Quarterly Trends Update Q4 2018 Food Fraud PPT€¦ · 12.12.2018 · Quarterly Trends Update:...
Transcript of Quarterly Trends Update Q4 2018 Food Fraud PPT€¦ · 12.12.2018 · Quarterly Trends Update:...
Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud
Technical Document 4Q-2018
Webinar Wednesday December 12 2018100 to 200 PM ET
John Spink PhD amp Douglas C Moyer PhDDirector amp Assistant Professor Food Fraud InitiativeCollege of Veterinary Medicine Food Safety
wwwFoodFraudMSUedu Twitter FoodFraud and FoodFraud
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC ndash pronounced mook)httpfoodfraudmsuedumoocFree open online open to anyone with an optional Certificate of Completion Format Typically monthly with two webinars that also on-demand
1 Food Fraud Overview MOOC 2 Food Fraud Audit Guide MOOC3 Food Defense Audit Guide MOOC4 Food Fraud VACCP (Vulnerability Assessment and Food Fraud Prevention Strategy
Development) MOOC Executive Education (Short-Course)bull Food Fraud Strategy Quantifying Food Risk with Vulnerably Assessments
Graduate Courses (Online Three Credits)1 Food Fraud Prevention2 Anti-Counterfeit amp Product Protection (Food Fraud)3 Quantifying Food Risk (including Food Fraud)4 Global Food Safety (including Food Fraud) 5 Food Protection and Defense (Packaging Module)6 Packaging for Food Safety
Graduate Certificate (Online Four Courses Each)bull Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention (Food Safety)
Master of Science in Food Safety (Online)bull wwwonlineFoodSafetymsuedu
Certificate in International Food Lawndash httpswwwcanrmsueduiflr
Food Fraud Curriculum
Research
EducationOutreach
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 2
Defining Food Fraudbull Action Intentional deception for economic gain using food
ndash Consistent with GFSI ECEU UK ISO and othershellipndash Including the sub-category of ldquoEconomically Motivated Adulterationrdquo or EMAndash Note FDA currently defines EMA as a ldquosubstancerdquo for ldquoeconomic gainrdquo
bull Motivation Economic Gainndash ldquoFood Defenserdquo motivation is traditionally harm or terrorndash ldquoFood Defense (FDAFSMA-IA)rdquo is narrowed to ldquowide-scale human health harmrdquo
bull Effectndash Economic Threat ndash Public Health Vulnerability or Threat
Examplesbull Horsemeat in ground beefbull Peanut Corporation selling known
contaminated productbull Diluted or extra virgin olive oilbull Melamine in pet food and infant
formulabull Over-icing with unsanitary water
bull Unauthorized unsanitary repackaging (up-labeling or origin-laundering)
bull Cargo Theft reintroduced into commerce Stolen products
bull Expired product date code tampering or ldquorefreshingrdquo
Reference Spink amp Moyer (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 3
Terminology (Types of Fraud)
bull Dilutionbull Substitutionbull Concealmentbull Unapproved
Enhancementsbull Mislabelingbull Gray Market
Production Theft Diversion
bull Counterfeiting (IPR)
Table 2 Table Food Fraud Types Definitions and Examples (adapted from (Spink and Moyer 2011 Spink 2013 SSAFE Organization 2015 PWC Price Waterhouse Cooper 2016 GFSI 2017 Spink Ortega et al 2017))
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 4
The Food Risk Matrix
ActionIntentionalUnintentional
Harm Public Health Economic or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain Economic
Food Fraud
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source Adapted from Spink (2006) The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) Annual Meeting 2006 Spink J amp Moyer DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science November 2011
Wide-scale
Terrorism
EMA
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 5
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC ndash pronounced mook)httpfoodfraudmsuedumoocFree open online open to anyone with an optional Certificate of Completion Format Typically monthly with two webinars that also on-demand
1 Food Fraud Overview MOOC 2 Food Fraud Audit Guide MOOC3 Food Defense Audit Guide MOOC4 Food Fraud VACCP (Vulnerability Assessment and Food Fraud Prevention Strategy
Development) MOOC Executive Education (Short-Course)bull Food Fraud Strategy Quantifying Food Risk with Vulnerably Assessments
Graduate Courses (Online Three Credits)1 Food Fraud Prevention2 Anti-Counterfeit amp Product Protection (Food Fraud)3 Quantifying Food Risk (including Food Fraud)4 Global Food Safety (including Food Fraud) 5 Food Protection and Defense (Packaging Module)6 Packaging for Food Safety
Graduate Certificate (Online Four Courses Each)bull Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention (Food Safety)
Master of Science in Food Safety (Online)bull wwwonlineFoodSafetymsuedu
Certificate in International Food Lawndash httpswwwcanrmsueduiflr
Food Fraud Curriculum
Research
EducationOutreach
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 2
Defining Food Fraudbull Action Intentional deception for economic gain using food
ndash Consistent with GFSI ECEU UK ISO and othershellipndash Including the sub-category of ldquoEconomically Motivated Adulterationrdquo or EMAndash Note FDA currently defines EMA as a ldquosubstancerdquo for ldquoeconomic gainrdquo
bull Motivation Economic Gainndash ldquoFood Defenserdquo motivation is traditionally harm or terrorndash ldquoFood Defense (FDAFSMA-IA)rdquo is narrowed to ldquowide-scale human health harmrdquo
bull Effectndash Economic Threat ndash Public Health Vulnerability or Threat
Examplesbull Horsemeat in ground beefbull Peanut Corporation selling known
contaminated productbull Diluted or extra virgin olive oilbull Melamine in pet food and infant
formulabull Over-icing with unsanitary water
bull Unauthorized unsanitary repackaging (up-labeling or origin-laundering)
bull Cargo Theft reintroduced into commerce Stolen products
bull Expired product date code tampering or ldquorefreshingrdquo
Reference Spink amp Moyer (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 3
Terminology (Types of Fraud)
bull Dilutionbull Substitutionbull Concealmentbull Unapproved
Enhancementsbull Mislabelingbull Gray Market
Production Theft Diversion
bull Counterfeiting (IPR)
Table 2 Table Food Fraud Types Definitions and Examples (adapted from (Spink and Moyer 2011 Spink 2013 SSAFE Organization 2015 PWC Price Waterhouse Cooper 2016 GFSI 2017 Spink Ortega et al 2017))
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 4
The Food Risk Matrix
ActionIntentionalUnintentional
Harm Public Health Economic or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain Economic
Food Fraud
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source Adapted from Spink (2006) The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) Annual Meeting 2006 Spink J amp Moyer DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science November 2011
Wide-scale
Terrorism
EMA
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 5
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Defining Food Fraudbull Action Intentional deception for economic gain using food
ndash Consistent with GFSI ECEU UK ISO and othershellipndash Including the sub-category of ldquoEconomically Motivated Adulterationrdquo or EMAndash Note FDA currently defines EMA as a ldquosubstancerdquo for ldquoeconomic gainrdquo
bull Motivation Economic Gainndash ldquoFood Defenserdquo motivation is traditionally harm or terrorndash ldquoFood Defense (FDAFSMA-IA)rdquo is narrowed to ldquowide-scale human health harmrdquo
bull Effectndash Economic Threat ndash Public Health Vulnerability or Threat
Examplesbull Horsemeat in ground beefbull Peanut Corporation selling known
contaminated productbull Diluted or extra virgin olive oilbull Melamine in pet food and infant
formulabull Over-icing with unsanitary water
bull Unauthorized unsanitary repackaging (up-labeling or origin-laundering)
bull Cargo Theft reintroduced into commerce Stolen products
bull Expired product date code tampering or ldquorefreshingrdquo
Reference Spink amp Moyer (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 3
Terminology (Types of Fraud)
bull Dilutionbull Substitutionbull Concealmentbull Unapproved
Enhancementsbull Mislabelingbull Gray Market
Production Theft Diversion
bull Counterfeiting (IPR)
Table 2 Table Food Fraud Types Definitions and Examples (adapted from (Spink and Moyer 2011 Spink 2013 SSAFE Organization 2015 PWC Price Waterhouse Cooper 2016 GFSI 2017 Spink Ortega et al 2017))
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 4
The Food Risk Matrix
ActionIntentionalUnintentional
Harm Public Health Economic or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain Economic
Food Fraud
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source Adapted from Spink (2006) The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) Annual Meeting 2006 Spink J amp Moyer DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science November 2011
Wide-scale
Terrorism
EMA
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 5
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology (Types of Fraud)
bull Dilutionbull Substitutionbull Concealmentbull Unapproved
Enhancementsbull Mislabelingbull Gray Market
Production Theft Diversion
bull Counterfeiting (IPR)
Table 2 Table Food Fraud Types Definitions and Examples (adapted from (Spink and Moyer 2011 Spink 2013 SSAFE Organization 2015 PWC Price Waterhouse Cooper 2016 GFSI 2017 Spink Ortega et al 2017))
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 4
The Food Risk Matrix
ActionIntentionalUnintentional
Harm Public Health Economic or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain Economic
Food Fraud
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source Adapted from Spink (2006) The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) Annual Meeting 2006 Spink J amp Moyer DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science November 2011
Wide-scale
Terrorism
EMA
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 5
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
The Food Risk Matrix
ActionIntentionalUnintentional
Harm Public Health Economic or
Terror
Food Defense
Food Safety
Motivation
Gain Economic
Food Fraud
Food Quality
Prevent by Understanding the Motivation
Source Adapted from Spink (2006) The Counterfeit Food and Beverage Threat Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO) Annual Meeting 2006 Spink J amp Moyer DC (2011) Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud Journal of Food Science November 2011
Wide-scale
Terrorism
EMA
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 5
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
QUARTERLY UPDATE2018 4Q
Audit Non-Conformance ndash results and warningshellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 6
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 7
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
2011GFSI
MSU
2011ldquoDefining
Food Fraudrdquo
published
2011GFSI GD v6
2012 GFSI FFTT
2013Horseme
at Incident
2014GFSI
Position Paper
2017GFSI GD v7
2018GFSI
Compliance
Food Fraud is born
Food Fraud is
Conceived
Food Fraud is an idea
There is such a thinghellip
GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 52018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 8
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
bull Food fraud reviewbull Blog Technical Report
httpwwwmygfsicomfilesTechnical_Documents201805-food-fraud-technical-document-finalpdf
GFSI Announcement 592018
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 9
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
FSM AI 21 Food fraud vulnerability assessmentbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented food
fraud vulnerability assessment procedure in place to identify potential vulnerability and prioritise food fraud mitigation measures
FSM AI 221 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organisation has a documented plan
in place that specifies the measures the organisation has implemented to mitigate the public health risks from the identified food fraud vulnerabilities
FSM AI 222 Food fraud mitigation planbull The standard shall require that the organizations Food fraud mitigation
plan shall cover the relevant GFSI scope and shall be supported by the organisationrsquos Food Safety Management System
Every lsquovulnerabilityrsquo does NOT need a control plan
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 10
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
References and Resources
bull OTHER RESOURCES ndash Food Fraud Overview and History [includes the history of the GFSI Food Fraud
Think Tank Position Paper and inclusion in the GFSI Benchmarking Document] Presented by John Spink Food Fraud Session GMA Annual Conference Tokyo 2018 URL (5-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomedito=Uampvideo_id=mg67m5c3lTE
ndash Food Fraud Update and Terminology Survey Presented by John Spink GMA Science Forum 2018 URL (21-minutes) httpswwwyoutubecomwatchv=lZNwilEz6fMampfeature=youtube
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 11
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology (Definitions)
bull ldquoBoth(1) definitions cover all types of fraud and all products and highlight that the motivation behind food fraud is intentional and economically driven ie potentially linked to criminal activities and at least aiming to avoid detectionrdquo
bull (1) GFSI Position paper on food fraud (2014) and Benchmarking Document (2017)
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 12
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology (Detail)
bull ldquoThis implies that any plans and activities to mitigate prevent or even understand the risks associated with food fraud should consider an entire companyrsquos activities including some that may not be within the traditional food safety or even HACCP scope applying methods closer to criminal investigationrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 13
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe standard shallhelliprdquo refers to the Food Safety Management Systemndash BRC FSSC22000 IFS SQF etc
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 14
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
bull ldquoThe requirements refer to the ldquoThe Organizationrdquo While the traditional HACCP-type food safety approach is applied at manufacturing facilities these operate within the overall organization The food fraud vulnerabilities are company-wide and thus the food fraud scope is company-widerdquo ndash MSU Note Food Fraud is more of a top-down
assessment than Food Safety or Food Defense that is facility-based hazards
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 15
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
bull Depends on process and root-causebull Facility-based or enterprise-based
123
321
Food Safety Food Fraud
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 16
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
bull ldquoWhile an ldquoall hazardsrdquo assessment approach is important all vulnerabilities are not risks all risks are NOT hazards and all hazards are NOT hazards that require a preventive controlrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 17
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
What Requires a Controlbull A ldquovulnerabilityrdquo is not always a ldquoriskrdquobull A ldquoriskrdquo is not always a ldquohazard that
requires a preventive controlrdquobull Each ldquovulnerabilityrdquo does not require a
ldquopreventive controlrdquo ndash but monitorbull Reference Spink John Ortega David Chen Chen and Wu Felicia (IN PRESS) Food Fraud Prevention Shifts
Food Risk Focus to Vulnerability Trends in Food Science and Technology Journal Volume 0 Number 0 Pages 00-00 [Accepted Feb 13 2017] (ISI 4651 SJR 2267)
Vulnerability Risk Hazard Hazard requiring a PC
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 18
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
bull The basic GFSI requirement is to address ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoallrdquo vulnerabilities not ldquoeachrdquo
bull hellipyethellip
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 19
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Auditing Guidancebull ldquo lsquoDuring a food safety certification audit conducted against GFSI
recognised schemes the auditor will review the documentation related to the vulnerability assessment process and confirm that a comprehensive control plan as outlined in the [position paper] Appendix has been developed and implemented by the companyrsquo rdquo
bull ldquoWith this in mind there is awareness that addressing food fraud is new and different for those being audited as well as the auditorsrdquo
bull ldquo lsquoThe auditor is not expected to detect fraud or affirm that an anti-fraud program is capable of ldquopreventing fraudrdquo This approach is very much in line with the verification of a HACCP plan during the food safety auditrsquo2 rdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 20
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Audit Depthbull ldquoGFSI is aware that the harmonization and best practices
are just now being developed and refined A new system that is less than a year old in implementation cannot be expected to be as robust thorough or detailed as a system such as HACCP that has been implemented for more than 25 years The most important step for the food industry is to start addressing food fraud and for auditors to start asking the basic questions on how vulnerabilities were assessed and identified and a strong mitigation plan thought throughrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 21
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
bull ldquoAllrdquo not necessary ldquoeveryrdquo or ldquoeachrdquondash can cluster into groupshellip even very big groups
bull Include ldquoOtherrdquo to address ldquoallrdquondash admittedly a very broad categoryhellip it can be further
refined laterhellipbull Just get startedhellip and complete an assessment
ndash Identify future needshellipndash Getting to ldquopoint Brdquo not all the way to ldquopoint Zrdquo
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 22
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
ldquoFood Fraud Compliance Requirements mdash The general compliance requirements for Food Fraud prevention are1 Conduct a Food Fraud Vulnerability Assessment (YN)2 Written (YN)3 Implement a Food Fraud Prevention Strategy (YN)4 Written (YN)5 Minimally conduct an annual Food Fraud Incident Review
(YN)6 Note Address all types of Food Fraud (YN)7 Note Address all products from both incoming goods (eg
ingredients) and outgoing goods (eg finished goods) through to the consumerrdquo (YN)
bull Reference bull Food Safety Magazine Feb 2017 ldquoFood Fraud Vulnerability Assessment and Prefilter for FSMA GFSI and SOX Requirementsrdquo
httpwwwfoodsafetymagazinecommagazine-archive1februarymarch-2017food-fraud-vulnerability-assessment-and-prefilter-for-fsma-gfsi-and-sox-requirements
bull New Food Magazine Feb 2017 Food Fraud Prevention ndash how to start and how much is enoughrdquo httpwwwnewfoodmagazinecom33890new-food-magazinepast-issuesissue-1-2017issue-1-2017-digital-version
REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 23
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Call to Action
1 Review the GFSI requirements2 Review your current certification status
AND report to see if the auditor asked the full set of questions
3 Consider the ldquo7 Questionsrdquo ndash if any ldquonordquo then get education on next steps
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 24
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
copy 2011 Michigan State University 25
MSU Engagement 2018Outcome Benefit Commitment
Graduate Course
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Plus Graduate Certificate in Food Fraud Prevention
14 Weeks online May to August ~$2200
Executive Education
Share your knowledge and set direction of research
Develop the internal talent to support initiatives in the AC space meet other thought leaders (ldquoinvitation onlyrdquo sessions for brand owners)
2 Days on-campus ($1950)2019 dates TBD
Multi-Client Studies
Research the whyrsquos of ACD understand underlying drivers
Uncovering the drivers may lead to new strategies to combat Counterfeiting
Teleconference Meetings with option for on-campus eg Veterinary and Animal Product Fraud
MOOC Engage global network of Food Fraud thinkers
Two 2-hour on-line webinar format with assessment Students earn an MSU ldquocredentialrdquo
Overview Open self-pacedFF Audit Guide MonthlyFFVA amp PS MonthlyFood Defense Audit Guide Monthly
Contact John Spink SpinkJMsuedu ndash 5173814491 ndash httpFoodFraudmsueduFoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 25
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
Acknowledgementsbull MSU Veterinary Medicine Dean Christopher Brown Chair Dan Grooms Chair Ray Geor Dr Wilson Rumbeiha Cindy
Wilson Dean John Bakerbull MSU Global Associate Provost Executive Director Christine Geith Jerry Rhead Gwyn Shelle Lauren Zavala Associate
Provost EVP Dr Karen Klomparens Rashad Muhammadbull Queensrsquos University Belfast (UK) Professor amp Director Christopher Elliott Dr Moira Dean Dr Michael Hollisbull MSU Online Masterrsquos of Science in Food Safety Director Melinda Wilkins Ex-Director Julie Funk Kristi Denbrock
Heather Ricks Peggy Trommater Heidi Chen Dr Gary Ades Chair Ray Goerbull MSU Food Science Chair Fred Derksen Les Bourquin Bradley Marks Felicia Wu VP of Research Ian Gray David
Ortega Gale Strasburgbull MSU Program in Public Health Director Michael Rip and Douglas C Moyerbull MSU NFSTC Dr Scott Winterstein Trent Wakenight Dr Kevin Walker Sandy Enness Jen Sysak Dr Rick Foster to
name a few critical contributors and supporters bull MSU Food Safety Policy Center Dr Ewen Toddbull MSU School of Packaging Dr Bruce Harte Dr Robb Clarke Dr Laura Bix Dr Paul Singh Dr Diana Twede Dr Gary
Burgess Dr Harold Hughes Dr Mark Uebersax Dennis Young and Director Joseph Hotchkissbull MSU Communication Arts Consumer Behavior Dr Maria Lapinski and Dr Nora Rifonbull MSU Criminal Justice Dr Jeremy Wilson Director Ed McGarrell Dr Justin Heinonen Roy Fenoff Zoltan Fejas Barbara
Sayre and Sara Heegbull MSU Supply Chain Management Dr Cheryl Speier Dr Ken Boyer Dr John MacDonald Chair David Closs Dr Stan
Griffis Dr Judy Whipplebull MSU College Social Science Dean Marietta Baba and Assoc Dean Chris Maxwellbull MSU College of Law Dr Neil Fortin and Dr Peter Yubull MSU Libraries Anita Ezzo Nancy Lucas Kara Gustbull MSU International Programs Dr Mary Anne Walker Dr John Whimmsbull State of Michiganrsquos Ag amp Food Protection Strategy Steering Committee Dr John Tilden Brad Deacon Gerald
Wojtala Byron Beerbowerbull The Citadel Dr Roy Fenoff
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 26
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-
DiscussionJohn Spink PhD
SPINKJmsuedu
Douglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msuedu
wwwFoodFraudmsuedu
Twitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
27
httpsyoutubexZgEqNaoQLI httpsyoutube0wAAxfjd
Q2c
FoodFraudmsuedu copy 2018 Michigan State University 27
- Quarterly Trends Update Food Fraud Compliance and the GFSI Food Fraud Technical Document 4Q-2018
- Food Fraud Curriculum
- Defining Food Fraud
- Terminology (Types of Fraud)
- The Food Risk Matrix
- Quarterly Update2018 4Q
- HOT TOPICGFSI FF Technical Document
- GFSI History of Food Fraud Prevention
- GFSI Announcement 592018
- GFSI Issue 7 PublishedFood Fraud Terms
- References and Resources
- Terminology (Definitions)
- Terminology (Detail)
- Terminology ldquoThe standardhelliprdquo
- Terminology ldquoldquoThe Organizationhelliprdquo
- MSU Level of EffortTop-Down or Bottom-Up
- Terminology All Vulnerabilities are not Hazards
- What Requires a Control
- MSU Assess ldquoEveryrdquo not ldquoEachrdquo
- Auditing Guidance
- Audit Depth
- Incoming Goods amp Outgoing Goods - Key Points
- REVIEW Food Fraud Compliance Requirements Scope
- Call to Action
- MSU Engagement 2018
- Acknowledgements
- DiscussionJohn Spink PhDSPINKJmsueduDouglas C Moyer PhDMOYERDO1msueduwwwFoodFraudmsueduTwitter Food Fraud and FoodFraud
-