Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

38
Institutionen för ekologi, miljö och geovetenskap Umeå universitet Umeå 2013 Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape Uranium, thorium and other metals in forests, wetlands and streams Fredrik Lidman Akademisk avhandling som med vederbörligt tillstånd av Rektor vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen framläggs till offentligt försvar i Lilla hörsalen, KBC-huset, fredagen den 11 oktober, kl. 13:00. Avhandlingen kommer att försvaras på engelska. Fakultetsopponent: Dr. Oleg Pokrovsky, Géoscience Environnement Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, Frankrike.

Transcript of Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

Page 1: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

Institutionen för ekologi, miljö och geovetenskap

Umeå universitet

Umeå 2013

Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape Uranium, thorium and other metals in forests, wetlands and streams Fredrik Lidman

Akademisk avhandling

som med vederbörligt tillstånd av Rektor vid Umeå universitet för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen framläggs till offentligt försvar i Lilla hörsalen, KBC-huset, fredagen den 11 oktober, kl. 13:00. Avhandlingen kommer att försvaras på engelska.

Fakultetsopponent: Dr. Oleg Pokrovsky, Géoscience Environnement Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, Frankrike.

Page 2: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

Organization Document type Date of publication Umeå University Doctoral thesis 20 September 2o13 Dept. of Ecology and Environmental Science

Author Fredrik Lidman

Title Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape – uranium, thorium and other metals in forests, wetlands and streams

Abstract

The boreal landscape is complex mosaic of vast forests, lakes and wetlands. Through the landscape

flows a fine network of streams and rivers, carrying dissolved and suspended material from

atmospheric deposition and weathering of soils and bedrock to downstream recipients. This thesis

investigates the transport of U, Th and other metals in the boreal landscape by comparing a set of

catchments with contrasting characteristics, ranging from 0.12-68 km2 in area. Using uranium

(234U/238U) and oxygen isotopes (δ18O) it was demonstrated that catchment size has a strong impact

on the hydrological pathways and on the mobilisation of uranium. Both tracers also displayed a

consistent shift towards more superficial sources and more superficial flow pathways when going

from winter baseflow conditions to the spring flood. Large spatiotemporal variability was observed

with U fluxes ranging from 1.7 -30 g km-2 a-1. Using a wide set of hydrochemical parameters and

landscape characteristics it was demonstrated that wetlands play a decisive role for the

biogeochemical cycling of many metals. Comparing normalised fluxes of 13 different elements (Al,

Ba, Ca, Cr, Cu, La, Mg, Na, Ni, Si, Sr, U and Y) 73% of the spatial variance could be explained based

on the wetland coverage and the affinity for organic matter, the latter of which was quantified using

thermodynamic modelling. Hence, it was possible to link the large-scale transport patterns of a wide

range of metals to fundamental biogeochemical properties. When restraining the analysis to the

smaller streams (<10 km2), the explanatory power increased to 88%. For elements such as Na and Si

with low affinity for organic matter the decrease in wetland-dominated catchments corresponded

closely to the area of mineral soils that had been replaced by peat, indicating that reduced

weathering was the main cause of the decrease. For organophilic metals the decrease in wetland-

dominated catchments was even greater, suggesting that there also was an accumulation of these

metals in the peat. This was confirmed by investigating the distribution of radionuclides in local

mire, which revealed considerable accumulation of uranium and thorium along the edges of the

mire. Based on the inventories of uranium and thorium and their distribution in the peat it was

concluded that the mire historically had been a sink for these metals and that it most likely will

continue to be so for a long time to come. All and all, boreal wetlands were estimated to decrease the

fluxes of metals from the boreal forests to downstream lakes and oceans by 20-40%, depending on

how strongly they bind to organic matter.

Keywords U, Th, Ra, uranium, thorium, radium, isotope, forest, wetland, mire, stream, boreal, landscape, transport, flux, radionuclide, radioactivity, metal, peat, water, groundwater, deposition, environment

Language ISBN Number of pages English 978-91-7459-714-1 30 + 4 papers

Page 3: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

Radionuclide Transport in the Boreal Landscape Uranium, Thorium and Other Elements in Forests, Wetlands and Streams

Fredrik Lidman

Institutionen för ekologi, miljö och geovetenskap

Umeå 2013

Page 4: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

This work is protected by the Swedish Copyright Legislation (Act 1960:729).

© Fredrik Lidman 2013

ISBN: 978-91-7459-714-1

Omslag: Fredrik Lidman och Maria Jaremalm

Elektronisk version tillgänglig på http://umu.diva-portal.org/

Tryck: Servicecenter KBC

Umeå, Sverige 2013

Page 5: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

Längre norrut ser man från en höjd den blå

oändliga barrskogsmattan

där molnskuggorna

står stilla.

Nej, flyger fram.

– Tomas Tranströmer

Page 6: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

i

Table of Contents

Table of Contents i List of papers ii Abstract iii Background 1

The boreal landscape 1 The biogeochemical cycles of metals 2 Radioactivity in the environment 3 Transport of metals in the boreal landscape 5 Objectives 6

Materials and methods 8 The Krycklan catchment 8 Methodology 9 Analytical techniques 11 Thermodynamic modelling 13

Results and discussion 14 Uranium and thorium in the boreal landscape 14 A generalised model for metal transport in the boreal landscape 15 Getting the puzzle right… 16 Many small streams... 18 Final remarks 20

Author contributions 22 Tackord 23 References 26

Page 7: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

ii

List of papers

This thesis is a summary and discussion of the following papers, referred to

in the text by their Roman numerals:

I. Lidman, F., Mörth, C. M. and Laudon, H.: Landscape control of

uranium and thorium in boreal streams – spatiotemporal

variability and the role of wetlands, Biogeosciences, 9, 4773-

4785, 2012.

II. Lidman, F., Ramebäck, H., Bengtsson, Å. and Laudon, H.:

Distribution and transport of radionuclides in a boreal mire –

assessing past, present and future accumulation of uranium,

thorium and radium, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity,

121, 87-97, 2013.

III. Lidman, F., Peralta Tapia, A., Vesterlund, A. and Laudon, H.: 234U/238U and δ18O in a boreal stream network – comparing two

tracers for deep groundwater discharge, submitted manuscript.

IV. Lidman, F., Köhler, S., Mörth, C. M. and Laudon, H.: Metal

transport in the boreal landscape – the role of wetlands and the

affinity for organic matter, submitted manuscript.

Paper I is reproduced under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Paper II is reproduced with kind permission from Elsevier.

Page 8: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

iii

Abstract

The boreal landscape is complex mosaic of vast forests, lakes and wetlands.

Through the landscape flows a fine network of streams and rivers, carrying

dissolved and suspended material from atmospheric deposition and

weathering of soils and bedrock to downstream recipients. This thesis

investigates the transport of U, Th and other metals in the boreal landscape

by comparing a set of catchments with contrasting characteristics, ranging

from 0.12-68 km2 in area. Using uranium (234U/238U) and oxygen isotopes

(δ18O) it was demonstrated that catchment size has a strong impact on the

hydrological pathways and on the mobilisation of uranium. Both tracers also

displayed a consistent shift towards more superficial sources and more

superficial flow pathways when going from winter baseflow conditions to the

spring flood. Large spatiotemporal variability was observed with U fluxes

ranging from 1.7 -30 g km-2 a-1. Using a wide set of hydrochemical

parameters and landscape characteristics it was demonstrated that wetlands

play a decisive role for the biogeochemical cycling of many metals.

Comparing normalised fluxes of 13 different elements (Al, Ba, Ca, Cr, Cu, La,

Mg, Na, Ni, Si, Sr, U and Y) 73% of the spatial variance could be explained

based on the wetland coverage and the affinity for organic matter, the latter

of which was quantified using thermodynamic modelling. Hence, it was

possible to link the large-scale transport patterns of a wide range of metals to

fundamental biogeochemical properties. When restraining the analysis to

the smaller streams (<10 km2), the explanatory power increased to 88%. For

elements such as Na and Si with low affinity for organic matter the decrease

in wetland-dominated catchments corresponded closely to the area of

mineral soils that had been replaced by peat, indicating that reduced

weathering was the main cause of the decrease. For organophilic metals the

decrease in wetland-dominated catchments was even greater, suggesting that

there also was an accumulation of these metals in the peat. This was

confirmed by investigating the distribution of radionuclides in local mire,

which revealed considerable accumulation of uranium and thorium along the

edges of the mire. Based on the inventories of uranium and thorium and

their distribution in the peat it was concluded that the mire historically had

been a sink for these metals and that it most likely will continue to be so for a

long time to come. All and all, wetlands were estimated to decrease the fluxes

of metals from the boreal forests to downstream lakes and oceans by 20-

40%, depending on how strongly they bind to organic matter.

Page 9: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

1

Background

The boreal landscape

The boreal forest region is one of the world’s largest terrestrial biomes,

covering approximately 12,000,000 km2. This represents 2.3% of Earth’s

total surface and 8.0% of its land area. The boreal forests cover much of

Fennoscandia and Russia on the Eurasian continent, including the northern

parts of Kazakhstan, Mongolia and Japan. It also stretches across North

American, covering large parts of Canada and northern USA. In total, 21% of

the world’s forests are found in the boreal forest region. (Hassan et al., 2005)

However, the boreal landscape is not all forests. During the Holocene

large volumes of peat have been formed in the boreal landscape, which has

made boreal wetlands one of the largest carbon pools in the biosphere. It is

estimated that the amount of carbon currently held in boreal wetlands

corresponds to 40% of the carbon in the atmosphere (Turunen et al., 2002).

On a global scale it is estimated that approximately half of the wetlands have

been lost (Fraser and Keddy, 2005), but yet peat-forming wetlands alone

cover 3% of Earth’s land area (Limpens et al., 2008). Four fifths of the peat-

forming wetlands are found in the cold or temperate regions of the northern

hemisphere, and boreal and subarctic wetlands combined are estimated to

cover an area of 3,500,000 km2 (Gorham, 1991). Large wetland areas are

found, for instance, in the West Siberian Plains in Russia and in the Hudson

Bay Lowlands in Canada. In Sweden, 20% of the area is classified as

wetlands (Nilsson et al., 2001).

One key factor in the development of wetlands is the hydrology. Although

the boreal region in general is not characterised by particularly high

precipitation, the relatively low evapotranspiration still allows a

comparatively high runoff. For example, the European part of the boreal

hydroregion has an average runoff of 364 mm a-1 (Meybeck et al., 2013).

This runoff is generated by a fine network of watercourses, which cuts

through the boreal landscape. For example, it is estimated that there on

average is one kilometre of stream in every square kilometre in Sweden

(Bishop et al., 2008). Understandably, most of these streams are small –

more than 90% of the streams have catchment areas smaller than 15 km2 –

but in force of their number they still play an important role for the transport

of water from the boreal forests and wetlands to major rivers, lakes and,

eventually, the sea. With the stream water flows a multitude of dissolved and

suspended material, which has been derived partly from weathering of local

soils and bedrock, partly from atmospheric deposition. This thesis is about

the incessant fluxes of metals from the forest soils of the boreal landscape,

sometimes through wetlands, sometimes following deep groundwater

pathways, and out into the streams.

Page 10: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

2

The biogeochemical cycles of metals

The biogeochemical cycles of metals are typically characterised by long –

even on geological timescales – residence times in the geosphere. Near the

surface mechanical and chemical processes will attack the minerals,

gradually transforming bedrock into soils and releasing elements from the

mineral matrix into a dissolved form. With few exceptions, weathering of

minerals is the major source of the elements that are found at Earth’s

surface. The mean global rate of rock weathering has been estimated to

0.11 kg m-2 a-1 (Wakatsuki and Rasyidin, 1992). Assuming an average density

of 2,700 kg m-3, this implies that an amount corresponding to ca. 4.1 cm of

bedrock is lost in 1,000 years. On average ca. 20% of this loss is caused by

chemical weathering and 80% by mechanical weathering, but it varies

greatly between different regions (Ingri, 2012; Schlesinger and Bernhardt,

2013).

For the material that is mobilised from the mineral matrix a wide range of

biogeochemical processes may affect its further fate, e.g. biological uptake,

precipitation of secondary minerals, coprecipitation and various sorption-

desorption processes to different types of surfaces. However, groundwater

and surface water will strive to transport the metals downstream until they

reach the sea. Here, a small fraction of the metals can be mobilised into the

atmosphere and be transported back to terrestrial environments, but this

mainly important for metals, which occur in high concentrations in sea

water, and in regions close to the sea. For instance, it is estimated that 8% of

the average runoff of sodium is so-called cyclic salt (Ingri, 2012). Sodium in

seawater has turnover time of 55 million years, while the turnover time for

uranium has been estimated to 320,000-560,000 years (Dunk et al., 2002).

However, most of the material will sooner or later end up in sediments,

where it eventually will be incorporated into the geosphere by lithification.

Often when discussing metals this is described as their geochemical cycle,

while the term biogeochemical is reserved for biological key elements like

oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur. However, although the

biological fluxes of metals in many cases may be insignificant from a

quantitative perspective, they may still be of decisive importance in the

ecosystem. Many metals are nutrients so too low metal concentrations can

be harmful to biota. Even more metals are toxic in too high concentrations –

and this also includes many essential metals – so environmental problems

may also occur in relation with too high accessibility of metals. Because

environmental problems caused by metals often require an assessment of the

uptake in biota and the transport within ecosystems the term biogeochemical

cycle is justified also for the metals. Understanding only the abiotic side of

the metal cycling will often not suffice.

In addition to the natural processes that were discussed above there is also

an anthropogenic impact on the biogeochemistry of metals. In some cases,

Page 11: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

3

such as lead, anthropogenic emissions can be traced back to prehistoric

times (Bindler, 2006), and the emissions have been so large that

atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic lead dominates over weathering-

derived lead in runoff (Klaminder et al., 2006). Given the modern

technological advancements the trend is that the biogeochemical cycles of

more and more metals are being significantly affected by human activities

(Sen and Peucker-Ehrenbrink, 2012).

Radioactivity in the environment

Radioactivity is a ubiquitous and – mostly – natural part of the environment.

The dominating source of radioactivity in the environment is radionuclides

that were present in the material, from which the Earth was formed. This

group is referred to as the primordial radionuclides, which include many

long-lived radionuclides like 40K, 235U, 238U and 232Th. The three latter

radionuclides are also the starting points of the naturally occurring decay

chains, which contain radiologically important radionuclides like 226Ra and 222Rn (Fig. 1).

PbPoBiPb

Tl

Po

BiPb

PoRnRaThUPaThU

dda

m

sm

m

mdakakahdGa

206

4.138

210

01.5

210

3.22

210

30.1

210

164

214

9.19214

27

214

10.3

218

8235.3

222

1600

226

4.75

230

246

234

69.6

234

10.24

234

47.4

238

%02.0

%98.99

Figure 1. The uranium (or radium) decay chain. Half-lives are given under the arrows and decay mode above

them. All members of the uranium decay chain have mass number of the form A=4n+2, where n is an integer.

In closed systems the decay chain dynamics will cause all daughter

radionuclides to reach essentially the same activity as 238U. This state is

known as secular equilibrium, but it typically takes approximately five-six

half-lives of the daughter radionuclide. Secular equilibrium can also be

established in parts of the decay chain, when the half-life of a parent

radionuclide is much longer than the half-life of its daughters. For instance, 222Rn will reach secular equilibrium with its parent, 226Ra, after

approximately one month in closed system. The uranium decay chain is also

the origin of 234U, which is discussed in Paper III.

The other decay chain that is discussed in this thesis is the thorium chain

(Fig. 2). Compared to the uranium decay chain the members of the thorium

Page 12: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

4

decay chain have short half-lives, the most long-lived daughter being 228Ra

with a half-life of 5.76 years.

Pb

Tl

PoBi

PbPoRnRaThAcRaTh

mm

sh

hdsdahaGa

208

053.3

208

25

298.0

212

009.1212

64.10

212

145.0

216

56.5

220

36.3

224

913.1

228

15.6

228

76.5

228

0.14

232

%9.35

%1.64

Figure 2. The thorium decay chain. The letters above the arrows indicate decay mode, and the half-lives are

given below the arrows. All members of the thorium decay chain have mass number of the form A=4n.

Another type of natural radioactivity derives from the cosmic radiation that

ceaselessly bombards Earth’s atmosphere. These are the so-called

cosmogenic radionuclides, which typically are formed in the atmosphere.

Important radionuclides in this group are, for instance, 22Na, 14C, 7Be and 3H.

Compared to the primordial radionuclides this group is often characterised

by comparatively short half-lives, and their occurrence in various

environments is dependent on an input from the atmosphere.

However, there are also radionuclides in the environment, which do not

naturally belong there. These radionuclides are present in the environment

as a result of human activities. To some extent this group overlaps the

primordial and cosmogenic radionuclides in terms of radionuclides, but

there are also several purely artificial radionuclides or radionuclides that

only exist naturally in trace amounts, e.g. 90Sr, 99Tc, 129I, 137Cs and several

transuranium isotopes. Major releases of anthropogenic radioactivity have

occurred when testing nuclear weapons, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s

when atmospheric tests were used, and in connection with nuclear disasters

such as the Chernobyl accident in 1986 or the Fukushima accident in 2011.

Radioactivity has also been used by society in many common applications,

ranging from medicine to smoke detectors, which also causes emissions to

the environment.

The hazards of radioactivity are related to the ionising radiation that is

emitted by decaying radionuclides. When a radionuclide decays, a small

fraction of its mass is transformed into energy, following the equation of

mass-energy equivalence:

E=mc2 (Equation 1)

Page 13: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

5

where E denotes energy, m mass and c the speed of light. Depending on how

the radionuclide decays there will be different types of radiation, e.g. alpha

radiation, beta radiation and gamma radiation. Ionising radiation is

generally harmful and potentially lethal to living organisms. One notorious

example is 222Rn, an intermediate decay product of 238U, which for many

people represents the largest source of exposure to ionising radiation. It is

believed that 222Rn – second to smoking – is the most important contributor

to lung cancer, annually causing 22,000 deaths in the USA alone (Zielinski et

al., 2006).

Due to the hazards that are associated with ionising radiation it is

necessary to protect both humans and the environment from being exposed

to harmful radiation doses. The branch of science that deals with assessment

of radioactive substances in the environment and the estimation of radiation

doses is called radioecology. Important tasks in radioecological assessments

are to determine the transport and fate of radionuclides in the environment

and to predict the uptake of radionuclides in biota so that reliable radiation

doses can be estimated. Here there are obvious connections to the study of

biogeochemical cycles. In the case of uranium and thorium the most

important isotopes occur naturally so there are good opportunities to study

their long-term behaviour in the environment. In other cases there are stable

isotopes, which can be used as natural analogues for the assessment of the

long-term fate of artificial radioisotopes in various environments. Only in a

few cases is this impossible, since the elements in question occur naturally

only in extremely small amounts. This concerns, for instance, technetium,

neptunium, plutonium and americium, for which other elements often must

be used as natural analogues in environmental assessments.

Transport of metals in the boreal landscape

The mobility of a metal through in boreal landscape is the result of complex

interactions between a large number of factors, e.g. pH, redox conditions,

speciation, total concentrations, biological activity etc. Since the transport of

metals generally is mediated by water, the mobility of a metal is closely

linked to its ability to remain in the water once it has been mobilised. Often

material is said to be dissolved in the water if passes through a filter,

commonly with pore size of 0.45 µm or 0.22 µm, while anything that cannot

pass through a filter is defined as particulate material (Gustafsson and

Gschwend, 1997). This is purely operational definition, and there are no

special reasons to expect a fundamentally different behaviour between

0.44 µm solutes and 0.46 µm particles. However, based on this definition

being dissolved in the water does not always imply that metals occur as free

ions in the water. Although this often is the case with, for example, the alkali

metals, other metals commonly form various complexes. Hexavalent

uranium, U6+, for instance, tends to form uranyl (UO22+) in the aqueous

Page 14: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

6

phase, which in turn may form other larger complexes. In carbonate-rich

areas, for example, uranyl can form neutral or anionic carbonate complexes,

which often greatly enhances the mobility of uranium in those environments

(Wazne et al., 2003). Apart from these yet relatively small complexes, there

are also appreciably larger molecules or molecule complexes present in the

water, onto which metals can sorb. Hence, sorption does not only occur onto

solid material, but also onto material that is dissolved in the water – so-

called colloids. Colloids are often operationally defined as anything larger

than 1 kDa but still filterable, but an alternative definition has been

suggested by Gustafsson and Gschwend (1997), stating that a colloid is a

“constituent that provides a molecular milieu into and onto which

chemicals can escape from the aqueous solution”. As opposed to particles,

colloids are not considered to be significantly affected by gravitational forces

and will therefore not settle in sediments – unless they are somehow

destabilised. Colloids are highly important for the transport of many metals

in boreal waters (Gustafsson et al., 2000; Pokrovsky and Schott, 2002;

Lyven et al., 2003; Andersson et al., 2006; Dahlqvist et al., 2007; Pokrovsky

et al., 2010). Two important types of colloids in boreal waters are organic

colloids, essentially dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and Fe colloids. Boreal

rivers are characterised by high concentrations of DOC due to the relatively

high primary production rates and the low decomposition rates.

Watercourses in the boreal landscape usually have DOC concentrations

around 10 mg L-1, but significantly higher concentrations occur in smaller

streams and, particularly, in wetland dominated catchments (Ingri, 2012).

Since many metals have a high affinity for organic matter, they easily bind to

DOC. As DOC per definition is dissolved in the water, the metals will

technically remain dissolved, although they may no longer be present in the

aqueous phase. Thus, colloids are especially important for the mobility of

metals with low solubility and low affinity for the aqueous phase.

Objectives

The primary objective of this thesis was to gain a better understanding of the

biogeochemical cycling of metals – particularly the radioactive metals

uranium, thorium and radium – in the heterogeneous boreal landscape.

Since metals represent important nutrients in the forest landscape as well as

existent and potential pollutants, such knowledge is important for our ability

to manage and protect the environment.

The Krycklan catchment was chosen as a study site not because it has

particularly high levels of radioactivity or pollution, but because the well-

developed research infrastructure allowed a process based approach, which

facilitates a generalisation of the conclusions. The objective was not

primarily to understand Krycklan, but to understand metal dynamics in the

boreal landscape. The idea was to apply a landscape perspective to the fluxes

Page 15: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

7

of metals so that the role of various landscape units could be indentified on

the catchment scale.

More specifically:

The purpose of Paper I was to investigate and explain the

spatiotemporal variability of uranium and thorium in small boreal

streams from a landscape perspective.

The purpose of Paper II was to investigate the distribution and

inventories of natural radionuclides (238U, 232Th and 226Ra) in order to

better understand what happens to metals in wetlands. By using a

mass balance approach and comparing historical and contemporary

fluxes this also provided a way to test the conclusions of Paper I.

In Paper III the objective was to study the mobilisation and transport

of uranium on the landscape level in more detail, particularly with

focus on the importance of deep groundwater, using uranium isotopes

in combination with 18O, a well-known hydrological tracer.

The objective of Paper IV was to generalise the conclusions of

primarily Paper I and Paper II by broadening the perspective to a

wider range of metals. The idea was to link their large-scale transport

in the boreal landscape to fundamental chemical properties by

comparing their spatial patterns.

Page 16: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

8

Materials and methods

The Krycklan catchment

The Krycklan catchment is located in northern Sweden (64o14´ N, 19o46´ E),

ca. 50 km northwest of Umeå. Environmental research has been conducted

in the area since the early 20th century, and continuous meteorological,

hydrological and hydrochemical measurements are available from 1980.

Initially, only the so-called Nyänget catchment (C7) was monitored, but as

the Krycklan Catchment Study (KCS) was launched in 2002 the monitoring

was expanded to more streams, including C16, which today is known as the

Krycklan outlet (Fig. 3). KCS is also an integrate part of the Svartberget

Experimental Forests and the Svartberget LTER (Long Term Ecological

Research Network).

Figure 3. The Krycklan catchment as seen from the southeast. Note the extensive stream network (blue) and

the scarcity of wetlands (yellow) in the lower parts of the catchment, which are dominated by glaciofluvial silt

and sand deposits. Forests are shown in green and agricultural land in brown. The red markers show the

sampling sites used in Paper IV.

Page 17: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

9

KCS is still centred around the monitoring of hydrology and biogeochemistry

in various types of streams, ranging from small forest- or wetland-dominated

headwater streams to larger mixed streams, but nowadays the research

program also includes riparian soils, soil frost manipulation, atmospheric

exchange, deep groundwater, stream ecology and detailed studies of the mire

Kallkälsmyran (C4) and the lake Stortjärnen (C5) to mention a few on-going

projects.

The entire Krycklan catchment covers an area of 68 km2, which

corresponds to ca. 5.4‰ of the catchment of the Vindel River, to which it

drains. The landscape is dominated by coniferous forests, but also contains

some agricultural land (1.9%), lakes (1.0%) and wetlands (8.7%). Most of the

wetlands are found in the upper till-dominated areas of the Krycklan

catchments, while the lower parts are dominated by deep glaciofluvial sand

and silt deposits (Fig. 3). Detailed descriptions of the catchment can be

found in Papers I, III and IV.

Methodology

The thesis is largely based on sampling of a number of streams in the

Krycklan catchment. In Paper IV all streams that were regularly sampled at

the time were included, while Paper I and Paper III are based on a subset of

these streams. Paper II focuses on only one of the subcatchments in

Krycklan (C4), but takes advantage of the general understanding of the

fluxes of uranium and thorium from Paper I in order to estimate the input of

radionuclides to the mire.

From a statistical viewpoint the sampling and analysis of streams and

other watercourses is an underdeveloped area. However, if the objective is to

make statistically representative observations of the water leaving a

catchment, the large variability in discharge makes it clear that the sampling

cannot be random in time. Baseflow conditions may persist for long periods

of time without leading to particularly high cumulative volumes, while the

spring flood or rain storms may cause discharges that transport large

volumes of water and solutes under short periods of time. Therefore, the

sampling of stream water was more intense during periods of high discharge.

The focus of the thesis has been fluxes rather than concentrations, since

fluxes are what is needed to construct mass balances. As concept a mass

balance is very simple – without plunging into details the general mass

balance for metals in the boreal landscape should consider the losses of

material from local soils by weathering, the atmospheric deposition, the

export by runoff and the accumulation within various landscape units

(Fig. 4). However, in practice it is not easy to piece the picture together, since

many of the fluxes and inventories are notoriously difficult to quantify. Yet,

mass balances are among the most powerful tools there are in environmental

studies. Without establishing a consistent mass balance for a studied system,

Page 18: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

10

it is hard to claim that one really understands it. Although it is beyond the

scope of this thesis to present a complete mass balance, this approach has

still been methodologically important in the undertaking of the study.

Figure 4. The landscape puzzle – in order to establish a consistent mass balance on the catchment level all

puzzle pieces must fit together. Losses from local soils and historical atmospheric deposition must add up to

the accumulation in the landscape and historical losses by runoff.

As regards the stream or river fluxes no widely established methods exist for

the sampling of water and the calculation of fluxes, let alone methods to

quantify the uncertainties (Johnes, 2007; Barlund et al., 2009). Again, it is

beyond the scope of this thesis to develop such methods so unfortunately the

results largely lack a thorough assessment of uncertainties. However, a novel

method to calculate the stream fluxes was used, which is based on

interpolation of concentrations over the cumulative flux, rather than over the

Page 19: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

11

time (Papers I and IV). This method recognises that discharge – rather than

time – is an important driver behind the hydrochemical dynamics of streams

(Seibert et al., 2009). The autocorrelation that exists within the streams is

probably better expressed over a scale of cumulative discharge than over

time. For example, during baseflow conditions relatively long periods of time

can elapse without dramatic changes in the hydrochemistry, while the

stream water concentrations can change very rapidly in connection with

hydrological episodes such as the spring flood (Lidman et al., 2011).

An important methodological aspect for the possibilities to generalise the

results is that there is enough data to allow a statistical analysis. Whenever it

is possible to establish statistical relationship, this provides a way to reach

beyond the specific sites that are studied. However, when comparing metal

fluxes from catchments, collecting observations requires considerable

efforts. Every observation is based on numerous measurements of stream

chemistry and stream discharge. From a statistical perspective it would

obviously have been better with more observations, but this must be weighed

against the work and the resources required in order to produce a reliable

estimation of the export from a catchment.

The fact that some of the streams in the Krycklan catchment are

connected also constitutes a statistical problem. This implies that any

observations made in two connected streams are not entirely independent,

which is a fundamental requirement for most statistical analyses. There are

different ways to handle this problem, but in Paper I we compare the results

of using the complete, but slightly biased, dataset (n=10) to the results of

using only completely independent streams (n=6). It turns out that the

exclusion of nested streams rarely affects the slope and the intercept of

regressions considerably, but more so the statistical significance. Given the

relatively small number of observations, however, this is not surprising.

Analytical techniques

The analyses of various hydrochemical parameters are based on established

techniques such as ICP-SFMS and gamma spectrometry. Mass spectrometry

is today a standard method for the measurement of element concentrations

and it can in principle be used whenever the isotope in question occurs in

sufficiently high concentrations or when the isotope safely – that is without

too much contamination – can be preconcentrated to sufficiently high

concentrations. Sometimes, as in the case of 234U in Paper III, it may also be

necessary to separate the isotopes from other elements, which may disturb

the analysis. In some cases, especially when it concerns radionuclides with

short half-lives, it is more convenient to use radiometric techniques such as

alpha and gamma spectrometry, respectively. Since radiometric techniques

measure the decay of radionuclides rather than the number of atoms (as

mass spectrometry), they are often more suitable for short-lived

Page 20: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

12

radionuclides, which tend to occur in low concentrations. Gamma

spectrometry detects the gamma radiation that is emitted when some

radionuclides decay. Because every gamma-emitting radionuclide emits

gamma particles with distinct energies it is possible to identify the emitting

radionuclide by measuring the energy of the gamma particle. By counting the

number of gamma particles received during a certain time interval and

accounting for factors such as branching ratios and measuring efficiency it is

possible to determine the activity of the radionuclide in question. In practice,

detecting gamma radiation over a wide energy spectrum will lead to the

development of distinct peaks, whenever gamma-emitting radionuclides are

present (Fig. 5). The isotopic analyses of uranium, thorium and radium

presented in this thesis were made in cooperation with the Swedish Defence

Research Agency (FOI) in Umeå using both ICP-SFMS and gamma

spectrometry. Details can be found in the respective papers.

Figure 5. Screen dump from GammaVision showing the gamma spectrum between ca. 130 keV and 630 keV

for peat collected near the outlet of Kallkälsmyran (sample J300-350 in paper II).

Page 21: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

13

Thermodynamic modelling

It is well-known that many metals easily bind to organic matter. As the

affinity for organic matter throughout the course of this project emerged as

one of the most important properties for understanding the differences in

behaviour between different metals, there was a need define more precisely

what “affinity for organic matter” means (Paper IV). Ideally, one would wish

to quantify the affinity for organic matter by some direct measurement

technique, but unfortunately such measurements are not straightforward

and cannot easily be applied to a large number of samples. Instead,

thermodynamic modelling was used to estimate the affinity for organic

matter. These models are, in turn, based on comprehensive thermodynamic

databases of various binding constants, often including the binding of

various metals to organic matter (Gustafsson, 2001; Milne et al., 2003;

Tipping et al., 2011).

Besides that it is a simple method, one of the major advantages of using

thermodynamic modelling is that it can account for the hydrochemistry of

each location. Classifying metals as organophilic or organophobic on a

general level is not very useful, since their binding to organic matter is so

dependent on the environment, e.g. as regards pH and concentrations of

various ligands. Uranium, for example, has a high affinity for organic matter

in the Krycklan catchment (Paper IV), but in areas with higher carbonate

concentrations uranium will form highly mobile complexes, and,

consequently, uranium cannot be expected to bind as strongly to organic

matter in these environments (Åström et al., 2009). Hence, a sensible

definition of the affinity for organic matter should be able to account for the

effects of varying hydrochemical conditions. Using thermodynamic

modelling is a method that fulfils this criterion.

Page 22: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

14

Results and discussion

Uranium and thorium in the boreal landscape

Paper I revealed a considerable spatiotemporal variability in the

concentrations and fluxes of uranium and thorium in the investigated

streams. For example, the flux of uranium ranged from 1.7 g km-2 a-1 at the

outlet of Lake Stortjärnen (C5) to 30 g km-2 a-1 in one of the larger streams

passing through the silt- and sand-dominated parts of the Krycklan

catchment (C14). This is a nearly 18-fold difference only within the relatively

small Krycklan catchment. Similar, but less extreme, patterns were observed

for thorium. By comparing the fluxes to a wide range of catchment

characteristics, including airborne gamma spectrometric analyses of the

local soils, and various hydrochemical parameters it was concluded that the

differences in flux were caused mainly by the wetlands. In addition, it was

also concluded that there were significantly higher fluxes of uranium and

thorium from the glaciofluvial sediments than from the till soils.

One prediction of Paper I was that there should be a considerable

accumulation of uranium and thorium in the wetlands of the Krycklan

catchment. Hence, Paper II, in which the inventory and distribution of

radionuclides in one of the mires in Krycklan were investigated, was partly

an attempt to falsify the conclusions of Paper I. The results of Paper II

demonstrated that there had been an significant accumulation of both

uranium and thorium in the peat, primarily along the edges of the mire. By

using the results of Paper I it was possible to construct a radionuclide budget

for the mire, thereby quantifying the current accumulation of uranium and

thorium in the peat. Based on the observed concentrations of uranium and

thorium in the peat it was also possible to make a crude estimation of the

total inventories of these elements in the mire. By making some assumptions

concerning the evolution of the mire it was therefore possible to compare the

current and historical accumulation of uranium and thorium. Arguably, the

uncertainties were considerable, but the accumulation and the fluxes

appeared to be consistent, possibly with a tendency towards higher

accumulation rates in the past. Needless to say, the uncertainties could be

decreased significantly by analysing larger parts of the mire. This should also

include dating of the peat and the analysis of more elements, which would

provide more support and allow a comparison of elements with contrasting

biogeochemical properties as in Paper IV.

The conclusion that the fluxes of uranium are controlled by the wetlands

was further strengthened by the observation that the 234U/238U ratio in

wetland- and forest-dominated catchment, respectively, did not differ

(Paper III). This suggests that the mobilisation of uranium in both cases

Page 23: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

15

takes place under similar circumstances, presumably in the mineral soils of

the forest, and that the differences in concentrations arise elsewhere. Thus,

this is consistent with the idea that uranium is accumulating in the wetlands.

A generalised model for metal transport in the boreal landscape

The patterns discussed above are not unique for uranium and thorium.

When compiling data from the Krycklan catchment and estimating fluxes, it

turned out that most metals, which have been analysed frequently enough to

allow the estimation of fluxes in the Krycklan catchment, share the same

dependence on the wetland coverage (Paper IV). However, the impact of

wetlands was not equally strong for all metals. By using thermodynamic

modelling to quantify the affinity for organic matter it was possible to

statistically confirm that there was a stronger accumulation of more

organophilic metals in wetland – on the landscape level. A simple linear

model relying only on two explanatory variables – the wetland coverage and

the affinity for organic matter – could explain as much as 73% of the spatial

variance in the fluxes of the investigated metals, thereby linking the large-

scale transport of metals in the landscape to fundamental chemical

properties of the elements in question. By restraining the analysis to the

small streams (<10 km2) the explanatory power increased to 88%, which is

remarkable given the complexity and heterogeneity of the boreal landscape

and the number of processes that potentially could be involved in the

transport of these elements.

In paper IV it is suggested that the wetlands affect the fluxes of metals

mainly in two ways. Firstly, all metals that are derived principally by

weathering will decrease because peat does not contain nearly as much

minerals that can be weathered as mineral soils do. Hence, the fluxes

elements like sodium and silicon with a low affinity for organic matter will

decrease by a fraction that corresponds to the wetland coverage – if there is

10% wetlands in a catchment, the amount of mineral soils will be 10% lower

and, thus, the total weathering in the catchment should be approximately

10% lower than in a catchment with no wetlands. Indeed, this is what the

model of Paper IV predicts for such elements. Secondly, wetlands will

accumulate metals in relation to how strong affinity for organic matter they

have. For the most organophilic metals the accumulation is nearly as

important as the decreased weathering. Further research is needed to

explain why that is, but possibly the slope of regression is somehow related

to competition between the peat and the dissolved organic matter, which

presumably is the main vector for the transport of organophilic elements

through the peat.

Paper IV arguably presents a simplified model for the transport of metals

in the boreal landscape, but the simplifications are justified by the model’s

explanatory power. Clearly, the model must capture some of the key

Page 24: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

16

processes that control the fluxes of metals in these environments, but

whether that is the hypothesised processes is utterly an open question. The

dependence on the modelled affinity for organic matter is no guarantee that

sorption to organic matter indeed is the main mode of accumulation for all

investigated elements. Decisive evidence must include a chemical analysis of

how the various metals are bound in the peat. However, even in areas with

considerably higher uranium concentrations, uranium in peat predominately

seems to be found in the organic fraction (Schöner et al., 2009).

In Paper II, where one of the mires in the Krycklan catchment was

investigated, only gamma spectrometry was used to analyse the peat

samples. Hence, most of the elements included in Paper IV are missing.

However, it was clear that uranium and thorium, which have a high affinity

for organic matter (even if it could not be quantified for thorium), were

found in comparatively high activities along the edges of the mire, whereas 226Ra, which by analogy with barium, should have considerably lower affinity

for organic matter, was found in relatively high activities further out it the

peat. Partly this could be caused by the fact that 226Ra is produced by the

radioactive decay of 230Th in the mire, but it also suggests that radium is

more mobile than uranium and thorium in peat. This is consistent with

observations of other alkaline earth elements in Paper IV such as calcium,

strontium and barium. Moreover, potassium, which has a low affinity for

organic matter, had not accumulated in the peat in the same way as the other

analysed elements. Although potassium appears not to be controlled

principally by wetlands on the landscape level, its comparatively high

mobility suggests that sodium too would be mobile in the peat. This is in

agreement with the patterns observed in Paper IV.

Concerning potassium it must also be emphasised that the model was

unsuccessful in explaining the spatial patterns not only for potassium, but

also rubidium, caesium, iron, manganese, cadmium, lead and cobalt. It is

beyond the scope of this thesis to explain why they do not adhere to the

general pattern, but it is certainly worth investigating closer. Not only would

it be interesting to know what processes that control their fate, but it is also

important to understand the limitations of the model. Likewise, it would be

reassuring if similar results could be reproduced at other sites.

Getting the puzzle right…

Figure 4 illustrates the mass balance of the boreal landscape as a puzzle.

Paper II is essentially an attempt to fit two of the puzzle pieces together,

namely the export by runoff and the accumulation in wetlands. Based on the

current fluxes of uranium and thorium to the investigated mire and the

fluxes of these elements in the stream that drains it (C4) it is possible to

estimate how much that annually is accumulating in the peat. Based on the

measurements of uranium and thorium in the mire it is also possible to

Page 25: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

17

make a crude estimation of the inventories of these elements. As no parts of

the mire have been dated yet, much of its evolution remains obscure.

Accordingly, it is unclear for how long the accumulation has been going on.

Arguably, the uncertainties could also be decreased significantly by

constraining the element budgets better and by analysing more samples

from the mire, preferably including more elements. Yet, the amounts of

uranium and thorium that were encountered in the mire seem plausible

judging from the current fluxes and the current accumulation of these

elements. Regrettably, no budget could be established for 226Ra, which would

have been interesting, since it has a half-live on the same timescale as the

age of the mire (1,600 years). Therefore, 226Ra could be a useful tracer for the

transport and accumulation in the mire.

While the reasonably good agreement between the fluxes of uranium and

thorium in the landscape and the historical accumulation in the investigated

mire – given the uncertainties – is promising, these puzzle pieces must also

be compared to the amount of uranium and thorium that has been lost from

the surrounding till. Such quantifications of the losses of various metals from

local soils are, again, beyond the scope of this thesis, but it would no doubt

be a valuable addition. Previous studies have indicated that the historical

weathering rates in northern Sweden may have been higher than they

currently are (Land et al., 1999).

In the case of uranium and thorium, precipitation is a relatively

unimportant source (Paper I). For other elements, however, it is potentially a

major source or at least a significant contributor to the export (Paper IV). No

attempts were made in Paper IV to account for the potential contribution of

precipitation to the stream water fluxes because it is hard to do in a

consistent and reliable way. Recent research has demonstrated that not even

chloride always is conservative in forest ecosystems, suggesting that such

assumptions would be problematic also for many metals (Svensson et al.,

2012). Furthermore, for chromium, nickel and copper corrections for the

atmospheric deposition would be outright impossible based on the available

data, since the atmospheric deposition in at least some of the investigated

catchments is higher than the export by runoff (Paper IV). Apparently, there

must be a significant retention of these metals in the landscape. This is in

accordance with previous investigations of lead in the Krycklan catchment,

where isotopes were used to differentiate between anthropogenic and

geogenic lead. Although the lead deposition historically has been high

enough to dominate as a source for lead in the stream water, most of the

deposited lead still remains in the soils and the retention time is measured in

centuries (Klaminder et al., 2006; Klaminder et al., 2008).

Evidently, much work remains before all pieces are in place, but one thing

is clear from the results presented in this thesis, and that is that there is a

considerable redistribution of metals within the boreal landscape – from the

Page 26: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

18

forest soils to the wetlands. Hence, the accumulation within the landscape

cannot be left out of the landscape puzzle (Fig. 4). Simply stating that the

runoff is equal to the deposition plus the net weathering is not correct.

Assuming an average wetland coverage of 20% (Nilsson et al., 2001), the

average losses from the forest soils would be underestimated by at least 20%,

in the case of the most organophilic metals as much as 40%, using that

approach.

It is also important to understand the role of wetlands for predicting the

fate of various pollutants in the boreal landscape. Since Paper IV is based

mainly on weathering products, which consequently reach the wetlands by

groundwater advection, the conclusions should apply mainly for pollutants

that are released to the groundwater, i.e. not atmospherically deposited

pollutants. From this perspective, the successful linking of the long-term

transport of metals in the landscape and their fundamental chemical

properties is important because it allows a way to predict the fate of artificial

elements like technetium, neptunium, plutonium, americium and curium in

the boreal landscape. While the chemical properties of these elements can be

studied in laboratory experiments, in small-scale experiments or – in some

cases – by using anthropogenic emissions, it is difficult to study their

behaviour in the environment over timescales of thousands of years. Hence,

one must try to understand the chemistry of these elements as good as

possible using small-scale experiments and then rely on the process

understanding of the environment for extrapolation of the results.

Equation 1 from paper IV provides one approach to assess the long-term fate

of artificial radionuclides in boreal wetlands.

Many small streams...

The proverb “many small streams make one big river” suggests that the

importance of small streams would be a wide-spread popular insight.

Perhaps it is, but nevertheless small streams have traditionally often been

overlooked in national monitoring programmes as well as in science (Bishop

et al., 2008). While it is clear that the small streams represent the vast

majority of the stream length, it still appears to be an open question to what

extent the small streams contribute to the runoff in the boreal landscape. In

Krycklan, which is a fourth order stream, approximately 50% of the

catchment area drains to first order streams and another 30% to second

order streams. Accordingly, approximately 80% of the catchment area is

drained by first or second order streams, leaving only 20% for the larger

third or fourth order streams. One might expect the areal contribution of

small streams to be lower in the catchments of larger rivers, and furthermore

the annual specific discharge may increase with the catchment size due to

outflow of deep groundwater (Lyon et al., 2012, Paper III). Yet, there are

strong reasons to believe that a considerable portion of the discharge even in

Page 27: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

19

major rivers is generated in small streams. Thus, understanding the small

streams is important also for understanding the hydrology, the

hydrochemistry and the element fluxes on larger scales.

Temnerud and Bishop (2005) have previously demonstrated that there is

a remarkable variability in the hydrochemistry of small streams, an

observation that is fully valid also with respect to many trace metals

(Paper IV). In a way, this is understandable, since small streams will be

much more sensitive to their surrounding environment than large streams,

but as discussed in Paper III there are also differences in how the water is

transported to the stream channel and how the solutes are mobilised. The

observed increase in 234U/238U ratios with area suggest that there is a gradual

deepening of the hydrological pathways and a lengthening of the residence

times (Paper III). Increasing catchment areas are also associated with a

general shift in the hydrochemistry, including higher concentrations of

hydrogen carbonate, lower concentrations of DOC and higher pH (Paper I,

Fig. 6). Based on data from Paper IV, pH is strongly correlated to the

logarithm of the catchment area (r=0.89, p<0.001) – increasing the

catchment area by an order of magnitude will increase the pH by 0.71 units.

Figure 6. pH and La/Al ratios (based on fluxes) throughout the Krycklan catchment as a function of the

catchment area. The La/Al ratio is fairly stable in small streams (<2 km2), while the pH gradually increases.

The increasing pH will eventually trigger the precipitation of gibbsite, causing high fluxes of La relative to Al

in larger streams. The graph is based on data from Paper IV.

Page 28: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

20

Inevitably, this also has consequences for the speciation and transport of

metals in small and large streams, respectively. For instance, gibbsite and

ferrihydrite are not thermodynamically stable in the headwaters in Krycklan

due to the low pH and the high concentrations of DOC, but as pH increases

downstream, Fe and Al will precipitate, forming colloids and particles

(Neubauer et al., 2013; Fig. 6). In the Krycklan catchment significant

amounts of particles are present when the catchment areas reach few square

kilometres, which typically means that pH is between 5 and 6. This marks a

profound difference between small and large streams, which has

implications for several metals. For instance, there is a constant ratio

between the fluxes of lanthanum and aluminium in the smallest streams,

indicating that they are mobilised and transported in a similar manner, but

as the pH of the stream water increases and saturation with respect to

gibbsite is reached, the La/Al ratio starts to increase due to removal of

aluminium from solution and increased mobilisation of lanthanum (Figure

6). The appearance of non-organic colloids in the streams is likely to affect

various metals differently (Dahlqvist et al., 2007).

This is probably the explanation to some the shortcomings of the model

presented in Paper IV, in particular its inability to accurately predict the

fluxes in the larger streams. When the transport of dissolved aluminium is

limited by precipitation of gibbsite, the model currently has no ways to

account for this. Judging from the fluxes, some metals, chromium for

instance, appear to follow aluminium or iron into the particulate phase,

while other metals such as lanthanum and uranium do not (Paper IV).

Further research is needed, however, to confirm that these trends are caused

by the suggested mechanisms, but linking a detailed understanding of the

chemical speciation and the chemical reactions to the large-scale behaviour

of elements in the landscape ought to be a prioritised task for contemporary

biogeochemistry.

Final remarks

The entire Krycklan catchment represents approximately 6 ppb of the boreal

forest region. Consequently, its contributions to the global or even regional

biogeochemical fluxes are no doubt negligible. Therefore, the relevance of a

venture like the Krycklan Catchment Study ultimately hinges on whether the

conclusions are applicable outside its catchment boundaries. This is why it is

so important to use a process-based approach. Even on an international level

there are relatively few comparable sites in the boreal region with equally

ambitious and focused research on a catchment of this scale. However, in the

comparisons that have been made so far nothing has indicated that the

functioning of Krycklan would be unique in any way (Tetzlaff et al., 2010).

The conclusions of this thesis strongly emphasise the importance of wetlands

for controlling the fluxes of various elements in the boreal landscape. It is

Page 29: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

21

important to note that these patterns are not caused by an exceptional

abundance of wetlands in the Krycklan catchment. On the contrary, the

Krycklan catchment has a wetland coverage of 8.7%, while the wetland

coverage for Sweden has been estimated to 20% (Nilsson et al., 2001) –

more than twice as much in other words.

As discussed in Paper IV, it is doubtful whether the strong impact of

wetlands that has been observed in the Krycklan catchment would be as

salient when comparing larger catchments. As demonstrated by Paper III,

there are differences in the mobilisation of uranium – and most likely many

other elements – between catchments of different areas. More importantly,

however, the extension of wetlands is commonly limited by the topography

so larger streams and rivers cannot be expected to have the same forest-

wetland gradient as the small streams. Hence, one should not expect

wetlands to be the controlling factor on such scales. In fact, Åström et al.

(2009) have already demonstrated that, in the case of uranium, there is a

significant dependence on the uranium concentrations in local soils or on the

hydrogen carbonate concentration in the streams. Nevertheless, wetlands

remain an important part of the landscape, and the fundamental role of the

wetlands is likely to remain the same – it just that the signal might be

blurred in the large rivers. Therefore, the extrapolation of Paper IV,

indicating that wetlands may decrease the fluxes of metals from the boreal

forests to downstream recipients by as much as 40%, is justifiable as a first

approximation. Hence, judging from the results of this thesis, the role of

wetlands for the biogeochemical cycling of metals in the boreal landscape is

significant and deserves more attention.

Page 30: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

22

Author contributions

Paper I:

HL and CMM planned the measurements of trace elements in stream water.

FL analysed the data and wrote the paper with input from HL and CMM.

Paper II

FL sampled the peat cores. FL and ÅB did the field measurements. FL and

HR were responsible for the gamma spectrometry. FL wrote the paper with

insightful comments and support HL, HR and ÅB.

Paper III

FL and other members of the Krycklan catchment study collected the

samples. FL and AV analysed uranium isotopes. APT analysed oxygen

isotopes. FL wrote the paper with intellectual contributions and comments

from HL, APT and AV.

Paper IV

HL and CMM planned the measurements of trace elements in stream water.

HL and SK planned the measurements of major elements in stream water.

FL analysed the data, modelled the affinity for organic matter and wrote the

paper with input from HL, SK and CMM.

Authors:

FL = Fredrik Lidman, HL = Hjalmar Laudon, CMM = Carl-Magnus Mörth,

HR = Henrik Ramebäck, ÅB = Åsa Bengtsson, APT = Andres Peralta Tapia,

AV = Anna Vesterlund, SK = Stephan Köhler

Page 31: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

23

Tackord

Tillkomsten av denna avhandling beror – som så mycket annat – på en rad

fullständigt osannolika händelser. Även om jag växte upp i Vännfors, en by

som ligger bara några mil nedströms Krycklans utlopp, och har tillbringat

många timmar i utspätt krycklanvatten under alla somrar vid Vindelälvens

stränder, krävdes det mycket långa omvägar innan jag slutligen satte min fot

i Krycklans avrinningsområde.

En avgörande händelse inträffade i Uppsala när min och Marias goda vän

– och på den tiden tillika granne – Lina knackade på vårt sovrumsfönster en

sen vårkväll. (Numer känner alla på SKB säkert till henne som fru Christian

Nyström.) Lina hade under en tid sökt sommarjobb och till slut fått tag på en

professor vid SLU som behövde hjälp med ett projekt under sommaren.

Emellertid krävdes det två personer och därför undrade hon nu om inte

Maria ville bli hennes kompanjon. Professorn i fråga var Kevin Bishop och

jobbet gick ut på att kartlägga den bäcknära zonen längs några av

vattendragen i Krycklan. Jag tyckte förstås att det lät utmärkt, eftersom det

för min del skulle innebära en sommar i Norrland. Vid det laget framstod

bara det faktum att det skulle dyka upp ett sommarjobb för hydrologer så

pass nära Vännfors som helt osannolikt, men snart visade det sig att det

fanns en kontaktperson i vid SLU i Umeå som skulle hjälpa dem – och detta

var en viss Hjalmar Laudon. Det är här det verkligt osannolika börjar,

eftersom Hjalmar råkar vara en av mina föräldrars närmstgrannar (som det

heter på norrländska) i Vännfors. Därför kände jag naturligtvis till honom,

men i och med att jag lämnade byn i ungefär samma veva som familjen

Laudon flyttade dit visste jag inte så mycket mer än att han jobbade med

någon form av skogsforskning.

Någon gång den sommaren inledde jag och Hjalmar en diskussion om

bäckar, skogar, myrar och diverse mer eller mindre obskyra ämnen som

finns i dessa miljöer – kort sagt det som i avhandlingens titel benämns

”radionuklidtransport i det boreala landskapet”. Diskussionerna ledde så

småningom till att vi skrev en ansökan till SKB om stöd till ett

doktorandprojekt, vars resultat bland annat utgörs av föreliggande

avhandling.

Som doktorand har det varit en verklig ynnest att få vara med ändå från

början och planera projektet. Tyvärr tror jag att få doktorander ges den

möjligheten. Därför vill jag rikta ett stort tack till Hjalmar för att du redan

från början trodde på mig och på mina idéer. Jag måste också tacka för det

tålamod som du har visat under alla år och för att du vågade ge mig friheten

och ansvaret att ägna mig åt de problem som jag tyckte var viktiga. Det har

varit en spännande intellektuell process – och jag hoppas att den inte är över

än – men samtidigt vill jag betona att forskning, inte minst miljöforskning,

Page 32: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

24

till stora delar är en kollektiv prestation. Oavsett om man anser att jag

genom denna avhandling har bidragit med något västentligt eller inte

kvarstår det faktum att jag inte hade kunnat åstadkomma tillnärmelsevis så

mycket som jag ändå har gjort utan andras hjälp. Därför har det varit en stor

förmån att få arbeta i ett så välstuderat område som Krycklan. Du förtjänar

all heder, Hjalmar, för att du har utvecklat Krycklan till vad det är idag. Ita

res accedent lumina rebus.

Jag måste förstås också tacka SKB som har finansierat hela detta

doktorandprojekt. Förhoppningsvis har denna avhandling i någon mån

bidragit till att fördjupa också er förståelse för hur radionuklider rör sig i det

boreala landskapet. Speciellt vill jag tacka Ulrik Kautsky för att du lät mig

komma och mäta radionuklider i Klarebäcksmossen när jag höll på att

avsluta mina studier i Uppsala och inte minst för det stöd du har gett under

planeringen och genomförandet av detta forskningsprojekt. Jag måste även

tacka Tobias Lindborg och Sten Berglund för gott samarbete under denna

tid. Det har varit glädjande att se hur SKB alltid har visat så stort intresse för

både min forskning och forskning i allmänhet. Jag tror att det är en stor

tillgång för SKB med medarbetare som har ett genuint intresse för forskning,

eftersom det i slutändan är det enda sättet att nå tillförlitliga svar på de svåra

frågorna. I kretsen kring SKB vill jag också tacka Sara Grolander för hjälp

med provtagning i Forsmark. Även om resultaten inte kom med i den här

avhandlingen är de inte desto mindre intressanta och kommer säkert att

dyka upp i något annat sammanhang.

Min biträdande handledare, Stephan Köhler, har varit ett stort moraliskt

stöd när det gäller geokemi och termodynamisk modellering. Vi har inte

sällan haft lite olika infallsvinklar på olika problem, men just därför har

diskussionerna också alltid varit givande. Det är svårt att inte dras med av

din ohejdbara entusiasm och energi.

Jag måste också tacka alla på FOI i Umeå – Henrik Ramebäck, Anna

Vesterlund, Ulrika Nygren, Petra Lagerkvist och Annika Tovedal – som har

hållit ordning på mig och alla isotoper i labbet. Jag är mycket imponerad av

er professionalism när det gäller att analysera radionuklider. Ibland har jag

möjligen stoppat händerna i väl radioaktiva lösningar, men på det stora hela

det varit mycket lärorikt att samarbeta med er. Henrik och Anna har

dessutom varit till stor hjälp under skrivandet av två av avhandlingens

uppsatser.

Under mina år vid EMG och på SLU har jag haft förmånen att arbeta med

många hängivna, toksmarta och inte minst trevliga kollegor – Mahsa, Peder,

Åsa, Ida, Anneli, Andres, Jakob, Viktor, Mark, Tejshree och alla andra som

jobbar i Krycklan (eller andra nästan lika bra avrinningsområden). Även om

omständigheterna har gjort att jag har arbetat en hel del hemifrån har det

alltid varit lika kul att träffa er både på jobbet och annorstädes. Vidare vill

jag tacka alla tidigare och nuvarande (om vi fortfarande finns) medlemmar

Page 33: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

25

av EMG-bandet – Anna, Henrik, Kenyon, Cristoph, Magnus, Martin med

flera – för de himmelska tonerna och det grymma svänget. Jag vill också

tacka mina tidigare kollegor i doktorandsektionens styrelse samt övriga

doktorander på EMG och SLU som har bidragit till att göra de här åren i

Umeå så givande.

Jag måste naturligtvis också tacka alla som har hjälpt mig och Maria att ta

hand om vår växande barnaskara. Utan denna hjälp hade jag sannolikt inte

varit arbetsför. Det finns tillfällen då en god natts sömn är helt ovärderlig.

(Sanningen att säga så tycker jag nästan alltid att den är det.) Inte minst har

farmor och farfar (Ann-Britt och Peter) alltid ställt upp – vardag som helg –

för att underlätta för oss. Mormor och morfar (Birgitta och Stig) har hjälpt

till under somrarna på Idö och har också ofta kommit upp till Umeå för att

ge oss en hjälpande hand. Dessutom har faster Anna, farbror Johan och

kusin Nora samt morbror Eric, moster Miki och kusinerna Hugo och Noah

alltid ställt upp när de har kunnat. Det är lätt att se på tjejerna att de

uppskattar all denna hjälp till och med mer än vad jag och Maria gör.

Under dessa år i Umeå har vi lärt känna många fantastiska människor och

det har även skett en imponerande tillväxt av alldeles nya personer.

Samtidigt finns det några som borde ha fått vara med oss idag, men som

tyvärr inte är det. I synnerhet vill jag därför hedra minnet av Ernst Lidman

(1928-2011) och Kerstin Nilsson (1932-2012).

Till sist vill jag tacka alla mina underbara och undersköna flickor – Klara,

Edith, Elina och Maria – för att ni vill ha mig hos er. Det är märkligt hur helt

främmande personer kan dyka upp i ens liv med sådan självklarhet att man

inte längre kan föreställa sig ett liv utan dem. Därför vill jag tacka för alla

skratt, allt bus, all kärlek, all tågkörning, alla sagostunder och allt ert stöd

under arbetet med denna avhandling. Ich weiß nur, dass der Welt Getümmel

seitdem mir wie ein Traum verweht …

Ja, hä jer behänlet då han köm ehög höre hä ha vyrä å höre hä jer. I veit int mer än ein del söm jer likt å söm heller aller våL annars å hä jer räfshärva.

– Olof Forsgren, Hössjö

Page 34: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

26

References

Andersson, K., Dahlqvist, R., Turner, D., Stolpe, B., Larsson, T., Ingri, J. and Andersson, P.: Colloidal rare earth elements in a boreal river: Changing sources and distributions during the spring flood, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70(13), 3261–3274, doi:10.1016/j.gca.2006.04.021, 2006.

Åström, M. E., Peltola, P., Ronnback, P., Lavergren, U., Bergback, B., Tarvainen, T., Backman, B. and Salminen, R.: Uranium in surface and groundwaters in Boreal Europe, Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 9(1), 51–62, doi:10.1144/1467-7873/08-185, 2009.

Barlund, I., Rankinen, K., Jarvinen, M., Huitu, E., Veijalainen, N. and

Arvola, L.: Three approaches to estimate inorganic nitrogen loading under varying climatic conditions from a headwater catchment in Finland, Hydrology Research, 40(2-3), 167–176, doi:10.2166/nh.2009.058, 2009.

Bindler, R.: Mired in the past -- looking to the future: Geochemistry of peat and the analysis of past environmental changes, Global and Planetary Change, 53(4), 209–221, doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.03.004, 2006.

Bishop, K., Buffam, I., Erlandsson, M., Folster, J., Laudon, H., Seibert, J. and Temnerud, J.: Aqua Incognita: the unknown headwaters, Hydrological Processes, 22(8), 1239–1242, doi:10.1002/hyp.7049, 2008.

Dahlqvist, R., Andersson, K., Ingri, J., Larsson, T., Stolpe, B. and Turner, D.:

Temporal variations of colloidal carrier phases and associated trace elements in a boreal river, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71(22), 5339–5354, doi:10.1016/j.gca.2007.09.016, 2007.

Dunk, R. M., Mills, R. A. and Jenkins, W. J.: A reevaluation of the oceanic uranium budget for the Holocene, Chemical Geology, 190(1-4), 45–67, doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00110-9, 2002.

Fraser, L. H. and Keddy, P. A.: The World’s Largest Wetlands: Ecology and Conservation, Cambridge University Press., 2005.

Gorham, E.: Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable

Responses to Climatic Warming, Ecological Applications, 1(2), 182–195, 1991.

Page 35: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

27

Gustafsson, J. P.: Modeling the acid-base properties and metal complexation of humic substances with the Stockholm Humic Model, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 244(1), 102–112, doi:10.1006/jcis.2001.7871, 2001.

Gustafsson, O. and Gschwend, P.: Aquatic colloids: Concepts, definitions,

and current challenges, Limnology and Oceanography, 42(3), 519–528, 1997.

Gustafsson, O., Widerlund, A., Andersson, P., Ingri, J., Roos, P. and Ledin, A.: Colloid dynamics and transport of major elements through a boreal river - brackish bay mixing zone, Marine Chemistry, 71(1-2), 1–21, 2000.

Hassan, R. M., Scholes, R. and Ash, N.: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group, Island Press., 2005.

Ingri, J.: Från berg till hav - en introduktion till miljögeokemi,

Studentlitteratur, 2012.

Johnes, P.: Uncertainties in annual riverine phosphorus load estimation: Impact of load estimation methodology, sampling frequency, baseflow index and catchment population density, Journal of Hydrology, 332(1-2), 241–258, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.006, 2007.

Klaminder, J., Bindler, R., Laudon, H., Bishop, K., Emteryd, O. and Renberg, I.: Flux rates of atmospheric lead pollution within soils of a small catchment in northern Sweden and their implications for future stream water quality, Environmental Science & Technology, 40(15), 4639–4645, doi:10.1021/es0520666, 2006.

Klaminder, J., Bindler, R. and Renberg, I.: The biogeochemistry of

atmospherically derived Pb in the boreal forest of Sweden, Applied Geochemistry, 23(10), 2922–2931, doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.04.007, 2008.

Land, M., Ingri, J. and Öhlander, B.: Past and present weathering rates in northern Sweden, Applied Geochemistry, 14(6), 761–774, 1999.

Lidman, F., Mörth, C., Björkvald, L. and Laudon, H.: Selenium Dynamics in Boreal Streams: The Role of Wetlands and Changing Groundwater Tables, Environmental Science & Technology, 45(7), 2677–2683, doi:10.1021/es102885z, 2011.

Page 36: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

28

Limpens, J., Berendse, F., Blodau, C., Canadell, J. G., Freeman, C., Holden, J., Roulet, N., Rydin, H. and Schaepman-Strub, G.: Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications – a synthesis, Biogeosciences, 5(5), 1475–1491, doi:10.5194/bg-5-1475-2008, 2008.

Lyon, S. W., Nathanson, M., Spans, A., Grabs, T., Laudon, H., Temnerud, J.,

Bishop, K. H. and Seibert, J.: Specific discharge variability in a boreal landscape, Water Resour. Res., 48, doi:10.1029/2011WR011073, 2012.

Lyven, B., Hassellöv, M., Turner, D., Haraldsson, C. and Andersson, K.: Competition between iron- and carbon-based colloidal carriers for trace metals in a freshwater assessed using flow field-flow fractionation coupled to ICPMS, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67(20), 3791–3802, doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00087-5, 2003.

Meybeck, M., Kummu, M. and Dürr, H. H.: Global hydrobelts and hydroregions: improved reporting scale for water-related issues?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17(3), 1093–1111, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1093-2013, 2013.

Milne, C., Kinniburgh, D., Van Riemsdijk, W. and Tipping, E.: Generic

NICA-Donnan model parameters for metal-ion binding by humic substances, Environmental Science & Technology, 37(5), 958–971, doi:10.1021/es0258879, 2003.

Neubauer, E., Köhler, S. J., von der Kammer, F., Laudon, H. and Hofmann, T.: Effect of pH and Stream Order on Iron and Arsenic Speciation in Boreal Catchments, Environ. Sci. Technol., doi:10.1021/es401193j, 2013.

Nilsson, M., Mikkelä, C., Sundh, I., Granberg, G., Svensson, B. H. and Ranneby, B.: Methane emission from Swedish mires: National and regional budgets and dependence on mire vegetation, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D18), PP. 20,847–20,860, doi:200110.1029/2001JD900119, 2001.

Pokrovsky, O. and Schott, J.: Iron colloids/organic matter associated

transport of major and trace elements in small boreal rivers and their estuaries (NW Russia), Chemical Geology, 190(1-4), 141–179, doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00115-8, 2002.

Pokrovsky, O., Viers, J., Shirokova, L., Shevchenko, V., Filipov, A. and Dupre, B.: Dissolved, suspended, and colloidal fluxes of organic carbon, major and trace elements in the Severnaya Dvina River and its tributary, Chemical Geology, 273(1-2), 136–149, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.02.018, 2010.

Page 37: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

29

Schlesinger, W. H. and Bernhardt, E. S.: Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change, Academic Press., 2013.

Schöner, A., Noubactep, C., Büchel, G. and Sauter, M.: Geochemistry of

natural wetlands in former uranium milling sites (eastern Germany) and implications for uranium retention, Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry, 69(Supplement 2), 91–107, doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2007.12.003, 2009.

Seibert, J., Grabs, T., Kohler, S., Laudon, H., Winterdahl, M. and Bishop, K.: Linking soil- and stream-water chemistry based on a Riparian Flow-Concentration Integration Model, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13(12), 2287–2297, 2009.

Sen, I. S. and Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B.: Anthropogenic Disturbance of Element Cycles at the Earth’s Surface, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46(16), 8601–8609, doi:10.1021/es301261x, 2012.

Svensson, T., Lovett, G. M. and Likens, G. E.: Is chloride a conservative ion

in forest ecosystems?, Biogeochemistry, 107(1-3), 125–134, doi:10.1007/s10533-010-9538-y, 2012.

Temnerud, J. and Bishop, K.: Spatial variation of streamwater chemistry in two Swedish boreal catchments: Implications for environmental assessment, Environmental Science & Technology, 39(6), 1463–1469, 2005.

Tetzlaff, D., Carey, S., Laudon, H. and McGuire, K.: Catchment processes and heterogeneity at multiple scales-benchmarking observations, conceptualization and prediction Preface, Hydrological Processes, 24(16), 2203–2208, doi:10.1002/hyp.7784, 2010.

Tipping, E., Lofts, S. and Sonke, J. E.: Humic Ion-Binding Model VII: a

revised parameterisation of cation-binding by humic substances, Environ. Chem., 8(3), 225–235, doi:10.1071/EN11016, 2011.

Turunen, J., Tomppo, E., Tolonen, K. and Reinikainen, A.: Estimating carbon accumulation rates of undrained mires in Finland – application to boreal and subarctic regions, The Holocene, 12, 69–80, doi:10.1191/0959683602hl522rp, 2002.

Wakatsuki, T. and Rasyidin, A.: Rates of Weathering and Soil Formation, Geoderma, 52(3-4), 251–263, doi:10.1016/0016-7061(92)90040-E, 1992.

Page 38: Radionuclide transport in the boreal landscape

30

Wazne, M., Korfiatis, G. P. and Meng, X.: Carbonate Effects on Hexavalent Uranium Adsorption by Iron Oxyhydroxide, Environmental Science & Technology, 37(16), 3619–3624, doi:10.1021/es034166m, 2003. Zielinski, J. M., Carr, Z., Krewski, D. and Repacholi, M.: World Health Organization’s International Radon Project, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 69(7-8), 759–769, doi:10.1080/15287390500261299, 2006.