Parting Ways, Firing an Employee, Haw Can We Get it Right? Gökçe Oyal Püskülcü
R oyal U niversity of P hnom P enh I nstitute of F oreign L anguages D epartment of E nglish
description
Transcript of R oyal U niversity of P hnom P enh I nstitute of F oreign L anguages D epartment of E nglish
Royal University of Phnom Penh
Institute of Foreign Languages
Department of English
Report WritingLecturer: OR Vitou ( OVT)
Class: E4.9
Semester I Academic Year 2010-2011
Doeuy Chandara Keo Chantra Lao Seavpheng Meng Kea PENG Veasna SAM
Chanmakara Teang Sokunthea
I. Locate sources of relevant information 1. People 2. Books and other publications 3. Information technology 4. Events and places
II. Obtaining the information 1. Experimentation 7. Telephone call
2. Reading 8. Questionnaire3. Listening 9. Research on the internet
4. Observation5. Interview6. Letter
III. Sorting and grouping your findings
IV. Evaluate your findingsV. Prioritising your findingsVI. Check your findings
Our required information must be compatible with the things below: The precise purpose of the report The needs of your readers Your objective(s) Your resources Your skeletal framework
Sources of Information: People
Colleagues, members of the public, politicians, producers, manufacturers, retailers, federations, unions, pressure groups, and international organizations,.. or The Information Bureau
Books and Other publicationsEncyclopedias, reference books, text books,
guides, handbooks, journals and magazines, newspapers, maps and charts, previous reports, correspondence and minutes…
Information Technology Computer with its CD Rom to store the data A TV tuner card connected to PC to watch TV The Internet
Events and PlacesLibraries, learning resources centers,
research institutions, exhibitions, museums, galleries, laboratories, theatres, concerts, talks….
Information can be gathered by:
1. experimentation2. reading3. listening4. observation5. interview6. letter7. telephone call8. questionnaire9. research on the Internet
state clear objective giving a brief account providing a hypothesis (optional) describe how the experiment was carried
out and provide a diagram of apparatus used.
provide a complete list provide a full statement of the final result. conclusion
The SQ3R method of reading: Survey Question Read Recall Review
Assume that the topic is boring or irrelevant Criticise delivery or presentation;
concentrate on the content Submit to emotional phrases Become over stimulated Remain passive. Listening is an active
process, so stay alert Tolerate distractions Listen to only what you want to hearEvade
difficult subjects. Face problems head on
Do not:
Run ahead of the speaker Examine the evidence presented. Is it
accurate, objective and complete? Is it strong or weak?
Recap every few minutes Remember that listening is an active
process
find out more specific information recording information
Greeting Give a friendly manner Avoid talking too much or less Maintain a professional image Explain the purpose of the interview Ask question (Open question) Sum up the interview and check your
understanding Thank the interviewee for his/her co-
operation
Person name Heading Explain the purpose (First Paragraph) Ask the information you require, keep it
short, clear, but comprehensive Draw a table where this information can
be inserted (If possible) Limit the time for the reply Enclosed a stamped address envelope Conclude the letter with thanks
Give your name Ask for the right person Explain the purpose of calling Remain your politeness while asking
information Thank the person
Two kinds of information Factual Opinion
Note: Approaching member of the public, and
having no obligation to assist you Assure that all questions are relevant to the
subject of report
Checklist for a good questionnaire: Does it have a title Does it have a reference or questionnaire
number Does it record the name of the interviewer Is it well spaced Does it explain the purpose of the
questionnaire Where appropriate, does it emphasize that all
replies will be treated confidentially? Is it clear and unambiguous? Is it simple? Is it logically developed? Does it ask one question at a time
Does it require definite answer? Does it avoid leading question? Does it avoid an appeal for vanity? Does it avoid an appeal to sympathy? Where appropriate, does it leave sensitive
areas until last? Is the questionnaire written in such a way
that that will make it straight forward to record and analyze your overall results?
Has the questionnaire been ‘pilot tested’ among a small number of respondents to highlight any obvious errors, omission, ambiguities and other shortcomings before the survey goes live?
Simple random sampling Systematic random sampling Quota sampling
Do not deliberately select people or items Do not substitute or replace items selected
randomly Do not deliberately omit items that should be
selected randomly Do not vary the wording of your question Do not ask leading questions Do not ask questions which appeal to vanity Do not ask questions which appeal to sympathy
All the too easy to get side-tracked: The internet can take up all your research time Remember what you are trying to achieve Beware of the need to evaluate information
obtained on the internet Before beginning your research: Write down the questions you hope to answer Spend time thinking about would be likely to know
the answers Develop a list of subtopic and synonyms that you
can use as search terms Using a subject directory Using metasearchers Using various combinations of search terms
If there is no match for your request: May have miss pelt one or more words May have used the wrong symbols or phrase May need to try a different search engine May have submitted too narrow a search Give both the abbreviation and the full name
If there are too many listings: Take a look at the first ten result Skim a few of first ten listings on your topic Add
more words to your search string, putting a more specific word first
Information to each section and subsection Complete the heading and subheading of the skeletal framework
1. Reliable2. Significant
1. Reliability Accuracy Objective Completeness Strength
2. Significant HOW?
Highlight (only) your most significant finding
Amend the skeletal framework Use any appendix Don’t waste the reader’s time
Collected & handled all information Accurate and reliable information
Thanks for Your AttentionThanks for Your Attention @-@ @-@
Q & AQ & A