Quality label
15
Open ECBCheck Open ECB-Check Quality Label Rafael García Rodríguez University of Augsburg, 2010
-
Upload
faligarcia -
Category
Education
-
view
605 -
download
2
description
This presentation describes the process by which an organization must pass to earn the Quality Label of the Open ECB-Check
Transcript of Quality label
Open ECBCheck
Open ECB-Check Quality Label
Rafael García Rodríguez
University of Augsburg, 2010
Introduction
Organisations in developing countries are interested in measuring and improving impact efficiency and guaranteeing the success of their e-learning programs for progress.
Also a few organizations which are very advanced in the use of
e-learning for their programs are interesting in excellence label.
The quality label offering two possibilities for an institutional certification. A basic level, focusing on effectiveness, and a second level, focussing on excellence.
Inquiry & application
Organization
contact for a first inquiry
inform about:
- process to follow
- costs and tasks
Administration
Office
First contact:
Eligibility check
Institutions
brief questionnaire
Eligibility check
Not eligible Eligible
• Seriousness
• Potential
• Reasons
• Advice
Self-assessment
Organization ToolKit
• based on Excel
• digital form online
Self-assessment
• According to
quality criteria
Self-assessment
The assessment is valid when the organization registers for each criterion within the Toolkit and also presents proof for their rating.
This proof may provided in form of protocols, concept papers, curricula, information brochures or any other document that may proof the self-rating.
Self-assessment
Two targets
- assessment of the quality
- learning system
Administration Office
Self-assessment
completed
Self-assessment report
Self-assessmentreport
Administration Office
ECB-Check community
not known potential interest conflicts
Capacity Building Organisations
- Justified objection
- Positive prejudice
Two peer-reviewers
Peer-review
assess the rating ofthe organisation for
each criterion
- Clarity
- Comprehensiveness
- Validity
Reviewers
* If data or details are unclear or unsatisfactory, the organisation have the
timeframe to two weeks maximum to provide the additional data or details.
Peer-review report
Self-assessment
3 areas
- Summary of the self-assessment
- Recommendation
- Detailed learning report
Peer-review report
Administration Office
completed
Awarding Body
Awarding Body
simple majority
Decision
positivenot satisfactory negative
Awarding Body
Administration Office
not satisfactory Awarding Body
revision of
the report
appropriate
deadline
Awarding Body
positive
Administration OfficeInstitution
process to follow
update the official register
Open ECB-Check Label
(valid for three years)
re-application after three years
Awarding Body
Awarding Body
negative
Administration OfficeInstitution
learning report for improvements
informs about reasons
no reapplication in one year
advice about changes
Awarding Body
• http://www.qualityfoundation.org/openecbcheck/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=6:improvement-a-certification-concept&catid=3:the-ecbcheck-concept&Itemid=8
• http://www.qualityfoundation.org/openecbcheck/
• http://www.efqm.org/en/
More information about Open ECB-Check in: http://www.qualityfoundation.org/openecbcheck/
References
