Rana Plaza collapse aftermath: Are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?
-
Upload
rudolf-r-sinkovics -
Category
Education
-
view
161 -
download
0
Transcript of Rana Plaza collapse aftermath: Are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?
1
Rana Plaza collapse aftermath: Are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?
Sinkovics, Noemi, Samia Ferdous Hoque, and Rudolf R. Sinkovics (2016), "Rana plaza collapse aftermath: Are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective?," Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability, 29 (4), 617-649. (DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2141). • http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2015-2141
Journal Ranking JWB - doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.01.006
4
Authors — Sinkovics, Hoque, Sinkovics
• Dr Noemi Sinkovics » Lecturer in International Business and Management
The University of Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business [email protected] www.manchester.ac.uk/research/noemi.sinkovics
• Dr Samia Ferdous Hoque» Research Associate in International & Responsible Business
The University of Manchester, Alliance Manchester Business [email protected]
• Prof Rudolf R. Sinkovics» Professor of International Business
The University of Manchester, Manchester Business [email protected] www.manchester.ac.uk/research/rudolf.sinkovics
McKinsey (2011); LBL (2013); Kabeer and Mahmud (2004)
6
Trigger for this work
• The state of social standards complience» Since 2005, several incidences of factory fire, collapse and
labour unrest have been reported» Rana Plaza 2013 garments building collapse in Bangladesh
killed 1077; Primark and Mango labels were found inside
• Upgrading discussions in GVC/GPN literatures» Limited number of suppliers has started to move beyond
cut, make and trim (CMT) and to upgrade service levels» Large factories located in the export processing zones
(EPZs) and outside are mostly progressive and are the first tier suppliers of branded retailers
» Small ones focus on price and speedy delivery» Most firms sell through buying houses having no direct
contact with buyers
8
Short summary of this paper
• Purpose» Intended and unintended consequences of compliance and auditing
pressures• Context
» Bangladeshi garment industry, post April 2013 Rana Plaza incident• Findings
» Case companies prioritise the implementation of measurable standards over socially grounded needs and priorities of workers
» Certain initiatives don’t add value, destroy social value» Compliance requires to find ways to recover compliance cost» Process upgrading through technological advancement means
increased work pressure on labour, increased power imbalance and
10
Approach taken
• Increased pressure for product quality and production quality (economic upgrading) » coupled with increased pressure for cost
reduction can lead to increased reliance on irregular workers in addition to regular workers (e.g. Barrientos and Kritzinger 2004; Rossi 2011)
• Social downgrading » is more likely to happen to irregular
workers, while regular workers are more likely to experience some degree of social upgrading from economic upgrading (cf. Barrientos et al. 2011)
• CSR compliance » does not necessarily lead to real
improvements for workers (cf. Locke 2013)
• Research approach: multiple case study
• Data collection method: » Face-to-face interviews with the
managers/owners and the workers» Collection of organisational
documents and secondary data• Data analysis: template analysis• Dimensions in the template
» State of social upgrading: dimensions in Barrientos, Gereffi, and Rossi (2011)
» Social value creation (Sinkovics et al. 2015)
» Impact on workers: emerged from data
Literature background Methodology
11
Approach taken
• Increased pressure for product quality and production quality (economic upgrading) » coupled with increased pressure for cost
reduction can lead to increased reliance on irregular workers in addition to regular workers (e.g. Barrientos and Kritzinger 2004; Rossi 2011)
• Social downgrading » is more likely to happen to irregular
workers, while regular workers are more likely to experience some degree of social upgrading from economic upgrading (cf. Barrientos et al. 2011)
• CSR compliance » does not necessarily lead to real
improvements for workers (cf. Locke 2013)
• Research approach: multiple case study
• Data collection method: » Face-to-face interviews with the
managers/owners and the workers» Collection of organisational
documents and secondary data• Data analysis: template analysis• Dimensions in the template
» State of social upgrading: dimensions in Barrientos, Gereffi, and Rossi (2011)
» Social value creation (Sinkovics et al. 2015)
» Impact on workers: emerged from data
Literature background Methodology
• The limitations of the social upgrading
approach• Measurable standards merely serve as proxies.
• Are these proxies really cues for significant improvements in
workers’ lives?
• Under which circumstances can they be?
• Enabling rights only mean something if they go hand in hand with the
fulfilment of social, economic and cultural rights
• e.g. the freedom of speech does not mean anything for those who
are starving
• a focus on a wider range of human rights would yield more
insights (Giuliani and Macchi 2014, Sinkovics et al. 2015)
14
Dimensions(Barrientos et al 2011)
Changes Social upgrading
Social value creation
Impact on workers
Measurable standards
Wage level Increased basic salary Yes No Reduced monthly incomeOvertime limitation (2-4 hours/week) reduced income
Social protection Improved fire safety and hygiene Yes Yes Improved working condition although workers think some new facilities are not important, such as child care centre, dining room.
Introduced child care and dining facilityIntroduced separate medical unit and doctor for first aid
Working hour Reduced overtime Yes No More pieces of garments produced in less time, while monthly income has reduced.Workers squeeze lunch time to complete daily targets on time
Daily production target to be finished within regular work hours
Enabling rightsFreedom of association Union participation not encouraged No No Workers cannot discuss their problems freely with
management Workers’ committee formed for liaison with management
Gender ratio No female workers in the supervisory team or quality checking team
No No Accept domination and verbal abuse from male colleagues
Skill development No formal mechanism for training; No No Workers have to pay the price for being unskilled while they receive no opportunity for skill development
Unskilled workers are downsized as cost per worker has increased due to compliance
Lost social value in transition
Lunch facilities stopped Not part of compliance
No Workers have to wake up early to cook lunch at home and also bear lunch cost
Prayer room converted into dinning space Not part of compliance
No No privacy in saying prayers
Downsizing to compensate the cost of compliance; stopped recruiting new workers
Not part of compliance
No Reduced job security;Reduced bargaining power with managementIncreased work pressure for remaining workers
The effectiveness of compliance: social upgrading vs. social value
15
Conclusions
Social upgrading can be regarded as meaningful when it also creates social
value The findings indicate human rights implications that occurred as a result of
the CSR standards compliance The loss of the prayer room (cultural right)
Loss of nutritious food (social right, right to decent food)
Loss of job that leads to the exclusion from the labour market (the right to work)
Increased pressure and fear for job has implications for mental health and well-
being Lost social value goes beyond social downgrading
The 4 case companies are small garment manufacturers with limited
resources. Their primary motivation for the adoption of CSR standards is
the hope that they can increase their competitiveness and attract more
buyers Does the case of larger suppliers differ in terms of the relationship between
social upgrading and social value creation?
Is the discrepancy between social upgrading and social value creation merely an
outcome of resource shortages?