Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

download Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

of 3

Transcript of Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

  • 7/25/2019 Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

    1/3

    6/30/2016 RE: VETERANS AFFAIRS ICO OLIVER MITCHELL - B M

    https://outlook.li ve.com/owa/?viewmodel=R eadMessageItem&ItemID=AQMkADAwATYwMAItYWEAZGYtMj M2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOm5sghMl3JTJc6z449Z

    RE: VETERANS AFFAIRS ICO OLIVER MITCHELL

    Ms. Nelson,

    I went ahead and reviewed the audio, my initial complaint as well as the transcript's from my EEO investigation.

    Now you state, that the IG's investigation and the facility's response to my allegations show no wrong doing.

    However, as I listen to the recording and compare it to the IG's investigation I come to the same conclusion.

    The facility fabricated liedtheir story in an effort to deflect from theirwrong doing.

    1. In the recording Istate "why are we still scheduling orders 5yrs and back, im still canceling orders from 2001 ."

    2. In the recording Dr. ElSaden states "anything over a year old should be canceled ."

    3. Ithen ask "should be canceled or scheduled."

    4. Dr. ElSaden clearly states "canceled because they wouldn t let us do a mass purge, so its just a matter of getting in there and canceling

    them ourselves."

    5. Dr. ElSaden states "your backlog should start at April 07."

    6. Then Dr. ElSaden poses a question to Craig Morioka asking "isn t that right Craig not anyth ing earlier than that?"

    7. The committee chairman then states "somebody needs to be canceling those orders."

    8. Then Dr. ElSaden states "cancel everything and not just MR cancel any of those orders before April 07."

    9. Randy Jones then states "if they don t read the history it maybe please do a year from now."

    10.Then Dr. ElSaden states "well that is where the April 7 came from because I got permission..."

    11.However she is interruptedby Randy before she could finish her statement.

    12.Lastly, Dr. ElSaden states "and the mass purge thing is not going to happen is that right?"

    13.Then Craigresponds to Dr. ElSaden stating "not that I know of nobody wants to even take the chance of fear of losing there job or

    something."

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____

    Now lets analyze this rationally.

    Ms. Nelson you state that Dr. ElSaden got permission to delete the backlog and it should start at April '07.

    However, in Dr. ElSadens own words she stated "canceled because they wouldn t let us do a mass purge, so its just a matter of getting in the

    and canceling them ourselves."

    Now lets look at "its just a matter of getting in there and canceling them ourselves."

    Wed 8/21/2013 10:31 PM

    To:[email protected] ;

  • 7/25/2019 Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

    2/3

    6/30/2016 RE: VETERANS AFFAIRS ICO OLIVER MITCHELL - B M

    https://outlook.li ve.com/owa/?viewmodel=R eadMessageItem&ItemID=AQMkADAwATYwMAItYWEAZGYtMj M2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOm5sghMl3JTJc6z449Z

    If the facility or Dr. ElSaden had actuallyreceived permission to cancel any portion thereof why make the statement of "its just a matter of

    getting in there and canceling them ourselves?"

    Clearly, she is saying "I did not get permission " thus her statement "so its just a matter of getting in there and canceling them ourselves."

    Clearly, she is saying "canceled because they wouldn t let us do a mass purge"

    Now Randy Jones states "if they don t read the history i t maybe please do a year from now"

    What he is referring to is that "some orders have provisions or additional orders that state please do a future exam a year from now."

    Thus Dr. ElSadens statement "well that is where the April 7 came from because I got permission..."

    Then there's the committee chairs statement "somebody needs to be canceling those orders"

    So again the question becomes, "if theyhad permission to delete or purge anyportion thereof," then why be so concerned about how or wh

    its being deleted?"

    Then Dr. ElSaden states again"and the mass purge thing is not going to happen is that right?"

    And lastlyyouhear Craig say in responseto that mass purge "not that I know of nobody wants to even take the chance of fear of losing ther

    job or something."

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    ___________

    So Ms. Nelson, when even the audio is examined and weighed in its entirety, any person of reason can conclude that the facility did not get

    any permission to mass purge, delete, destroy,

    hide or fabricate any portion thereof the backlog.

    As we previously discussed, the IG's investigation is flawed because they reliedon the facilities internal investigation and response.

    When you look at the timing of my complaints to include my subsequent detail it is more than apparent that the facility conspired with Dr.

    Anderson in order to address my IG complaint.

    Ms. Nelson I still believe that this situation in its entirety is nothing more than a sham and an attempt to cast any negative and or wrongdoin

    away from the agency.

    Since I have made this recording public I have received quite a number of positive comments in support of my allegations. several thousand

    are in agreement

    There appears to be a difference of opinion here.

    It would appear that the agency to includethe OSC would rather not find any wrongdoing despite the obvious elephant in the room.

    This isn't a question of any outdated orders or pending orders this is a question of illegality regarding how and why the orders were canceled

    Any order for anyservices regardless of the department is and becomes a permanentrecord within the veterans medical record.

    As previously stated before, no one can authorize anyone to delete any records pertaining to a veterans entire medical record.

    That's like saying were going to delete any record in a veterans health record just because its old and/or outdated.

    Frankly, this entire situation seems to fit the narrative that the agency, the OSC and the US government doesn't want this to come out becaus

    it would show that the agency cannot keep up

    with the demand and they are actively trying to eliminate me and my partner so it never comes out.

    To be honest, the OSC is only hurting the veterans by denying this complaint.

  • 7/25/2019 Re_ Veterans Affairs Ico Oliver Mitchell - b m 4

    3/3

    6/30/2016 RE: VETERANS AFFAIRS ICO OLIVER MITCHELL - B M

    https://outlook.li ve.com/owa/?viewmodel=R eadMessageItem&ItemID=AQMkADAwATYwMAItYWEAZGYtMj M2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOm5sghMl3JTJc6z449Z

    Lets look at one of the other VA scandals in which the agency was accused of destroying veterans health records in connection to their

    disability claims.

    Those records in question were old and were thrown away regardless and by several VA benefits offices across the country.

    And in that instance the VA was found to be in error because they destroyed those records in an attempt to deny the veterans their disability

    claims.

    So what's the difference between the medical records within the medical center and the medical records at the veterans benefit administratio

    Allow me to answer that for you; there is no difference, any and all records pertaining to a veteran belong in their medical record.

    If the rumors are true, that the government has gone into my personal affects and retrieved my EEO, IG, OSC, FLRA files in connection to my

    complaints then that again fits this narrative that

    the VA, OSC and US government is doing this in an attempt to not allow the TRUTH to come out.

    Again, that only hurts the veterans, not HELP them.

    Lastly, I honestly believe that if my allegations were unfounded then why would anyone within the agency be so concerned after the fact

    regarding the complaint in the first place?

    I believe this entire situation is predicated on race and the messenger and not the message within the complaint.

    Please advise.

    From: [email protected]

    To: [email protected]

    Subject: VETERANS AFFAIRS ICO OLIVER MITCHELL

    Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:42:38 0700

    Ms. Nelson,

    I thank you and appreciate the follow up to my request.

    In response to your request I ask that you give me a few days to address said request.

    I have a host of issues that I need to deal with first.I have an ex partner who is suffering a great deal of stress in direct response to this issuethat has manifested into a host of medical issues.

    I have to find gainfu l employment.

    I have to repair the damage from this relentless character assassination.

    Plainly, I have ALOTof other things I have to deal with.

    That's not to say this matter isn't important, however, in my mind this was a dead issue for me when I was constructively discharged.

    Honestly, I DO NOT appreciate ANYof th is, not to say you are to blame but sometimes people need to learn to let go and move on .

    Clearly, it appears to be that im the only one who thinks that way.

    Anyway, I will do my best to get you what you need by Monday of next week.

    If you have any questions please feel free.

    Oliver