people are also unaware that it is legal for a doctor to give you pain medication that may
unintentionally hasten a person’s death. Notice the word unintentionally, a doctor isn’t trying to
kill but it is obligated to provide a patient with whatever is necessary for them to feel less pain
and more comfort. A prime example is the use of medical marijuana. While that is a whole other
debate on its own it’s a perfect example of a doctor providing a patient with the drugs or
medication needed to provide comfort and release from pain. There are also many agencies and
organizations striving to improve pain management tactics. Such organizations include State
Cancer Pain Initiatives, the American Pain Society, the Oncology Nursing Society, and the
National Association of Oncology Social Workers. These groups are pushing for and supporting
the advancement in modern medicine and training individuals to better treat and care for those
who and incurable diseases. K.M. Foley was quoted by saying, “In the United States today, not
enough health professionals, patients, families, and government policymakers understand that the
proper use of existing drugs and neurosurgical, anesthetic, and psychological approaches can
relieve pain and make life worth living. Some people may believe that suicide is the only way to
avoid a painful death. Severe, chronic pain can result in helplessness and hopelessness - two
mental states that can lead to suicide. Controlling pain can help ease these mental states and
change the belief that a premature death - a painless "final exit" is the solution. For example,
patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center who had requested suicide dismissed this as
an alternative once satisfactory pain control was established” (Foley 1991).
Another reason I believe euthanasia to be unjust is because morally it is wrong for a
human being to his or her own life because death is a natural occurrence. Also how is it morally
Kruse 3
and ethically correct for a doctor whose main objective to help people to practice active or
passive euthanasia? Active euthanasia is when a doctor knowingly gives a substance to a patient
with intent of ending that patients life because the physician has decide to in a sense put the
patient out of his or hers misery. Some would categorize this as murder because the doctor is
responsible for taking another humans life. Passive euthanasia is when a doctor doesn’t take
steps to speed up a person’s death but lets the disease take its course. Some argue that morally
passive euthanasia is more correct but I disagree. James Rachels hit the nail on the head by
saying, “It is not exactly correct to say that in passive euthanasia the doctor does nothing, for he
does one thing…. he lets the patient die” (Rachels). Then the question what is the real big
difference between passive and active euthanasia must be asked. In the end a physician is
responsible for the death of another person whether it be if the death was accelerated in some
way or if they just let the disease take its course and let the patient die.
A third reason as to why euthanasia shouldn’t be allowed is that it could become over
used and a means to contain healthcare spending. People may ask how our government or
insurance companies could become so heartless and do such a thing but even though money is
said not to be everything, in today’s society and the increasing national debt, it becomes a much
larger factor. If euthanasia becomes legalized it could lead to things such as longer waits for
much needed surgeries or funds not being made for home care for the sick and elderly. The
government could make cuts in the budget making those things much harder to get or impossible
to obtain, resulting in those people possibly choosing to have a PAS as opposed to letting their
life end naturally. Also who is to say the government could possibly refuse a surgery and
consider it passive euthanasia because they intend to let the disease take its course on the patient?
Yes, you are supposed to have a choice in in whether or not you wish to be euthanized but people
Kruse 4
are apt to give into to a physician pressuring them to do such a thing. Especially in the
emotionally distraught and depressed state they are in due to their illness. In the state of Oregon,
the only U.S. state where euthanasia is legal, once the bill was passed 18 months later health care
budgets for the poor were cut making it harder for those residents to receive medication or
treatment needed to deal with their illness and to be comfortable. Wesley J. Smith said, “drugs
used in assisted suicide cost only about $40, but that it could take $40,000 to treat a patient
properly so that they don't want the "choice" of assisted suicide” (Smith). This is exactly why the
use of PAS as healthcare cost containment could become a huge problem if euthanasia was
legalized. People who could be kept alive and comfortable while dealing with their illness with
the aid of modern medicine could be stripped of what precious little time they have left. Time
that could be used to get their private affairs in order, enjoy time with loved ones, and fulfill any
last wishes they had. Also the poor and less privileged people in the United States often do not
have any sort of medical insurance. Which means for doctors it is financially risky to provide
medications and prescriptions to these patients. If euthanasia was legalized doctors could decide
that for them financially it would be better for a patient to die rather than treat them. They may
try to sway them in favor of choosing a physician assisted suicide. In short nothing in this world
is perfect and countless people let greed corrupt them. So who is to say doctors across the
country wouldn’t try to sway the decisions of patients to do what puts more money in their
pockets?
Proponents to euthanasia do not see the point for someone to suffer greatly. They argue
that the laws preventing PAS is like a government mandate for people to suffer. As Americans
we are not a death excepting society but one that fears it. When a life is near its end it is only
natural for one to become weary of the troubles and fear the suffering. Especially those
Kruse 5
diagnosed with illnesses such as cancer. A patient who is terminally ill with cancer has a long
hard road before the end. Many would often lose all will to live wishing to pass because they
have become helpless to the point where they can’t survive without medical treatment or the help
of others. These are hard times and I don’t see that one would be thinking in their right mind to
make such a decision. Ones thoughts would be murky and their judgment clouded. They would
be thinking solely about themselves but may have a change of heart if reminded about those
around them who love them. Also those who see government restrictions as mandated suffering
aren’t arguing against laws that restrict the selling of tainted food claiming it to be government
mandated starvation. It’s ludicrous. Laws are made for a reason and more times than not they are
made to prevent bad things from happening, such as making it acceptable for someone to take
their own life. Who has the right to even decide who has the right to live or die? What if laws are
taken advantage of and people abuse the right or find loop holes to take their own life regardless
if they are “deserving” or not? The law is unjust and could be used as a scapegoat for those
wishing to die due to depression or guilt and not an illness. It could be abused so that those who
don’t need it can use it to have a so called “dignified” death and one that is accepted by society.
If ever passed the law would be flawed and far from perfect. At the moment are government has
enough on its plate and doesn’t need to deal with something foolish that hasn’t been accepted in
our society for hundreds of years.
That is why euthanasia or also known as physician aided suicide is unjust and shouldn’t
be practiced in modern medicine. Yes, people fear suffering and sometimes feel that it would be
best to take the easy way out, but with modern medicine and better education in the alternative
options people would discover that they can live comfortably and die naturally.
Kruse 6
Works Cited
"Arguments Against Euthanasia." Euthanasia Suicide Mercy-killing Right-to-die Physician
Assisted Suicide Living Wills Research. Web. 17 Apr. 2011.
"Euthanasia, Is It Morally Permissible?" Truth Awakens.com: Philosophy Essays. Web. 17 Apr.
2011.
"Euthanasia, Pain Management, and Polls." Pregnant Pause. Web. 17 Apr. 2011.
"Pain and Euthanasia: The Need for Alternatives." Pain & Policy Studies Group Homepage.
Web. 17 Apr. 2011.
"Top 10 Pros and Cons - Euthanasia - ProCon.org." Euthanasia ProCon.org -- Should
Euthanasia Be Legal? Web. 17 Apr. 2011.