RC 020 081 AUTHOR Cuban, Larry TITLE - ERIC - Education ... · Schools, 1927. 7. Foreword. Those...

154
ED 383 498 AUTHOR TITLE DOCUMENT RESUME RC 020 081 Cuban, Larry How Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in American Classrooms, 1890-1980. 1st Edition. Research on Teaching Monograph Series. REPORT NO ISBN-0-582-28481-3 PUB DATE 84 NOTE 306p.; Photographs will not reproduce adequately. PUB TYPE Books (010) Historical Materials (060) Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Case Studies; Classroom Techniques; *Educational Change; Educational History; *Educational Practices; Elementary Secondary Education; Open Education; *Progressive Education; *Resistance to Change; Rural Education; Teacher Behavior; Teaching Methods; Urban Education IDENTIFIERS School Culture; *Teacher Centered Instruction; Virginia (Arlington) ABSTRACT This book investigates teaching practices before, during, and after reform impulses in the 20th century aimed at changing what teachers routinely do. Patterns of stability and change over a 90-year period are developed from evidence from a wide variety of sources, including classroom photographs, textbooks and tests used, student recollections, teacher reports of how they taught, and classroom observations by parents and administrators. A continuum stretching from teacher-centered instruction to student-centered instruction provides a tool to help map the intricate complexity of classroom practices. Part I covering 1890-1940 consists of three chapters: (1) a description' of teaching at the turn of the century, including progressive reforms of that era; (2) case studies of classroom practices in New York City, Denver, and Washington, D.C. during the 1920s and 1930s; and (3) a survey of teaching practices nationally during those 2 decades, particularly in rural schools. Part II summarizes case studies of informal and open education in Washington, D.C., New York City, and North Dakota during 1965-1975, and provides an intensive look into Arlington (Virginia) classrooms during 1969-1980. Part III examines five possible explanations for continuity/change in teaching during this century: (1) school as a form of social control and sorting; (2) constraints related to the organizational structure of school and classroom; (3) the culture of teaching; (4) individual and shared beliefs about child development, the role of school, and authority; and (5) the nature and effectiveness of reform implementation. This book contains over 300 references, many photographs, and an index. (SV) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ***********************************************************************

Transcript of RC 020 081 AUTHOR Cuban, Larry TITLE - ERIC - Education ... · Schools, 1927. 7. Foreword. Those...

ED 383 498

AUTHORTITLE

DOCUMENT RESUME

RC 020 081

Cuban, LarryHow Teachers Taught: Constancy and Change in AmericanClassrooms, 1890-1980. 1st Edition. Research onTeaching Monograph Series.

REPORT NO ISBN-0-582-28481-3PUB DATE 84NOTE 306p.; Photographs will not reproduce adequately.

PUB TYPE Books (010) Historical Materials (060) Reports

Research/Technical (143)

EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC13 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Case Studies; Classroom Techniques; *Educational

Change; Educational History; *Educational Practices;Elementary Secondary Education; Open Education;*Progressive Education; *Resistance to Change; RuralEducation; Teacher Behavior; Teaching Methods; UrbanEducation

IDENTIFIERS School Culture; *Teacher Centered Instruction;Virginia (Arlington)

ABSTRACTThis book investigates teaching practices before,

during, and after reform impulses in the 20th century aimed atchanging what teachers routinely do. Patterns of stability and changeover a 90-year period are developed from evidence from a wide variety

of sources, including classroom photographs, textbooks and testsused, student recollections, teacher reports of how they taught, andclassroom observations by parents and administrators. A continuumstretching from teacher-centered instruction to student-centeredinstruction provides a tool to help map the intricate complexity ofclassroom practices. Part I covering 1890-1940 consists of threechapters: (1) a description' of teaching at the turn of the century,including progressive reforms of that era; (2) case studies ofclassroom practices in New York City, Denver, and Washington, D.C.during the 1920s and 1930s; and (3) a survey of teaching practicesnationally during those 2 decades, particularly in rural schools.Part II summarizes case studies of informal and open education inWashington, D.C., New York City, and North Dakota during 1965-1975,and provides an intensive look into Arlington (Virginia) classroomsduring 1969-1980. Part III examines five possible explanations forcontinuity/change in teaching during this century: (1) school as a

form of social control and sorting; (2) constraints related to the

organizational structure of school and classroom; (3) the culture of

teaching; (4) individual and shared beliefs about child development,the role of school, and authority; and (5) the nature andeffectiveness of reform implementation. This book contains over 300references, many photographs, and an index. (SV)

***********************************************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

***********************************************************************

Igt

4

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

41.4-"J

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)"

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

U DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and improvementEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION

CENTER (ERICI

This document has been reproduced asreceived born the person or organizationOoginaling rt

0 Minor changes have been made to improvereproduction quality

Points of view Of owns slatedin this documeal do not necessarily represent officialOERI position or policy

Res

earc

h on

Tea

chin

gM

onog

raph

Ser

ies

ED

ITO

RIA

L B

OA

RD

Dav

id B

erlin

er, U

nive

rsity

of A

rizo

na

Jere

E. B

roph

y, M

ichi

gan

Stat

e U

nive

rsity

Susa

n Fl

orio

-Rua

ne, M

ichi

gan

Stat

e U

nive

rsity

Tho

mas

L. G

oad,

Uni

vers

ityof

Mis

sour

i

Vir

gini

a K

oehl

er, N

atio

nal I

nstit

ute

of E

duca

tion

Hug

h M

ehan

, Uni

vers

ity o

fC

alif

orni

a, S

an D

iego

Lee

S. S

hulm

an, S

tanf

ord

Uni

vers

ity

Rob

ert S

lavi

n, J

ohns

Hop

kins

Uni

vers

ity

Jane

Sta

lling

s, V

ande

rbilt

Uni

vers

ity

PUB

LIS

HE

D T

ITL

ES

JER

E E

. BR

OPH

YA

ND

CA

RO

LY

N M

. EV

ER

TSO

N,

Stud

ent C

hara

cter

istic

s

and

Tea

chin

gSU

SAN

UR

MST

ON

PH

ILIP

S,T

he in

visi

ble

Cul

ture

:C

omm

unic

atio

n in

Cla

ssro

om a

nd C

omm

unity

on

the

War

m S

prin

gs I

ndia

nR

eser

vatio

n

HA

RR

IS M

. CO

OPE

RA

ND

TH

OM

AS

L. G

OO

D,

Pygm

alio

n G

row

s U

p: S

tudi

es

in th

e E

xpec

tatio

nC

omm

unic

atio

n Pr

oces

s

TH

OM

AS

L. G

OO

D, D

OU

GL

AS

GR

OU

WS,

AN

DH

OW

AR

D E

BM

EIE

R, A

ctiv

e

Mat

hem

atic

s T

each

ing

RO

BE

RT

E. S

LA

VIN

,C

oope

rativ

e L

earn

ing

LE

ON

AR

D S

. CA

HE

N,

NIK

OL

A F

ILB

Y, G

AIL

McC

UT

CH

EO

N,

AN

DD

IAN

E W

.

KY

LE

, Cla

ss S

ize

and

Inst

ruct

ion

PHIL

IP A

. CU

SIC

K, T

heE

galit

aria

n Id

eal a

nd th

eA

mer

ican

Hig

h Sc

hool

LA

RR

Y C

UB

AN

, How

Tea

cher

s T

augh

t: C

onst

ancy

and

Cha

nge

in A

mer

ican

Cla

ssro

oms:

189

0-19

80

GA

RY

NA

TR

IEL

LO

AN

DSA

NFO

RD

M. D

OR

NB

USC

H,

Tea

cher

Eva

luat

ive

Stan

dard

s an

d St

uden

t Eff

orts

HO

WT

EA

CH

ER

ST

AU

GH

TC

ON

ST

AN

CY

AN

DC

HA

NG

E IN

AM

ER

ICA

NC

LAS

SR

OO

MS

1890

-198

0

Larr

y C

uban

ST

AN

FO

RD

UN

IVE

RS

ITY

:?. 1

e::

:i. 9

8 4

.;5:3

'7.

-4-

iI.

III

I ,.

2- -

-:PI

PI

PI

..... /A v

III

11 1

1no

wL

ongm

anN

ew Y

ork

& L

ori o

n11

.4,,.

I

How

Tea

cher

s T

augh

t

Lon

gman

Inc

., 15

60 B

road

way

, New

Yor

k, N

.Y. 1

0036

Ass

ocia

ted

com

pani

es, b

ranc

hes,

and

rep

rese

ntat

ives

thro

ugho

ut th

e w

orld

.

Cop

yrig

ht

198

4 by

Lon

gman

Inc

.

All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

No

part

of

this

pub

licat

ion

may

be

repr

oduc

ed, s

tore

d in

a r

etri

eval

sys

tem

, or

tran

smitt

edin

any

for

m o

r by

any

mea

ns, e

lect

roni

c, m

echa

nica

l,ph

otoc

opyi

ng, r

ecor

ding

, or

othe

rwis

e, w

ithou

t the

pri

orpe

rmis

sion

of

the

publ

ishe

r.

Dev

elop

men

tal E

dito

r: L

ane

Ake

rsE

dito

rial

and

Des

ign

Supe

rvis

or: R

usse

ll T

illPr

oduc

tion

and

Man

ufac

turi

ng S

uper

viso

r: F

erne

Y. K

awah

ara

Lib

rary

of

Con

gres

s C

atal

ogin

g in

Pub

licat

ion

Dat

a

Cub

an, L

arry

.H

ow te

ache

rs ta

ught

.

Bib

liogr

aphy

: p.

Incl

udes

inde

x.1.

Edu

catio

nUni

ted

Stat

esH

isto

ry-1

9th

cent

ury.

2. E

duca

tionU

nite

d St

ates

His

tory

-20t

h ce

ntur

y.3.

Tea

chin

g.I.

Titl

e.L

A2I

6.C

8219

8437

0'.9

7383

1755

9IS

BN

0-5

82-2

8481

-3

MA

NU

FA

CT

UR

ED

IN T

HE

UN

ITE

D S

TA

TE

S O

F A

ME

RIC

A9

87

65

43

21

9291

94/

8988

8786

8584

Con

tent

s

Fore

wor

d

Ack

now

ledg

men

ts

Intr

oduc

tion

PAR

T I

. PR

OG

RE

SSIV

ISM

AN

D C

LA

SSR

OO

M P

RA

CT

ICE

,18

90-1

940

1T

each

ing

at th

e T

urn

of th

e C

entu

ry: T

radi

tion

and

Cha

lleng

e

2B

ehin

d th

e C

lass

room

Doo

r in

Thr

ee C

ities

, 192

0-19

40

3R

ural

and

Urb

an S

choo

ls, 1

920-

1940

PAR

T I

I. O

PEN

CL

ASS

RO

OM

S A

ND

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

SC

HO

OL

S:PR

OG

RE

SSIV

ISM

RE

VIS

ITE

D, 1

965-

1975

4In

form

al E

duca

tion,

196

5-19

75: N

ew W

ine

in O

ld B

ottle

s?14

7

5C

lass

room

Pra

ctic

e in

a S

choo

l Dis

tric

t:A

rlin

gton

, Vir

gini

a, 1

969-

1980

208

PAR

T I

II. S

TA

BIL

ITY

AN

D C

HA

NG

E I

N C

LA

SSR

OO

MS,

1890

-198

023

7

6E

xpla

inin

g H

ow T

hey

Tau

ght:

An

Exp

lora

tory

Ana

lysi

s23

7

vii xi 17 41 112

App

endi

x

Bib

liogr

aphy

Inde

x

272

274

287

w CO

elt

Nbl

icca

t Ala

rms

Aer

ial C

lass

room

,G

eogr

aphy

Les

son,

Los

Ang

eles

Pub

licSc

hool

s, 1

927

7

Fore

wor

d

Tho

se w

ho c

ondu

ct r

esea

rch

on te

achi

ngra

rely

con

side

r hi

stor

ical

inve

stig

atio

ns

germ

ane

to th

eir

wor

k. T

here

is a

sen

se in

whi

ch h

isto

ry is

trea

ted

as a

rcan

e,

esot

eric

, and

of

little

impo

rt to

the

conc

erns

of p

ract

ice

and

polic

y. I

n re

adin

g

this

boo

k, 1

am

con

vinc

ed th

atpr

ecis

ely

the

oppo

site

is tr

ue. C

aref

ully

cond

ucte

d

hist

oric

al in

quir

y m

ay w

ell p

rovi

de u

sw

ith th

e m

ost p

ower

ful g

uide

s av

aila

ble.

Any

stu

dy o

f te

achi

ng th

at p

urpo

rts

topr

ovid

e gu

idan

ce f

or f

utur

e pr

actic

e or

polic

y m

akes

two.

kin

ds o

f cl

aim

s.Fi

rst,

we

mus

t bel

ieve

that

the

part

icul

ar

clas

sroo

ms

stud

ied

wer

e re

pres

enta

tive

of c

lass

room

s at

larg

e at

the

time

the

inve

stig

atio

n w

as c

ondu

cted

. Sec

ond,

we

mus

tfu

rthe

r be

lieve

that

the

clas

sroo

ms

of in

tere

st to

us,

at a

tim

e an

d pl

ace

typi

cally

dif

fere

nt I

ron

thos

ein

vest

igat

ed,

bear

suf

fici

ent r

esem

blan

ce to

thos

est

udie

d to

pro

vide

hel

pful

insi

ghts

.

Cer

tain

ly it

can

be

argu

ed th

at th

e pa

stpr

efig

ures

the

futu

re, b

ut th

e pr

esen

t

neve

r ex

actly

mim

ics

the

past

.D

o w

e ga

in b

ette

r ad

vice

fro

min

vest

igat

ions

pluc

ked

out o

f th

e te

mpo

ral a

nd c

ultu

ral-

ideo

logi

cal c

onte

xt in

whi

ch th

ey o

c-

curr

ed; u

r ar

c w

e be

tter

info

rmed

thro

ugh

stud

ies

that

ext

end

self

-con

scio

usly

thro

ugh

time,

atte

mpt

ing

expl

icitl

y to

expl

ain

the

phen

omen

a de

scri

bed

by c

on-

nect

ing

them

mea

ning

fully

to o

thet

eve

nts

occu

rrin

g co

ncut

rent

ly a

s w

ell a

s to

thos

e th

at h

ave

prec

eded

? In

an

unpu

blis

hed

essa

y, L

ee C

ronb

ach

refe

rs to

ed-

ucat

iona

l res

earc

h an

d ev

alua

tion

as"q

uant

itativ

ely

assi

sted

his

tory

,"

Whe

n w

e th

ink

of h

isto

rica

l inq

uiry

, we

ofte

n im

agin

e a

scho

lar

read

ing

the

lette

rs, j

ourn

als,

new

spap

er a

ccou

nts,

and

offi

cial

doc

umen

ts o

f a

give

n pe

riod

and

then

agg

rega

ting

thos

e di

vers

efo

rms

of p

erso

nal o

r co

llect

ive

impr

essi

ons

into

the

indi

vidu

al im

pres

sion

of

the

hist

oria

n. A

s w

e re

ad th

is m

onog

raph

by

Lar

y C

uban

, we

can

begi

n to

see

how

the

line

that

div

ides

his

tory

fro

m s

ocio

logy

or p

sych

olog

y, h

ence

educ

atio

nal h

isto

ry f

rom

the

mai

nstr

eam

of e

mpi

rica

l ed-

ucat

iona

l res

earc

h, is

a th

in o

ne.

Cub

an m

akes

use

of

clas

sroo

m o

bser

vatio

n

reco

rds

colle

cted

ove

r m

any

deca

des

for

dive

rse

purp

oses

the

eval

uatio

n ac

-

tiviti

es o

f th

e E

ight

Yea

r St

udy;

syst

em-w

ide

mon

itori

ng o

f cu

rric

ulum

and

or-

gani

zatio

nal c

hang

es in

the

publ

ic s

choo

lsy

stem

s of

New

Yor

k,W

ashi

ngto

n,

Den

ver,

and

Nor

th D

akot

a, a

mon

g m

any

othe

rs; a

nd h

undr

eds

of p

hoto

grap

hs

of c

lass

room

s w

hich

he

uses

inve

ntiv

ely

to in

fer

how

teac

hing

was

con

duct

eddu

ring

thos

e pe

riod

s. N

ever

is a

ny o

ne s

ourc

eof

dat

apho

togr

aphs

, per

sona

l

BE

ST

CO

PY

AV

AIL

AB

LE8

vu

viii

IFo

rew

ord

diar

ies,

cla

ssro

om o

bser

vatio

ns,

dist

rict r

epor

ts a

nd e

valu

atio

ns,

publ

ishe

d ar

ticle

s,

or e

ven

his

own

obse

rvat

ions

take

n as

evi

denc

e by

itsel

f. C

uban

is a

car

eful

hist

oria

n w

ho in

sist

s on

car

eful

lyju

xtap

osin

g da

ta s

ourc

es, s

earc

hing

for

both

corr

obor

ativ

e co

nsis

tenc

y as

wel

l as

prov

ocat

ive

cont

radi

ctio

n be

twee

nda

ta

sour

ces,

am

ong

diffe

rent

scho

ol s

ites

durin

g th

e sa

me

era,

and

amon

g si

mila

r

scho

ol s

ettin

gs d

urin

g di

ffere

ntde

cade

s.

Muc

h of

the

richn

ess

com

mun

icat

edth

roug

h th

is b

ook

is a

con

sequ

ence

of

the

uniq

ue b

ackg

roun

d br

ough

t to

the

ente

rpris

e by

its

auth

or. L

arry

Cub

anbe

gan

as a

cla

ssro

om te

ache

r,sp

endi

ng fo

urte

en y

ears

teac

hing

seco

ndar

y so

cial

stu

dies

in th

e sc

hool

dis

tric

ts o

fC

leve

land

, Ohi

o, a

nd W

ashi

ngto

n,D

.C. H

e tr

aine

d

retu

rned

Pea

ce C

orps

vol

unte

ers

tote

ach

in in

ner-

city

sch

ools

and

subs

eque

ntly

dire

cted

sta

ff de

velo

pmen

t for

am

ajor

pro

gram

in th

e D

istr

ict o

fC

olum

bia

publ

ic

scho

ols.

His

inte

iest

in h

isto

ry a

s a

subj

ect a

rea

final

ly le

d hi

m to

Sta

nfor

d U

ni-

vers

ity, w

here

he

stud

ied

educ

atio

nal

hist

ory

unde

r D

avid

Tya

ck a

nd w

rote

a

mas

terf

ul d

isse

rtat

ion

on th

e ca

reer

sof

thre

e bi

g-ci

ty s

uper

inte

nden

ts.

His

Sch

ool

Chi

efs

unde

r F

ire w

as b

ased

on

that

diss

erta

tion.

But

Cub

an w

as n

ot c

onte

nt to

stu

dyhi

stor

ical

ly th

e ad

min

istr

atio

n of

larg

e

scho

ol d

istr

icts

; he

was

com

mitt

ed to

mak

ing

that

his

tory

as

wel

l. U

pon

com

plet

ing

his

doct

orat

e in

edu

catio

nal h

isto

ryhe

was

app

oint

ed S

uper

inte

nden

tof

the

Ar-

lingt

on C

ount

y, V

irgin

ia, P

ublic

Sch

ools

, a p

ositi

on h

e he

ld fo

r se

ven

year

sun

til

he r

etur

ned

to S

tanf

ord

in 1

981

as a

mem

ber

the

Sch

ool o

f Edu

catio

nfa

culty

,

The

re a

re th

ose

who

will

rea

d th

isvo

lum

e as

a p

essi

mis

tic a

sses

smen

tof

the

failu

res

of s

choo

l ref

orm

. Des

pite

the

ener

gy a

nd r

heto

ric th

at h

assu

ppor

ted

the

refo

rm o

f edu

catio

nal i

nstit

utio

nsin

the

dire

ctio

n of

"pr

ogre

ssiv

e"id

eals

,

espe

cial

ly s

tude

nt-c

ente

red

inst

ruct

ion.

in a

ctiv

ity-b

ased

cla

ssro

oms

in w

hich

subj

ect a

rea

inst

ruct

ion

is c

orre

late

d an

din

tegr

ated

, me

gene

ral p

ictu

re C

uban

draw

s is

of a

rat

her

stab

le, t

each

er-c

ente

red

peda

gogy

sus

tain

ing

itsel

f fro

m N

cw

Yor

k to

Den

ver,

from

Nor

th D

akot

a to

Mic

higa

n, fr

om 1

900

to 1

980.

But

the

pict

ure

draw

n by

Cub

an is

far

mor

esu

btle

than

that

. He

finds

that

the

port

rait

is n

ot m

onol

ithic

. Som

e re

form

sta

ke b

ette

r th

an o

ther

s. S

ome

setti

ngs

(e.g

.,

the

elem

enta

ry s

choo

l) ar

e m

ore

fert

ile g

roun

d fo

r pl

anne

d ch

ange

.E

ven

in th

e

failu

res

of r

efor

m h

e de

rives

less

ons

for

futu

re p

lann

ing

and

inno

vatio

n.H

e as

ks

not o

nly

why

the

refo

rms

wer

e no

tsu

stai

ned,

but

wha

t was

rig

ht a

ndad

aptiv

e

abou

t the

trad

ition

al m

etho

ds w

hose

resi

lienc

e he

doc

umen

ts s

o vi

vidl

y.F

rom

the

very

sta

bilit

y of

cer

tain

inst

ruct

iona

l for

ms,

he

asse

rts,

we

may

lear

n im

por-

tant

prin

cipl

es r

egar

ding

the

fund

amen

tal c

hara

cter

of

scho

ol-b

ased

edu

catio

n

prin

cipl

es th

at c

an g

uide

our

futu

re a

ttem

pts

to im

prov

e th

e qu

ality

of

publ

ic

educ

atio

n.W

e th

us c

onfr

ont t

he d

ual p

ersp

ectiv

esof

his

toria

n an

d sc

hool

man

. the

dis

-

pass

iona

te "

long

vie

w"

of th

e di

scip

lined

scho

lar

and

the

impa

ssio

ned

and

prac

-

tical

con

cern

of t

he fr

ont-

line

deci

sion

mak

er. I

t is

a ra

re b

lend

, whi

ch m

ay

occa

sion

ally

offe

nd th

e se

nsib

ilitie

s of

the

hist

orio

grap

her

who

pre

fers

his

sch

ol-

arsh

ip b

land

and

dis

tant

. Yet

this

issc

hola

rshi

p of

the

high

est,

mos

t met

icul

ous

orde

r. E

vide

nce

for

each

ass

ertio

n is

care

fully

mar

shal

led

and

cont

radi

ctor

yfin

d-

ings

met

icul

ousl

y ex

amin

ed. R

eplic

atio

ns a

reso

ught

in a

djac

ent d

ecad

es a

nd/o

r

Fore

wor

d/

Ix

conc

urre

nt e

vent

s in

sim

ilar

dist

ricts

. Qua

ntita

tive

and

qual

itativ

ein

dica

tors

are

used

with

out f

ear

of c

ombi

ning

the

inco

mpa

tible

. Whi

le u

ndou

bted

ly a

wor

k of

hist

ory,

Cub

an h

as w

ritte

n a

Mas

terf

ul e

xam

ple

of fl

exib

le in

quiry

that

can

be

read

with

pro

fit b

y al

l ir

embe

rs o

f the

res

earc

h on

teac

hing

com

mun

ity. T

hehi

ghes

t pra

ise

I can

giv

e a

piec

e of

edu

catio

nal r

esea

rch

is th

at it

con

trib

uted

subs

tant

ially

to m

y ow

n ed

ucat

ion,

How

Tea

cher

s T

augh

t did

so

for

me,

and

Itr

ust i

t lik

ewis

e fo

r m

any

othe

rs in

the

wor

lds

of s

chol

arsh

ip, p

olic

y, a

nd p

ract

ice.

10

LEE

S. S

FIU

LMA

NS

tanf

ord.

Cal

iforn

ia

Ack

now

ledg

men

ts

I be

gan

this

stu

dy a

s a

scho

ol s

uper

inte

nden

t and

com

plet

ed it

as a

pro

fess

or.

The

ble

nd o

f pr

actic

e w

ith te

achi

ng a

nd r

esea

rch

at th

e un

iver

sity

rea

ffir

ms

my

deep

ly h

eld

belie

f th

at w

orth

whi

le k

now

ledg

e dr

aws

from

bot

h w

orld

s. I

ndee

d,th

e se

para

tion

of p

ract

ice

from

theo

ry, o

f pr

actit

ione

rs f

rom

res

earc

hers

, is

mor

eof

ten

than

not

a d

ivor

ce th

at is

mor

e sy

mbo

lic th

an r

eal.

My

quar

ter-

cent

ury

ofex

peri

ence

in p

ublic

sch

ools

, shu

ttlin

g ba

ck a

nd f

orth

bet

wee

n te

achi

ng a

nd a

d-m

inis

teri

ng, p

ersu

aded

me

that

the

daily

rea

litie

s of

cla

ssro

oms

and

scho

ols

pro-

duce

d kn

owle

dge

of m

uch

wor

th b

ut th

at r

equi

red

conc

eptu

al f

ram

ewor

ksto

impr

ove

my

unde

rsta

ndin

g of

wha

t tho

se th

ings

I f

aced

dai

lym

eant

. The

inte

rpla

ybe

twee

n kn

owle

dge

deri

ved

from

exp

erie

nce

in s

choo

ls a

nd th

at w

hich

res

earc

hers

stud

ied

help

ed m

e gr

eatly

in g

rasp

ing

the

mea

ning

of

both

org

aniz

atio

nal

and

indi

vidu

al b

ehav

ior

in p

ublic

sch

ools

.T

his

stud

y of

cla

ssro

om te

achi

ng o

ver

the

last

cen

tury

is p

art o

fm

y jo

urne

yin

tryi

ng to

und

erst

and

the

com

plex

ity o

f th

e pr

oces

s of

cha

nge

in s

choo

ls.

Bec

ause

I ta

ught

for

man

y ye

ars

and

serv

ed a

s a

scho

ol s

uper

inte

nden

t for

seve

n ye

ars,

I ne

eded

to d

isco

ver

answ

ers

to s

ome

long

stan

ding

que

stio

ns I

had

abou

t the

proc

ess

of te

achi

ng b

oth

in s

choo

ls w

here

I ta

ught

and

thos

e w

here

I s

erve

das

an a

dmin

istr

ator

. The

que

stio

ns I

ask

and

the

answ

ers

I fo

und

cons

truc

t the

boun

dari

es o

f th

is s

tudy

.A

ny in

vest

igat

ion

that

take

s ei

ghte

en m

onth

s to

com

plet

e re

quir

es th

e he

lpof

man

y ki

nd in

divi

dual

s w

illin

g to

sha

re th

eir

time

and

advi

ce. H

isto

rica

lre

sear

chof

ten

mea

ns ti

me

spen

t in

libra

ries

. In

New

Yor

k C

ity, P

aulin

ePi

ncus

who

serv

ed in

the

scho

ol s

yste

m's

Pro

fess

iona

l Lib

rary

was

esp

ecia

lly h

elpf

ul in

trac

king

dow

n so

urce

s I

coul

d no

t fin

d el

sew

here

. Rob

ert M

orri

s of

Tea

cher

sC

olle

ge to

ok ti

me

to in

trod

uce

me

to th

eir

new

ly a

cqui

red

arch

ives

from

the

New

Yor

k C

ity P

ublic

Sch

ools

. Lill

ian

Web

er g

ave

me

a m

orni

ng to

tell

of h

eref

fort

s in

New

Yor

k, h

er v

iew

s of

the

info

rmal

edu

catio

nm

ovem

ent i

n th

e la

te19

60s

and

earl

y 19

70s,

and

som

e pe

rsis

tent

issu

es in

sch

oolin

g.H

er in

sigh

tshe

lped

me

to r

evis

e a

num

ber

of a

ssum

ptio

ns.

Gor

don

Yor

k, A

ssis

tant

Sup

erin

tend

ent o

f th

e G

rand

For

ks, N

orth

Dak

ota

Publ

ic S

choo

ls a

nd G

lenn

Mel

vey,

Far

go A

ssis

tant

Sup

erin

tend

ent

of I

nstr

uctio

n,ar

rang

ed v

isits

for

me

to e

ach

of th

e sc

hool

s I

had

requ

este

d. I

app

reci

ated

the

1112

xii

IA

ckno

wle

dgm

ents

patie

nce

of th

e pr

inci

pals

and

teac

hers

who

put

up

with

my

note

-tak

ing

and

ques

tions

.In

Den

ver,

Elle

ngai

l Bue

htel

who

dir

ects

!he

dis

tric

t'spr

ofes

sion

al li

brar

y

help

ed m

e lo

cate

a n

umbe

r of

sou

rces

that

I h

ad g

iven

up

on e

ver

find

ing.

John

Ran

kin

in th

e Pu

blic

Inf

orm

atio

nD

epar

tmen

t was

esp

ecia

lly g

raci

ous

in a

rran

ging

for

me

to u

se s

tude

nt y

earb

ooks

,cl

ippi

ng f

iles,

and

pho

togr

aphs

stor

ed in

the

base

men

t of

the

adm

inis

trat

ion

build

ing.

Res

earc

hing

the

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.sc

hool

s in

two

time

peri

ods

was

mad

e

easi

er b

y th

e so

urce

s lo

cate

d in

the

Dis

tric

t of

Col

umbi

a Pu

blic

Lib

rary

's W

ash-

ingt

onia

Roo

m. I

n th

e sc

hool

sys

tem

,E

rika

Rob

inso

n an

d M

aggi

e H

owar

dof

the

Div

isio

n of

Res

earc

h w

ere

espe

cial

ly h

elpf

ul in

loca

ting

sour

ces

and

patie

nt

with

my

use

of th

eir

spac

e. B

illW

ebb

in th

e M

edia

Cen

ter

let m

e se

eph

otog

raph

s

of c

lass

room

s ta

ken

sinc

e th

em

id-1

960s

.G

ordo

n. Y

ork,

Ass

ista

nt S

uper

inte

nden

tof

the

Gra

nd F

orks

, Nor

th D

akot

a

Publ

ic S

choo

ls a

nd G

lenn

Mel

vey,

Farg

o A

ssis

tant

Sup

erin

tend

ent o

fIns

truc

tion,

arra

nged

vis

its f

or m

e to

eac

h of

the

scho

ols

I ha

d re

ques

ted.

I a

ppre

ciat

epa

tienc

e

of th

e pr

inci

pals

and

teac

hers

who

put

up

with

my

note

-tak

ing

and

ques

tions

.

Rev

iew

ers

of th

e m

anus

crip

t fol

low

ed m

yin

stru

ctio

ns to

giv

e it

a to

ugh,

clos

e re

adin

g. I

app

reci

ated

the

prom

ptan

d fu

ll re

spon

ses

from

Elis

abet

hH

anso

t,

Car

l Kae

stle

, Jos

eph

Ket

t, M

arvi

nL

azer

son,

Kim

Mar

shal

l, an

dD

avid

Tya

ck.

The

y ar

e ab

solv

ed o

fre

spon

sibi

lity

for

any

erro

rs in

fac

t orj

udgm

ent t

hat p

ersi

st

in th

e fi

nal s

tudy

.O

ne r

evie

wer

des

erve

s sp

ecia

lm

entio

n. T

he e

dito

rial

boa

rd f

orth

is s

erie

s

aske

d L

ee S

hulm

an, a

col

leag

uew

ho jo

ined

the

Stan

ford

Uni

vers

ityfa

culty

in

1982

, to

revi

ew th

e m

anus

crip

t.H

is g

entle

and

wis

e to

uch

help

ed m

eel

ithin

ate

som

e co

nfus

ions

Iha

d cr

eate

d, a

nd h

e ur

ged

me

to p

ursu

e m

yar

gum

ents

abo

ut

teac

her

prac

tices

to th

eir

logi

cal

conc

lusi

on. H

is in

sigh

ts w

ere

help

ful.

I al

so w

ant t

o ac

know

ledg

eth

e he

lp o

f C

harl

es M

issa

r, L

ibra

rian

for

the

Nat

iona

l Ins

titut

e of

Edu

catio

n. H

e w

ases

peci

ally

gra

ciou

s an

d pa

tient

with

an

ex-s

uper

inte

nden

t unl

imbe

ring

rus

ty r

esea

rch

mus

cles

. I a

ppre

ciat

ed h

is h

elp

a

grea

t dea

l. A

nd N

IE it

self

dese

rves

a b

rief

ack

now

ledg

men

t for

the

orig

inal

stu

dy

whi

ch th

ey f

unde

d an

d fr

om w

hich

this

boo

k de

rive

d. I

fee

l aw

kwar

dth

anki

ng

an o

rgan

izat

ion

for

betti

ng th

at a

sch

ool s

uper

inte

nden

tcou

ld c

arry

off

a c

ompl

ex

hist

oric

al in

vest

igat

ion.

Usu

ally

, I th

ank

indi

vidu

als

but a

larg

e nu

mbe

r of

peo

ple

wer

e in

volv

ed in

mak

ing

the

deci

sion

to f

und

this

res

earc

h.I

than

k th

em f

or

havi

ng c

onfi

denc

e in

this

prac

titio

ner-

rese

arch

er.

Fina

lly, a

s in

eve

ry s

ingl

e w

ritin

g ve

ntur

eI

have

und

erta

ken,

my

wif

e B

arba

ra

has

help

ed a

t som

e st

age

with

eith

er th

e m

echa

nics

, pro

ofre

adin

g, o

rpr

ovid

ing

supp

ort.

Tha

nks.

I ha

ve w

ritte

n a

grea

t dea

l ove

rth

e la

st tw

enty

yea

rs a

bout

educ

atio

n. I

cann

ot s

ay w

hat i

t has

am

ount

ed to

but,a

s fo

r th

is s

tudy

, I c

an s

ayit

was

the

mos

t sat

isfy

ing.

It s

crat

ched

an

itch

that

had

bee

n bo

ther

ing

me

for

anu

mbe

r

of y

ears

.

13LA

RR

Y C

UB

AN

Intr

oduc

tion

I ha

ve w

orke

d as

a p

ublic

sch

ool

teac

her,

adm

inis

trat

or, a

nd r

esea

rche

rin

four

sch

ool s

yste

ms

for

a qu

arte

r-ce

ntur

y.O

ver

the

year

s ba

sic

ques

tions

on s

choo

ling

aros

e th

atse

emed

una

nsw

erab

le o

r ha

d, f

or m

e, n

ope

rsua

sive

ans

wer

eith

er in

my

expe

rien

ce o

rin

the

rese

arch

lite

ratu

re. L

et

me

shar

e a

few

of

thes

equ

estio

ns th

at h

ave

trou

bled

me.

I ha

ve b

een

in m

any

clas

sroo

ms

inth

e la

st d

ecad

e. W

hen

I w

atch

edte

ache

rs in

sec

onda

ry s

choo

ls a

fla

sh o

fre

cogn

ition

jum

ped

out o

f m

ym

emor

y an

d sw

ept o

ver

me.

Wha

t I s

aw w

as a

lmos

t exa

ctly

wha

t Ire

mem

bere

d of

the

juni

or a

nd s

enio

r hi

gh s

choo

lcla

ssro

oms

that

I s

at in

as

a st

uden

t and

as

a te

ache

rin

the

mid

195

0s. T

his

acut

e se

nse

ofre

call

abou

t

how

teac

hers

wer

e te

achi

ng o

ccur

red

in m

any

diff

eren

t sch

ools

. How

, I

aske

d m

ysel

f, c

ould

teac

hing

ove

ra'

fort

y-ye

ar p

erio

d se

em, a

nd I

mea

n to

unde

rlin

e th

e w

ord,

alm

ost u

ncha

nged

?L

ongt

ime

unio

n le

ader

Alb

ert S

hank

erm

ade

a si

mila

r ob

serv

atio

nth

at o

nly

gave

fur

ther

wei

ght t

o m

y qu

estio

n.

Ten

thou

sand

new

teac

hers

eac

h ye

ar e

nter

the

New

Yor

k C

ity s

choo

l

syst

em a

s a

resu

lt of

ret

irem

ent,

deat

h,jo

b tu

rnov

er, a

nd a

ttriti

on. T

hese

new

teac

hers

com

e fr

om a

ll ov

er th

e co

untr

y. T

hey

repr

esen

tal

l rel

igio

ns, r

aces

,

polit

ical

per

suas

ions

, and

edu

catio

nal i

nstit

utio

ns.

But

the

amaz

ing

thin

g is

that

, aft

er th

ree

wee

ks in

the

clas

sroo

m y

ou c

an't

tell

them

fro

m th

e te

ache

rs

they

rep

lace

d.'

His

obs

erva

tion

unde

rsco

red

the

puzz

ling

ques

tion

of a

ppar

ent u

nifo

rmity

in in

stru

ctio

n ov

er ti

me.

Dur

ing

the

last

dec

ade,

ser

ving

as

a de

cisi

on-m

aker

in tw

o lo

cal s

choo

l

dist

rict

s, I

hav

e ha

d to

dea

l with

ano

ther

ques

tion

that

puz

zled

me:

inin

stitu

tions

so

appa

rent

ly v

ulne

rabl

e to

cha

nge

assc

hool

s w

hy d

o so

few

inst

ruct

iona

l ref

orm

s ge

t pas

t the

cla

ssro

omdo

or?

The

se q

uest

ions

, Ibe

lieve

, are

link

ed. T

he a

ppar

ent u

nifo

rmity

in in

stru

ctio

n ir

resp

ectiv

e of

14

2 / I

ntro

duct

ion

Intr

oduc

tion

I3

time

and

plac

e is

rel

ated

to th

e ap

pare

ntin

vuln

erab

ility

of

clas

sroo

ms

to

chan

ge.

In a

pap

er c

omm

issi

oned

by

the

Nat

iona

l Ins

titut

e of

Edu

catio

n(N

1E),

I s

ough

t ans

wer

s to

thes

equ

estio

ns th

roug

h a

stud

y of

curr

icul

um

chan

ge a

nd s

tabi

lity

sinc

e18

70.2

In

exam

inin

g ho

w v

ario

us f

orce

ssh

aped

the

curr

icul

um a

nd th

eir

cons

eque

nces

for

clas

sroo

ms

over

the

last

cen

tury

,

I us

ed th

e m

etap

hor

of a

hurr

ican

e to

dis

tingu

ish

betw

een

curr

icul

um

theo

ry, c

ours

es o

f st

udy,

mat

eria

ls,

and

clas

sroo

m in

stru

ctio

n. H

urri

cane

win

ds s

wee

p ac

ross

the

sea

toss

ing

up tw

enty

foot

wav

es; a

fat

hom

bel

ow

the

surf

ace

turb

ulen

t wat

ers

swir

lw

hile

on

the

ocea

n fl

oor

ther

eis

unru

ffle

d ca

lm.

As

tric

ky a

s m

etap

hors

can

be,

Ico

mpa

red

that

hur

rica

ne to

any

new

ly

trum

pete

d cu

rric

ulum

theo

ry. P

rofe

ssio

nalj

ourn

als,

for

exa

mpl

e, e

cho

pro

and

con

argu

men

ts o

n a

new

theo

ry.

Let

ters

to e

dito

rs a

nd s

harp

reb

utta

ls

add

to th

e fl

urry

. Boo

ks a

re w

ritte

nan

d re

puta

tions

are

mad

e. C

onfe

r-

ence

s ho

st b

oth

skep

tics

and

advo

cate

s. P

rofe

ssor

s of

edu

catio

nte

ach

the

new

wis

dom

to th

eir

stud

ents

. Yet

mos

t pub

lishe

rs c

ontin

uepr

oduc

ing

text

s un

touc

hed

by th

at th

eory

,and

mos

t tea

cher

s us

e m

etho

dsun

mar

ked

by c

ontr

over

sy, s

loga

ns, j

ourn

alar

ticle

s, o

r co

nven

tion

prog

ram

s. I

used

this

met

apho

r fo

r its

util

ity in

illus

trat

ing

dist

inct

ions

bet

wee

n th

eory

,co

nten

t, m

ater

ials

, and

, mos

tim

port

ant,

impa

ct u

pon

teac

hing

beha

vior

.

In th

is N

IE p

aper

I f

ound

that

curr

icul

um th

eori

es d

id in

flue

nce

prof

essi

onal

ideo

logi

es a

nd v

ocab

ular

ies,

cou

rses

of s

tudy

, and

som

ete

xtbo

ok c

onte

nt. B

ut I

did

not

fin

dm

uch

evid

ence

of

sign

ific

ant c

hang

e in

teac

hing

pra

ctic

es. H

owev

er, I

did

not

syst

emat

ical

ly o

r co

mpr

ehen

sive

ly

exam

ine

prim

ary

sour

ces

or r

esea

rch

any

scho

ol d

istr

icts

. I u

sed,

for

the

mos

t par

t, se

cond

ary

sour

ces

and

a fe

w p

rim

ary

docu

men

ts th

at w

ere

avai

labl

e. B

ased

upo

n th

is in

itial

rev

iew

I fo

und

evid

ence

of

a se

emin

gly

stub

born

con

tinui

ty in

the

char

acte

r of

inst

ruct

ion

desp

ite in

tens

e re

form

effo

rts

to m

ove

clas

sroo

m p

ract

ices

tow

ard

inst

ruct

ion

that

was

mor

e

stud

ent-

cent

ered

.D

eepe

ning

the

para

dox

furt

her,

the

limite

d ev

iden

ce s

ugge

sted

that

teac

hing

pra

ctic

es s

eem

ed u

ncom

mon

lyst

able

at a

ll le

vels

of

scho

olin

gto

uchi

ng s

tude

nts

of d

iver

se a

bilit

ies

in d

iffe

rent

set

tings

ove

r m

any

deca

des

desp

ite e

xten

sive

teac

her

educ

atio

n. I

n de

alin

g w

ith th

is p

arad

oxre

sear

cher

s ha

ve ti

ed m

ore

knot

s th

anth

ey lo

osen

ed. S

ome

wri

ters

ass

ert

that

stu

dent

-cen

tere

d te

achi

ngpr

actic

es w

ere

embr

aced

by

teac

hers

,w

hile

othe

rs a

rgue

that

suc

h cl

assr

oom

chan

ges

are

seld

om in

stitu

tiona

lized

.C

omm

on to

all

wri

ters

is s

ever

ely

limite

d ev

iden

ce a

bout

wha

t tea

cher

s

have

don

e in

cla

ssro

oms.

;Sc

anty

evi

denc

e ab

out t

he s

tabl

e or

chan

ging

cha

ract

er o

f in

stru

ctio

n

drov

e m

e to

war

d as

king

a f

unda

men

tal

ques

tion:

how

did

teac

hers

teac

h?

The

fra

gmen

ts o

f kn

owle

dge

abou

tw

hat t

each

ers

did

in th

eir

clas

sroo

ms

need

ed to

be

brou

ght t

oget

her

togi

ve a

cum

ulat

ive

clar

ity. T

his

stud

y

begi

ns th

at ta

sk.4

In tr

ying

to a

nsw

er th

e qu

estio

n of

how

teac

hers

taug

ht, I

will

use

the

fram

ewor

k of

t;-i

e pr

evio

us r

efor

m e

ffor

ts d

irec

ted

at a

lteri

ng c

lass

room

peda

gogy

. By

inve

stig

atin

g te

achi

ng p

ract

ices

bef

ore,

dur

ing,

and

afte

rre

form

impu

lses

in th

e tw

entie

th c

entu

ry a

imed

at c

hang

ing

wha

t tea

cher

sro

utin

ely

do, a

cle

arer

sen

se o

f w

hat h

as p

ersi

sted

and

wha

t has

cha

nged

incl

assr

oom

s sh

ould

em

erge

. But

wha

t to

look

for

in c

lass

room

s m

arke

d by

abe

wild

erin

g va

riet

y of

stu

dent

and

teac

her

beha

vior

s? W

hile

ther

e is

a r

ich

vari

ety

of in

stru

ctio

nal p

ract

ice

and

no s

ingl

e st

udy

can

do ju

stic

e to

the

intr

icat

e co

mpl

exity

of

clas

sroo

m te

achi

ng, a

use

ful t

ool f

or r

evea

ling

apo

rtio

n of

that

com

plic

ated

topo

grap

hy is

ava

ilabl

e. T

he c

once

ptof

desc

ribi

ng in

stru

ctio

n as

a c

ontin

uum

str

etch

ing

from

teac

her-

cent

ered

tost

uden

t-ce

nter

ed c

onta

ins

a lim

ited

but u

sefu

l set

of

indi

cato

rs d

escr

ibin

gim

port

ant d

imen

sion

s of

wha

t tea

cher

s di

d in

thei

r cl

assr

oom

s. N

ot a

imed

at c

aptu

ring

the

rich

ness

of

the

clas

sroo

m, t

his

cont

inuu

mno

neth

eles

spr

ovid

es a

han

dy w

edge

in p

ryin

g op

en th

e cl

osed

doo

rs o

f cl

assr

oom

s th

atex

iste

d de

cade

s ag

o an

d m

appi

ng, i

n a

prel

imin

ary

fash

ion,

thei

r pe

dago

-gi

cal t

erra

in.

Bef

ore

proc

eedi

ng f

urth

er, l

et m

e st

ate

plai

nly

wha

t I m

ean

byte

ache

r- a

nd s

tude

nt-c

ente

red

inst

ruct

ion.

Tea

cher

-cen

tere

d in

stru

ctio

nm

eans

that

a te

ache

r co

ntro

ls w

hat i

s ta

ught

, whe

n,an

d un

der

wha

tco

nditi

ons

with

in h

is o

r he

r cl

assr

oom

. Obs

erva

ble

mea

sure

s of

teac

her-

cent

ered

inst

ruct

ion

are:

Tea

cher

talk

exc

eeds

stu

dent

talk

dur

ing

inst

ruct

ion.

Inst

ruct

ion

occu

rs f

requ

ently

with

the

who

le c

lass

; sm

all g

roup

or

indi

vidu

alin

stru

ctio

n oc

curs

less

fre

quen

tly.

Use

of

clas

s tim

e is

det

erm

ined

by

the

teac

her.

The

cla

ssro

om is

usu

ally

arr

ange

d in

to r

ows

of d

esks

or

chai

rs f

acin

g a

blac

kboa

rd w

ith a

teac

her's

des

k ne

arby

.

Stud

ent-

cent

ered

inst

ruct

ion

mea

ns th

at s

tude

nts

exer

cise

a s

ubst

antia

lde

gree

of

dire

ctio

n an

d re

spon

sibi

lity

for

wha

t is

taug

ht, h

ow it

is le

arne

d,an

d fo

r an

y m

ovem

ent w

ithin

the

clas

sroo

m. O

bser

vabl

e m

easu

res

ofst

uden

t-ce

nter

ed in

stru

ctio

n ar

e:

Stud

ent t

alk

on le

arni

ng ta

sks

is a

t lea

st e

qual

to, i

f no

t gre

ater

than

, tea

cher

talk

.M

ost i

nstr

uctio

n oc

curs

eith

er in

divi

dual

ly, i

n sm

all (

2 to

6 s

tude

nts)

or

mod

erat

ely

size

d (7

to 1

2) g

roup

s ra

ther

than

the

who

le c

lass

.St

uden

ts h

elp

choo

se a

nd o

rgan

ize

the

cont

ent t

o be

lear

ned.

Tea

cher

per

mits

stu

dent

s to

det

erm

ine,

par

tially

or

who

lly, r

ules

of

beha

vior

and

pen

altie

s in

cla

ssro

om a

nd h

ow th

ey a

re e

nfor

ced.

Var

ied

inst

ruct

iona

l mat

eria

ls a

re a

vaila

ble

in th

e cl

assr

oom

so

that

stu

dent

sca

n us

e th

em in

depe

nden

tly o

r in

sm

all g

roup

s, e

.g.,

inte

rest

cen

ters

,te

achi

ng s

tatio

ns, a

nd a

ctiv

ity c

ente

rs.

4/ In

trod

uctio

nIn

trod

uctio

n I5

Use

of t

hese

mat

eria

ls is

eith

er s

ched

uled

by

the

teac

her

orde

term

ined

by

stud

ents

for

at le

ast h

alf o

f the

acad

emic

tim

e av

aila

ble.

Cla

ssro

om is

usu

ally

arr

ange

din

a m

anne

r th

at p

erm

itsst

uden

ts to

wor

k

toge

ther

or

sepa

rate

lyin

sm

all g

roup

s or

inin

divi

dual

wor

k sp

ace;

no

dom

inan

t pat

tern

exi

sts

and

muc

h m

ovem

ent o

f des

ks, t

able

s,an

d ch

airs

occu

rs in

rea

ligni

ngfu

rnitu

re a

nd s

pace

.

The

se c

once

pts

of te

ache

r-an

d st

uden

t-ce

nter

edin

stru

ctio

n sh

ould

be

view

ed a

s to

ols

to h

elp

in d

eter

min

ing

wha

t hap

pene

d in

cla

ssro

oms.

As

conc

eptu

al to

ols

they

are

limite

d be

caus

e th

ey a

re a

rbitr

ary;

they

ofte

n

lack

pre

cisi

on. A

t diff

eren

ttim

es, f

or e

xam

ple,

stud

ent-

cent

ered

inst

ruc-

tion

is u

sed

as a

syn

onym

for

prog

ress

ive

prac

tices

or

the

open

cla

ssro

om.

Fur

ther

, the

y si

mpl

ify c

ompl

excl

assr

oom

eve

nts.

Nev

erth

eles

s, e

ven

with

thes

e sh

ortc

omin

gs, t

hese

con

cept

sca

n he

lp s

ort o

ut,

how

ever

cru

dely

,

vario

us te

achi

ng p

atte

rns,

esp

ecia

llyw

hen

thes

e pa

ttern

s ar

e ar

raye

d on

a

cont

inuu

m. O

f eve

n gr

eate

r im

port

ance

is to

wei

gh th

ese

shor

tcom

ings

agai

nst t

he s

impl

efa

ct th

at th

ere

are

so fe

wst

udie

s th

at h

ave

capt

ured

wha

t

teac

hers

hav

e do

ne in

cla

ssro

oms

over

tim

e.

In u

sing

thes

e co

nstr

ucts

,I d

o no

t ass

ume

that

actu

al c

hang

es in

prac

tice

mov

ed s

olel

yfr

om te

ache

r- to

stu

dent

-cen

tere

d;tr

affic

flow

ed

both

way

s re

gard

less

ofr

efor

mer

s' in

tent

ions

. Ind

ivid

ualt

each

ers

stop

ped

at v

ario

us p

lace

s al

ong

the

way

. Nor

do

I ass

ume

that

cha

nges

in te

achi

ng

beha

vior

wer

e an

all-

or-n

othi

ngem

brac

e of

an

entir

e ap

proa

ch.

Qui

te

ofte

n, a

s th

is s

tudy

will

sho

w,

teac

hers

inco

rpor

ated

into

thei

r re

pert

oire

s

part

icul

ar p

ract

ices

they

foun

d us

eful

. An

elem

enta

rysc

hool

teac

her

in

1929

, for

exa

mpl

e, w

hose

onl

ycl

assr

oom

cha

nge

in y

ears

was

todi

vide

her

clas

s in

to tw

o gr

oups

for

read

ing,

teac

hing

one

in th

e fr

ont

of th

e ro

om

whi

le th

e re

st w

orke

d at

thei

rde

sks

on a

n as

sign

men

t, ha

dad

ded

a ne

w

prac

tice

to h

er a

rsen

alof

teac

hing

met

hods

. Or

take

a h

igh

scho

ol h

isto

ry

teac

her

in 1

933

who

beg

an u

sing

exam

ples

from

con

tem

pora

rypo

litic

al li

fe

to e

nliv

en h

is s

tude

nts'

stu

dyof

the

Fre

nch

Rev

olut

ion.

Whi

le p

edag

ogic

al p

rogr

essi

ves

of th

e tim

e m

ight

hav

ew

ince

d at

my

wor

ding

and

labe

led

such

cha

nges

as

triv

ial,

thes

ete

ache

rs h

ad a

dopt

ed

prog

ress

ive

prac

tices

,al

beit

sele

ctiv

ely.

On

a co

ntin

uum

ther

e ne

eds

to b

e

spac

e fo

r pr

ogre

ssiv

ete

ache

r-ce

nter

ed in

stru

ctio

n as

ther

ew

ould

be

spac

e

for

the

vario

us ty

pes

of s

tude

nt-c

ente

red

inst

ruct

ion

mor

efa

mili

ar to

prog

ress

ive

refo

rmer

s.T

he v

ario

us a

dapt

atio

ns o

f pro

gres

sive

peda

gogy

that

teac

hers

in-

corp

orat

ed in

to th

eir

prac

tices

are

just

as

puzz

ling,

if no

t int

eres

ting,

as

wha

t was

igno

red.

The

ran

geof

teac

hing

pra

ctic

eco

ntai

ned

in th

is s

tudy

trie

s to

des

crib

e a

varie

tyof

teac

hing

beh

avio

rs.5

Des

pite

indi

vidu

al te

achi

ngdi

ffere

nces

, obs

erve

rs c

an,

I bel

ieve

, stil

l

cate

goriz

e in

stru

ctio

nal p

atte

rns

by c

aref

ul a

ttent

ion

toat

leas

t fiv

e vi

sibl

e

area

s of

cla

ssro

omde

cisi

on m

akin

g ov

er w

hich

teac

hers

hav

e di

rect

influ

ence

. The

se c

lass

room

indi

cato

rs c

an s

ugge

st d

omin

ant f

orm

s of

inst

ruct

ion,

esp

ecia

lly w

hen

they

com

bine

to c

reat

e pa

ttern

s.

1.A

rran

gem

ent o

f cla

ssro

om s

pace

2.R

atio

of t

each

er to

stu

dent

talk

3.W

heth

er m

ost i

nstr

uctio

n oc

curs

indi

vidu

ally

, in

smal

l gro

ups,

or

with

the

entir

e cl

ass

4.T

he p

rese

nce

of le

arni

ng o

r in

tere

st c

ente

rs th

at a

re u

sed

by s

tude

nts

aspa

rt o

f the

nor

mal

sch

ool d

ay5.

The

deg

ree

of m

ovem

ent s

tude

nts

are

perm

itted

with

out a

skin

g th

ete

ache

r

In s

eeki

ng to

des

crib

e cl

assr

oom

pra

ctic

es I

had

to n

arro

w m

y sc

ope.

No

judg

men

ts w

ill b

e m

ade

abou

t the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

teac

her-

or

stud

ent-

cent

ered

inst

ruct

ion,

nor

will

com

paris

ons

be m

ade

amon

g te

achi

ng p

rac-

tices

. Fin

ally

, thi

s st

udy

will

not

dea

l with

the

emot

iona

l clim

ate

of th

ecl

assr

oom

or

the

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

adul

ts a

nd c

hild

rena

s im

port

ant a

sth

ese

issu

es a

re. T

he c

entr

al r

esea

rch

issu

e fo

r m

e is

to d

etet

min

e ho

wst

able

cer

tain

teac

hing

beh

avio

rs w

ere

deca

de a

fter

deca

de in

the

face

of

mig

hty

effo

rts

to m

ove

tow

ard

stud

ent-

cent

ered

inst

ruct

ionn

ot th

e re

la-

tive

valu

e of

teac

her-

cent

ered

inst

ruct

ion

in a

chie

ving

stu

dent

out

com

es.

How

ever

, the

re is

littl

e po

int i

n de

term

inin

g w

hich

teac

hing

beh

avio

rspr

oduc

e im

prov

ed s

tude

nt p

erfo

rman

ce u

ntil

rese

arch

ers

find

out w

hich

teac

hing

act

s pe

rsis

t ove

r tim

e, w

hich

hav

e ch

ange

d, a

nd w

hy.

Giv

en th

ese

limits

, an

obvi

ous

ques

tion

aris

es: i

f thi

s re

sear

ch w

ill n

otre

veal

wha

t is

"goo

d" o

r "p

oor"

teac

hing

or

how

som

e te

ache

rs a

re b

ette

rth

an o

ther

s at

cre

atin

g po

sitiv

e cl

assr

oom

clim

ates

. the

n w

hat w

ill b

e th

epr

actic

al u

se o

f the

res

earc

h? T

his

is a

fair

ques

tion

beca

use

it ra

ises

the

issu

e of

the

inte

rsec

tion

betw

een

rese

arch

and

pra

ctic

e. W

ithou

t get

ting

into

the

mer

its o

f app

lied

or b

asic

res

earc

h or

the

valu

e of

incr

emen

tal

know

ledg

e, I

antic

ipat

e br

oade

r us

es o

f thi

s st

udy.

Bec

ause

so

little

is k

now

n by

res

earc

hers

, pol

icym

aker

s, s

choo

lad

min

istr

ator

s, te

ache

rs, a

nd c

itize

n-ad

voca

tes

abou

t wha

t has

rem

aine

dst

able

and

wha

t has

alte

red

in te

achi

ng o

ver

the

last

cen

tury

, inv

estig

atin

gth

e se

emin

g pe

rsis

tenc

e of

cer

tain

inst

ruct

iona

l pra

ctic

es c

an il

lum

inat

ebo

th th

e po

tent

ial a

nd th

e lim

its to

cla

ssro

om c

hang

e. E

xplo

ring

the

terr

ain

of th

e cl

assr

oom

sin

ce th

e tu

rn o

f the

cen

tury

sho

uld

reve

al w

hat i

s du

rabl

ean

d w

hat i

s tr

ansi

ent,

wha

t is

open

to im

prov

emen

t and

wha

t is

invu

lner

-ab

le to

ref

orm

. By

sim

ply

know

ing

mor

e ab

out t

he in

stru

ctio

nal q

uark

that

is th

e cl

assr

oom

, citi

zens

and

pro

fess

iona

ls c

an c

ome

to h

ave

reas

onab

leex

pect

atio

ns a

bout

wha

t tea

cher

s ca

n an

d ca

nnot

do,

wha

t sch

ools

can

be

held

acc

ount

able

for

and

wha

t is

beyo

nd th

eir

reac

h. S

uch

mod

est

outc

omes

offe

r pr

actic

al d

irect

ions

for

the

perio

dic

surg

es o

f ref

orm

that

swee

p ov

er p

ublic

sch

ools

.

1718

61 In

trod

uctio

n

Sinc

e th

e la

te 1

950s

, ref

orm

s in

cur

ricu

lum

(e.

g. n

ewm

ath)

, gov

ern-

ance

(e.

g. c

omm

unity

con

trol

),in

stru

ctio

n (e

.g. t

eam

teac

hing

) ha

ve tr

ied

to a

lter

teac

her

beha

vior

in th

e cl

assr

oom

.T

here

sho

uld

be a

pag

e in

the

Gui

nnes

s B

ook

of W

orld

Rec

ords

on f

aile

d cl

assr

oom

ref

orm

s, f

or f

ew e

ver

seem

to h

ave

been

inco

rpor

ated

into

teac

hers

' rep

erto

ires

. Per

haps

inst

udyi

ng d

irec

tly h

ow te

ache

rs h

ave

taug

ht, r

elia

ble

clue

sw

ill e

mer

ge th

atsu

gges

t pat

hs th

at b

oth

.teac

hers

and

refo

rmer

s m

ight

pur

sue

mor

ere

alis

tical

ly, i

f no

t use

fully

.M

oreo

ver,

est

ablis

hing

that

whi

ch is

end

urin

g an

dth

at w

hich

isch

ange

able

in th

e cl

assr

oom

aid

s th

e pr

ofes

sion

al e

duca

tors

resp

onsi

ble

for

turn

ing

out t

he n

ext g

ener

atio

n of

teac

hers

. Whi

lefo

rmal

teac

her

educ

a-tio

n is

one

of

seve

ral w

ays

of im

prov

ing

clas

sroo

min

stru

ctio

n, s

tate

legi

slat

ors

acro

ss th

e co

untr

y ha

ve o

pted

for

stif

feni

ngce

rtif

icat

ion

requ

ire-

men

ts a

nd m

anda

ting

entr

y-le

vel t

ests

for

new

teac

hers

. Whi

le th

ese

may

be a

pol

itica

lly s

atis

fyin

g re

spon

se to

pop

ular

une

ase

with

pub

lic s

choo

ls,

anyo

ne k

now

ledg

eabl

e ab

out t

heco

mpl

exity

of

clas

sroo

m in

stru

ctio

nkn

ows

that

suc

h so

lutio

ns a

re m

argi

nal i

n th

eir

impa

ct o

nte

ache

r ef

fect

ive-

ness

. Wha

t is

less

mar

gina

l and

mor

e us

eful

is to

det

erm

ine

wha

tkn

owle

dge

and

skill

s te

ache

rs h

ave

used

in p

erfo

rmin

g cl

assr

oom

task

s

year

in a

nd o

ut, d

ecad

e af

ter

deca

de. T

o un

cove

rw

hat i

s ch

ange

able

and

wha

t is

stab

le in

teac

hing

off

ers

univ

ersi

ty te

ache

r-ed

ucat

ors

ingr

edie

nts

for

a w

ell-

grou

nded

app

roac

h to

wha

t can

dida

tes

for

the

prof

essi

onsh

ould

know

and

he

able

to p

erfo

rm o

nce

they

ent

er th

e cl

assr

oom

.Sim

ilarl

y, to

know

wha

t is

pers

iste

nt a

nd p

redi

ctab

le in

teac

hing

off

ers

scho

ol a

dmin

is-

trat

ors

path

s to

pur

sue

in w

orki

ng w

ithex

peri

ence

d te

ache

rs.

The

re is

a ta

ngib

le u

sefu

lnes

s fo

r te

ache

rs in

this

exam

inat

ion

ofcl

assr

oom

pra

ctic

e. F

or te

ache

rs to

be

relia

bly

info

rmed

that

colle

ague

s a

cent

ury

ago

cope

d w

ith s

imila

r si

tuat

ions

,fo

und

solu

tions

that

wor

ked

inth

eir

clas

sroo

ms,

and

ada

pted

to w

orki

ng c

ondi

tions

that

,w

hile

not

iden

tical

, wer

e un

deni

ably

alik

e, m

ay g

ive

prac

titio

ners

pri

dein

how

thei

rpr

edec

esso

rs c

oped

with

adv

ersi

ty a

nd a

cle

ar s

ense

of

iden

tity

with

apr

ofes

sion

that

is a

fflic

ted

with

sel

f-do

ubts

and

dim

inis

hed

publ

ic e

stee

m.

Furt

herm

ore,

for

teac

hers

to k

now

that

som

e cl

assr

oom

pra

ctic

es h

ave

pers

iste

d fo

r ov

er a

cen

tury

whi

le o

ther

s ar

e of

mor

e re

cent

ori

gin

may

sugg

est t

o th

em a

bas

is f

or a

ccur

atel

y es

timat

ing

wha

tcl

assr

oom

cha

nges

are

feas

ible

, giv

en e

xist

ing

cond

ition

s.Fi

nally

, und

erst

andi

ng th

at w

hat h

aspe

rsis

ted

and

wha

t has

cha

nged

in A

mer

ican

sc0

00ls

was

less

oft

en d

ue to

wha

t ind

ivid

ual t

each

ers

did

in th

eir

clas

sroo

ms

but s

tem

med

fro

mfa

ctor

sbe

yond

thei

r im

med

iate

infl

uenc

e m

ay s

ugge

st to

teac

hers

pro

per

targ

ets

for

chan

ge in

the

clas

sroo

m, s

choo

l, an

d co

mm

unity

. Mos

tin

stru

ctio

nal

refo

rms

in th

e la

st c

entu

ry w

ere

gene

rate

d ou

tsid

e th

e sc

hool

and

wer

esh

oved

dow

nwar

d in

to th

e cl

assr

oom

. Wer

e te

ache

rs to

be

mor

ein

form

edab

out t

he h

isto

ry o

f cl

assr

oom

inst

ruct

ion

perh

aps

they

wou

ldvo

ice

thei

rpr

efer

ence

s ba

sed

upon

a f

irm

kno

wle

dge

of w

hat c

an a

nd c

anno

t be

done

in c

lass

room

s as

they

are

pre

sent

ly o

rgan

ized

.

Intr

oduc

tion

17

The

re is

als

o an

othe

r le

ss d

irec

t, m

ore

subt

le u

se th

at I

see

for

this

stud

y of

cla

ssro

om in

stru

ctio

n. P

ower

ful m

etap

hors

dom

inat

e th

e th

inki

ngof

pra

ctiti

oner

s, p

olic

ymak

ers,

and

sch

olar

s on

sch

oolin

g. J

. M. S

teph

ens

wri

tes

that

the

com

mon

met

apho

r fo

r sc

hool

s is

the

fact

ory.

Thi

s im

age,

like

that

of

a m

achi

ne, r

einf

otce

s ra

tiona

l dec

isio

n m

akin

g, s

ugge

stin

g th

atev

ery

face

t of

scL

oolin

g is

a c

andi

date

for

pla

nned

cha

nge.

Sw

itch

the

met

apho

r to

far

min

g, h

e sa

ys, a

nd s

choo

ling

look

s ve

ry d

iffe

rent

. In

agri

cultu

re y

ou s

tart

with

an

anci

ent,

stab

le p

roce

ss a

nd b

uild

you

r ef

fort

sar

ound

the

sun,

clim

ate,

see

ds, p

lant

s, a

nd w

hat i

nsec

ts a

re li

kely

to d

o