Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences
Transcript of Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences
![Page 1: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
QUALITY DIMENSIONS IN EVALUATING SOCIAL SCIENCES
![Page 2: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
• Evaluation in social science must gauge what children have learnt in terms of concepts, rules and generalizations, and their ability to use this knowledge for problem solving and application in the real life situations. • The evaluation that measure lower
mental abilities like memory, retention and reproduction of facts/information should be discarded. • Rather higher cognitive skills like
Decision Making, Critical Thinking, Effective Citizenship, Problem Solving and Social Participation etc should be evaluated in social science testing.
![Page 3: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TOOLS FOR EVALUATING SS
Tools
Open Ended Essay
Multiple Choice Items
Project/Assignments
Documentatio
n
Discussion /
Conversation
Portfolio
Interpretative
Exercises
![Page 4: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
QUALITY ISSUES
Neglecting Affective and Psychomotor Aspects
Using Traditional Type of Test Items
Not Use of Non-testing Assessment Tools
Making question suitable for all
Lack of Scorer Realibility
Tracking Students Progress
Providing Feedback
![Page 5: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SUGGESTIONS• The HOTs, values and social skills should be
given more weightage in assessment. • Question paper should consist of well
prepared and different types of items. • The non-testing devices like projects,
assignments, group discussion, group work, portfolio etc can successfully be used. • Students reading and writing ability should
be taken into consideration while preparing items.• The items should have power to
differentiate students. • The choices for essay question should be
parallel to each other. • The evaluator should be given freedom to
score not on basis of model answer only but from their own understanding on questions
![Page 6: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• The attitude and work habits of students need to be assessed in assignments and projects.• Analytical and Constructive Feedback to
students and teachers should be given on both cognitive and non-cognitive development.• Interest of students towards study of
social sciences need to be fostered by creating awareness about career options and necessity for life.• The capacity building programme for
teachers on assessment process in social science need to be organized regularly.• Questions can be pooled all year round,
from teachers, college professors, educators from other states and even from students (NCF-2005).
![Page 7: Quality dimensions for evaluating social sciences](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082905/58e4d4e31a28abf5048b51ef/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CONCLUSION
There is an urgent need to reform evaluation system in general and social science subject in particular. The nature of social science content demands more flexibility to students in answering and to scorer in scoring the essay questions.
The examination reform cannot be successful until it linked to teacher preparation and change of attitude of stake holders of education like parents, teachers, educational administrators, educationists etc.