Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

26
US Wealth Distribution 2009

Transcript of Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Page 1: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

US Wealth Distribution 2009

Page 2: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 3: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Economic Inequality – GINI Coefficients (CIA 2009)

Page 4: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 5: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 6: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Social Mobility/Income Inequality

Page 7: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Homicide and Income Inequality

Page 8: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 9: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 10: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Fishkin's TrilemmaThree ideals–Equality of life chances–Merit–Family autonomy

People in unequal family conditions have unequal resources/abilities

Thus we can satisfy two, but not all three, of these principles

Page 11: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Equality of life chances

The prospects of children for eventual social positions should not significantly vary because of arbitrary native characteristics.

Alternative to equality of results, still may require some “affirmative action” to provide basic resources for children of poor families.

Page 12: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Merit

Insistence on procedural fairness in the evaluation of qualifications for positions and access to benefits

Assumes possibility of measuring qualifications in reasonably equitable and uniform manner

Page 13: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Autonomy of the Family

Parents have autonomy in raising their children, unless parents harm or hamper them for adult participation in society

State cannot insist that parents follow best practices for children’s education or socialization

Page 14: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Possible Resolutions of TrilemmaReduce family autonomy – greater

social/state role in child rearingAdopt affirmative action – reduce role

of merit in admissions, hiring, promotion

Accept greater inequality - disadvantaged children will be penalized for their bad luck

Page 15: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Compromises

Encourage family autonomy, but supplement with universal education

Implement affirmative action, but do so in early development, e.g., head start programs

Page 16: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Black CodesFormer slaves were “forbidden to appear in

the towns in any other character than menial servants. They were required to reside on and cultivate the soil without the right to purchase or own it. There were excluded from many occupations of gain, and were not permitted to give testimony in the courts in any case where a white man was a party.”

Slaughterhouse Cases (1872)

Page 17: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Barriers to Voting for African-Americans

literacy requirements poll taxes discretionary registration

rules “grandfather” waivers single race primary elections

Page 18: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Economic Barriers for African-Americans

lack of access to capital or landlimited skills and literacy

significant intimidation, includingvagrancy laws

licensing procedures excluding blacks

Page 19: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Social Discrimination against African-Americans

Laws Prohibiting Intermarriage

Use of Separate FacilitiesResidential SegregationSchool Segregation

Page 20: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)Discrimination by Design

v. Disparate Impact

Duke had segregated plant until 1964 Civil Rights Act, African-Americans only worked in labor dept

Following CRA, Duke requires HS degree or passage of aptitude test for any position, including truck driving, outside Labor Dept.

Page 21: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)

Results of Segregated Education % of NC male high school grads, 1966

Black Men: 12% White Men: 34%

Applicants who passed aptitude test Black Men: 6 % White Men: 58%

Page 22: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Do African-Americans have an equal chance as whites in being hired for a

job for which they are qualified?

1963 2011Whites 41% 78%

African Americans 23% 39%

USA Today/Gallup Poll, 8/17/2011

Page 23: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Are new civil rights laws needed to reduce discrimination against blacks?

1993 2011

Total (all races) 38% 21%Whites 33% 15%Blacks 70% 52%USA Today/Gallup Poll, 8/17/2011

Page 24: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.

Should the government have a ____ in improving the social/economic position

of blacks and other minority groups?Major Role

Minor Role

No role

Total 27% 46% 26%Whites 19% 50% 30%Blacks 59% 32% 8%

USA Today/Gallup Poll, 8/17/2011

Page 25: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.
Page 26: Quandaries of Equality. US Wealth Distribution 2009.