Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

9
Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions ILRS Fall 2005 Worksho October 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, U Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions Daniel Koenig, Roland Schmidt, Rolf Koenig

description

Daniel Koenig, Roland Schmidt, Rolf Koenig. Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions. Characterisation of Predicted Orbits Quality Control Improvement of CHAMP Orbit Predictions. Contents. last observation. Time Advance. 3h 6h 9h ... 48h. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Page 1: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Quality Control ofGFZ Orbit Predictions

Daniel Koenig, Roland Schmidt, Rolf Koenig

Page 2: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Contents

* Characterisation of Predicted Orbits

* Quality Control* Improvement of CHAMP Orbit Predictions

Page 3: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Characterisation of PDOs for CHAMP and GRACE-A/-B

True Orbit(RSO)

radial cross-track

along-track/Time Bias

3h 6h 9h ... 48h

last observation Time Advance

PDOObserved Part Predicted Part

Part of Force Function Model

Gravity of Earth Up to 05/2005: GRIM5-C1 (90x90)Since 06/2005: EIGEN-CG01C-2 (60x60)

Ocean Tides Up to 05/2005: GRIM5-C1Since 06/2005: FES2002

Page 4: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Quality of Observed Part (Orbit Fit): CHAMP Laser Residuals

Change to

new gravity field

EIGEN-CG01C-2

Page 5: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Quality of Observed Part (Orbit Fit): GRACE-A Laser Residuals

Change to new gravity field

EIGEN-CG01C-2

Page 6: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Quality of Predicted Part: Orbit Comparison to RSOs

Satellite: CHAMPPeriod: 03/2005Component: Time BiasTime Advance: 9h

Histogram of Orbit ErrorsBetween Predicted Part and RSO

Mean : -0.57 ms Sigma : 11.64 ms Min : -32.37 ms Max : 31.42 ms Rate of inner class: 60.0 %

Page 7: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Improvement of CHAMP Orbit Predictions – Results –

Satellite: CHAMP Period: 09/2004

Rate of Time Bias in [-10ms, +10ms]from Histograms

Page 8: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Improvement of CHAMP Orbit Predictions – Results –

Satellite: CHAMP Period: since 05/2001 Time Advance: 9h

Rates of Time Bias in [-10ms, +10ms]from Histograms

Page 9: Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

Quality Control of GFZ Orbit Predictions

ILRS Fall 2005 WorkshopOctober 3-7, 2005, Eastbourne, UK

Summary

• Operational quality control of CHAMP and GRACE predictions by comparison to precise RSOs.

• Evaluation of orbit differences for CHAMP based on histograms for 09/2004 shows:

– that more than 90 percent of the predictions are within a time bias of [-10ms, +10ms] up to 6 hrs after the last data point, and

– that in the interval 9 to 12 hrs the aging of the predictions is most pronounced. However, still about 50 percent are within the requirement of [-10ms, +10ms] .

– Thus updating at 8h intervals (3 predicts/day) is currently still sufficient.

• On the other hand, the quality of CHAMP predictions, in particular in the critical time interval of 9 to 12 hrs after the last data point is significantly improved when exchanging the static gravity model from GRIM5-C1 to a modern GRACE-based gravity model EIGEN-CG01C-2 .