rce.. Gdtr? ~ 00~ - Scanned Retina · PDF file2 PAGE 3 OF 10 6 3 from the Harford Van Dyke...

10
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 RECEIVED SEP 15 20\4 Audltor's Office RECEfiVEO) COpy ORIGINAL FILED SEP 152014 3 SEP 15 2014 .. Scott G. Weber. Clerk. Clark Co. David A. Darby In Propria Persona (In Proper P~ of Comml8SIonerf One~~opleofWethePeople BECEIVIED ::~~ 11' .ECEIVE~ Domiciled at PO Box 772 n V, Amboy, Washington (zip exempt) '1 5 6)n~Un' , SEP 1 5 2014 360-606-8009 ~Ff.J .t < !,I\.I fi'i , [email protected] p SGCuting j\ttorn~ BY: rce.. Gdtr? ~ 00 ~ IN THE SUPERIOR COOWID~HE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK 4 5 6 7 Case No: 12-2-03432-3 8 THE COUNTY OF CLARK, ex reI, by, [CCo.= Clark County] Taylor Hallvik, CCo. Prosecuting Attorney, Douglas Lasher, CCo. Treasurer, Greg Kimsey, CCo. Auditor, Peter VanNortwick, CCo. Assessor, David Madore, CCo. Commissioner, Edward Barnes, CCo. Commissioner, Plaintiff, Amended Counter Suit 9-15-14 Civil Third Party Counter Suit Against Clark County At Common Law, With A Trial By Jury, Demandino- A Com lete Audit For All Tax Mone Collected and Disbursed From 2008 To 2014, to prove that Clark County has the lawful privilege to collect taxes from me, David A. Darby, or anybody else in this County. 9 vs. David A. Darby, Third Party Counter Plaintiff The objective of this Counter Suit is to compel the corporate Clark County to prove the County's publi fidelity and corporate solvency, without which it does not have the lawful privilege to proceed in an Tax-Financed Court of the State of Washington, fo any purpose. This audit shall include a full disclosure of all tax money investments disbursed to, or invested in, corporate County private investment accounts called "CAFR" accounts, which are County tax funds hidden from the taxpayers. David A. Darby, Defendant vs. THE COUNTY OF CLARK, ex rel, by, Points oflaw: Taylor Hallvik, CCo. Prosecuting Attorney, The 1787 Constitution for the United States of Douglas Lasher, CCo. Treasurer, America, Amendment 5, Just Compensation- Greg Kimsey, CCo. Auditor, "nor shall Private Property [Taxes] be taken for Peter Van Nortwick, CCo. Assessor, public use without just compensation" David Madore CCo. Commissioner, 18 USC 4, 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242. All contests Edward Barnes CCo. Commissioner, and answers shall be by Affidavit in writing, and be Third Party Counter Defendant read to, and be open to criticism and challenge by, ----..;.----------------1 the Jury and the People. 18 USC 1621, 18 USC 1622. PAGE 1 OF 10

Transcript of rce.. Gdtr? ~ 00~ - Scanned Retina · PDF file2 PAGE 3 OF 10 6 3 from the Harford Van Dyke...

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

RECEIVED

SEP 15 20\4

Audltor's OfficeRECEfiVEO)

COpyORIGINAL FILED

SEP 152014

3

SEP 1 5 2014.. Scott G. Weber. Clerk. Clark Co.

David A. Darby In Propria Persona (In Proper P~ of Comml8SIonerf

One~~opleofWethePeople BECEIVIED ::~~ 11' .ECEIVE~Domiciled at PO Box 772 n V,

Amboy, Washington (zip exempt) '1 5 6)n~Un' , SEP 1 5 2014360-606-8009 ~Ff.J .t < !,I\.I fi'i ,

[email protected] p SGCutingj\ttorn~ BY: rce.. Gdtr? ~ 00 ~IN THE SUPERIOR COOWID~HE STATE OF WASHINGTON

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK

4

5

6

7

Case No: 12-2-03432-38 THE COUNTY OF CLARK, ex reI, by,[CCo.= Clark County]Taylor Hallvik, CCo. Prosecuting Attorney,Douglas Lasher, CCo. Treasurer,Greg Kimsey, CCo. Auditor,Peter VanNortwick, CCo. Assessor,David Madore, CCo. Commissioner,Edward Barnes, CCo. Commissioner,Plaintiff,

Amended Counter Suit 9-15-14Civil Third Party Counter Suit Against ClarkCounty At Common Law, With A Trial By Jury,Demandino- A Com lete Audit For All Tax MoneCollected and Disbursed From 2008 To 2014, toprove that Clark County has the lawful privilege tocollect taxes from me, David A. Darby, or anybodyelse in this County.

9

vs.

David A. Darby,Third Party Counter Plaintiff

The objective of this Counter Suit is to compel thecorporate Clark County to prove the County's publifidelity and corporate solvency, without which itdoes not have the lawful privilege to proceed in anTax-Financed Court of the State of Washington, foany purpose. This audit shall include a fulldisclosure of all tax money investments disbursedto, or invested in, corporate County privateinvestment accounts called "CAFR" accounts,which are County tax funds hidden from thetaxpayers.

David A. Darby,Defendant

vs.

THE COUNTY OF CLARK, ex rel, by, Points oflaw:Taylor Hallvik, CCo. Prosecuting Attorney, The 1787 Constitution for the United States ofDouglas Lasher, CCo. Treasurer, America, Amendment 5, Just Compensation-Greg Kimsey, CCo. Auditor, "nor shall Private Property [Taxes] be taken forPeter Van Nortwick, CCo. Assessor, public use without just compensation"David Madore CCo. Commissioner, 18 USC 4, 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242. All contestsEdward Barnes CCo. Commissioner, and answers shall be by Affidavit in writing, and beThird Party Counter Defendant read to, and be open to criticism and challenge by,----..;.----------------1 the Jury and the People.

18 USC 1621, 18 USC 1622.

PAGE 1 OF 10

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

INTRODUCTORY BRIEF - AFFIDAVIT

I David A. Darby certify and affirm the following:

I am a flesh and blood person, not a State-Licensed Corporation. The County Officers havetried to seize my property unlawfully through the unlawful use of Summary Court Processes,Summary Judgments and Summary Orders. A Summary Court is a Judge-Only Courtmeaning that it is not a Trial By Jury Court and the law guarantees to me a Trial By Jury toprotect my property with Trial By Jury.

Court Limitations» The Common Law Court is a court conducted before a Jury to obtain a Trial By Jury. A

Jury can rule on both the facts and the law, and can disregard any law or ruling whichthey conclude to be defective or inapplicable. This is called jury nullification of the law,or simply, "Jury Nullification". The Common Law Court is guaranteed by law to beavailable to any citizen when the amount in controversy exceeds Twenty (20) Dollars(US Constitution.) or some other minimum figure set by legislated Session Law of theState wherein the Trial By Jury is conducted.

» A Judge only Court, a government court without a jury, called also an Equity orChancery Court, cannot be imposed upon a flesh and blood person without the person'sconsent in writing. A Corporation can be compelled by a State Government to accept ~Judge Only. Equity, Chancery Court process because the State is a dominant silentpartner in every legal entity which it licenses into existence, and must protect its owncommercial liability for what the licensed corporation does. Corporations are required tobe bonded to cover the liability of the State for their creation.

» A Judge only process called a Summary Court with its Summary Judgments andSummary Orders, can lawfully conduct only trials or hearings wherein both opposingparties are Corporations, and the licensing State Government has consented to the courtprocess for both sides of the conflict.

TO ALL OFFICERS, AND TO THE CITIZENS OF CLARK COUNTYThis is a Third Party Counter Suit to compel the County and its representatives to present, inAffidavit form, a Complete Audit of all tax money received and disbursed for the years 2008 tothe present, which shall account for every penny, nickel, dime, quarter and dollar that the countyhas spent, day by day, for the above years in question. This accounting audit is guaranteed in thefollowing Constitutions to stand as proof of Just Compensation, pursuant to The 1878Constitution ofthe State of Washington, Article 5, Section 15. and pursuant to the 1889Constitution of the State Of Washington, Article 1, Section 16, Eminent Domain. The 1787Constitution for the United States of America, Amendment 5, pertaining to Just Compensation,guarantees that a complete Audit of all tax moneys collected and spent must be accounted for,including CAFR accounts. The County shall account for the three Public Wealth (Tax) RebateNotes (PWRN) with issue numbers 1016, 1056, 1093 totaling $125,761,480 disbursed to theCounty as "one-half for the county and one-half for the citizens," disbursed to Clark County

PAGE 2 OF 10

2

PAGE 3 OF 10

6

3

from the Harford Van Dyke Public Wealth (Tax) Rebate Bank/Trust, one on 6/21/97, and two on6/28/97. These lawful notes were well known by the Secret Service and the FBI. Public Wealth(Tax) Rebate Notes (PWRN) were never challenged by the United States Secret Service or theFBI during the 5 years that they were disbursed on the public street, and have never been provedto be invalid or unlawful by any legal action. All 39 counties of the State of Washingtonreceived PWRNs at that time in June of 1997, in proportion to their population. All of thesePWRNs are still currently valuable and they are all brokerable or auctionable in the UnitedStates, or on the International Money Market (by Dutch Auction).

4

5

7This Third Party Counter Suit puts a stop to the collection of all property taxes, and propertyforeclosures to collect property taxes, in and by Clark County until this Audit is completed andpresented to the public for their inspection and approval as required in the above legal citations.

8

9 Greg Kimsey, Doug Lasher and Peter VanNortwick have all disregarded my demands for them t provethat the 1878 Constitution of the State of Washington is not a lawful contract with the people of estateof Washington. This controversy would have ended long ago if they had been honest and lawful lectedofficials. Instead they have blocked me at every turn. Now they think they have beaten me by se lingmy property. First of all they have to prove that the county or state owns my land. Then they ha e toprove in court that the 1878 is not a valid contract between the constitutional government and thesovereign people of Washington. That contract was never terminated with a vote of the people.Therefore, the 1878 Constitution of the State of Washington is still a valid contract and can be us d byanyone that chooses to demand its protections.

10

11

12

13

14

15The county must have a contract with the people or prove that they have clear title to the land. If heydo not have either one, then they do have the authority to sell anyone's property. I have checked lofthe records that are recorded with the county and there is not one piece of paper that shows owne ship ofmy property by the county. Stop and think about it. If you decided to sell the neighbor's propewithout a title, how far do you think you would get. So what gives the county the idea that they sellprivate property when they do not have ownership?

16

17

18

19The Columbian Article

On their web site, http://www.Columbian.com/news/2014

20> The Columbian Staff and Management labeled and libeled me repeatedly as an"Anti-government activist".

> I am in favor of honest Dejure (Constitutional) government officials, and against corruptgovernment officials.> I acknowledge an honest Dejure's government's authority to honestly and lawfully collectconstitutional taxes, especially a per capita (apportioned) tax, and its authority to honestly andlawfully send our men to war.> I stand against dishonest and unlawful (Defacto) government officers, who allow and operateunlawful taxation system, secretly set aside tax money (e.g., CAFR investment accounts) and stemoney from the tax coffers; who capitalize, undermine and destroy our Nation's internal justice s stem

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The County has the corrupt physical power to take, but this Duel will be a Commercial Duel.

5

and court system; and who send our young men off to dishonorable and unlawful undeclared war andpolitical police actions in other countries.> We have enough evil officers in our own government political system to bring under control,sending our young men to some other country to force our political system and police actions onpeople of that other country. Our sons and daughters should be at home on our own national soilpersonal property to protect our own families, homes, and property from the rising attack from 0

(Defacto) government officers employing unlawful martial law against us.It is because we must always be prepared to protect ourselves from our own wayward, despotic, dpolitically disloyal government officers, that our forefathers provided the Second Amendment Pr tectionof our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and maintain an unorganized militia. Honest government 0 cersdo not need to fear the corrective power of a public militia.

3

4

6

7

8 > So far in my contest with the Clark County government, its officers have not provided to meaccounting of the use of the taxes, which I have already entrusted to it. Should I accept being sueinto paying any additional taxes to a government operation which is secret and has tried to takeproperty without notifying me of my inalienable right to a Trial By Jury?

9

10

11 > So far in my contest with the Clark County government, its officers have not provided to meaccounting of the use of the taxes, which I have already entrusted to it. Should I accept being forpay any additional taxes to a government operation which is secret and has tried to take my propwithout notifying me of my inalienable right to a Trial By Jury?

12

13

14> Some people become a manifestation of their name, so you want to be careful about how you nyour child. On the Columbian's website, Doug Lasher describes the transfer of the David Darbyas a Clark County-arranged Duel.(1) The Clark County Officers, without a lawful common law Trial By Jury, will sell David Darbto create a combatant called a Buyer.(2) Lasher and the Clark County Sheriff will then step back and let the County-created Buyer anDarby, the lawful Property Owner, engage in a private physical Duel for the land.

15

16

17

18 Buyer Beware!19

20

21 > I will leave my property to do any of the ordinary things that all persons do that require them to dealelsewhere than on their property, and then return to my property at my choosing, but I will not va atemy property in the sense of abandoning my rightful domicile to anyone.22

23

24

25> Whoever sells my property in an unlawful auction will be charged with violation of my civil ri hts,and whoever buys my property in an unlawful auction will be charged, along with the seller, wiconspiracy to violate my civil rights. The penalty for such unlawful action could result in a Civil Ri tsLien, in each case is in the starting range of $350,000 for each person involved in procuring the .ef of

PAGE 4 OF 10

26

2

PAGE50F 10

3

my property, in the facilitation of that theft, and in the act of theft. Every day of unlawful possess on ofmy property, will be dollar-valued as a repeat of the original offence committed by all offending arties.Once elected officials break their oath, they fall outside the umbrella of government protection a d intothe laws of commerce that can be very harsh if those same elected officials do not protect the peo Ie'srights as they promise with the giving of an oath to do so.

4Liens and Notices of Liens

5

6A Lien is a Full-Disclosure Affidavit Claim of Debt. Any lawful Lien, defaulted by the failure to ontestthe Lien within its 3 month or 90 day Grace Period, becomes an Account Receivable, and a Ne 0 iableCommercial Instrument, which can be converted into a currency on the street by merely placing t enumeric symbols of its dollar value in the four comers of the Lien instrument, or it can be fractio atedinto practical Partial Lien Assignments from the Lien, as denominated currency Street Notes, bac ed bythe Lien. It can also be sold nationally or internationally to professional Debt Collectors, or be s ld at aDiscount Auction, or at a Dutch Auction.

7

8

9

10 A Notice of Lien is not a Full-Disclosure Affidavit Claim of Debt hence it cannot be defaulted in 0 anAccount Receiveable. In order for a Notice of Lien to be lawful, it must declare where the origin ingLien can be found and copied so that the Lien can be contested by the Lien Debtor within the law IGrace Period of 3 months or 90 days. A Notice of Lien is best delivered by directly serving a cop of theLien itself on the Lien Debtor. A Notice of Lien is not a lawfully valid document if the citedcorresponding Lien does not, in fact, exist or has not been filed.

11

12

13

14 THE POWER, but, NOT THE LAWFUL AUTHORITY

15Government Officials have the power, but not the lawful authority, to disobey, and to engage (prother Government Officials to disobey, the International Laws of Commerce or the Su reme La of theLand, The Constitution for the United States of America (Constitution), and the laws pursuant th reto.Corrupt Government Officers will levy taxes from the PeoplelPublic to ain and to use the owe of thetaxes to steal more taxes and to injure, control, and enslave the PeoplelPublic. Our GovernmentOfficials' notorious/open criminal exercise of power against their own citizenry destroys theinternational commercial image of our Nation in the eyes of the people of other Nations until the cannolonger overlook the hypocrisy in it, and the future international commercial instability it will sur ly

cause, hence the trade contracts it will destroy.

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 Our wise forefathers were very concerned about the potential misuse and mal-use of corporations andespecially Limited Liability Corporations and Alter Ego Corporations.Therefore, our wise forefathers warned, in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, that the P oplemust always be armed to protect themselves from predatory corporations, United States Corporat ons,Federal (Reserve) Corporations [IRS], State Corporations, County Corporations, City Corporatio s, andeven some Citizen-operated Corporations.

23

24

25

26The following is an example of the criminal activity that goes on daily in the Clark County Audit r'sOffice.

RCW 60.68, is the Washington State Government presentment of the Federal Universal Directiv calledthe Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act, which procures the State's County Recorders to co itperjury on the County Tax Lien Index, in violation of the United States' own Criminal Code Title 18Sections 1621 crerjury) and 1622 ( Procurement of Perjury). in order to unlawfully facilitate andaccelerate the fraudulent collection of IRS taxes in violation of State, U.S., and internationalCommercial Law.

2

PAGE 6 OF 10

3

The Daily Perjury Crimes of the Clark County Recording OfficeRCW 60.68.045 Tax lien index --- Duties of county auditor.

4

5

6

7

8

9There are two distinctly different legal documents used in the federal-county tax scam, (1) the Fe eralTax Lien called an FTL, and (2) the Notice of Federal Tax Lien called an NFTL.

lO

1]

The first and most important document is called the Federal Tax Lien or FTL. The FTL must pro re thecorporate privilege to collect taxes, and the corporate privilege to seize property, which can be t en tosatisfy the purported tax debt. An FTL must satisfy all lawful Lien requirements.

12

13The second, and less important of the two documents, is called the Notice of Federal Tax Lien, 0

NFTL. The NFTL declares that an originating Federal Tax Lien or FTL document exists.

14 The two documents involved in the scam have been adequately defined and will henceforth be re erredto as the FTL and NFTL documents.

.:\

> Ever since Victor Calzaretta's, James Carty's, Frank Kanekoa's, and the Columbian's involvem t withClark County Government (Gambling, Prostitution, Drugs, concealment of County Tax Money,concealment of County Crime, Port/Customs Crime, and Government Crime, etc.), the FBI has k pt awatchful eye and an info-log on all of them, and especially the Clark County Government, a bord rlinegovernment of Washington, at Vancouver, a city about one mile distant from Portland, Oregon.

15

16

17The Federal Tax Lien Index Scam

18There are several reasons c- for the Clark County Officers to comply with federal orders.

19 > Virtually every county in the Nation gets Federal Funding, and becomes dependent upon it.

20

21

22

23> If the Federal Government tells the Clark County Officials something, they are going listen.

24

25

26

2

PAGE70F 10

SCAM FRAME #1> RCW 60.68.035, and RCW 60.68.045, mandated by federal law, state as follows:

3RCW 60.68.035 Fees for recording or filing federal liens.RCW 60.68.035 (3)"The recording officer shall bill the district directors of the internal revenue service or other appr priatefederal officials on a monthly basis for fees for documents filed for record by them."

4

5

6 RCW 60.68.045 Tax lien index -----Duties of auditor."When a notice of such tax lien is recorded, the county auditor shall forthwith enter it in an alphatax lien index to be provided by the board of county commissioners showing on one line the namresidence of the taxpayer named in the notice, the collector's serial number of the notice, the datehour of recording, and the amount of tax and penalty assessed."

7

8

9

10We make the code text clearer by adding the correct document title abbreviations into the text.We get --- SCAM FRAME #2

11RCW 60.68.035 Fees for recording or riling federal liens (FTLs)RCW 60.68.035 (3)The recording officer shall bill the district directors of the internal revenue service or other appro riatefederal officials on a monthly basis for fees for (NFTL) documents filed for record (as FTLs) by em.

12

13

14 RCW 60.68.045 Tax lien (FTL) index -----Duties of auditor.When a notice (NFTL) of such tax lien (FTL) is recorded, the county auditor shall forthwith ente it (theNFTL) in an alphabetical tax lien (FTL) index to be provided by the board of county commission rsshowing on one line the name and residence of the taxpayer named in the notice (NFTL), the colI ctor'sserial number of the notice (NFTL), the date and hour of recording [it] (the NFTL), and the amo t oftax and penalty assessed (in the NFTL).

15

16

17

18

19

Now we make the code text even clearer by substituting the document abbreviations into the text.We get --- SCAM FRAME #3

20 RCW 60.68.035 Fees for recording or riling liens (FTLs)RCW 60.68.035 (3)"The recording officer shall bill the district directors of the internal revenue service or other appr priatefederal officials on a monthly basis for fees for NFTL documents filed for record, as FTLs, by th m."

21

22

23 RCW 60.68.045 FTL index -----Duties of auditor.When an NFTL of such FTL is recorded, the county auditor shall forthwith enter the NFTL in analphabetical FTL index to be provided by the board of county commissioners showing on one lin thename and residence of the taxpayer named in the NFTL, the collector's serial number of the NFT , thedate and hour of recording the NFTL, and the amount of tax and penalty assessed in the NFTL.

24

25

26

2The IRS Property Theft Scam

3Now each non-negotiable NFTL appears unlawfully as a negotiable FTL on the FTL index.The NFTL has, in effect, been converted into MONEY by recording a Notice as a Lien.This converts the County Recorder's Office into a False FTL index-Note Issuing Bank.The IRS now has a Bank Account at the County Recorder Bank.Let us say that the IRS agent as a part of his daily work wants to make three withdrawals of mon y fromthe County Recorder Bank for his employer, the Federal Reserve Corporation's "Department of eTreasury", the Internal Revenue Service.The IRS agent asks the County Recorder to provide him with three Certified True Copies of the Lindex so that the agent can display them to three members of the Commercial World to "prove" t at theIRS has just acquired the taxpayer's property by filing a Federal Tax Lien against a taxpayer.> The IRS Agent presents a Certified True Copy of the FTL index to the taxpayer's Employer to 'prove"to the Employer that the IRS has a Federal Tax Lien on the taxpayer's Wages, and therefore that eEmployer must take money away from the taxpayer's Wages, and give the Wages/money to the I S.> The IRS Agent presents a Certified True Copy of the FTL index to the Sheriff to "prove" to the Sheriffthat the IRS has a Federal Tax Lien on the taxpayer's Real Property and House, and therefore tha theSheriff must take the taxpayer's Real Property and the House away from the taxpayer, and give it 0 theIRS.> The IRS Agent presents a Certified True Copy of the FTL index to the taxpayer's Banker to "pr ve" tothe Banker that the IRS has a Federal Tax Lien on the taxpayer's Bank Account, and therefore th theBanker must seize the money away from the taxpayer's Bank Account, and give it to the IRS.

The Banker's Problem

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15> However, the local Banker, having a higher standing in commerce, but a more fragile relations .p withrespect to the Public, and not wanting to have a public run on the Bank, has an additional set ofcredibility conditions to deal with, and, therefore, so does the IRS. The IRS must leave the BankAccount in the Third Party Custody of the Banker for thirty days, to allow the Banker to retain hi /herappearance oflegitimacy in the public eye, and the Banker must notify the Taxpayer that the IRS intendsto seize the Taxpayer's Bank Account in thirty days if the Taxpayer is unable to show cause why he IRSshould not be allowed to seize it.> Furthermore, commercial law requires that the IRS, being a Private Corporation intending to D stress(Impound) a Bank Account in the Third Party Custody of the Banker, must purchase a Distress B nd orBond on Distress to hold the Banker harmless for any detrimental effects that the impoundment 0 theBank Account might cause the Bank and/or the Taxpayer. The face amount on the Bond on Distr sswould probably have to be valued at twice the amount of money being seized, and the penalty (c st) ofthe Bond could possibly be one-twentieth (1120) of the face value of the Bond. A minimum Bon isprobably $1000 face value. The IRS does not want to have to buy Distress Bonds in order to colI ctmoney and/or any other type of property.

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25 > The Banker has an additional problem that is not common knowledge to the public.Any Bank, which has connections with the Federal Reserve [Corporation's] Bank is not allowed t havemore than some specific amount of cash on hand in the vault at any time. If they have too much c h,

PAGE 8 OF 10

26

2

PAGE 9 OF 10

7

then an armored car takes it away, and if they need more cash, then they order that cash be brouz t tothe bank by the armored car. lfthe Banker raises objections to the policies of the Federal ReserveCorporation (the "Fed"), then the armored car does not deliver money to the bank until the Bankecomplies with the Fed policy, or the Bank is put under direct control of the Fed.Since the IRS is the debt collection arm of the Federal Reserve Corporation (the Fed), and the B er IS

dependent upon the Fed to provide the money necessary to open and operate the teller windows, .obvious that the Banker will be inclined to do whatever the IRS agent wants himlher to do.To make this IRS bank scam look legitimate and to eliminate the requirement to purchaselbuy aon Distress. the IRS creates a new document called a Distraint Warrant.The IRS agent serves both the Certified True Copy of the perjured County Recorder's Federal T(FTL) Index and the IRS Distraint Warrant on the Banker, waits thirty days, and then seizes theTaxpayer's Bank Account from the third part custody of the Banker.

3

4

5

6

8

9The Morals of the Story

It has been said that if you cannot trust a man in those things which are least,then you cannot trust the man in those things which are greater.

There is a simple law that a person shall not involve themselves, in any way, in associa onor accomplicity with people or organizations conducting their activities in a criminal w

and it is against the law to compel a person to act against this simple law (18 USC 3).

10

11

12

13The County Recorder and the County Auditor are paid by the taxpayer to faithfully recordinstruments/documents. Instead, the County Recorders and the County Auditors, acting in compli itywith the IRS agents, are daily involved instealing the property of the people of their own County innearly every County and State in the United States of America.14

15No one should pay taxes to support a County Government in which the County Recorder a

County Auditor insist upon being accessories to the IRS Property Scam.16

17 Anyone who uses IRS paperwork or IRS forms contributes to the success of the IRS and its crim s.Anyone's use of IRS paperwork and forms encourages the IRS to continue to defraud the public ith it,and makes the citizen a criminal accomplice in the commission of that fraud.Every other move of the IRS in support of the false recording scheme is either another deception, or anact of violence which either they commit or they procure SOIDeother person to commit by tricke ,deception, violence, threats of violence, or economic terrorism.

TIDS IS A PRIMARY LEGAL REASON WHY NO ONE SHOULD HAVEANY DEALINGS WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

OR TRUST ANY Q.F THEIR PAPERWORK OR PUBLICATIONS.ONLY THE I.R.S. AND THE "FED" KNOW THEIR INTENTIONS.

18

19

20

21

22

23TIDS IS THE ONLY LEGAL ARGUMENT NECESSARY

TO NULLIFY ALL OF THE "LEGAL POWER" OF A CORRUPT I.R.S.24

25 The letterhead of the I.R.S. states that the I.R.S. is a "Department of the Treasury".It doesn't say "U.S. Department of the Treasury" or Department of the U.S. Treasury".

26

1

PAGE 10 OF 10

7The I.R.S. is a predatory Corporation, and the taxes we pay to the County do not provide theService of protecting us from the predatory fraud of the I.R.S ..

2

And you can bet your bottom dollar that if they could have used one of these other two titles that heywould have jumped at the opportunity to do so.The I.R.S. is a "Department ofthe Treasury" of the Federal Reserve Corporation, ("The Fed").The "Treasury" of the Federal Reserve Corporation is the Federal Reserve Bank.The Bank of the United States, currently called the Federal Reserve Bank:, is a Rothschild bank:."Give me the control of a nations currency, and I care not who makes its laws." -- RothschildThe Federal Reserve Corp. creates currency, and the U.S. Congress spends it into circulation.This Nation's currency has, for years, been headed with the title "Federal Reserve Note"."When you assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you." -- F.W. GabrielThe Federal Reserve Corporation is the de facto Government of the United States of America.

3

4

5

6

8

9

10

11Certification:

12

13I, b~v,~( ,q. .D"\.,,-Io; , Sovereign Affiant, Pursuant to Article 2, Section 3 of the 1878Constitution of the State of Washington, certify and affirm on my own commercial liability that Ihave read the foregoing document and know the content thereof, and that, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that the above Affidavit is true, correct, complete, and not misleading,the truth, the whole truth, and no . g but the truth, So Help Me God.

.~~ Date: ~_~:yIn Propria P rsona "",~\~~ ••••••:10"",

~ §> ••i.\()G'so.~·•• .$> ~~O •••• Noi~~= <:! :Jl1aOd '\ 'd) :_. gJiAL·-:: :(() ACf\fluN .: :- cJ) ~~ 0: ..•- ~.\..~ .~.-- ..•,. '\>" • 0'" ~-:.. ~ ,~ /1..•1:~NOISSt-··~~$'"', P""& •••••••• ~\ .••• ~,

""" 01:/ H \7,,'..•.'IIU'~"\\\,2u_l_'-/,

14

15

16

17

18

19

20[STATE] LUcrshlnc:;;, +C;Y'

[COUNTY] ClayK) s.s.

21 )

JStb r: IOn this _~~_ day of --.:;>e p-rern be v22

23 The above signatory appears before me personally with picture IDand executes the ~strum!nt jIlld acknowledges this to b~ ~eir free. act an~deed. a ~ ;::~ My Commission Expires: 12/3/ I

v24

25 Notary Public26