QFD Requirements prioritization J.Jayaraman Center for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering)...
-
Upload
albert-casey -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of QFD Requirements prioritization J.Jayaraman Center for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering)...
QFD Requirements prioritization
J.JayaramanCenter for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering)
Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of technology, Bombay
DIAT POINTS COURSE 03-06-2008
Benefits of QFD
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Comparison of design changes with and without QFD
-14-17-1-3 0 +3 months
Design changes
Jap Co used QFD
US Co Did not use QFD
Toyota production start up problems before and after QFD
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 +1 2 3 4 5
After QFD
Before QFD
Product complaints
months
Benefits of QFD
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Pre QFD
startup Pre production
After QFD
startup Pre production
39% of pre QFD cost
Loss
Preparation training etc.
Start up and Pre-production costs at Toyota before and after QFD
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
•QFD is a concept developed by Yaji Akao•Developed at Kobe shipyard of Mitsubishi Shipyard early 1980s.•Xerox and Ford have used it•Typically applied to small systems. Being tried for large systems (NASA Lunar Rover)•It was developed to build design quality into a product
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
It facilitates translation of a prioritized set of subjective customer requirements into a set of system level requirements during system conceptual stage
It addresses customer requirements, design requirements, functions, parts, and failure modes
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Definition
“ An organized, disciplined process for determining the product or service requirements necessary to achieve customer-perceived expressed or unexpressed quality” (Otten and Groeneveld 2002)
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
•QFD permits analysis and determination of priority issues
•QFD is a planning process
•Out puts are the key action issues for improved customer satisfaction
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Customer Requirements
whats
Customer weights
Relative importance
Design requirements
Hows
Relationship Matrix
Whats vs. hows
Hows vs. hows
Whats vs. whys
whys
How much How much vs. How much
Benchmarking
competition
Prioritized requirements Competitive benchmarks Design targets
QFD provides integration through the life cycle phases
of the system
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Customer voice analysisCustomer Requirements
System Design Requirements
Customer importance
Sub-system Requirements
Product design and development
Part requirements
Process requirements
Manufacturing process design and development
Requirements prioritization
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Improvement ratio: It is the ratio of desired performance to existing performance
Sales point: It is the weight given to a requirement if it will improve the marketability of the product
Requirements prioritization
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Customer weights: The importance customer gives to each of his requirements. It defines his priorities.
Customer satisfaction: It is the rating of the existing product technical characteristics based on the customer requirements
Planned satisfaction: It is the rating of the new product technical characteristics planned based on customer requirements
Determining Target values Design Requirements
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Identify customer Requirements (CR) and weight
Identify design requirements (DR) corresponding to CR
Identify relationship between DR and CR
Bench mark competitive products on CR
Determine improvement ratio and revised weights of CR
Calculate weight of DRs
Choose best value of competing DR performance
Video projector Customer requirements and
weightsCR No.
Customer requirements
Customer
weights
1 Excellent image quality
3
2 Clear sound 1
3 Easy to use 9
4 portable 9
5 stylish 1
6 reliable 9
7 quiet 3
8 compatible 9
9 affordable 9
10 Bright image 9
Customer weights scale 1-9
Video projector benchmarking competitors
Customer requirements
Customer weights
Us Product A
Plan IPR Sales point
Raw score
Revised customer weights
Excellent image quality
3 5 7 7 1.4 1.2 5.0 6.0
Clear sound 1 4 5 5 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.4
Easy to use 9 7 6 7 1.0 1.3 11.7 14.0
portable 9 8 6 8 1.0 1.3 11.7 14.0
stylish 1 3 4 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2
reliable 9 7 5 8 1.2 1.3 14.0 16.8
quiet 3 4 5 4 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.6
compatible 9 7 7 7 1.0 1.2 10.8 12.9
affordable 9 7 6 7 1.0 1.1 9.9 11.9
Bright image 9 5 7 7 1.4 1.2 15.1 18.3
IPR- Improvement ratio
Raw score= customer weight*IPR*sales point Revised Customer wt. = Raw score/ Raw score
Video projector design requirements with their
unitsDesign requirements Sl No. Units
Image brightness 1 lumens
Contrast ratio 2 a:1
Image resolution 3 X*Y pixels
weight 4 kg
Set up time 5 seconds
Audio quality 6 N-M Hz.
Audio volume 7 Watts
Physical volume 8 mm*mm*mm
Surface temperature 9 Degree C
Operating noise 10 dB
MTBF 11 Hours`
Video projector Relationship matrix CRs vs. DRs
Rel.wt. % PriorityRel.wt. % Priority
Raw scoreRaw score
11.911.999
18.318.31010
12.912.988
3.63.677
16.816.866
1.21.255
14.014.044
14.014.033
1.41.422
6.06.011
Revised Revised Cust. wts.Cust. wts.
CR CR No.No.
33 11 22 44
23223210510516516527427435353131307307282282109109109109236 236
3333993333333399
331133111133
99
9911111111
993311331111
1133111111
119911111199
1133119933
3311339911
1133999999
11111010998877665544332211
Design requirementsDesign requirements
Video projector Target requirements
50K4550305*230*100
0.850 to 6000
30 4.2.600*450
350:1500Our product
Desig
n
Desig
n
req
uir
em
en
req
uir
em
en
tsts
Imag
e
Imag
e
bri
gh
tness
bri
gh
tness
Con
trast
rati
oC
on
trast
rati
o
Imag
e
Imag
e
resolu
tion
resolu
tion
Weig
ht
Weig
ht
Set
up
tim
e
Set
up
tim
e
Au
dio
qu
ality
Au
dio
qu
ality
Au
dio
volu
me
Au
dio
volu
me
Ph
ysic
al volu
me
Ph
ysic
al volu
me
Su
rface
Su
r face
tem
pera
tur e
tem
pera
ture
Op
era
tin
g
Op
era
tin
g
nois
en
ois
e
MTB
FM
TB
F
40K4060350*250*100
150 to 6000
354.5800* 600
400:1700Product A
50K4050305*230*100
150To6000
304800*600
400:1700Target s
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Solve water dispenser problem in place of the video projector