Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The...

25
Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa Ashcraft

Transcript of Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The...

Page 1: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J.

Presenter: Teresa Ashcraft

Page 2: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

What to Expect   Background- formation of terrestrial planets

  Need for High Resolution

  Numerical Method

  Initial conditions

  Simulation 0

  Simulations 1a and 1b

  Simulations 2a and 2b

  Conclusions

Page 3: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Final Stages of Formation for

Terrestrial planets

  Formation of planetary embryos from planetesimals

  Accretion of embryos into terrestrial planets

  Embryos from in Two steps : Runaway and oligarchic growth

Page 4: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

More about Embryos   30-50 or 500-1000 embryos formed, depending on

mass

  Embryos form faster closer to the Sun

  Formation time unknown: 104 – 107 years

  Oligarchic growth ends when 50%-50% mass in embryos and planetesimals

  Final assembly - accretional growth – 50Myr

Lynette Cook/Gemini Observatory

Page 5: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Why High-Resolution Simulations?

  Past simulations limited to 20-200 particles, no sub-lunar size embryos, neglected planetesimals

  Dynamical friction requires large number of particles

  Large number low-resolution

  need better resolution to understand phenomena

  Simulate realistic number of embryos

  Problem- only one simulation and stochastic nature of accretion process

Page 6: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Numerical Method  Mercury- serial code (Chambers, 1999)

 5-10X more particles compared to pervious simulations

 Time for simulation scales with number of particles N2

 2-16 months of CPU time per simulation run

Page 7: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

INITIAL CONDITIONS

 

Page 8: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Initial Conditions   Represent different timescales for the formation of

Jupiter and/or formation of embryos

  Did embryos from in the asteroid belt before Jupiter?

  Fast scenario- formed in inner disk before Jupiter

  Slow scenario-embryos start to accrete after Jupiter is formed

  0-fast formation of Jupiter

  1- late formation of Jupiter or slow accretion of embryos

  2 - very late formation of Jupiter or fast embryo formation

Page 9: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Simulation 0   Starts- Late stage of oligarchic growth

  No planetary embryos formed

  Embryo separation – 0.3 and 0.6 mutual Hill radii

  1885 Planetesimals

  Simulation runs for 200 Myrs

Page 10: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

1885 Particles and self-interacting

The size of each body corresponds to its relative physical size (i.e., its mass M1/3), but is not to scale on the x axis. The color of each particle represents its water content, and the dark inner circle represents the relative size of its iron core.

Page 11: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

The Feeding Zones!

Page 12: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

  Accretion of more distant bodies marks the end of oligarchic grown in a region

Page 13: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations. Note the change in the “ejection zone” at t≈10 Myr.

Page 14: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Eccentricity vs time The mean eccentricities for

planets a, b, and c from 100–200 Myr are 0.048, 0.039, and 0.057

Page 15: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.
Page 16: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Evolution of Asteroid Belt

  Evolution of the asteroid belt (defined as 2.2<a<5.2 AU) in time for simulation 0. Top: The most massive body in the asteroid belt through time. Middle: Total mass in the asteroid belt as a function of time. Bottom: Mass-weighted eccentricity of all bodies in the asteroid belt over time.

Page 17: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Simulations 1a and 1b   38 – planetary embryos out to 2.5 AU

  1000 – 0.006 MEarth “planetesimals” between 2.5 and 5 AU

  Same starting positions

  1a-planetesimals are massive bodies which interact gravitationally with all other bodies in the simulation

  1b-planetesimals feel the gravitational presence of the embryos and Jupiter, but not each other's presence. These non-interacting planetesimals may not collide with each other.

Page 18: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

1a and 1b

Self Interacting Non self-interacting

Page 19: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Growth of surviving terrestrial planets

Top: Number of surviving bodies

Bottom: mass-weighted eccentricity of surviving

bodies

Page 20: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

1a and 1b Summary   Accretion can happen in asteroid belt

  No large embryos formed in asteroid belt

  Run into resolution limit because no planetesimals remain at end of simulations

  Self-gravity accelerates planet fromation

Page 21: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

2a and 2b Simulations   2a and 2b have identical starting conditions

  54 planetary embryos throughout the terrestrial region, embedded in a disk of 1000 “planetesimals” of 0.003 Mearth

  Mass: 2/3 – embryos, 1/3 – planetesimals.

  Embryos formed all the way out to 5 AU

  2a all particles are fully self-interacting

  2b the planetesimals do not feel each other's presence

Page 22: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

2a and 2b

Self-interacting Non-self-interacting

Page 23: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Top: Mass vs Time for surviving planets Middle: Number of surviving planetary embryos

Bottom: Mass-weighted eccentricity of surviving bodies

2b 2a

Page 24: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.

Conclusions – feeding zones of the terrestrial planets widen and

move outward in time

– The asteroid belt is cleared of >99% of its mass as a natural result of terrestrial accretion.

– Jupiter possibly stunting growth of embryos beyond 2-3AU

– Dynamical friction is important for the growth of terrestrial planets

– smaller eccentricities

Page 25: Raymond, S., Quinn, T. and Lunine, J. Presenter: Teresa ...591/2009-10-09/...2009/10/09  · The timing of the ejection and accretion by Jupiter of bodies from different starting locations.