Rare Disease Patient and Ethics Council (RD-PEC) Broad issues of interest Secondly, the PEC can give...
-
Upload
silvester-gordon -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Rare Disease Patient and Ethics Council (RD-PEC) Broad issues of interest Secondly, the PEC can give...
Rare Disease Patient and Ethics Council (RD-PEC)
Broad issues of interest
Secondly, the PEC can give opinion on broad issues of interest which
arise through the developments undertaken by EURenOmics, Neuromics
and RD Connect. PEC members have so far commented on the Data
Sharing Charter which regulates data and materials sharing for the three
projects.
Rare Disease Patient and Ethics Council – RD-PEC
The PEC (pronounced pek) is a forum for members of the Ethics Committees of RD Connect,
Neuromics, EURenOmics and members of the Patient Advisory Council to collaborate on
examining ethical and social issues arising out of the work of the three projects. The PEC is a
voluntary, multidisciplinary group which forms part of the governance of RD Connect.
Membership of the PEC by role http://rd-connect.eu/platform/ethics/rd-pec/
Conclusions
New approaches to health technologies, such as those being explored in
RD Connect, Neuromics and EURenOmics can raise issues that are not
fully covered by existing ethical guidelines. The PEC helps to provide the
institutional capacity to identify, clarify and evaluate emerging ethical
tensions in their practical contexts. In addition it allows the inclusion of
patient perspectives in these interdisciplinary debates.
Operational aspects
Specific questions and answers
Firstly the PEC provides a publicly available question and answer forum
where anyone with an ethical, social or legal query concerning the work
of EURenOmics, Neuromics and RD Connect can submit their question.
These will be debated by the PEC members and a summary, consensus
answer will be made available on the PEC website.
PEC Members
Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Megan Fookes; Emma Heslop; Joseph
Irwin; Anna Kole; Chantal Loirat; Milan Macek; Deborah
Mascalzoni; Pauline McCormack (chair); Caron Molster; Marita
Pohlschmidt; Daniel Renault; Peter Reussner; Balthasar Schaap;
Inge Schwersenz; Volker Straub; Johanne van Delden; Marieke
van Meel; Urban Weising; Simon Woods
patient representa-tive
clinician
scientist
bioethicist
sociologist
lawyer
Pauline McCormack, Policy, Ethics & Life Sciences Research Centre, Newcastle University, on behalf of the Patient and Ethics Council
@paulinemacco
PEC online question form
can be found at
Ethics workshop at Sitges
Background and rationale
Based on best practice from similar large RD networking projects, the PEC
aims to be a reactive and responsive resource which can examine
contemporary, pragmatic, sometimes urgent issues around the ethics of
research and focus on useful, problem solving for patient groups,
researchers and clinicians. It will encourage a bottom-up approach,
generating knowledge triggered by empirical questions, with relevant
results publicly available through the RD Connect website.
Rather than being a source of formal or technical guidance on points of
law, regulation and governance, the PEC will take a deliberative, reflexive
approach to questions posed.
Meetings/reporting
The PEC meets face to face
at the annual joint meetings of
the three projects and reports
its activities to the EC every
12 months.