Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in...

14
Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much Simulated image Real image Blind challenges to improve weak lensing measurement

Transcript of Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in...

Page 1: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal.

Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal).

Simulated image Real imageBlind challenges to improve weak lensing measurement

Page 2: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

A problem ideally suited to simulation

The Forward Process

The Inverse Problem

Page 3: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Figure of merit Iterations & lessons2006: STEP IKnown PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, random positions, constant input shear

2007: STEP IIKnown PSF, complex galaxy morphologies, random positions, constant input shear

KISS! And this isn’t an “astronomy” problem

2009: GREAT08Known PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, grid of positions, constant input shear

Winners were computer scientists! But when outsourcing, must ask right question

2011: GREAT10 Don’t include a dateVarying PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, grid of positions, input shear f(RA,Dec)

Input shear

Mea

sure

d sh

ear

Page 4: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Separablechallenges

Kitching et al. 2011

Page 5: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Star challenge (~50Gb)Multiple tiers: Moffat/Airy, with/without diffraction spikes

Jitter, optical distortions, trackingSingle-screen Kolmogorov turbulence

Barney Rowe (UCL/JPL)

Page 6: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Separablechallenges

Kitching et al. 2011

Page 7: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Galaxy challenge (~1Tb)Multiple tiers: Bulge/disc models

Big/small, bright/faint galaxiesGround/space observing conditionsAll had a known PSF (the problems are

separable)

Tom Kitching (ROE)

Page 8: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Nestedchallenges

Kitching et al. 2011

Page 9: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Crowdsourcing (~10Gb, .png)Target the small of GalaxyZooers who wanted to write an algorithmBetter name, advertise in WSJ, White House blog, offer a “cool” prize

Page 10: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Roger Bannister effect

Page 11: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Figure of merit Past iterations2006: STEP IKnown PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, random positions, constant input shear

2007: STEP II1 Q=57Known PSF, complex galaxy morphologies, random positions, constant input shear

2009: GREAT08 Q=119Known PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, grid of positions, constant input shear

2011: GREAT10 Q=309Varying PSF, simple galaxy morphologies, grid of positions, input shear f(RA,Dec)

Requirement for Euclid/WFIRST (2019)Bernstein has achieved this, at high S/N

Q=1000

Input shear

Mea

sure

d sh

ear

Q is a combination of multiplicative & additive biases. High values are better.

Page 12: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Testing the unknown unknowns

Offner relay

Suresh Seshadri (JPL), Roger Smith (Caltech), Jason Rhodes (JPL)

Mask ofknownshapes

Page 13: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Lensing in a lab

Page 14: Realistic images, containing a known shear (distortion) signal. Animations show 0-10% distortion in 1% steps (much bigger than ~2% real signal). Simulated.

Lensing in a lab