RATIONAL COMBINATION IMMUNOTHERAPY: The best of ASCO16 clinical data
-
Upload
paul-d-rennert -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
1.328 -
download
0
Transcript of RATIONAL COMBINATION IMMUNOTHERAPY: The best of ASCO16 clinical data
Summary of Key Clinical Combination Trials Presented at ASCO
Paul Rennert, President & CSO, Aleta Biotherapeutics Inc.
Founder & Principal, SugarCone Biotech LLC .
1
31 August 2016
IO combos at ASCO
2
I feel a little bit like this
The Drive for IO Combinations
• Increase response rates, durability of response
! Find the next ipilimumab/nivolumab combination
• Impact cancers currently resistant to immune checkpoint (ICI) therapy
• An ideal profile ...
! Potent combination ! Modest toxicity or does not add toxicity ! May be broadly active or indication selective or tumor
phenotype selective
3
The ICI Combination Landscape
4Produced by Beacon: IO Combination Database
4
So three examples
• ICI combinations
• ICI & targeted therapy
• ICI & cellular therapeutics
5
www.sugarconebiotech.com
ICI Combinations • Where to begin?
• Diverse targets and cell types
• Inhibitory and activating pathways
• Known and unknown biology
How do you approach this complexity?
Mahoney, Rennert, Freeman. 2015. Nat Rev DD 6
Deconstructing ICI combinations• Members of the Ig superfamily (home of CTLA4, PD-1, PD-L1)
• Interesting targets but no clinical data yet
Rennert, 2016. in: Novel Immunotherapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Cancer 7
Deconstructing ICI combinations
• Multiple antibodies in clinical development, none very far advanced
• All appear relatively tolerable once dose is established
• Although diverse MOA are postulated within this group of receptors, it is unclear how much the biology will overlap or be affected by FcR-engagement
Mahoney, Rennert, Freeman. 2015. Nat Rev DD 8
• Activating pathways of the TNFRSF
Agonist mAbs to 4-1BB and OX40
• There are many clinical and preclinical programs targeting these receptors with agonist mAbs
• At ASCO we heard updates on two of these programs
• Phase Ib: PF-05082566 plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (4-1BB, Pfizer)
• Phase Ib: MOXR0916 plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (OX40, Genentech)
• Both are dose escalation studies, on top of fixed anti-PD-1 (pembro) or anti-PD-L1 (atezo) therapy
9
10
Abstract #3002. Dr Tolcher presenting...
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3002)
Phase Ib study of PF-05082566 (utomilumab) in combination with pembrolizumab
• Established MTD (>5mpk) = selected Phase 2 dose
• Safety/tolerability good: AEs were similar to those seen with pembro alone
• Efficacy: ! n = 23 ! 6 confirmed responses (4 PR, 2 CR, ORR = 26%) ! Responses were in indications known to be ICI responsive
(RCC, NSCLC, H&N, SCLC) plus 1 thyroid carcinoma.
11 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3002)
Efficacy similar to pembro monotherapy
• 5 were durable:
12 JClinOncol34,2016(suppl;abstr3002)
Abstract #101, presented by Dr Infante
13 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 101)
A phase Ib dose escalation study of the OX40 agonist MOXR0916 and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in
patients with advanced solid tumors
• Established MTD (none) and selected Phase 2 dose (300mg)
• Safety/tolerability – well tolerated, AEs similar to atezolizumab alone
• Trial moving to expansion cohorts in melanoma, RCC, NSCLC, urothelial Ca and TNBC
! these are ICI responsive indications
14 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 101)
Efficacy similar to atezolizumab monotherapy
15 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 101)
• Durable responses: 10/51 (20%)
What can we say about these early studies
16
• Results generally viewed as underwhelming – at a minimum we were looking for better response rates than a-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy
• These therapeutics appear to have had the desired phamacologic effect
! CD8 numbers and IFNγ levels were increased in some patients in the anti-4-1BB study
! PD-L1 was induced in some patients in the anti-OX40 study (this is IFNγ-dependent and therefore likely to be CD8-dependent)
• Results are preliminary but do not suggest that these therapeutics will reach new indications (i.e. patients with ICI-refractory tumors)
• The big biopharmas have the bandwidth to continue to prosecute these targets – small companies with such assets will have to endure a longer timeframe to clinical validation
ICI & targeted therapy:attacking a "non-responsive" tumor
• Colorectal Cancer (CRC) has not responded to ICI therapy
• Three abstracts at ASCO16 were therefore of immediate importance
! Correlation of Immunoscore with outcome
! Response of MSI-hi CRC to ICI
! Encouraging data from the combination of a MEK inhibitor with atezolizumab in CRC
17
18
Abstract #3500, presented by Dr Galon
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3500)
Immunoscore
19
• standardized measurement of T cell density within a tumor tissue (CD3+ T cells and CD3+/CD8+ T cells)
• CRC samples were classified as Immunoscore (IM) high, intermidiate or low
• Patients were followed to assess time to disease recurrence
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3500)
This suggests that some CRC patients could be ICI responsive
20
• but clearly there are other constraints, as the response in CRC across CTLA4 and PD-pathway inhibitor trials was at or near zero
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3500)
Response of MSI-hi CRC to ICI
21
Abstract #3501, presented by Dr Overman J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3501)
Subset of CRC
22
• MSI-high: high mutational burden: 15% of early CRC, 4% of metastatic CRC
• Patients received nivolumab first, then either stayed on nivo or moved to nivo plus ipilimumab (2 dose regimens)
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3501)
Efficacy was surprisingly good
23
• ORR: 33% in the nivo/ipi combo arm
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3501)
ORR CR PR SD
MSS, nivo 10 (n=1) nr nr nr
MSS, combo 0 nr nr nr
MSI-hi, nivo 26 0 26 30
MSI-hi, combo 33 0 33 52
Progression-free survival
24
• responses
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3501)
median for MSS patients
Overall survival
25
• responses
J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3501)
median for MSS patients
ICI and targeted therapeutics
• ~15% early CRC and 4% of metastatic CRC • what else can we do?
26
MEK signaling implicated in CRC tumor cell survival/proliferation
27
• Combining targeted therapeutics with ICI has yielded mixed results – toxicity and lack of additive efficacy
• Targeting MEK has no impact on CRC
• MEK has been a controversial target for IO combos
• Nevertheless, preclinical data suggested that synergy might be achieved in CRC
Cobimetinib plus atezo
28
Abstract #3502, presented by Dr Bendell J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3502)
The Landscape
29 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3502)
• Cobimetinib is a highly selective MEK1/2 inhibitor
• The combination of cobi & atezo was tested in a dose escalation plus expansion cohort trial – both drugs are from Genentech
The patients
30 JClinOncol34,2016(suppl;abstr3502)
• relapsed/refractory, many late stage
Tolerability
31 JClinOncol34,2016(suppl;abstr3502)
• No additive toxicity, generally similar to MEK inhibitor monotherapy
Efficacy
32 JClinOncol34,2016(suppl;abstr3502)
• ORR 17-20%, all PR. SD in another 20-22% of patients
Durable responses seen
33 JClinOncol34,2016(suppl;abstr3502)
• Durability see with both PR and SD responses
Clinically meaningful impact
34 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3502)
• Durable responses are reflected in PFS and OS results
Clinically meaningful impact
35 J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 3502)
Cellular Therapeutics and ICI
• There are many preclinical studies investigating the use of ICI to enhance CAR T cell therapies
• Leave you with a case study from Dr Schuster's clinical trial of CTL019 CAR T cells in NHL, running at UPenn
• These unpublished data were presented by Dr David Porter (Genentech) in a session devoted to the future of cellular therapies
36
Cellular Therapeutics and ICI
Dr Porter 37
Cellular Therapeutics and ICI
38
• A remarkable response in a patient who was certainly out of options
Dr Porter
Cellular Therapeutics and ICI
39
• Next steps: PD-1 KO CAR T cells
• Combination therapy with ICI
• Sequential therapy with ICI
• and so on
Issues with cellular therapies – solid tumors
40
• Immuno-suppressive TME
• Sub-optimal expansion esp in MRD or in cases where solid tumors are heavily consolidated prior to therapy ! Persistence is linked to expansion
! Antigen acccessibility may be limiting
• Antigen specificity is often an issue (Her2, EGFR, mesothelin, CAIX)
• Lots of problems to solve...
ICI Combos – summary
41
• ICI combos: Progress will be made – perhaps with fits and starts – but the sheer breadth of available therapeutics suggests that best-in-class combos are coming
• ICI and targeted therapeutics: despite many failures, examples such as cobi/atezo will encourage the field to continue looking for combos with acceptible profiles
• ICI and cell therapeutics – certainly an interesting start – but likely solves only one of several critical issues that limit cell therapy for solid tumors
@PDRennert
www.aletabio.com
42
Aleta Biotherapeutics is focused on transforming cellular therapeutics to allow a broad spectrum of cancer
indications to be targeted, including currently intractable solid tumors