Quantum dynamics with ultra cold atoms Nir Davidson Weizmann Institute of Science Billiards BEC I....
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Quantum dynamics with ultra cold atoms Nir Davidson Weizmann Institute of Science Billiards BEC I....
Quantum dynamics with ultra cold atoms
Nir Davidson
Weizmann Institute of Science
-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Billiards BEC86 1010 n 1 n
I. Grunzweig, Y. Hertzberg, A. Ridinger (M. Andersen, A. Kaplan)
Eitan Rowen, Tuesday
R
E 1 nm
Dynamics inside a molecule:quantum dynamics on nm scale
Fsec laser pulse
Is there quantum chaos?
• Classical chaos: distances between close points grow exponentially
• Quantum chaos: distance between close states remains constant
1212 |expexp nnnH
iH
in
Asher Peres (1984): distance between same state evolved by close Hamiltonians grows faster for (underlying) classical chaotic dynamics ???
nnnH
iH
in |expexp 12
Answer: yes….but also depends on many other things !!!
One thing with many names: survival probability = fidelity = Loschmidt echo
R. Jalabert and H. Pastawski, PRL 86, 2490 (2001)
PRL 86, 1518 (2001), PRL 87, 274101(2001), PRL 90 023001 (2003)
…and effects of soft walls, gravity, curved manifolds, collisions…..
Atom-optics billiards:decay of classical time-correlations
Wedge billiards: chaotic and mixed phase space
Criteria for “quantum” to “classical” transition
Old: large state number
'' nnnn 610/ nEE
Quantum dynamics with <n>~106: challenges and solutions:
• Very weak (and controlled) perturbation –optical traps + very strong selection rules
• No perturbation from environment - ultra cold atoms
• Measure mixing – microwave spectroscopy
• Pure state preparation? - echo
11010 66 n
1n
New: “mixing” to many states by small perturbation 1' nnn
But “no mixing” is hard to get
Pulsed microwave spectroscopy
Prepare Atomic Sample → MW-pulse Sequence → Detect Populations
Off
On
2
1
3
• cooling and trapping ~106 rubidium atoms• optical pumping to
π-pulse:
π/2-pulse: 22
12
11
i
21 i
1
optical transition
MW “clock” transition
)0,3,5( 2/1 FmFS
)0,2,5( 2/1 FmFS
Ramsey spectroscopy of free atoms
TΔcos121
P2
2/21 i
2/21 Tiie 1
H = Hint + Hext → Spectroscopy of two-level Atoms
π/2 π/2T
MW
Pow
er
Time
Ramsey spectroscopy of trapped atoms
22H11HH 21 extHH int
EHF
2
1
|1,Ψ>
|2,Ψ>
|1,Ψ>
H2
H1
e-iH2t|2,Ψ>
e-iH1t|1,Ψ>
<Ψ| eiH1
te-iH2
t|Ψ>…
Microwave pulse
Microwave pulse
General case: Nightmare Short strong pulses: OK (Projection)
)/( ALopt IV
Ramsey spectroscopy of single eigenstate
π/2 π/2M
W P
ower
Time
T
For small Perturbation:
Ramsey spectroscopy of thermal ensemble
π/2 π/2M
W P
ower
Time
T
Averaging over the thermal ensemble destroys the Ramsey fringes
For small Perturbation:
Echo spectroscopy (Han 1950)
π/2 π/2TM
W P
ower
Time
π T
t=T
t=2T
NOTE: classically echo should not always work for dynamical system !!!!
Echo spectroscopy
π/2 π/2TM
W P
ower
Time
π T
Coherence
De-Coherence Ramsey
Echo
BUT: it works here !!!!
nH
iH
iH
iH
in
2121 expexpexpexp
nH
iH
in
21 expexp Ramsey
Echo
Echo vs. Ramsey spectroscopy
H2
H1
H2
H1
H1
H2
Quantum dynamics in Gaussian trap
Coherence
De-Coherence
Calculation for H.O.
'n,nδn'n
Tosc/2 Tosc
EHF
2
1
Long-time echo signal
nEEEnn nn /' '
4
2 nn'n121
P
Coherence
De-Coherence
610/ EE•2-D:
•1-D:310/ EE
nEEnn nn /1/' '
Observation of “sidebands”
Π-pulse
4π-pulse
Quantum stability in atom-optic billiards
<n>~104
Quantum stability in atom-optic billiards
<n>~104
D. Cohen, A. Barnett and E. J. Heller, PRE 63, 046207 (2001)
Avoid Avoided Crossings
Quantum dynamics in mixed and chaotic phase-space
Coherent
Incoherent
Perturbation strength
Perturbation-independent decay
Quantum dynamics in perturbation-independent regime
0,000 0,005 0,010
0,0
0,2
0,4
P2
Time between pulses (s)
Chaotic Mixed
Shape of perturbation is also important
… and even it’s position
No perturbation-independence
Finally: back to Ramsey (=Loschmidt)
•Quantum dynamics of extremely high-lying states in billiards:survival probability = Loschmidt echo = fidelity=dephasing?
• Quantum stability depends on: classical dynamics, type and strength of perturbation, state considered and….
• “Applications”: precision spectroscopy (“clocks”) quantum information
Conclusions
Can many-body quantum dynamics be reversed as well?
(“Magic” echo, Pines 1970’s, “polarization” echo, Ernst 1992)
•Control classical dynamics (regular, chaotic, mixed…)
•Quantum dynamics with <n>~106 ????
Tzahi Ariel Nir
Atom Optics Billiards
Atom Optics Billiards
Positive (repulsive) laser potentials of various shapes.Standing Wave
Trap Beam
• Z direction frozen by a standing wave
• Low density collisions
• “Hole” in the wall probe time-correlation function