Quasi-geometrical Optics Approximation in Gravitational...

13
Quasi-geometrical Optics Approximation in Gravitational Lensing Ryuichi Takahashi Department of Physics, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan Ray path in geometrical optics Ray path formed by diffraction effect Diffracted ray passing through the lens center is newly formed source observer lens

Transcript of Quasi-geometrical Optics Approximation in Gravitational...

  • Quasi-geometrical Optics Approximation in

    Gravitational Lensing

    Ryuichi Takahashi Department of Physics, Kyoto University

    Kyoto, Japan

    Ray path in geometrical optics

    Ray path formed by diffraction effect

    Diffracted ray passing through the lens center is newly formed

    source

    observer lens

  • §1.Introduction

    lens

    Er

    1/2E MDr Einstein radius :

    ●Gravitational lensing

    D

    observer

    Gravitational lensing of light is usually treated in geometrical optics

  • ・double slit

    1

    2Er

    double slit

    path length difference : M 21

    21E MDr/

    M Wave effect (diffraction)

    monochromatic waves

    (Nakamura 1998)

    ●Wave effects in gravitational lensing (Schneider et al. 1992; Nakamura & Deguchi 1999 )

    ・long wavelength

    gravitational waves λ 1AU

    for space interferometer

    screen

  • The wave does not feel the existence of the lens

    lens

    ・λ >M Diffraction effect * source

    ・λ ≪M Geometrical optics approximation

    ・λ <M Quasi-geometrical optics approximation

    Geometrical 1st order perturbation optics in powers of λ /M

    (λ →0) (correction term arising from diffraction )

    Difference between geometrical optics and wave optics

    1

    8101

    M

    M

    AUM

  • §2.Wave Optics in Gravitational Lensing

    (Misner et al. 1973; Schneider et al. 1992)

    Background metric

    dxdxgdUdtUdsB)(222 2121 r

    :gravitational potential of the lens )(rU 1U

    Wave propagation

    02 )(;;

    hRhB :Background

    Riemann tensor

    )(BR

    Lensed waveform )(~

    Lh

    )(~

    )()(~

    hFhL

    Unlensed waveform

    ),(exp2),( 2 ηξξη d

    LSL

    S tidiDD

    DF

    )(2

    ),(

    2

    ξηξ

    ηξ

    SLLS

    SLd

    DDD

    DDt 8, 2ξ

    Amplification factor

  • ),(exp2),( 2 yxxy wTid

    i

    wwF

    Amplification factor

    S

    O ηLDLSD

    SD

    ξ

    SL DD 00 , ηyξx

    20LLS

    S

    DD

    Dw

    (ξ :normalization constant of the length)

    Nondimensional quantities

    :nondimensional frequency

    )(2

    1),(

    2xyxyx T : nondimensional time delay

    d

    S

    LLS tD

    DDT 20

    Er0

    Expanding F (w,y) in powers of 1/w

    1,1 Tyx

    Mw Mλ1/w

    Setting (Einstein radius)

  • ●Geometrical optics approximation w

    Stationary points of the T (x,y) contribute to

    the above integral :

    Image positions are determined

    j

    jjgeo iwTF exp2/1

    j

    jdj

    L tthth ),(),( ,2/1

    rr

    Amplification factor

    0),( xyxT

    :lens equation

    jx

    Lensed wave in time domain

    ),(exp2),( 2 yxxy wTid

    i

    wwF

    (Fermat’s principle)

    (Schneider et al. 1992; Nakamura & Deguchi 1999 )

    )(xxy

    Expanding T(x,y) around jx

    )~(~~),(),( 321 xxxTTT bajbaj yxyx

    jjj TT xxxyx ~),,(

  • ●Quasi-geometrical optics approximation 1w

    j

    tt

    jj

    L

    geo

    L thtdththd

    ),(~

    ),(),(2/1

    rrr

    Amplification factor

    ),(exp2),( 2 yxxy wTid

    i

    wwF

    Expanding T(x,y) to higher order

    )~(~~~~),(

    ~~~),(

    ~~),(),(

    5

    241

    61

    21

    xxxxxT

    xxxT

    xxTTT

    dcbajdcba

    cbajcba

    bajbaj

    yx

    yx

    yxyx

    Effects on magnifications of the images

    )(

    exp

    2/3

    241

    6

    12122

    21

    wxxxxT

    xxxTxxTideF

    dcbajdcbaw

    cbajcbawbajba

    iwT

    ji

    j x

    )(1 22/1

    we

    w

    ijiwT

    jjj

    2

    )3(

    2

    2)3(

    3

    )4(

    2

    11

    12

    5

    2

    1

    16

    1

    jjj

    jj

    j

    jj

    j

    j

    j

    j

    j

    xx

    jjjjj x 1,1 2121jiwTjj e

    w

    idF

    2/1

    Lensed wave in time domain

  • Amplification factor

    ),(exp2),( 2 yxxy wTid

    i

    wwF

    Central cusp of the lens

    )0(2 rrInner density profile

    x ,1

    )(),(2

    21 xyxyx T

    x0)( x

    )(

    1 22/32

    0

    2

    2/2

    wyw

    edF

    iwy

    )/1(exp2

    2

    2

    2

    101

    22/2

    wxxxyidwi

    eF

    iwy

    x

    observer

    lens

    source

    (e.g. Singular Isothermal Sphere)

  • ・Point mass lens

    w≫1: geometrical optics limit

    Twi

    geo eiF

    2/12/1

    TwFgeo sin22/12

    )()( 2 ξξ M

    §3.Results

  • ・Singular isothermal sphere

    TwFgeo sin22/12

    2/)( 2v ξw≫1: geometrical optics limit

  • ・Isothermal sphere with a core

    x

    Deflection potential 22

    cxx

    Contribution from the lens center

    )/1()(exp2

    22

    2

    2

    101

    22/2

    wwxxxxyidwi

    edF c

    iwy

    x

    For wx <1, the behavior is similar to that in SIS

  • §4.Conclusion

    We discussed the effects of diffraction in

    wave optics of gravitational lensing. We

    studied first order perturbation in powers

    of λ /M .

    1.The magnification μ is changed to

    μ + dμ , where dμ is of the order of

    λ /M .

    2. Diffracted ray passing through the lens center is newly formed .