Quantitative Analysis of Cooked Rice Grain Texture · Name of program Method Texture Profile...
-
Upload
nguyenliem -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Quantitative Analysis of Cooked Rice Grain Texture · Name of program Method Texture Profile...
Name of program
Quantitative Analysis of Cooked
Rice Grain Texture
Yanco Rice Quality TeamPresented by
Dr Jixun Luo
19th Jul 2017
Name of program
Introduction
Rice varieties with different quality and texture are used to
make different type of foods
Adapted from DPI website
Name of program
Introduction
Factors affecting cooked rice texture
• Amylose content
• Post-harvest processing
• Cooking methods
– South and East Asians: rice cooker, particular water ratio
– Indians: boiling in excess water
– Americans: use large amount of water then drained
Current methods (indirectly measures texture)
• RVA (setback correlated with firmness)
• Gel texture analysis (gel firmness)
Name of program
Introduction
Texture analysis
• Sensory panel
High cost for training and maintaining the panel
Not ideal for screening purpose
• Instrumental approach
Less cost and less time-consuming
• Texture analyser
Mimic the first bite of a food sample
probe
rice
scale
Firmness Stickiness
Name of program
Aims of study
• Develop a method to directly measure
cooked rice texture
• Compare textures of breeding lines and
existing varieties
• Determine the contribution of different grain
quality factors affecting the texture (amylose
content, gelatinisation temp, RVA parameters, etc.)
Name of program
Materials
30 varieties from Leeton farm, C2016
Selected based on
• Different grain dimensions
• Apparent amylose content 7~27 %
• Gelatinisation temp (GT) 65~79 oC
• Optimum cooking time 14~21 min
Name of program
Method
Cooking method
Excess water method with
• Standard cooking time
• Standard water ratio
Instrumental texture analysis• Excess water drained after cooking
• Single layer cooked rice grains
• Two cycle compression
Name of program
Method
Cooking in RVA • 1g white rice contained in tea ball
mesh and rinsed with tap water
• Add water up to 4g in a RVA can
• Seal the can with lid on using the
thermo tape
• Load on to RVA machine
• Run the standard cooking profile
• Remove the lid after cooking to release the steam
• Replace with another lid at 1 min to keep it warm for
3 min on the bench
95oC, 21min
Name of program
Method
Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) using TXT
• Weigh and prepare 1g cooked rice sample
within the mark on a glass plate in 1 min
• Run the standard test profileTwo cycle compression,
compress to 80% sample height
Technical tips:
Each single grain sits on its side and spread
well. Sample height is negatively correlated with
firmness for the same sample.
Name of program
Results - theory
(Firmness)
Peak force
Area3
(Stickiness)
Cycle 1 Cycle 2
Area4
(Ration of
Area3 and 4 is
cohesiveness)
Texture Profile
Name of program
Results - Firmness
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
b
f
bc
g
a
7%~9% 17%~21% 25%~27%
b
d de
d
f
d ddcc
ff
ccb b
cd
cb
d
f
contro
l
Fir
mn
ess
(g
)
Name of program
Results - Firmness
Calmochi101TDK11
HMN
Tarra140
YRW4
Reiziq
YRM69
Quest
Koshi
Nipponbare
IRAT109
Doongara
IR64
L205
Fin
SHZ2
BD192
Amber33
Viet5
Amarroo
Namaga
Opus
Langi
Bengal
Jarrah
KyeemaYRB4
TakanriCalmochi 201
YRM70
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
65 70 75 80
7%~9%
17%~21%
25%~27%
Amylose
content
Gelatinization Temp (oC)
Fir
mn
ess
(J)
Name of program
Results - Firmness
y = 77.459x + 2027
R² = 0.76640
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Fir
mn
ess
(g
)
Amylose content (%)
y = 3.2828x + 3020.5
R² = 0.4789
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Fir
mn
ess
(g
)
Gel firmness (g)
None Waxy
Name of program
Results - Stickiness
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
aa
bb b
bb
b
cc cc ccc
c cd
de e
ff
fgg
g
h h
contro
l7%~9% 17%~21% 25%~27%
Sti
ckin
ess
(J)
Name of program
Results - Stickiness
Calmochi101
TDK11
HMN
Tarra140
YRW4
Reiziq
YRM69
Quest
Koshi
Nipponbare
IRAT109
Doongara
IR64
L205
Fin
SHZ2
BD192Amber33
Viet5
Amarroo
Namaga
Opus
Langi
Bengal
Jarrah
Kyeema
YRB4
Takanari
Calmochi 201
YRM70
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
65 70 75 80
7%~9%
17%~21%
25%~27%
Amylose
content
Sti
ckin
ess
(J)
Gelatinization Temp (oC)
Name of program
Results - Stickiness
Calmochi101
TDK11
HMN
Tarra140
YRW4
Reiziq
YRM69
Quest
Koshi
Nipponbare
IRAT109
Doongara
IR64
L205
Fin
SHZ2
BD192 Amber33
Viet5
AmarrooNamaga
Opus
Langi
Bengal
Jarrah
Kyeema
YRB4
Takanari
Calmochi 201
YRM70
y = -0.0505x + 274.95
R² = 0.4697
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
Sti
ckin
ess
(J)
Firmness (g)
Name of program
Results - Stickiness
y = 13.949x - 171.71
R² = 0.5255
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sti
ckin
ess
(J)
OCT (oC)
None Waxy
y = -13.129x + 1146.2
R² = 0.7708
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
0 50 100 150 200
Se
tba
ck (
RV
AU
)
Stickiness (J)
Name of program
Summary
• Used TVT machine to measure texture
directly
• Compared results to gel firmness
• Explored texture correlation with OCT, GT,
RVA setback parameter
• The outlier varieties in the texture profile
of each amylose group were found
Name of program
Future work
• More quality data for covariant analysis
• Amylose & amylopectin structure analysis
by CE/SEC
• Look at the outliers
Name of program
Acknowledgement
Rice Quality Team:
Dr Rachelle Ward Dr Laura Pallas
Ms Margrit Martin Dr Prakash Oli
Ms Leanne Johnston Ms Yuki Sims
Ms Kylie Elliott Dr Mark Talbot
Ms Rachael Wood (PhD candidate)
Rice Breeding Team:
Dr Peter Snell
Dr Ben Ovenden
Supervisor:
Dr Sandra McDougall