Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

8

Click here to load reader

description

A presentation given at the Irish Cancer Society's Survivorship Research Day at the Aviva Stadium, Dublin on Thursday, September 20th, 2013. Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Transcript of Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Page 1: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Quality of Life of Head and NeckCancer Survivors in Urban and Rural IrelandAudrey Alforque Thomas1

Timmons A2, Molcho M1, Gallagher P3, O’Neill C1,Butow P4, Gooberman-Hill R5, O’Sullivan E6, Sharp L2

1National University of Ireland, Galway; 2National Cancer Registry Ireland; 3Dublin City University; 4University of Sydney, Australia; 5University of Bristol, UK; 6University College Cork

Funding from Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement FellowshipHealth Research Board

Page 2: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Irelandhead and neck cancer

Urban – Rural Comparisons

• Mostly incidence, treatment, clinical outcomes• United States, Australia, Canada, Scotland• Breast, colorectal, prostate cancers

health-related quality of lifeHow does health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer survivors differ in urban versus rural Ireland ?

Page 3: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

SuN Study

• Support Needs of Survivors of Head & Neck Cancer Study• Data collection funded by HRB• Respondents identified from the Registry• 583 head and neck cancer survivors• Linked to Registry data

The SuN Study

Head & Neck Cancer

Page 4: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

• Composite variable• Distance to treating hospital• Population density• Self-reported area

• Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)• Physical• Social/Family• Emotional• Functional• Head and Neck module

Measuring urban/rural and wellbeing

Page 5: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Analysis

FACT domain scores were skewed• Bootstrap linear regression• Bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals• Similar to OLS linear regression

Page 6: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Living in a rural area is associated with higher wellbeing

Physical Social Emotional Functional HN

Rural 1.27 0.89 0.99 1.41 1.55Female -0.22 1.64 -1.15 0.56 0.91Medical card -1.78 -0.79 -1.63 -2.44 -2.24Married/cohabiting 0.42 2.36 -0.18 1.76 1.10Third Level education 1.96 -1.51 0.61 0.69 2.62Age at survey 0.10 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.04Cancer returned/spread -3.77 0.44 -1.93 -2.22 -4.34Larynx -0.54 -0.24 -1.22 -1.65 -2.41Mouth -0.61 0.61 -0.85 -0.28 -3.36Pharynx -2.63 -1.17 -1.51 -2.65 -7.79

Coefficients in bold are significant at the 0.05 level

Page 7: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

Living in a rural area is associated with higher wellbeing

• Drift Hypothesis• Breeder Hypothesis• Biophilia Hypothesis• Rural culture

Can only speculate about why there is a relationship

Urban and rural cancer survivors havedifferent life experiences.

Page 8: Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors in Urban and Rural Ireland - Audrey Thomas

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Eamonn O’Leary, Statistical consultantNeil McCluskey, Geographic information consultant

Funding from Health Research Board