QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES …developing questions for students, and designing...

3
3 rd Annual Conference on Ultrasound in Anatomy and Physiology Education “The Ultrasound Curriculum in Medical Education: Session Design, Integration, and Hands-On Experience” QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Goals vs Learning Objectives: Goals: Broad outcomes that are expected to be achieved as part of an academic session or program. Learning Objectives: Support goal of session or program and should specify what knowledge, skills or attitudes a learner should demonstrate following instruction. Should be clarifying and should serve as the foundation for assessment. Learning Objectives Should be “SMART” • Specific • Measurable/Observable • Attainable for target audience within scheduled time and specified conditions • Relevant and results-oriented • Targeted to the learner and to the desired level of learning “Medical teachers agree that the process of writing objectives leads to clarification of intuitively held teaching goals and thus leads to better teaching and testing decisions. To achieve this benefit, educators must invest considerable time, effort and creativity in the process.” Williams RG and Osborne CE (1982) Medical Teachers' Perspectives on Development and Use of Objectives. Medical Education, 16: 68-71

Transcript of QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES …developing questions for students, and designing...

Page 1: QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES …developing questions for students, and designing assessments. Bloom’s (1956) original framework is shown here. More recent work (Anderson

3rd Annual Conference on Ultrasound in Anatomy and Physiology Education “The Ultrasound Curriculum in Medical Education: Session Design, Integration, and Hands-On

Experience”

QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

Goals vs Learning Objectives: Goals: Broad outcomes that are expected to be achieved as part of an academic session or program. Learning Objectives: Support goal of session or program and should specify what knowledge, skills or attitudes a learner should demonstrate following instruction. Should be clarifying and should serve as the foundation for assessment. Learning Objectives Should be “SMART”

• Specific

• Measurable/Observable

• Attainable for target audience within scheduled time and specified conditions

• Relevant and results-oriented

• Targeted to the learner and to the desired level of learning

“Medical teachers agree that the process of writing objectives leads to clarification of intuitively held teaching goals and thus leads to better teaching and testing decisions. To achieve this benefit, educators must invest considerable time, effort and creativity in the process.” Williams RG and Osborne CE (1982) Medical Teachers' Perspectives on Development and Use of Objectives. Medical Education, 16: 68-71

Page 2: QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES …developing questions for students, and designing assessments. Bloom’s (1956) original framework is shown here. More recent work (Anderson

Bloom’s Taxonomy: Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical framework that is used to help educators focus on different cognitive levels of thinking. It can be used to assist educators in designing educational sessions, developing questions for students, and designing assessments. Bloom’s (1956) original framework is shown here. More recent work (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001) modified this taxonomy, but the basic hierarchy and structure was maintained. Web Resources: Iowa State University- Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching: http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching-resources/effective-practice/revised-blooms-taxonomy/ Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine Faculty Development Webpage: http://medicine.hofstra.edu/faculty/facdev/index.html

http://www.celt.iastate.edu/teaching-resources/effective-practice/revised-blooms-taxonomy/
http://medicine.hofstra.edu/faculty/facdev/index.html
Page 3: QUICK GUIDE TO GOALS, LEARNING OBJECTIVES …developing questions for students, and designing assessments. Bloom’s (1956) original framework is shown here. More recent work (Anderson

Creating Effective Learning Environments: Five Easy Steps ...€¦ · Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) has stood the test of time. Recently Anderson & Krathwohl (2001) have proposed some

Creating Effective Learning Environments: Five Easy Steps ...€¦ · Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) has stood the test of time. Recently Anderson & Krathwohl (2001) have proposed some

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy - Carey Business Schoolcarey.jhu.edu/uploads/faculty/BLOOMS_WORKSHOP.pdfBloom’s Taxonomy History • Created by a committee of educators in 1956 to classify learning

Bloom’s Taxonomy - Carey Business Schoolcarey.jhu.edu/uploads/faculty/BLOOMS_WORKSHOP.pdfBloom’s Taxonomy History • Created by a committee of educators in 1956 to classify learning

Thinking Skills in Teaching Practices: Relationship with ... · According to Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objec-tives [Bloom 1956], thinking skills required for learning

Thinking Skills in Teaching Practices: Relationship with ... · According to Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objec-tives [Bloom 1956], thinking skills required for learning

APPealing Curriculum Tool Kit - · PDF fileOriginal Bloom’s Taxonomy Updated Bloom’s Taxonomy Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy Lesson Creation Ideas ... 1990’s Update of Bloom’s

APPealing Curriculum Tool Kit - · PDF fileOriginal Bloom’s Taxonomy Updated Bloom’s Taxonomy Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy Lesson Creation Ideas ... 1990’s Update of Bloom’s

Bloom’s Taxonomy Workshop - Instructional Leadership€¦ · Bloom’s Taxonomy Examination on Sales and Marketing Where the questions fit in Bloom’s Taxonomy Q1. Level 3 of Bloom’s

Bloom’s Taxonomy Workshop - Instructional Leadership€¦ · Bloom’s Taxonomy Examination on Sales and Marketing Where the questions fit in Bloom’s Taxonomy Q1. Level 3 of Bloom’s

Closing Achievement Gaps - tguskey.com · Objectives: The Cognitive Domain (Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956), commonly labeled Bloom’s Taxonomy, Bloom’s later

Closing Achievement Gaps - tguskey.com · Objectives: The Cognitive Domain (Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956), commonly labeled Bloom’s Taxonomy, Bloom’s later

Developing Excellence in Independent Learning Mary Brewer ...€¦ · Most received definitions are derived from Bloom’s taxonomy of learning objectives (1956), particularly with

Developing Excellence in Independent Learning Mary Brewer ...€¦ · Most received definitions are derived from Bloom’s taxonomy of learning objectives (1956), particularly with

BLOOM’S DIGITAL TAXONOMY

BLOOM’S DIGITAL TAXONOMY

Alignment of Standards and Assessment: A theoretical and ... · taxonomía de Porter son los modelos más adecuados. Método. ... Bloom’s revised taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl,

Alignment of Standards and Assessment: A theoretical and ... · taxonomía de Porter son los modelos más adecuados. Método. ... Bloom’s revised taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl,

Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.

KENMORE Anderson School (W.A. Anderson Building) · PDF fileKenmore Air and Davidson’s Marina ... In 1956, the building was renamed the W.A. Anderson building in City of Bothell

KENMORE Anderson School (W.A. Anderson Building) · PDF fileKenmore Air and Davidson’s Marina ... In 1956, the building was renamed the W.A. Anderson building in City of Bothell

Semester 1 2010. Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Bloom (1956) developed a classification of levels of intellectual behaviour in learning. The taxonomy is a.

Semester 1 2010. Bloom’s Taxonomy Benjamin Bloom (1956) developed a classification of levels of intellectual behaviour in learning. The taxonomy is a.

Analysis and Evaluation of Learning Outcomes in High ...dergi/makaleler/yayinda/20/EFMED_KME154.pdf · Bloom’s taxonomypublished by , Benjamin Bloom and coworkers - in 1956, is

Analysis and Evaluation of Learning Outcomes in High ...dergi/makaleler/yayinda/20/EFMED_KME154.pdf · Bloom’s taxonomypublished by , Benjamin Bloom and coworkers - in 1956, is

Celebrating Ability The River Runs Through Us: A ... · Bloom’s (1956) Taxonomy Creative Problem Solving (Parnes, 1981) strategies Paul’s (1991) “Wheel of Reasoning” critical

Celebrating Ability The River Runs Through Us: A ... · Bloom’s (1956) Taxonomy Creative Problem Solving (Parnes, 1981) strategies Paul’s (1991) “Wheel of Reasoning” critical

The Affective Domain: Combating Student Depression · Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains (1956) Cognitive (knowledge) Affective (attitude) Psychomotor (skills) The Affective Domain

The Affective Domain: Combating Student Depression · Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains (1956) Cognitive (knowledge) Affective (attitude) Psychomotor (skills) The Affective Domain

BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Jamaica C. Olazo .

BLOOM’S TAXONOMY BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Jamaica C. Olazo .

TheOriginal Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Levels Anderson and Krathwohl's (Revised Bloom’s) Taxonomy (2001) Levels Isaiah 11:2 1 Knowledge Remember Isaiah 11:2 (NKJV) The Spirit of the

TheOriginal Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Levels Anderson and Krathwohl's (Revised Bloom’s) Taxonomy (2001) Levels Isaiah 11:2 1 Knowledge Remember Isaiah 11:2 (NKJV) The Spirit of the

Practi… · Web viewIt is also worthwhile to examine taxonomies of learning such as Benjamin Bloom’s Educational Objectives (1956) where he categorises learning into three domains:

Practi… · Web viewIt is also worthwhile to examine taxonomies of learning such as Benjamin Bloom’s Educational Objectives (1956) where he categorises learning into three domains:

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy