Quantum Imaging: New Methods and Applications Robert W. …...Experimental confirmation of ghost...
Transcript of Quantum Imaging: New Methods and Applications Robert W. …...Experimental confirmation of ghost...
Quantum Imaging: New Methods and Applications
Robert W. BoydThe Institute of Optics and
Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
http://www.optics.rochester.edu
Presented at PQE, January 5, 2006.
Research in Quantum Imaging
Can images be formed with higher resolution orbetter sensitivity through use of quantum states of light?
Can we "beat" the Rayleigh criterion?
Quantum states of light: For instance, squeezed light orentangled beams of light.
Outline for this presentationProgress in quantum lithographyProgress in ghost imaging
Progress in Quantum Lithography
Robert W. Boyd, Sean J. Bentley, Hye Jeong Chang, and Malcolm N. O’Sullivan-Hale
Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester NY,USA
PDC
50/50TPA
phase shift φ
Quantum Lithography
Boto et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2733, 2000.
• Entangled photons can be used to form an interference pattern with detail finer than the Rayleigh limit• Process “in reverse” performs sub-Rayleigh microscopy, etc.
("al." includes Jon Dowling)
• Resolution ≈ λ / 2N, where N = number of entangled photons
Quantum Lithography: Easier Said Than DoneNeed an N-photon recording material
For proof-of-principle studies, can useN-th-harmonic generator, correlation circuitry, N-photon photodetector.
For actual implementation, use ????Maybe best bet is UV lithographicmaterial excited in the visible or abroad bandgap material such asPMMA excited by multiphotonabsorption.
Need an intense source of individual biphotons (Inconsistency?)Maybe a high-gain OPA provides the best tradeoff between
•
•
3PA in PMMAbreaks chemical bond, modifying optical properties.
high intensity and required quantum statistics
Problem: self healing
NONLINEAR OPTICS LABORATORY INSTITUTE OF OPTICS UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER 12
QUANTUM LITHOGRAPHY RESEARCH
Experimental Layout
Non-Quantum Quantum Lithography
beam spliter
simulatedN-photon absorber
prism
translation stage
10-Hz, 25 ps 1064 nm Nd:YAG
computer
CCD camera
N-harmonic generator
imaging Lens
spectral filters
N-photon absorber
φk (c)
N=1, M=1
N=2, M=1
N=2, M=2
Concept: average M shots with the phase of shot k given by 2πk/M
S. J. Bentley and R.W. Boyd, Optics Express, 12, 5735 (2004).
Spatial Resolution of Various Systems
• Linear optical mediumE = 1 + cos kx
• Two-photon absorbing medium, classical lightE = (1 + cos kx)2 = 1 + 2 cos kx + cos2 kx= 3/2 + 2 cos kx + (1/2) cos 2kx
• Two-photon absorbing medium, entangled photonsE = 1 + cos 2kx
where k = 2(ω/c) sin θ
θθ
Demonstration of Fringes Written into PMMA
N-photon absorber
θ θ
θ = 70 degreeswrite wavelength = 800 nmpulse energy = 130 µJ per beampulse duration = 120 fsperiod = λ / (2 sin θ) = 425 nm
PMMA on glass substratedevelop for 10 sec in MBIKrinse 30 sec in deionized water
(N = 3 ?)
AFM
PMMA is a standard lithographic material
N-photon absorber
θ θ
θ = 70 degreestwo pulses with 180 deg phase shiftwrite wavelength = 800 nmpulse energy = 90 µJ per beamfundamental period = λ / (2 sin θ) = 425 nmperiod of written grating = 212 nm
PMMA on glass substratedevelop for 10 sec in MBIKrinse 30 sec in deionized water
Demonstration of Sub-Rayleigh Fringes (Period = λ/4)
Significance of PMMA Grating Results
• Provides an actual demonstration of sub-Rayleigh resolution by the phase-shifted grating method
• Demonstrates an N-photon absorber with adequate resolution to be of use in true quantum lithography
Quantum Lithography Prospects
Quantum lithography (as initially proposed by Dowling)has a good chance of becoming a reality.
Classically simulated quantum lithography may be arealistic alternative approach, and one that is much morereadily implemented.
Progress in Ghost Imaging
Robert W. Boyd, Ryan S. Bennink, Sean J. Bentley,
Irfan Ali Khan and John C. Howell
Institute of Optics and Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Rochester, Rochester NY,USA
PDC
photodetector array
"bucket" detectorobject to be imaged
coincidence circuitry
Ghost (Coincidence) Imaging
• Obvious applicability to remote sensing!
entangled photon pair
• Is this a purely quantum mechanical process?Strekalov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).Pittman et al., Phys. Rev. A 52 R3429 (1995).Abouraddy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 123602 (2001).Bennink, Bentley, and Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601 (2002).Bennink, Bentley, Boyd, and Howell, PRL 92 033601 (2004)Gatti, Brambilla, and Lugiato, PRL 90 133603 (2003)Gatti, Brambilla, Bache, and Lugiato, PRL 93 093602 (2003)
Classical Coincidence Imaging
Bennink, Bentley, and Boyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 113601 (2002).
We have performed coincidence imaging with a demonstrably classical source.
Even diffraction effects are observable with classical coincidence imaging.
HeNe
doubleslit
+5 cm
14 cm
5 cm
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 60
join
t int
ensi
ty
diffraction angle (mrad)
Ghost Diffraction with a Classically Correlated Source
scanningdetector
fixed detector (samples center of diffraction pattern)
Bennink, Bentley, Boyd, and Howell, PRL 92 033601 (2004)
Further Development
Entangled Imaging and Wave-Particle Duality: From the Microscopicto the Macroscopic Realm
A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, and L. A. LugiatoINFM, Dipartimento di Scienze CC.FF.MM., Universita dellíInsubria, Via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy
(Received 11 October 2002; published 3 April 2003)
We formulate a theory for entangled imaging, which includes also the case of a large number ofphotons in the two entangled beams. We show that the results for imaging and for the wave-particleduality features, which have been demonstrated in the microscopic case, persist in the macroscopicdomain. We show that the quantum character of the imaging phenomena is guaranteed by thesimultaneous spatial entanglement in the near and in the far field.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.133603 PACS numbers: 42.50.Dv, 03.65.Ud
P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R Sweek ending
4 APRIL 2003VOLUME 90, NUMBER 13
Entangled Imaging and Wave-Particle Duality: From the Microscopicto the Macroscopic Realm
A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, and L. A. LugiatoINFM, Dipartimento di Scienze CC.FF.MM., Universita dellíInsubria, Via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy
(Received 11 October 2002; published 3 April 2003)
We formulate a theory for entangled imaging, ich includes also the case of a large number ofphotons in the two entangled beams. We show that the results for imaging and for the wave-particleduality features, which have been demonstrated in the microscopic case, persist in the macroscopicdomain. We show that the quantum character of the imaging phenomena is guaranteed by thesimultaneous spatial entanglement in the near and in the far field.
10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.133603 PACS numbers: 42.50.Dv, 03.65.Ud
P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R Sweek ending
4 APRIL 2003VOLUME 90, NUMBER 13
near field
Good imaging observed in both the near and far fields!
far field
Near- and Far-Field Imaging Using Quantum Entanglement
-500 0 500position (µm)
-500 0 500position (µm)
inte
nsity
inte
nsity
Bennink, Bentley, Boyd, and Howell, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 033601, 2004.
mask (object) is two opaque bars, 200 µm wide
Good imaging can be obtained only in near field or far field.Detailed analysis shows that in the quantum case the space- bandwidth exceeded the classical limit by a factor of ten.
near field
far field
••
Near- and Far-Field Imaging With a Classical Source
HeNe
34 cm
10 cm
testpattern
20 cm
14 cm
34 cm
HeNe
5 cm10 cm
5 cm
10 cm
testpattern
20 cm
-500 0 500position (mm)
-500 0 500position (mm)
inte
nsity
inte
nsity
Is Entanglement Really Needed for GhostImaging with an Arbitrary Object
Location?Gatti et al. (PRA and PRL, 2004) argue that thermalsources can mimic the quantum correlations produced byparametric down conversion. (Related to Brown-Twisseffect.)Experimental confirmation of ghost imaging withthermal sources presented by Como and UMBC groups
But the contrast of the images formed in this manner islimited to 1/2 or 1/N (depending on the circumstances)where N is the total number of pixels in the image.
entangled particles, perfectly correlated in position & momentum
The EPR Paradox
n measure x1 ⇒ know x2 with certainty (∆x2 = 0)
n measure p1 ⇒ know p2 with certainty (∆p2 = 0)
n measurement of particle 1 cannot affect particle 2 (?!)⇒ and
in conflict with
measure x or p
simultaneously (?!)
Det. 1 Det. 2
€
∆x2 = 0
€
∆p2 = 0
€
∆x2 ∆p2 ≥ 12
h
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen argued that quantum mechanicsmust be "incomplete."
n The quantum signature of ghost imaging issimultaneous correlations in both x and k
n EPR thought that simultaneous correlations in both x and p contradicted Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle
The criterion for quantum features in coincidence imaging,
Quantum Imaging and the EPR Effect
is equivalent to that for violating the EPR hypothesis.
n With entangled photons, one can perfom the original EPRexperiment (not Bell's). EPR were considering continuousvariables (momentum and position) not the spin variable.
∆x2( )x1( )2∆k2( )k1( )2
≤1
position (near field)
transverse momentum (far field)
• We find that (∆x2)x1 (∆p2)p1
= 0.1h
Position-Momentum Realization of the EPR Paradox
Diode Doubler
BBO
slit
APD 1
APD 2
PBS
16 cm
28 cm10 cm
SF
SF
SF
slit
Diode DoublerBBO
SF
PBS
10 cm
10 cm
10 cm
10 cmAPD 1
APD 2
SF
SF
slit
slit
-20 -10 0 10 200
0.05
0.1
0.15
p2 [h/mm]
-0.1 0 0.10
10
20
30
40
x2 [mm]
(∆x2)x1= 0.027mm
P(p
2|p
1)P
(x2|x
1)
(∆p2)p1= 3.7 h/mm
• We find that (∆x2)x12 (∆p2)p1
2 = 0.01h2 , where according to EPR the product could be no smaller than unity.
Discussion: Position-Momentum Realization of the EPR Paradox
-20 -10 0 10 200
0.05
0.1
0.15
p2 [h/mm]-0.1 0 0.1
0
10
20
30
40
x2 [mm]
(∆x2)x1= 0.027mm
P(p
2|p
1)
P(x
2|x
1)
(∆p2)p1= 3.7 h/mm
• The spread in x is determined by the angular bandwidth of the PDC process, which is limited by phase matching requirements.
• The spread in p is determined by the momentum uncertainty of the pump beam, which is limited by the pump spot size.
• PRL, 92, 210403 (2004).
position momentum
EPR Entanglement: previous work
• Squeezed light fields (quadrature squeezedcorrelations)
• Reid and Drummond, PRL 60, 2731 (1988)• Ou et al, PRL 68, 3663 (1992)• Silberhorn et al, PRL 86, 4267 (2001)• Bowen et al, PRL 89, 253601 (2002)
• Collective atomic spin variables (spinobservables)
• Julsgaard, Nature 413, 400 (2001)
• Modern rephrasing of continuous entanglement• Duan et al, PRL 84, 2722 (2000)• Simon, PRL 84, 2726 (2000)• Mancini et al, PRL 88, 120401 (2002)
Pixel Entanglement: Entanglement
Position Correlation Momentum CorrelationCore
CladdingAlice Bob Alice Bob
Quantum pixel: discrete average of a non-commuting, continuous variable (e.g., x or p).
xL1
L2
L3
DP
5x
5xAPDs
PBS
SF
SF
DMBBO
router
fiber array A
fiber array B
390 nm
780 nm14 cm
28 cm7 cm
1 23
132
0
0.5
1
1 2 3 12
3
1 2 3
12
3
0
0.5
1
Nor
mal
ized
Coi
ncid
ence
Cou
nts
Arm A
Arm B
Arm B
xA - xB pA - pB
xA - pB pA - xB
O'Sullivan-Hale, Khan, Boyd, and Howell, PRL 2005
Possible application: generalizationof cryptographic protocols to quditsof higher dimension d.
In A Very Large Hilbert Space
Summary
Quantum lithography has a good chance of becoming areality.
The quantum vs. classical nature of ghost imaging ismore subtle than most of us had appreciated.
Many of our cherished “quantum effects” can bemimicked classically.
There is still work to be done in the context of quantumimaging to delineate the quantum/classical frontier.
Thank you for your attention!
Thank you for your attention!
Our results are posted on the web at:
http://www.optics.rochester.edu/~boyd
Research in Quantum ImagingQuantum Imaging or Quantum Imogene?
Quantum Imaging MURI TeamRobert Boyd, John Howell, URSasha Sergienko, Bahaa Saleh, Mal Teich, BUJon Dowling, LSUJeff Shapiro, MITGeraldo Barbosa, Prem Kumar, NWUYanhua Shih, Fow-Sen Choa, Morton Rubin, UMBC
International CollaboratorsClaude Fabre, University of ParisMikhail Kolobov, University of LilleLuigi Lugiato, Alessandra Gatti, Como
Major US Initiative in Quantum Imaging
Quantum Imaging Research Plan
Quantum Imaging Systems Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography (QOCT). Quantum Coincidence (or Ghost) Imaging. Quantum Laser Radar. Quantum Lithography.
Quantum Imaging Technologies Intense Sources of Entangled Photons
Parametric Downconversion in Periodically Poled Waveguides.Quantum Entangled Sources based on Third-Order Interactions.Entanglement Utilizing Complex Pump Mode Patterns.
High-Order Entanglement. Pixel Entanglement and Secure Transmission of Images. Unified Theoretical Framework for Classical and Quantum Imaging.
Quantum Imaging Research Plan
Quantum Imaging Systems Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography (QOCT). Quantum Coincidence (or Ghost) Imaging. Quantum Laser Radar. Quantum Lithography.
Quantum Imaging Technologies Intense Sources of Entangled Photons
Parametric Downconversion in Periodically Poled Waveguides.Quantum Entangled Sources based on Third-Order Interactions.Entanglement Utilizing Complex Pump Mode Patterns.
High-Order Entanglement. Pixel Entanglement and Secure Transmission of Images. Unified Theoretical Framework for Classical and Quantum Imaging.
Quantum Laser Radar
Primary goal is to use noiseless preamplification (phase sensitive amplification) to increase senstivity of laser radar.
Kumar and Shapiro
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
: Pump off
: Pump on with path mismatch: Pump on & phase locking on: Pump on & phase locking off
Sweeping time (second)
Opt
ical
pow
er (
dB
m)
(b)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
: Pump off
: Pump on with path mismatch: Pump on & phase locking on: Pump on & phase locking off
Sweeping time (second)
Opt
ical
pow
er (
dB
m)
(b)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
: Pump off
: Pump on with path mismatch: Pump on & phase locking on: Pump on & phase locking off
Sweeping time (second)
Opt
ical
pow
er (
dB
m)
(b)
Quantum Optical Coherence Tomography
Sample
SLD
Mirror
Detector
QOCT Interferogram
Pathway delay (µm)
OCT Interferogram
FWHM = 18.5 µm
FWHM = 37 µm
Dispersion CancelledFWHM = 19.5 µm
Cross-interference
FWHM = 104 µm
c�
c�
Sample
Laser NLC BS
Mirror Detector 1
Detector 2
x
1213
2314
34
24 1234
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
1.0
1.2
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.8
AirFused Silica Dispersive medium
90-µm90-µm AirAir 12-mm ZnSe
Fused Silica
Classical
Quantum
I(�)
C(�)
Nasr, Saleh, Sergienko, and Teich, PRL 91 083601 (2003)
Quantum OCT offers three advantages over classical: Factor-of-two better spatial resolution Dispersion cancellation Cross-interference provides additional information
Nonlocal Quantum Spatial Correlations Induced by Pump Beams Carrying Orbital Angular Momentum
Altman, Kumar, Barbosa, et al., PRL 94 123601 (2005).
• Image information encoded on pump beam leads to quantum correlations in the down-converted photons.• Demonstrates entanglement of orbital angular momentum.
Compared to other kinds of continuous entanglement(squeezed fields, macroscopic spin), twin-photonspatial entanglement has several advantages:
n easy to produce
n easy to measure
n not degraded by optical loss
n many possible states (100’s) for quantum info
n pixel cryptography
n image teleportation
n ?
Advantages of x-p entanglement
(∆x2)x12 (∆k2)k1
2 = 2.2 ± 0.2
Uncertainty Product: Classical Versus Quantum
• The image resolution can be quantified by the width of the point spread function.
• Thus, nonclassical behavior has been observed.
• For images obtained with entangled photons, we find that the uncertainty product is given by
(∆x2)x12 (∆k2)k1
2 = 0.01 ± 0.03 which is 100 times smaller than the limiting value of unity.
• For images obtained with our classical source, we find that the uncertainty product is given by
which in agreement with theory is larger than unity.
Remote (Ghost) Spectroscopy
Can this idea be implemented with thermal light?Scarcelli, Valencia, Compers, and Shih, APL 83 5560 2003.
See also the related work of Bellini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 043602 (2003).