48 • RANGE MAGAZINE • WINTER 2015

Christopher Walter Monckton, formerjournalist and third Viscount Moncktonof Brenchley, is a hereditary peer of the

British Empire and a skilled public speaker.That means he knows you don’t win over anaudience on either side of a topic as technicalas global warming by droning away with sta-tistics till they’re snoring into their after-din-ner custard.

Although the audiences may still besmaller, the advantage here is increasingly tothe skeptics. Let Al Gore and his ilk stomparound like Bigfoot, roaring that doom is athand. As the decades go by and disaster failsto arrive, they’re stuck rejuggling their figuresand redefining their terms like any other“Repent Now!” prophet who finds both him-self and his audience looking inconvenientlyhealthy, several years after his establisheddoomsday deadline.

Monckton knows how to work an audi-ence. The reason the promoters of globalwarming won’t reveal their true colors is“the Stoplight Syndrome,” Moncktonexplains.“The Greens are too yellow to admitthey’re really Reds.”

He’s not even beneath quoting MontyPython’s “dead parrot” routine, reportingthat poor global-warming fans are nowstuck trying to get a refund for “a deceasedtheory. It has expired. It has shuffled off thismortal coil.”

The man-made global-warming zealotsknow most people’s eyes glaze over whenfaced with charts full of numbers. The easiestanswer for Mr. Common Man, at that point,is to say, “I don’t understand all this gob-bledygook; I’ll just trust the experts.” Sinceliterally 95 percent of the experts are on thegovernment payroll, the warming zealots canlive with that. What they can’t stand is to beshown up as a bunch of clowns.

Enter Christopher Monckton, who does-n’t mind doing some clowning of his own, solong as the effect is to expose the global-warming circus for what it is.

At the 2011 U.N. Climate Change Con-ference in Durban, South Africa, Moncktongot hold of a preliminary draft report inwhich the group was set to call for the reduc-tion of carbon-dioxide emissions in theWestern nations “by more than 100 percent.”He waits a moment to let his audienceabsorb that number. It takes a while for thelaughter to start. He publicized that at thetime, he says, causing a bit of a stir.

The response of Durban conferencemanagement was to try to bar him from the

Drama from the Viscount of Brenchley

Lord Christopher Walter Monckton is known as “the bane of environmental extremists everywhere...with the hammer

of truth.” By Vin Suprynowicz

Christopher Walter Monckton, third Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, is a hereditary peer, journalist,Conservative political advisor (including to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher), inventor of themathematical puzzle Eternity, and a British public speaker. Ridiculing the failed computer models ofglobal-warming alarmists, Lord Monckton drew cheers at the 2010 Oxford Union debate on globalwarming (which his side won, decisively) when he removed his cummerbund and declared: “If I askedthis House how long this cummerbund is, you might telephone around all the manufacturers and askthem how many cummerbunds they made, and how long each type of cummerbund was, and put thedata into a computer run by a zitty teenager eating too many doughnuts, and the computer would makean expensive guess. Or you could take a tape measure and MEASURE IT!”

PHO

TOS

CO

UR

TESY

CH

RIS

TOPH

ER W

ALTE

R M

ON

CKT

ON

WI15 10.17.14 pm.q_RANGE template.q 10/17/14 11:24 AM Page 48

WINTER 2015 • RANGE MAGAZINE • 49

pressroom when they realized morereporters were showing up at Monckton’spress conferences than their own.When he got to the next U.N. climate

conference in Doha, in the little oil satrapy ofQatar in 2012, he asked for a copy of thatyear’s draft report and was told they didn’tknow what he was talking about. There wasno such report. In fact, they insisted they’dnever handed out any “draft reports” at thebeginning of their conferences, ever.At his luncheon speech at the Heartland

Institute Climate Change Conference in LasVegas on July 9, where he was introduced as“the bane of environmental extremistseverywhere...with the hammer of truth,”Monckton gleefully showed slides of himselflooking slightly ridiculous skydiving into theclimate conference in Doha—where they’dmade it known he was not welcome—dressed up in the robe and headdress of anArab sheikh.“A lot of desks set aside for member

states and organizations sit vacant at theseconferences,” Monckton confides. “I foundmyself at the desk set aside for the delegationfrom Burma, from Myanmar. Presumablythey were still out at the pool, or shopping,or whatever. At that point the man at thepodium asked if anyone had anything else tosay. Well, there I was sitting at a microphone,with a toggle switch labeled On and Off.” Monckton smiles. His audience is already

laughing.“So I turned it on and said I represented

the Developing Nations Coastal Commis-sion. I had to make something up, and thatsounded pretty good. And then I told themthere had actually been no global warmingin 16 years.”The laughter grows louder.“I had expected a standing ovation for

informing them there had been no warmingin 16 years. I thought they’d be happy tolearn we could all go home and stop worry-ing. Instead you’d have thought we were at aJustin Bieber concert and they’d justannounced Mr. Bieber was not going to beappearing that day, after all. It was bedlam.”

For French TVNo one denies there may have been somemodest global warming over the decades, orthat mankind’s activities may have con-tributed to some modest rise in carbon-dioxide levels, Monckton says. But theassertion to which the zealots claim to havewon such near-unanimous consensus that

no more debate shouldbe permitted is: “Theactivities of mankind arethe major cause of anongoing catastrophicamount of global warm-ing, and mankind has itin its power to slow orstop global warming.”In fact, he states, there’s been no net

warming in 17 years, 10 months. Sea levelsfell from 2003 to 2008. Hurricane levels areat a low. Droughts have declined over thepast 30 years. What the IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change really wants to dois “abolish free markets, and impose hugetaxes,” he says. “Warming” is just the latestexcuse for a very old agenda.After his luncheon talk, Monckton start-

ed to work his way through the crowdtoward the exit doors. I was chatting withhim, briefly, when a gal with short hair andshort legs and a French accent came up,reminding him that he’d agreed to be inter-viewed “for French TV.”Checking later, I determined this was one

Laure Noualhat, with the French documen-tary outfit Phares & Balises (Lighthouse[s] &Beacon[s]). The firm’s Web page explains ofMs. Noualhat’s planned 52-minute docu-mentary, “Climate War”:

“Il s’agira d’appréhender le courant ‘clima-to-sceptique’ particulièrement bien implantéaux Etats-Unis, qui tente d’installer le doute,voire de contester la thèse du réchauffement de

la terre, pourtant scientifiquementdémontrée....”Well, you can look it up your-

self, but perhaps you’ll allow meto informally translate:“This [documentary] will

involve understanding the cur-rent ‘climate skeptic’ theories,

particularly well established in the UnitedStates, which attempt to create doubt aboutglobal warming, despite its having been sci-entifically proven. Industrialists work hard toundermine [the truth of global warming]with intense lobbying in favor of their pri-vate interests and against the public interest.They fund ‘think tanks’ which spread falsetheories or attempt to invalidate the truth,support politicians who deny the reality ofglobal warming, sponsoring the publicationof writings called ‘scientific,’ which are not….This approach has borne fruit, with 48 per-cent of Americans now saying ‘global warm-ing is exaggerated.’ The ‘climate skeptic’movement is proliferating and will tackleFrance using the same methods as in theUnited States.”So let’s harbor no delusion that Ms.

Noualhat and her one-man camera crewwere visiting the climate conference toreview the skeptics’ data with an open mind.I followed the lady and her cameraman

out into the hallway, where they equippedLord Monckton with a wireless microphoneand started rolling. After a few minutes ofsoftball questions, the predictable zinger

“I had expected a standing ovation for informing them there had beenno warming in 16 years. I thought they’d be happy to learn we could all go home and stop worrying. Instead you’d have thought we were

at a Justin Bieber concert and they’d just announced Mr. Bieber was notgoing to be appearing that day, after all. It was bedlam.”

Attention-getter Lord Moncktonarrived at the 2011 U.N. GlobalWarming Conference in Durban,South Africa, by skydiving (below).The next year, for the follow-upconference in Doha, Qatar, hearrived on camelback, wearingtraditional Arab garb. But he hadreverted to his more typical pinstripesuit when he borrowed theabandoned microphone of thedelegation from Burma to informattendees there had been no globalwarming for 16 years. “There werekeening shrieks of rage from thedelegates,” he reports.

WI15 10.17.14 pm.q_RANGE template.q 10/17/14 11:24 AM Page 49

50 • RANGE MAGAZINE • WINTER 2015

came when the charming Miss Noualhatasked Lord Monckton who was paying himto be there.

Monckton responded: “First I just wantto know, do you ask this same question ofthose on the other side, who claim man-made global warming is an ongoing cata-strophe? Do you ask who funds them?”

“Absolutely, every time. We ask themevery time,” Ms. Noualhat replied.

“Well, I’m going to take you at your wordon that,” he said, “though we’ll be checking.”

Now, I’m not going to call Miss Noualhata liar, because I’ve never watched any of herdocumentaries and I don’t know. But comeon. Global-warming true believers don’ttend to ask government-funded scientistswho’s funding them because we all knowexactly who funds them: 95 percent of allglobal-warming “science” is funded by gov-ernment agencies and tax-funded govern-ment grants.

The point is that the true believers can’timagine a government-sponsored scientistever fudging his data or presenting his resultsin a selective way designed to please thepoliticians and bureaucrats who fund him,thus winning approval for his or her nextgovernment grant (despite the jaw-droppingdata fudging of “Climategate”—look up“University of East Anglia Michael MannPhil Jones”—which many have called “thescience scandal of the century”).

Yet these same dewy-eyed Pollyannasthen turn around and cynically snarl thatanyone on the other side of the debate mustbe willing to sell—heck, must already havesold—his soul, agreeing to present outrightlies as scientific findings in exchange forhuge payoffs from the greedy oil and coalcompanies, because why else would anyonesay such disturbing things?

“I witnessed exactly the same thing,” inother interviews by the French team thatweek, Heartland Institute media guy JimLakely, who issued Miss Noualhat’s mediacredentials as well as mine, told me when Icalled him in Chicago to check on her affilia-tion. “One or two questions about the sci-ence,” to get the interview subject relaxed andtalking, “and then, literally, ‘So how much arethe oil companies paying you to be here?’”

No Human Cost?Laure Noualhat asked the “Who’s payingyou” question again.

“I’m not being paid to be here at all,”Monckton replied. “Aside from providing the

airfare and the hotel room. I’m here on myown dime.”

Miss Noualhat continued trying to gethim to admit that corporate interests withulterior motives were funding his travel andtalks.

Monckton finally said: “I’ve alreadyanswered that question. No one is paying meanything at all to be here, and frankly if you

don’t have anything else, if you can’t raiseyour game beyond that, I’m done. I won’thave anything further to do with you.” Atthat point the peer turned and strode awaydown the hallway, leaving Miss Noualhat’scameraman to rush after him and ask if theycould have their wireless microphone back.

I stopped Lord Monckton, shook hishand and told him I thought it was abouttime someone got off the defensive andresponded that way.

“Well, I’ve always wanted to do that,” hesaid, “and this seemed the perfect time. I’dalready answered the question several times.

In this case it so happens I’m being paidnothing by anyone. Except for the airfare andhotel, I’m here at my own expense.”

The Green Extreme tend to imply therewill be no human cost if they can succeed incrippling the fossil-fuel industry, somehowmagically replacing it with windmills, elves inhollow trees, whatever. In fact, Christianscholar Calvin Beisner points out it will costthe U.S. economy an estimated $50 billion tocomply with new EPA rules on carbon diox-ide—while for only $49.5 billion we could“build fossil-fueled power plants to electrifyevery home in the world.” And meantime, hesaid in Las Vegas, the EPA admits full com-pliance will have zero effect on global cli-mate, “so it’s all pain and no gain.”

Paul Driessen, author of “Eco-Imperial-ism/Green Power Black Death,” calls theGreen Extreme “dogmatic, imperialistic andauthoritarian. Their ultimate goal is to con-trol the future of mankind.... They’re shut-ting down Kentucky, the coal country, at ahuge human cost.”

They oppose the use of DDT to controlmosquitoes and thus malaria because “it hasadded to the (human) population problem,”Driessen asserts. Obama seeks the “de-devel-opment” of the United States. Sustainabledevelopment, he says, is nothing but the neweuphemism for Deep Green.

Driessen says 700 million Africans and300 million Indians now have no access toelectricity or fossil fuels. Two to four millionpeople every year die of lung diseases causedby heating and cooking with wood or char-coal, and another two million die every yearof diseases caused by the lack of electricity topreserve food and provide clean water. Yetthe goal of the Greens is not to make electric-ity and refrigeration more affordable, but toput them permanently out of reach for theworld’s poor.

Retired Canadian geography professorTimothy Ball reported in Las Vegas that inIndia, the prime minister’s Council on Cli-mate Change recently announced that thatcountry “would rather save its people frompoverty than from global warming.”

Sounds about right to me. ■

Vin Suprynowicz served for 20 years as anaward-winning columnist and editorial writerfor the daily Las Vegas Review-Journal. His4th book, “The Testament of James,” will bepublished in late November. All of his booksare available at http://tiny.cc/kl9pnx.

The reason the promoters of global warming won’t reveal their

true colors is “the Stoplight Syndrome,” Monckton explains.

“The Greens are too yellow to admitthey’re really Reds.”

Al Gore says “terrible tragedies are occurring inthe southern Sahara because of drought which heblames on global warming,” notes Scottish skepticLord Monckton, a mathematical prodigy. “Thereis no drought caused by global warming. In 2007there were record rains across the whole of thesouthern Sahara. In the past 25 years the Saharahas shrunk by some 300,000 square kilometersbecause of additional rainfall.”

WI15 10.17.14 pm.q_RANGE template.q 10/17/14 11:24 AM Page 50