R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

14
Presented by Renato Turchetta CCLRC - RAL 7 th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors – PSD7 Liverpool (UK), 12-16 September 2005 R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics P.P. Allport b , R. Bates c , G. Casse b* , J. Crooks a , A. Evans b , L. Jones a , V. O’Shea c , R.Turchetta a* , M.Tyndel a , J.J. Velthuis b , G. Villani a , F. Zakopoulos a a Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom b University of Liverpool, United Kingdom c University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

description

R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics. P.P. Allport b , R. Bates c , G. Casse b* , J. Crooks a , A. Evans b , L. Jones a , V. O’Shea c , R.Turchetta a* , M.Tyndel a , J.J. Velthuis b , G. Villani a , F. Zakopoulos a a Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

Page 1: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

Presented by Renato Turchetta

CCLRC - RAL

7th International Conference on Position Sensitive Detectors – PSD7

Liverpool (UK), 12-16 September 2005

R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

P.P. Allportb, R. Batesc, G. Casseb*, J. Crooksa, A. Evansb, L. Jonesa, V. O’Sheac, R.Turchettaa*, M.Tyndela, J.J. Velthuisb, G. Villania, F.

Zakopoulosa

a Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdomb University of Liverpool, United Kingdomc University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

Page 2: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

2PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Outline

Introduction. Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)

aka CMOS sensors for imaging.

Requirements

Results

Noise

Radiation hardness

CMOS sensors with in-pixel storage:

Flexible APS (FAPS)

Conclusions

Page 3: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

3PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

CMOS Image Sensors aka

Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor (MAPS)

CMOS sensors for imaging, introduced in early ’90s.

At the beginning, CMOS sensors used for low-end applications

Constant improvement in the technology: noise, QE, … CMOS

sensors widely used in high-end consumer and prosumer cameras

For high-speed imaging (industrial, HDTV, …) CMOS sensors have

already the best performance in terms of noise.

All major players in imaging field are improving the technology.

IEEE Workshop on CCD and Advanced Image Sensors IEEE

Workshop on Image Sensors

Page 4: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

4PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor Standard CMOS technology

all-in-one detector-connection-

readout = Monolithic

small size / greater integration

low power consumption

radiation resistance

system-level cost

Increased functionality

increased speed (column- or

pixel- parallel processing)

random access (Region-of-Interest

ROI readout)

Column-parallel ADCs

Data processing / Output stage

Rea

dou

t co

ntr

olC

amer

a co

ntr

ol

Camera-on-a-chip

What is needed for Particle Physics ?

Page 5: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

5PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Metal layers

Polysilicon

P-Well N-Well P-Well

N+ N+ P+ N+

MAPS for particle detection

Dielectric for insulation and passivation

High energy particles generate about 80 e-/h pair per m

Radiation

--

--

--

- ++

+++

++

- +- +- +

P-substrate

P-epitaxial layer

Potential barriers

epi

sub

N

Nln

q

kTV

Requirements

1) Efficiency:

100% or close

2) Noise: signal ~

100s e-/h pairs

3) Radiation

hardness: Mrad

and beyond

4) Speed: ‘frame

rate’ > 106/sec

5) Large area: side

~ cm’s

Page 6: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

6PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

RAL Sensors for Particle Physics

Parametric test sensor: RAL_HEPAPS family

RAL_HEPAPS1: 0.25 m, 2 m (!) epitaxial layer, 64*8

pixels, 15 m pitch: 3MOS, 4MOS

RAL_HEPAPS2: 0.25 m CIS, 8 m epitaxial layer, 384*224

pixels, 15 m pitch: 3MOS, 4MOS, ChargePreAmplifier

(CPA), Flexible APS (FAPS, 20 m pitch)

RAL_HEPAPS3: 0.25 m MM, no epitaxial layer, 192*192

pixels, 15 m pitch: 3MOS, 4MOS, Deep N-well diodes

UK collaboration to develop MAPS for Particle Physics and Space Science

(also Leicester/Brunel, Birmingham)

Test sensors

RAL_HEPAPS4: 0.35 m CIS, 20 m epitaxial layer, 1026*384 pixels, 15 m pitch. 3

versions: 1, 2 or 4 diodes per pixel. Rad-hard, 5MHz row rate (manufactured,

preparing tests)

Page 7: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

7PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Soft and hard reset

RESET

ROW_SELECT

Output

Diode

Vreset

Hard resetRESET – Vreset > Vth for reset transistor

Noise (ENC in e- rms)

Soft resetRESET ~ Vreset.A factor of >~2 reduction(reset in the dark)

Noise (ENC in e- rms)

Measured noise distributions for a 64x64 pixel test structure.

Not corrected for system noise

Page 8: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

8PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Radiation hardness

Transistors.

Threshold shift: reduces with shrinking feature size

Bird’s beak effect: use enclosed geometry transistors

Transistor leakage current: use guard-rings to

separate transistors

Diodes.

Radiation damage increases leakage current

Radiation damage reduces minority carrier lifetime

diffusion distance is reduced

~tox2

0.25 micron

Page 9: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

9PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Single pixel S/N dependence on impact point

Device simulation.4-diode 15 m pixel

1014

No rad

G. Villani (RAL)

• Less variation in S/N varies over pixel before and after irradiation.• S at edges still usable after 1015 p/cm2.

1015

No rad

Device simulation.Single diode 15 m pixel

Page 10: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

10PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Landau Distributions

Type Specs S N S/N

3MOS E 4 diodes 99 4.94 20.1

3MOS C GAA 87 4.85 18.0

3MOS B Diode 1.2x1.2 92 3.87 23.8

3MOS A Diode 3x3 67 3.31 20.3

4MOS C Lower VT 101 4.14 24.4

4MOS B Higher VT 114 4.70 24.2

4MOS A Reference 111 4.45 25.0

Examples of clusters. S/N per pixelBeta source (Ru106) test results. Sensors HEPAPS2.

Landau distributions

Summary table

Page 11: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

11PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Radiation test. Summary

• Sensors yield reasonable S/N up to 1014 p/cm2

• 0.35 m technology in the pixel transistors. Enclosed layout in 3MOS_E

• S/N reduction seems to be dominated by charge collection

J. Velthuis (Liv)

S/N

Dose (log10(p/cm2))

No

ise

(AD

U c

ou

nts

)

Dose (log10(p/cm2))

Sig

nal

(A

DU

co

un

ts)

Dose (log10(p/cm2))

Page 12: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

12PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Flexible Active Pixel Sensor

10 memory cell per pixel

28 transistors per pixel

20 m pitch

40x40 arrays

Design for the Vertex detector at the International Linear Collider

Pulses LED test (single pixel)

Light pulse

Amplitude

Time

Page 13: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

13PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

FAPS. Landau distribution• Test with source

• Correlated Double Sampling readout (subtract Scell 1)

• Correct remaining common mode and pedestal

• Calculate random noise

– Sigma of pedestal and common mode corrected output

• Cluster definition

– Signal >8 seed

– Signal >2 next

• Note hit in cell i also present in cell i+1.

• S/Ncell between 14.7±0.4 and

17.0±0.3

Seed 3x3 5x5

J. Velthuis (Liv)

Page 14: R&D on MAPS for High Energy Physics

14PSD7, Liverpool, 2005

Parametric test sensors used to study noise, radiation hardness, new designs.

Radiation hardness 1014 p/cm2

Noise < 20 e- rms (soft reset in dark)

Three versions for radiation hardness of fast (5MHz/line), rad-hard, large

(1024*384) sensor (RAL_HEPAPS4) manufactured

FAPS architecture developed for vertex detector at ILC

Digital pixel architecture (R&D within MI3 collaboration, N. Allinson et al.) in

development for CALICE Electromagnetic Calorimeter at ILC (P. Dauncey, Imperial

College et al.).

Would require large area coverage 104 m2, stitched sensors

CMOS technology could provide the solution for coverage of large areas with

pixel detectors

Conclusions