QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN THE EHEA
Quality assurance and qualifications frameworks as tools to promote mobility and recognition:...
-
Upload
quality-and-qualifications-ireland -
Category
Education
-
view
35 -
download
0
Transcript of Quality assurance and qualifications frameworks as tools to promote mobility and recognition:...
Quality assurance and qualifications frameworks as tools to promote mobility
and recognition: national, bilateral, regional and global experiences and
opportunities
China International Forum on Cross-border EducationHaikou, Hainan December 2016
Bryan Maguire
Quality assurance • European standards and guidelines• Quality assurance agencies• Qualifications frameworks• Irish experience
Bologna Ministerial Statements
• “To consolidate the EHEA, meaningful implementation of learning outcomes is needed. The development, understanding and practical use of learning outcomes is crucial to the success of ECTS, the Diploma Supplement, recognition, qualifications frameworks and quality assurance – all of which are interdependent.” Bucharest Communiqué, April 2012
• “Enhancing the quality and relevance of learning and teaching is the main mission of the EHEA.” Yerevan Communiqué, May 2015
3
Three layers of European Standards and Guidelines for
QA• Internal quality assurance• External quality assurance• External quality assurance agencies
4
Internal quality assurance• Policy for institutional QA• Programmes design + approval (NFQ)• Student-centred learning, teaching
and assessment• Student admission, progression,
recognition and certification• Teaching staff• Learning resources + student support• Information management• Public information• On-going monitoring and periodic
review of programmes
5
External quality assurance• Use of internal quality
assurance procedures• Designing methodologies
fit for purpose• Implementing processes• Peer review experts• Reporting• Criteria for outcomes• Complaints and appeals
6
Quality assurance agencies• Activities policy and
processes for QA• Official status• Independence• Thematic analysis• Resources• Internal QA and professional
conduct• Cyclical external review of
agencies7
External QA• Accreditation of programmes or• Accreditation/audit of institutions
or• Combination of both
8
Qualifications Frameworks• Based on learning outcomes• National qualifications frameworks
are being developed in all countries• Tuning project has worked on
learning outcomes for disciplines within QF-EHEA
• Integrating QA and QFs is increasingly important agenda
Quality and Qualifications Ireland• “an integrated agency for quality and qualifications in
Ireland”• Established November 2012 by Qualification and Quality
Assurance (Education and Training) Act of parliament• Reviewed by European Association for Quality Assurance
(ENQA) in 2014, • Member of ENQA, INQAAHE & CBQAN• Memoranda with QAA, MQA, HKCAAVQ, HKQFS (Ed
Bureau), NZQA
QQI roles• Custodian of National Framework of
Qualifications (established in 2003)• Qualifications Recognition Advice (NARIC)• Quality assurance guidelines for all
education and training outside schools• Quality assurance of all HEIs at
institutional level, onshore and TNE• Quality assurance of private HE and VET
at programme level, onshore and TNE
External QA - institution• Institutional review– Holistic assessment– Externality required– Relies on (and checks) institutional
capacity for programme level QA– Greater autonomy, closer to learners,
may be more cost effective– In some instance authority to validate
may be revoked or conditioned
External QA - programme• Programme validation/accreditation– Independent– More consistent across HEIs?– More developmental?– More trusted, especially for less
established institutions– Demanding on the agency
• TNE example - Dublin Business School/KPTM in Malaysia
Internal QA review• Self-validating universities in Ireland
are required to monitor and formally review their linked providers and programmes
• TNE example – University College Dublin– Monitoring report – Review of provision
QACHE principles• QAAs should share information about their
respective QA systems and about cross-border providers, with a view to facilitating mutual understanding and building mutual trust
• QAAs should seek to coordinate and cooperate in their review activity of cross-border higher education, with a view to avoiding regulatory gaps and duplication of efforts, and to lessening the regulatory burdens on providers
• Networks of quality assurance agencies should facilitate interagency cooperation and the implementation of the QACHE Toolkit
• www.qqi.ie• [email protected]
16