Quantum Interference and Imaginglsl.postech.ac.kr/data/con20_06.pdf · 2020-07-06 · Quantum...
Transcript of Quantum Interference and Imaginglsl.postech.ac.kr/data/con20_06.pdf · 2020-07-06 · Quantum...
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Quantum Interference and Imaging
Kasra AminiThe Institute of Photonics Sciences, ICFO, Spain (J. Biegert group)
Alexis ChaconMax Planck Research-Initiative, MPK & POSTECH, Korea (D. E. Kim Director)
Sebastian Eckart Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Germany (R. Dörner group)
Benjamin Fetić University of Sarajevo, Department of Physics, Bosnia and Herzegovina (D. B. Milosević group)
Matthias Kübel Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany (G. G. Paulus group)
�1
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Outline of Quantum Battle 2: Quantum Interference and Imaging
• B1 – Interference is a mathematical trick (it is not real). All that can be measured is intensity or
• B2 – How are LIED and holography useful to measure molecular structure?
• B3 – All can be learned by just solving the TDSE. Why do experiments?
• B4 – No one should ever solve the TDSE.
• Open discussion - Decoherence is a symptom of an incomplete measurement and has no physical reality.
|𝜓 2 .
�2
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
B1 – BenjaminInterference is a mathematical trick (it is not real).
All that can be measured is intensity or |𝜓 2
�3
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
P. Bucksbaum et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 760 (1987)
𝐸kin = 𝑛ℏ𝜔𝐼𝑅 − 𝐼𝑃 − 𝑈𝑃
ℏ𝜔𝐼𝑅 = 1.16𝑒V
𝐼𝑝(𝑋𝑒)
ℏ𝜔XUV = 19 ⋅ ℏ𝜔𝐼𝑅
𝜆 = 56 𝑛𝑚
Quantisation in strong fields: ATI in Xe - Benjamin
Photon picture is a successful model for
the fundamental strong-field effects
Up ∝ I0λ2
L. V. Keldysh et al., Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965)
Figure adapted from K. Amini, D.Phil thesis, University of Oxford (2017)
K. Amini et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 116001 (2019)
�4
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
If somewhere is written “interference” this simply indicates that the author was incapable of identifying the conserved quantity of the
system.
Example: Angular positions of the interference maxima for the double slit:
! The conserved quantity for the double slit
is one “doubleslititron” and has the value
𝜃𝑛 = 𝑛 ⋅𝜆𝑑
𝜆𝑑
Hypothesis: We don’t need no interference - Matthias
�5
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020 �6
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Propositions:(1) the ground state (GS) is the e-wave packet source (2) the laser-GS interaction can create multiple time-space slits (Sn) (3) the slits are located about zero of the electric field at tn, let’s assume an approximated time-window of T0/5 (4) by symmetry argument, these slits are separated by a laser-cycle T0 (5) the final energy distribution will be given by the squared of the sum of the individual EWPs produced by each slits
Sn: � with � 𝑃 (𝜀𝐤, 𝑡F) = |∑
𝑛
𝑎𝑛(𝜀𝐤, 𝑡𝑛, 𝑡F) |2 𝑎𝑛(𝜀𝐤, 𝑡𝑛, 𝑡F) = 𝐴𝑛( ⋅ )𝑒−𝑖𝑆(𝜀𝐤,𝑡𝑛,𝑡F)
Electron GS-GUN
S1 S2 S3 S4
Measured Final photoelectron Spectrum
EL(t)
Direct ATI and ultrafast slits analogy - Alexis
�7
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
ATI peaks can be explained as an inter-cycle interference or by using
energy conservation
!What about other types of interference?
Matthias
�8
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Sub-cycle electron trajectories - Kasra
F. H. M. Faisal, Nat. Phys. 5, 319 (2009)
�9
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Y. Huisman, et al., Science 331, 61 (2011) (SOM)
ATI “Temporal Double Slit“ Strong-field PE holography
Intracycle Interference
Scattering-free Interference
signalreference Δ𝜙
Propagation in ionic field
Emission time difference
direct
rescatteringlong
short
Types of interferences & holography - Matthias
Spacing in time gives the interference fringes in momentum space; space in time equals to photon energy
�10
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Intra-cycle interference cannot be modeled by photons - Sebastian
0
Ey [
arb.
uni
ts.]
-1 0 1-1
1
Ex [arb. units.]
0
py [
a.u.
]-1 0 1
-1
1
px [a.u.]
Han, M., Ge, P., Shao, Y., Gong, Q. & Liu, Y., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 73202 (2018) Feng, Y. et al., Phys. Rev. A 100, 63411 (2019)
Eckart, S., Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07249 (2020)Trabert, D. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09584 (2020)Eckart, S. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04148 (2020)
How can position-information or time-information be retrieved from measured electron momentum distribution without recolisions?
Sub-cycle interference allows for the retrieval of e.g.:! complex valued electron continuum wavefunction
! position offset of the electron wave packet at the tunnel exit ! Wigner-time delay in the molecular frame
First, Intra-cycle interference cannot be modeled by photons, because the time scale needed to explain intra-cycle interference Tintra is below one cycle of the light field. ! The concept “photon” does not exit on sub-cycle time-scales.
Second, this also indicates that the wave-particle duality is nonsense on sub-cycle time-scales.
Poll: - A) Photons do not exist at all - B) Photons cannot be used to model physics on sub-cycle time scales (t<1/Eph) - C) Photons are just as good as time dependent fields to model physics (wave particle duality)
�11
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
➡ Single Attosecond EWP
➡ How to recover the phase, if the measurement |ap|^2 lost it 😿 ?
XUV-Attosecond pulse
Atom
e-
📷 EWP
EWP Amplitude
EWP Phase
A. Chacon et al., PRA 87, 023408 (2013)
Attosecond electron wave packet (EWP) measurement - Alexis
Remetter et al., Nature Phys. (2006)
�12
|ap|^2 => |ψp|^2
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
💡 What about analogies? Instances, electromagnetic-laser interferometry tech, i.e. SPIDER
💡 But now with EWPs? https://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/research/ultrafast-quantum-optics-and-optical-metrology/
How is the EWP-phase recovered if its phase is lost in Meas.? - Alexis
Remetter et al., Nature Phys. (2006)
�13
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
But, but, … what about to recovering the wave-function? Still from EWPs’ interferences the dipoles or bound states are missing in Remetter’s paper!
Remetter et al., Nature Phys. (2006)
EWP interferometry by Remetter - Alexis
�14
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
How to extract dipole structural information?
EWP1 EWP2
QSPIDER: Phase Interferometry for Direct EWP Reconstruction - Alexis
A. Chacon et al., PRA (2014)
Primises:
�15
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Applications of qspider to retrieve EWPs And Dipole “phases":
SFA- ionisation from 2pz states of He+
A. Chacon et al., PRA (2014)
EWP-retrieval Dipole Matrix Element reconstruction
�16
QSPIDER: Phase Interferometry for Direct EWP Reconstruction - Alexis
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Atomic Molecular
Strong-field holography
signal
reference
Laser-induced electron diffraction (LIED)
B2 – How are LIED and holography useful to measure molecular structure? - Benjamin
�17
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
LIED: quantum picture - Kasra
�18
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Holography measures the electron wave packet - Matthias
�19M. Meckel et al., Nat. Phys. 10, 592 (2014)
Conclusion: “In our experiment, electron holography provides information about the continuum electron wave packet rather than the scattering object”
Off-center fringe pattern: what does it mean?
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Image orbitals without rescattering - Matthias
M. Meckel et al., Science 320, 1478 (2008)
3p, |m| = 1
3p, m = 0
M. Kübel, et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 1042 (2019)
�20
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
LIED works! - KasraMIR-LIED of C2H2
+
M. Pullen et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 7262 (2015)
C. I. Blaga et al., Nature 483, 194 (2012). B. Wolter et al., Science 354, 308 (2016)
MIR-LIED of C2H22+
deprotonation
LIED
CED (IAM)
NIR-LIED of N2+
Time after ionization (fs)
𝑝𝑟 = 𝑝∥ − A𝑟
�21
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Conditions for LIED - KasraNIR-Scattering: Orbital structure retrieval
- Sensitive to valence electron cloud
- Too low Up and narrow momentum transfer range for molecular structure retrieval
- Boundary of quasistatic (tunnelling) regime- Ionization saturation; easily ionize and fragment large molecules with small Ip
K. Amini, J. Biegert, AAMOP vol. 69, Elsevier (2020). https://bit.ly/31qEOdRB. Wolter et al., PRX 5, 021034 (2015)
F. Schell et al., Sci. Adv. 4, eaap8148 (2018)
MIR-LIED: Molecular structural retrieval
- Large Up – avoid influence/blurring of valence electron cloud- Large momentum transfer range and small λdB – spatial resolution
- Avoid ionization saturation
- Deep into quasistatic (tunneling) regime – you can use classical models and map classical trajectories to exp. data
- Large EWP extent (x)
- Coincidence single molecule imaging
�22
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Sebastian
B3 – All can be learned by just solving the TDSE.
Why do experiments?
�23
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
� 𝑖𝜕
𝜕𝑡 Ψ = − [ 1
2∆ +
1𝑟
+→𝐸 ⋅ →𝑟 ]Ψ
A short story of attoseconds - Matthias
�24
The end.
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Example: Attoclock in atomic hydrogen - Matthias
U. S. Sainadh, et al., Nature 568, 75 (2019)
See also (original work in He, 𝛥tD < 34 as):
P. Eckle, et al., Science 322, 1525 (2008)
�25
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Solutions for N>2, K>2 is very challenging to find
Hamiltonian of any molecule - Alexis
New review: P. Wustelt, M. Kübel, G. G. Paulus, and A. M. Sayler, AAMOP vol. 69, pp. 67–162.
Bromochlorofluoromethane
Alternative: DFT and TD-DFT
�26
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
We can measure this! - Kasra
M. Pitzer, M. Kunitski, A. S. Johnson, T. Jahnke, H. Sann, F. Sturm, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, H. Schmidt-Böcking, R. Dörner, J. Stohner, J. Kiedrowski, M. Reggelin, S. Marquardt, A. Schießer, R. Berger, M. S. SchöfflerDirect Determination of Absolute Molecular Stereochemistry in Gas Phase by Coulomb Explosion ImagingScience, 341 (2013) 1096
�27
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
(Semi-) classical model
TDSE vs (semi-) classical - Benjamin
TDSE Ψ(𝑡 → ∞)Ψ(𝑡 = 0)
𝐸(𝑡)
�28
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
B4.
�29
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Example: Attoclock in atomic hydrogen - Sebastian
U. S. Sainadh, et al., Nature 568, 75 (2019)
See also (original work in He, 𝛥tD < 34 as):
P. Eckle, et al., Science 322, 1525 (2008)
�30
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Reality is described by classical observables - Kasra
What we measure are intensities or • Electrons • Ions • Photons
Alternative interpretations of QM?
|𝜓 2
Poll: - A) Phases can be measured in the lab - B) Only can be measured in the lab - C) Quantum effects can be measured directly by looking at classical observables
|𝜓 2
�31
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Extracting PES from time-dependent wave function - Benjamin
�32
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
PCS vs WO for hydrogen atom - Benjamin
�33
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
PCS vs WO for Argon atom - Benjamin
�34
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Conclusion - Benjamin
�35
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Kasra
Decoherence is a symptom of an incomplete measurement and has no physical reality.
Poll: - A) Agree - B) Disagree - C) I am not sure (I am a cat - maybe)
�36
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Experiment: - dissociation of a neon dimer in a circularly polarized strong laser field- detect electron and ion in coincidence
Is the neon dimer decoherent? - Sebastian
M. Kunitski, N. Eicke, P. Huber, J. Köhler, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, N. Schlott, K. Henrichs, H. Sann , F. Trinter, L. Ph.H. Schmidt, A. Kalinin, M. S. Schöffler, T. Jahnke, M. Lein, R. Dörner, Nat. Commun., 10, 1 (2019)
electron momentum distribution
in the polarization plane (in the molecular frame)
�37
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Is the neon dimer decoherent? - Sebastian
M. Kunitski, N. Eicke, P. Huber, J. Köhler, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, N. Schlott, K. Henrichs, H. Sann , F. Trinter, L. Ph.H. Schmidt, A. Kalinin, M. S. Schöffler, T. Jahnke, M. Lein, R. Dörner, Nat. Commun., 10, 1 (2019)
electron momentum distribution
in the polarization plane (in the molecular frame)
�38
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Is the neon dimer decoherent? - Sebastian
Option B: Interference in momentum space can be used to infer position-information regarding the molecule
M. Kunitski, N. Eicke, P. Huber, J. Köhler, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, N. Schlott, K. Henrichs, H. Sann , F. Trinter, L. Ph.H. Schmidt, A. Kalinin, M. S. Schöffler, T. Jahnke, M. Lein, R. Dörner, Nat. Commun., 10, 1 (2019)
! Interference is recovered selecting only one channel (knowing if an additional photon is absorbed or not) ! Decoherence is a symptom of an incomplete measurement and has no physical reality
�39
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Some processes are incoherent by nature - Matthias
• Quantum physics is microscopic and coherent
• Experiments integrate over the macroscopic focal volume
Focal intensity distribution 𝐼(→𝑟 ) Focal phase distribution 𝜙0(→𝑟 )
D. Hoff, et al., Nature Phys. 13, 947–951 (2017)
�40
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Coherence and incoherence in strong fields - Matthias
HHG: Phase matching coherent sum over Vfocus
𝒀 focusHHG =
∭𝑉
𝒀 atomHHG𝑒−𝑖𝜙(→𝑟 )𝑑3→𝑟
2
𝒀 focusATI =
∭𝑉
𝑌 atomATI 𝑑3→𝑟
ATI: Focal volume averaging incoherent sum over Vfocus
Poll: In HHG all atoms in the focal volume radiate coherently. On the other hand in ATI, electron emission from different atoms…
- A) Is inherently incoherent - B) Is coherent, but we cannot observe the coherence - C) I am not sure (I am a cat - maybe)
�41
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Decoherence - Sebastian
Hackermüller, L., Hornberger, K., Brezger, B. et al. Decoherence of matter waves by thermal emission of radiation. Nature 427, 711–714 (2004)
�42
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Decoherence - Sebastian
Akoury, Dominique, et al. "The simplest double slit: interference and entanglement in double photoionization of H2." Science 318.5852 (2007): 949-952.
E1 ≈ 110 eVE2 < 1 eV
Eγ = 160 eV E1 ≈ 85 to 105 eV
Eγ = 160 eV
5 eV < E2 < 25 eV“Decoherence is the loss of coherence of a quantum system caused by ignoring (i.e., tracing over) degrees of freedom to which the system is coupled and which are regarded as of no interest. The latter is termed the bath, although it need not be larger than one degree of freedom.”
Heekyung Han and Paul Brumer 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 S209
�43
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Semiconductor occup dynamics HHG Spectrum 1D
Band-gap
Max
. ene
rgy-
gap
cv
Extending ultrafast science for electron structural and dynamics in condensed matter phases: Transition metal dicholoeidal Topological Chern insulators Topological insulators Weyl semimental Strongly-correlated materials ….
F. Langer, et al Nat. (2018)
TMDC Topological materials
Conducting edge states
Insulating bulk states
A. Chacon et al (2019) ArXiv Topo. Phase T. In Haldane Model
Future perspectives: dynamics in trivial and topological materials - Alexis
D. Bauer and K. K. Hansen. PRL (2018) R. Silva et al Nat. Photonics (2019) HHG in Haldane Model
�44
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
High harmonic in 3D topological insulators Bi2Se3
D. Baykusheva, A. Chacon et al. (in revision process)
S. Ghimire, D. Reis & T. Heinz SLAC California-USA
Topological anomalous Harmonic vs the ellip. Driven by 7.5 um Laser sources
Bi2Se3
3D TIs: - Insulating bulk bands - Conducting at the surface bands (protected by Time-reversal symm.)
45
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Towards the ultrafast e-h interferometry spectroscopy in trivial and topological materials?
Topological
D. Kim, H. Kang, D.E. Kim and A. Chacon (prelimirary results)
Trivial
46
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
Acknowledgements
CANTON SARAJEVOMinistry for Education, Science and Youth
�47
Battle 2 - Quantum Interference and ImagingQuantum Battles 2020
– Quantum Interference Imaging Team: Kasra, Alexis, Sebastian, Benjamin and Matthias
Thank you for your attention and
don’t forget to see the world from other point of view
�48