Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the...
-
Upload
malcolm-douglas -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the...
![Page 1: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality Assurance vs. Quality Assurance vs. Quality ControlQuality Control
Quality AssuranceQuality Assurance
An overallmanagement plan to guarantee theintegrity of data(The “system”)
Quality ControlQuality Control
A series of analytical measurements usedto assess thequality of the analytical data(The “tools”)
![Page 2: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
True Value vs. True Value vs. Measured ValueMeasured Value
True ValueTrue Value
The known, accepted value of a quantifiable property
Measured ValueMeasured Value
The result of an individual’s measurement of a quantifiable property
![Page 3: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Accuracy vs. PrecisionAccuracy vs. Precision
AccuracyAccuracyHow well a measurement agrees with an accepted value
PrecisionPrecisionHow well a series of measurements agree with each other
![Page 4: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Accuracy vs. PrecisionAccuracy vs. Precision
![Page 5: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Systematic vs. Systematic vs. Random ErrorsRandom Errors
Systematic ErrorSystematic ErrorAvoidable error due to controllable variables in a measurement.
Random ErrorsRandom ErrorsUnavoidable errors that are always present in any measurement. Impossible to eliminate
![Page 6: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Blanks, Blanks, BlanksBlanks, Blanks, Blanks• Laboratory Reagent Blanks
• Instrument Blanks
• Field Reagent Blanks
• Trip Blanks
![Page 7: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Laboratory Reagent Laboratory Reagent BlanksBlanks
• Contains every reagent used in the analysis
• Is subjected to all analytical procedures
• Must give signal below detection limit• Most methods require one with every
batch
![Page 8: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Instrument BlankInstrument Blank
• A clean sample (e.g., distilled water) processed through the instrumental steps of the measurement process; used to determine instrument contamination.
![Page 9: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Field Reagent BlanksField Reagent Blanks
• Prepared in the lab, taken to the field
• Opened at the sampling site, exposed to sampling equipment, returned to the lab.
![Page 10: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Trip BlanksTrip Blanks• Prepared in the lab, taken to the
field
• Not opened
• Returned to the lab
• Not always required in EPA methods
![Page 11: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Recovery StudiesRecovery Studies
• Matrix Spikes
• Laboratory Control Samples
• Surrogates .
![Page 12: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Matrix SpikesMatrix Spikes
• Sample spiked with a known amount of analyte
• Subjected to all sample prep and analytical procedures
• Determines the effect of the matrix on analyte recovery
• Normally one per batch
![Page 13: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Laboratory Control Laboratory Control SampleSample
• Subjected to all sample prep and analytical procedures
• Analyte spiked into reagent water
![Page 14: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Laboratory Control Laboratory Control SampleSample
Also known as:Also known as:
• Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB)
• Quality Control Sample (QCS)
![Page 15: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SurrogatesSurrogates
• Similar to an internal standard
• Added to all analytical samples, and to all QC samples to monitor method performance, usually during sample prep
• Methods often have specific surrogate recovery criteria
• Most common in Organic methods
![Page 16: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 16
COCOMO ModelsCOCOMO Models
![Page 17: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 17
Project Management and Mr. Project Management and Mr. MurphyMurphy
1. Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
2. Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.
3. Nothing ever gets built on schedule or within budget.
4. If mathematically you end up with the incorrect answer, try multiplying by the page number.
![Page 18: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 18
![Page 19: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 19
MotivationMotivation
The software cost estimation provides:
• the vital link between the general concepts and techniques of economic analysis and the particular world of software engineering.
• Software cost estimation techniques also provides an essential part of the foundation for good software management.
![Page 20: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 20
Cost of a projectCost of a project
• The cost in a project is due to:– due the requirements for software, hardware and human
resources
– the cost of software development is due to the human resources needed
– most cost estimates are measured in person-months (PM)
![Page 21: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 21
Cost of a project (.)Cost of a project (.)
• the cost of the project depends on the nature and characteristics of the project, at any point, the accuracy of the estimate will depend on the amount of reliable information we have about the final product.
![Page 22: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 22
Software Cost EstimationSoftware Cost Estimation
![Page 23: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 23
Introduction to COCOMO Introduction to COCOMO modelsmodels
• The COstructive COst Model (COCOMO) is the most widely used software estimation model in the world. It
• The COCOMO model predicts the effort and duration of a project based on inputs relating to the size of the resulting systems and a number of "cost drives" that affect productivity.
![Page 24: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 24
EffortEffort
• Effort Equation – PM = C * (KDSI)n (person-months)
• where PM = number of person-month (=152 working hours),
• C = a constant,
• KDSI = thousands of "delivered source instructions" (DSI) and
• n = a constant.
![Page 25: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 25
ProductivityProductivity
• Productivity equation – (DSI) / (PM)
• where PM = number of person-month (=152 working hours),
• DSI = "delivered source instructions"
![Page 26: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 26
ScheduleSchedule
• Schedule equation – TDEV = C * (PM)n (months)
• where TDEV = number of months estimated for software development.
![Page 27: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 27
Average StaffingAverage Staffing
• Average Staffing Equation– (PM) / (TDEV) (FSP)
• where FSP means Full-time-equivalent Software Personnel.
![Page 28: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 28
COCOMO ModelsCOCOMO Models
• COCOMO is defined in terms of three different models: – the Basic model,
– the Intermediate model, and
– the Detailed model.
• The more complex models account for more factors that influence software projects, and make more accurate estimates.
![Page 29: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 29
The Development modeThe Development mode
• the most important factors contributing to a project's duration and cost is the Development Mode
• Organic Mode: The project is developed in a familiar, stable environment, and the product is similar to previously developed products. The product is relatively small, and requires little innovation.
• Semidetached Mode: The project's characteristics are intermediate between Organic and Embedded.
![Page 30: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 30
The Development modeThe Development mode
• the most important factors contributing to a project's duration and cost is the Development Mode:
• Embedded Mode: The project is characterized by tight, inflexible constraints and interface requirements. An embedded mode project will require a great deal of innovation.
![Page 31: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 31
Modes Modes Feature Organic Semidetached Embedded
Organizationalunderstanding ofproduct andobjectives
Thorough Considerable General
Experience inworking with relatedsoftware systems
Extensive Considerable Moderate
Need for softwareconformance withpre-establishedrequirements
Basic Considerable Full
Need for softwareconformance withexternal interfacespecifications
Basic Considerable Full
![Page 32: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 32
Modes (.) Modes (.) Feature Organic Semidetached Embedded
Concurrentdevelopment ofassociated newhardware andoperationalprocedures
Some Moderate Extensive
Need for innovativedata processingarchitectures,algorithms
Minimal Some Considerable
Premium on earlycompletion
Low Medium High
Product size range <50 KDSI <300KDSI All
![Page 33: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 33
Cost Estimation ProcessCost Estimation Process
Cost=SizeOfTheProject x Productivity
![Page 34: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 34
Cost Estimation ProcessCost Estimation Process
Errors
Effort
Development Time
Size Table
Lines of Code
Number of Use Case
Function Point
Estimation ProcessNumber of Personnel
![Page 35: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 35
Project Size - MetricsProject Size - Metrics
1. Number of functional requirements
2. Cumulative number of functional and non-functional requirements
3. Number of Customer Test Cases
4. Number of ‘typical sized’ use cases
5. Number of inquiries
6. Number of files accessed (external, internal, master)
7. Total number of components (subsystems, modules, procedures, routines, classes, methods)
8. Total number of interfaces
9. Number of System Integration Test Cases
10. Number of input and output parameters (summed over each interface)
11. Number of Designer Unit Test Cases
12. Number of decisions (if, case statements) summed over each routine or method
13. Lines of Code, summed over each routine or method
![Page 36: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 36
Project Size – Metrics(.)Project Size – Metrics(.)
Availability of Size Estimation Metrics:
Development Phase Available Metrics
a Requirements Gathering 1, 2, 3
b Requirements Analysis 4, 5
d High Level Design 6, 7, 8, 9
e Detailed Design 10, 11, 12
f Implementation 12, 13
![Page 37: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 37
Function PointsFunction Points
• STEP 1: measure size in terms of the amount of functionality in a system. Function points are computed by first calculating an unadjusted function point count (UFC). Counts are made for the following categories External inputs – those items provided by the user that
describe distinct application-oriented data (such as file names and menu selections)
External outputs – those items provided to the user that generate distinct application-oriented data (such as reports and messages, rather than the individual components of these)
![Page 38: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 38
Function Points(.)Function Points(.)
External inquiries – interactive inputs requiring a response
External files – machine-readable interfaces to other systems
Internal files – logical master files in the system
![Page 39: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 39
Function Points(..)Function Points(..)
• STEP 2: Multiply each number by a weight factor, according to complexity (simple, average or complex) of the parameter, associated with that number. The value is given by a table:
![Page 40: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 40
Function Points(...)Function Points(...)
• STEP 3: Calculate the total UFP (Unadjusted Function Points)
• STEP 4: Calculate the total TCF (Technical Complexity Factor) by giving a value between 0 and 5 according to the importance of the following points:
![Page 41: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 41
Function Points(....)Function Points(....)
• Technical Complexity Factors:– 1. Data Communication
– 2. Distributed Data Processing
– 3. Performance Criteria
– 4. Heavily Utilized Hardware
– 5. High Transaction Rates
– 6. Online Data Entry
– 7. Online Updating
– 8. End-user Efficiency
– 9. Complex Computations
– 10. Reusability
– 11. Ease of Installation
– 12. Ease of Operation
– 13. Portability
– 14. Maintainability
![Page 42: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 42
Function Points(.....)Function Points(.....)
• STEP 5: Sum the resulting numbers too obtain DI (degree of influence)
• STEP 6: TCF (Technical Complexity Factor) by given by the formula
– TCF=0.65+0.01*DI
• STEP 6: Function Points are by given by the formula
– FP=UFP*TCF
![Page 43: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 43
ExampleExample
![Page 44: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 44
Example (.)Example (.)
![Page 45: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 45
Example (..)Example (..)
• Technical Complexity Factors:– 1. Data Communication 3– 2. Distributed Data Processing 0– 3. Performance Criteria 4– 4. Heavily Utilized Hardware 0– 5. High Transaction Rates 3– 6. Online Data Entry 3– 7. Online Updating 3– 8. End-user Efficiency 3– 9. Complex Computations 0– 10. Reusability 3– 11. Ease of Installation 3– 12. Ease of Operation 5– 13. Portability 3– 14. Maintainability 3
» DI =30 (Degree of Influence)
![Page 46: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 46
Example (…)Example (…)
• Function Points– FP=UFP*(0.65+0.01*DI)= 55*(0.65+0.01*30)=52.25
– That means the is FP=52.25
![Page 47: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 47
Relation between LOC and FPRelation between LOC and FP
• Relationship:
– LOC = Language Factor * FP
– where• LOC (Lines of Code)
• FP (Function Points)
![Page 48: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 48
Relation between LOC and Relation between LOC and FP(.)FP(.)
Assuming LOC’s per FP for:
Java = 53,
C++ = 64
aKLOC = FP * LOC_per_FP / 1000
It means for the SpellChekcer Example: (Java)
LOC=52.25*53=2769.25 LOC or 2.76 KLOC
![Page 49: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 49
Effort ComputationEffort Computation
• The Basic COCOMO model computes effort as a function of program size. The Basic COCOMO equation is:
– E = aKLOC^b
• Effort for three modes of Basic COCOMO.
Mode a b
Organic 2.4 1.05
Semi-detached
3.0 1.12
Embedded 3.6 1.20
![Page 50: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 50
ExampleExample
![Page 51: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 51
Effort ComputationEffort Computation
• The intermediate COCOMO model computes effort as a function of program size and a set of cost drivers. The Intermediate COCOMO equation is:
– E = aKLOC^b*EAF
• Effort for three modes of intermediate COCOMO.
Mode a b
Organic 3.2 1.05
Semi-detached
3.0 1.12
Embedded 2.8 1.20
![Page 52: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 52
Effort computation(.)Effort computation(.)• Effort Adjustment Factor
Cost Driver VeryLow
Low Nominal High VeryHigh
ExtraHigh
Required Reliability .75 .88 1.00 1.15 1.40 1.40
Database Size .94 .94 1.00 1.08 1.16 1.16
Product Complexity .70 .85 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.65
Execution Time Constraint 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.30 1.66
Main Storage Constraint 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.21 1.56
Virtual Machine Volatility .87 .87 1.00 1.15 1.30 1.30
Comp Turn Around Time .87 .87 1.00 1.07 1.15 1.15
Analyst Capability 1.46 1.19 1.00 .86 .71 .71
Application Experience 1.29 1.13 1.00 .91 .82 .82
Programmers Capability 1.42 1.17 1.00 .86 .70 .70
Virtual machine Experience 1.21 1.10 1.00 .90 .90 .90
Language Experience 1.14 1.07 1.00 .95 .95 .95
Modern Prog Practices 1.24 1.10 1.00 .91 .82 .82
SW Tools 1.24 1.10 1.00 .91 .83 .83
Required Dev Schedule 1.23 1.08 1.00 1.04 1.10 1,10
![Page 53: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 53
Effort Computation (..)Effort Computation (..)
Total EAF = Product of the selected factors
Adjusted value of Effort: Adjusted Person Months:
APM = (Total EAF) * PM
![Page 54: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 54
ExampleExample
![Page 55: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 55
Software Development TimeSoftware Development Time
• Development Time Equation Parameter Table:
Development Time, TDEV = C * (APM **D)
Number of Personnel, NP = APM / TDEV
Parameter Organic Semi-detached
Embedded
C 2.5 2.5 2.5
D 0.38 0.35 0.32
![Page 56: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 56
Distribution of EffortDistribution of Effort
• A development process typically consists of the following stages:
• - Requirements Analysis• - Design (High Level + Detailed)• - Implementation & Coding• - Testing (Unit + Integration)
![Page 57: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 57
Distribution of Effort (.)Distribution of Effort (.)
The following table gives the recommended percentage distribution of Effort (APM) and TDEV for these stages:
Percentage Distribution of Effort and Time Table:
Req Analysis
Design, HLD + DD
Implementation Testing
Effort 23% 29% 22% 21% 100%
TDEV 39% 25% 15% 21% 100%
![Page 58: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 58
Error EstimationError Estimation
• Calculate the estimated number of errors in your design, i.e.total errors found in requirements, specifications, code, user manuals, and bad fixes:
– Adjust the Function Point calculated in step1
AFP = FP ** 1.25– Use the following table for calculating error estimates
Error Type Error / AFP
Requirements 1
Design 1.25
Implementation 1.75
Documentation 0.6
Due to Bug Fixes 0.4
![Page 59: Quality Assurance vs. Quality Control Quality Assurance An overall management plan to guarantee the integrity of data (The “system”) Quality Control A.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56649eb75503460f94bc1559/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
SEG3300 A&B W2004 R.L. Probert 59
All TogetherAll Together Design
Unadjusted Function Point (UFP table)
ModifyFP=UFP*TCF
Classes*(2Function Points)
TCF
KLOC=Max[aKLOC, bKLOC]
LOC=13.20*Num of MethodLOC=18.25*Num of Method
AFP=FP*1.25
Compute Errors = AFP*Y
Compute Effort: Person Month, PM=A*(KLOC**B)
bKLOC=∑ (LOCs for all Classes)/1000
Adjusted PM: APM=(total EAF)*PM
Development Time: TDEV=C*(APM**D)Factor:1-15
Number of personnel: NP=APM/TDEV
DI=∑ratings of selected factors 14
TCF=0.65+0.01*∑(DI)j
1
Min[TCF]=0.65; Max[TCF]=1.35
aKLOC=FP*LOC_per_FP/1000
Java=53; C++=64
EAF=Product of selected factor NP Effort time
Req APM TDEV
Result