Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

22
Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists

Transcript of Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Page 1: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Ratifying the Constitution

Federalists vs. Antifederalists

Page 2: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Final DocumentO It took four months of

debate and compromise to complete the final draft of the new US Constitution.

O On September 17, the final document was read aloud.

O Some delegates were not happy with the final version; some even refused to sign it.

O Nevertheless, 38 delegates did sign the document, and Congress approved it. George Mason refused to sign

the Constitution unless a bill of rights was added to it.

Page 3: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

More Work AheadO Once a new

constitution was created, there was no guarantee the states would approve it.

O There was a lively debate in the newspapers and on the streets between those who supported ratification and those who did not.

Page 4: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Federalists• Those who favored

ratification were known as federalists.

• Noteworthy founders such as George Washington and Ben Franklin were federalists.• Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay went so far as to

write a series of letters to N.Y. newspapers defending the Constitution.

• Those letters became known collectively as The Federalist Papers.

Hamilton

Madison

Jay

Page 5: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Federalists

• Other groups that supported the federalist argument included:– Many merchants,

skilled workers, and laborers

– Small states and states with weak economies.

• Congressional Powers that benefit these groups:

Page 6: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Federalists• Federalists argued 3

main points:

1.Only a strong central government could handle problems the nation faced;

2.Checks and Balances would prevent any of the 3 branches from becoming too strong;

The penname Publius refers to the Roman consul who helped overthrow the Roman monarchy and establish a republic in 509 B.C.

3.The real threat to individual rights came from state governments, which lacked sufficient checks and balances.

Page 7: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Anti-federalists

• Anti-federalists fought against ratification.

• Some notable anti-federalists included Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Thomas Paine.

• Support for the anti-federalist argument came from rural areas, large states, and states with strong economies.

Adams Henry

Mason Paine

Page 8: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Anti-federalists

• Like the federalists, the anti-federalists wrote editorials outlining their arguments.

• Unlike the federalists, there was no real coordinated effort within the anti-federalist movement.

Anti-federalists used many pennames. It is widely believed that Richard Henry Lee wrote as the “Federal Farmer.”

Page 9: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

The Anti-federalists

• Anti-federalists passionately believed that states’ powers must be preserved in a weak union of states.

• Rather than draft a new document, they just wanted to strengthen the Articles of Confederation.

Adams Henry

Mason Paine

Page 10: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Other Anti-federalist Arguments

• Some feared that the Constitution created an elitist government that would only serve the interests of the privileged(see “Key Participants” chart);

• Others doubted that a national government could address the problems of such a large, diverse nation in the way that a loose confederation of state governments could;

• Many argued that a strong central government posed a threat to the individual rights of citizens.

Page 11: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

General Summary of the Debate

federalists

• Only a strong central government can deal effectively with national problems!

anti-federalists

• Strong government can not be trusted!–Could abuse its power

–Might serve interests of the rich and ignore common man.

–Could pose a threat to state power and people’s rights

Page 12: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

General Summary of the Debate

federalists• A bill of rights is not

necessary! The system of checks and balances would prevent any abuse of power.

anti-federalists• Demanded a bill of rights listing individual rights and freedoms.– A written guarantee

is the only way to ensure that the federal government could never infringe upon rights!

Page 13: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Important Clarification!

• The federalists in this debate are not necessarily the Federalist Party that formed in the 1790s, though many in this movement do join the Federalist Party.

• Here, “federalist” refers to a loose movement and should not be capitalized since it is not a proper noun.

• Likewise, “anti-federalist” refers to a very loose movement and not a proper noun.

CICERO © 2011

Page 14: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Ratification!

• In the end, the federalists were able to achieve victories in enough states to ratify the Constitution.

• They were able to win over many reluctant states by promising to adopt a Bill of Rights.

• The Bill of Rights was presented by James Madison to the first U.S. Congress as a series of Constitutional amendments.

The first ten amendments to the Constitution are referred to

collectively as the Bill of Rights.

Page 15: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

A Built-in Safeguard• An amendment process was included in the

Constitution because the Founders recognized that times change and laws should be able to change with the times.

• They did not, however, want the Constitution changed on a whim: – They wanted to make sure a super majority of Americans wanted

to change the Constitution before a change could be made.

– They did not want a quick 51% vote of a legislature to have the power to make any changes.

• Therefore, the amendment process is long and drawn out – by design.

• To date, there have only been 27 amendments added to the Constitution.

Page 16: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

3/6/2014 O Essential Question(s):• What role should the government play in protecting rights?

ODo Now:ORead “People Demand a Bill of Rights” on page 147 and answer Main Idea question B in your binder.

Objectives:•Explain how and why the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution (12.6.1.12.A.2.d)•Trace the expansion of voting rights throughout American history (6.1.12.A.1.b).

Homework:•Complete Unit 1 Study Guide.

Page 17: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Bill of Rights

• First 10 Amendments to the Constitution

• The First 8 spell out personal liberties

• #9 makes it clear that rights are not limited to those mentioned in 1 – 8.

• #10 is a clarification: any powers that are not granted to the federal government or explicitly denied to the states belong to the people and the states.

This was your homework

assignment! Take out your

summaries and turn to page 149.

Page 18: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Something that is NOT mentioned in the Bill of Rights . . .

Page 19: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Recall

• In what ways did the newly formed United States government seem to contradict the ideals of equality and freedom expressed in the Declaration of Independence?– Thing to Think About:• Voting

• Slavery

• Native Americans

Page 20: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Global Impact

•Other nations followed, and continue to follow, the United States in enumerating such rights.

• South Africa, for example, adopted its Bill of Rights on May 8, 1996.

Page 21: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

For Further Research

• Charters of Freedom: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html

• Bill of Rights Institute: http://billofrightsinstitute.org/

• Constitution for Kids: http://www.usconstitution.net/constkids.html

• Exploring Constitutional Law: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/home.html

Page 22: Ratifying the Constitution Federalists vs. Antifederalists.

Government Sites

•Senate: http://www.senate.gov/

•House of Representatives: http://www.house.gov/

•White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/

•Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourt.gov/