R. Aleksan CARE06 meeting Frascati, November 16, 2006 CARE06 1.Preparing FP7 2.Conclusion.
-
Upload
johnathan-mcbride -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
description
Transcript of R. Aleksan CARE06 meeting Frascati, November 16, 2006 CARE06 1.Preparing FP7 2.Conclusion.
R. AleksanCARE06 meeting
Frascati, November 16, 2006
CARE06
1. Preparing FP72. Conclusion
Project Type BeamType
Start date
DurationYears
Total Cost
EU contribution
CARE I3 All 1/1/04 5 55 M€ 15.2 M€
EUROTEV DS e+,e- (LC) 1/1/05 3 29 M€ 9 M€
EURISOL DS Ion, p beam)
1/1/05 4 33 M€(3.3 M€)
9.16 M€(1 M€)
Total >117 M€ 33.2 M€
Summary of Accelerator R&D projects
These projects are well structured, with clear objectives, deliverables and milestones. They represent a fantastic strength for the HEP European community in order to play a leadership role
In the improvement of present accelerators In the development of new accelerators
EUROLEAP NEST e Plasma acceleration
1/9/06 3 4.1 M€ 2 M€
ESGARD actions
Launching new projects
Preparing for FP7 calls
2 meetings: May 19 and September 12, 2006
ESGAR recommends continuing CARE/NED program from 2007 onwith the construction of test magnets
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Accelerator R&D
CARE Multipurpose (e,p,) ? ? ? ?
CARE SRFCARE PHINCARE HIPPICARE NED
EUROTEV DS: ILC+CLIC ? ? ? ? ?
EURISOL DS: Neutrino -beam ? ? ? ?
DS Fact Scoping study ? DS Fact ?
EUROLEAP e in plasma?
Maj
or S
trat
egic
dec
isio
ns
Includes 2 parts: bottom-up (all fields) and targeted (thematic)
Proposition de la Commission budget FP7 Mars 2006 6ème PCRDT Propositioninitiale
Année 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total1 PC7 CE 4881 5082 5514 6053 6865 7899 8856 9914 50183
Coopération 3764 3671 3744 3885 4273 4818 5495 6317 32200 44432Santé 742 720 735 751 791 864 987 1137 5984 8317Alilmentation, agriculture et biotechnologie 269 215 219 224 235 297 346 399 1936 2455Technologies de l'information (DG Infso) 1182 1086 1108 1136 1196 1317 1506 1734 9083 12670Nano,matériaux, production 436 409 417 427 450 509 583 671 3467 4832Energie 270 254 259 264 278 339 389 452 2236 2931Environnement 256 224 229 233 246 281 318 356 1886 2535Transport 494 478 488 499 526 616 714 831 4150 5940Sciences socio-économiques 74 72 73 75 79 90 102 117 607 792Sécurité et espace (DG ENTR) 60 212 216 276 473 506 551 621 2855 3960
Idées 318 649 994 1351 1379 1406 1434 7532 11862Personnel 482 454 466 497 531 747 902 980 4577 7129Capacités 391 414 422 436 459 696 785 909 4122 7485
Infrastructures de recherche 201 192 196 200 211 330 378 429 1936 3961Recherche au profit des PME 129 127 130 132 139 206 231 264 1228 1901Régions de la connaissance 11 11 17 18 20 22 28 126 158potentiel de recherche 27 27 28 29 63 67 80 320 554Science dans la société 41 39 40 41 43 47 53 66 329 554Coopération internationale 20 18 18 19 20 30 35 43 182 358
Total hors CCR 4656 4857 5281 5312 6615 7640 8588 9640 48433CCR 225 225 233 241 249 258 267 275 1749 1817
For indication: proposition budget profile from the commission (march 2006)
“We would like at this point to explore how our community could propose a coherent set of projects in an organized manner.To this end, we would like to make a call for Letters of Intent for R&D projects.
These proposals could be Joint Research Activities (JRA), to be included in I3 proposals, such as the ones in CARE Design Study (DS) projects, such EUROTeV or EURISOL Construction of New R&D Infrastructures (CNI-RD), such as a test facility.
It should be noted that ESGARD is only concerned by the new infrastructure for carrying accelerator R&D and not the accelerators project for carrying physics programmes.”
ESGARD actions
Call for Letters of Intent for accelerator R&D project
With a deadline on April 28th .
So as to have a first scope of the ideas of the community by the Zeuthen meeting
Activity Estimated Cost (M€)
LHC & magnets 23.35
p, ion Accel. 76.65 + ?
CLIC 36.8
SCRF - ILC 55.2 + ?
Neutrino facility 36
Phi Factory ?
Laser-Plasma 20
248 M€ + ?
34+ letters received
Line of action/Activity Topics called Funding scheme(s)
€ (millions)indicative
1. Support to existing research infrastructures
1.2 ICT based e-Infrastructures
INFRA-2007-1.2.1: Scientific Digital Repositories Combination of
Collaborative projects &
Coordination and support
actions (CSA)
89INFRA-2007-1.2.2: Deployment of e-Infrastructures for scientific communities.
INFRA-2007-1.2.3: e-Science Grid infrastructures
2. Support to new research infrastructures
2.1 Design studies
INFRA-2007-2.1.1: Design studies for research infrastructures in all S&T fields
Collaborative projects
27
INFRA-2007-2.1.2: Design studies for e-Infrastructures 8
2.2 Construction of new infrastructures preparatory phase
INFRA-2007-2.2.1.x: Preparatory phase for research infrastructures listed in the 2006 ESFRI Roadmap
120
INFRA-2007-2.2.2.x: Preparatory phase for Computer and Data Treatment Research Infrastructures in the 2006 ESFRI Roadmap
15
Main calls with closing dates spring 2007
Line of action/Activity Topics called Funding scheme(s)
€ (millions)indicative
1. Support to existing research infrastructures
1.1 Integrating Activities
INFRA-2008-1.1.1: Integrating Activities in all scientific and technological fields. Combination
of Collaborative projects and Coordination and support actions (CSA)
283INFRA-2008-1.1.2.x: Integrated Activities to support the specific needs of thematic priority areas
1.2 ICT based e-Infrastructures
INFRA-2008-1.2.4: GÉANT115INFRA-2008-1.2.5: Scientific Data
Infrastructure
Main calls with closing dates spring 2008
(~120)
(~160)
ActivityCall 1
(spring 2007)*
Call 2(spring 2008)*
Call 3(spring 2010)*
Call 4(spring 2012)*
Integrating activities X X X
e-Infrastructures X X X X
Design studies X
Construction – support to the preparatory phase X X
Construction – support to the implementation phase X X
Accompanying Measures X X X X
Summary timetable FP7
* Closing date
Given the calendar of the calls planned, ESGARD recommends to submit all the Design Studies of the LoI list in the fist call early 2007.
1. The upgrade of luminosity of the CERN-LHC 2. Super-beams and neutrino facilities 3. Fast cycling synchrotron design 4. Beta-beams study
ESGARD decided to set-up working groups to help developing consistentset of research activities, in line with the priorities stated in the Strategy Document adopted by the CERN Council, and that couldbe imbedded in an (or several) Integrated Activity (IA) projects
High-intensity, high-energy proton beams (convener: R. Garoby) Novel accelerating systems (convener: E. Jensen) Superconducting RF acceleration system (convener: O. Napoly)
ESGARD recommendations
A first meeting was help on October 30 at CERN
Considering the proposals received so far, ESGARD recommends the following priorities
Starting from the LoI received, the working groups are expected to establish
a consistent set of prioritized Joint Research Activities, including a first estimate of the needed resources for each activity, Identify the infrastructures that will benefit from the proposed R&D, Identify the infrastructures that could be subject to Transnational Access, A consistent set of Networking Activities related to the R&D activities The laboratories/institutes/universities that would participate to the different activities. A possible coordinator for each NA, TA and JRA
It is expected to get a first report from these working groups during the CARE06meeting in Frascati from November 15 to 17, 2006.
Mandate of the Working Groups
Conclusion
ESGARD has started the process for coordinating the next roundAccelerator R&D project
The call for LoI has shown that there is a strong interest from the communityto strengthen further the accelerator R&D program in Europe
ESGARD will meet on December 5th to review the situation and discuss the next steps
ESGARD has set up working groups to propose a consistent set of Networking, Transnational Access and R&D activities