Qed528 tg12 g5 pbl presentation
-
Upload
aschik-hoffman -
Category
Education
-
view
235 -
download
4
Transcript of Qed528 tg12 g5 pbl presentation
TG 12 - GROUP 5
QED528 – PBL SCENARIO 3
Ho Jia Wei Aaron
Melissa Manuela Rama Shan
Muhd Ashik B Mohd Daud
Yeo Kee Sheng
Yin Xiaohui
OUTLINE
1. Identifying the Problems
2. Applying and Solving the Problems
• Learning Theories and Approaches
• Piaget and Vygotsky’s Cognitive Development Theories
• Downes and Siemen’s Connectivism Theory
• Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
• Bloom’s Taxonomy
• Bruner’s Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Approach
• Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
• Skit
• Summary
3. References
IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEMS
1. Did not check students’ cognitive development
• Assumed they were at a higher cognitive level of
development
• Started off with higher-order thinking questions
• Had unrealistic expectations
IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEMS
2. Lack understanding of students’ learning processes
• Ineffective teaching pedagogies
• Did not engage students’ prior knowledge
• Use of pictures were insufficient to illustrate tsunamis
• Did not alter her activities when students could not
comprehend what she was teaching
• Overwhelmed them with more information
• Did not provide proper scaffolding, i.e. questioning techniques
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
We aim to help Ms. Rita…
• Check students’ level of cognitive development
• Understand students’ learning processes
• Improve her teaching pedagogies
…through the different learning theories.
1. Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory
• Concrete Operational Stage
• Engaging in logical thought to solve concrete problems
• Formal Operational Stage
• Ability to solve abstract problems: Engage in hypothetical,
analogical and deductive reasoning
• Development is gradual and task-dependent
• Application
• Scenario 3: Students might be in either stage
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
2. Vygotsky’s Cognitive Development Theory
• Social and Cultural Variables
• Language, shared beliefs, interactions with social circles
• Zone of Proximal Development
• Difference between a student’s current level of
development and potential level of development
• Solving problems with support and scaffolding
• Application
• Cannot assume that students have general/prior
knowledge about tsunamis
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
3. Downes and Siemen’s Connectivism Theory
• What is Connectivism?
• Knowledge is networked and distributed
• Connecting specialized information sets; Forming new
neural, conceptual and external networks
• Reside outside of ourselves (within an organization or
database)
• Needs to be connected to the right people in the
right context
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
3. Downes and Siemen’s Connectivism Theory
• Why Connectivism?
• Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism do not
attempt to address organizational knowledge and
transference
• Connections that enable us to learn are more
important than our current state of knowing
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
4. Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Instructional event Internal process/purpose
(i) Gain Attention Reception
(ii) Inform Objectives Expectancy
(iii) Recall Prior Knowledge Retrieval
(iv) Present Stimulus Selective perception
(v) Providing Learning Guidance Semantic encoding
(vi) Elicit Performance Responding
(vii) Provide Feedback Reinforcement
(viii) Assess Performance Retrieval
(ix) Enhance Retention and Transfer Generalization
4. Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
Ms. Rita believed she had planned her lesson properly.
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Use of videos and pictures to trigger thinking
Use of questions to scaffold learning
Use of higher-order thinking question
4. Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
Application
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Phases in which
breakdown
occurred
Evidences Solutions
(i) Gaining
attention
Assumed students’ prior
knowledge and asked
higher-order thinking
question at the start of
the lesson.
Use K-W-L strategy to get
students to construct
meaning while watching
video about tsunami.
4. Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
Application
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Phases in which
breakdown
occurred
Evidences Solutions
(ii) Recall of prior
knowledge
• Ms. Rita did not recap
relevant prior knowledge
• Ms. Rita dismissed any
student’s limited/
undeveloped
preconceptions
Build upon the students
prior knowledge of
tsunami and have them
share with each other
and probe the students
with basic knowledge
questions
4. Gagne’s 9 Events of Instruction
Application
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Phases in which
breakdown
occurred
Evidences Solutions
(ii) Providing
Feedback
• Incompetence at elicit
responses from students
• Give discouraging and
unconstructive
feedback.
Ms Rita should get
students to think on what
made them give the
answers – right or wrong.
5. Bloom’s Taxonomy of
cognitive skills
• A classification system of
learning objectives for
students.
• Many teachers may rely
on this taxonomy to
identify targeted skills of
students at a variety of
cognitive levels.
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
5. Bloom’s Taxonomy of cognitive skills
Application
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Level Possible questions
Remembering •What did you observe in the videos/pictures?
•What is tsunami?
Understanding •Identify some critical features of tsunami.
Applying &
Analyzing
•How does a tsunami form?
Evaluating •Compare and contrast tsunami and typhoon.
Creating •How do the data support the occurrence in certain
part of the world?
6. Bruner’s Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Approach
• Concrete Stage:
• Exposed to a real-world context:
• Videos on tsunami-formation or when tsunamis hit shores.
• Physical manipulatives:
• Mimic the occurrence of tsunamis using wave tanks.
• Pictorial Stage:
• Movements of a hand:
• Representing various forces which can be caused by tectonic movements, volcanic activity or meteorite impacts.
• Differences in tsunami size and strength.
• Abstract Stage:
• Not applicable
• No symbols that represent geographical terms.
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
7. Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
• Integration of information across the senses to achieve a
mental construction of the information
• Information presented must be collaborative in nature
• Application
• Present content audio-visually with spoken words on picture
slides to reduce cognitive overload of the visual stream
• Presentation must be concurrent rather than sequential
• Information must not be redundant but critical in defining
concepts and match students’ abilities
APPLYING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEMS
Please sit back, relax and watch our skit!
Effective Teaching and Learning
Engage student’s prior knowledge
Cognitive Development (Piaget’s stage theory)
Connectivism
Understand student’s learning process
Constructivism
Social Development
Theory (Vygotsky)
Bruner’s CPA
Use of teaching pedagogies
Gagne’s 9 Events of instructions
Multi-modality approach
Bloom’s Taxonomy
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. New York: Longman.
Arlin, P. K. (1977). Piagetian operations in problem solving. Developmental Psychology, 13, 297-298
Arlin, P. K. (1980). The Arlin test of formal reasoning. New York: Slosson Publishing
Berk, L. E. & Garving, R. A. (1984). Development of private speech among low-income Appalachian children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 271-286
Bloom, B.S. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. NY, NY: Longmans, Green.
Bloom, B. S., (Ed.). 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Costa, A. L. (Ed.). (2000). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
REFERENCES
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Joseph Boyle & David Scanlon. Methods and Strategies for Teaching Students with Mild Disabilities: A case-based approach.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1–17.
Keating, D. (1979). Adolescent thinking. In J. Adelson (ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 211-246), New York: Wiley
Manfra, L. & Winsler, A. (2006). Preschool children’s awareness of private speech. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 30, 537-549.
Marzano, R. J. (2000). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual-processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
REFERENCES
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.
Miller, P. (2002). Theories of developmental psychology. (4th Ed.) New York: Oxford University Press
Niaz, M. (1991). Correlates of formal operational reasoning: A Neo-Piagetian analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 19-40
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1963). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Paul.
Quek, C. L., Wong, A. F. L., & Tay M. Y. (2008). Engaging and managing learners: Practitioners’ perspectives. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
REFERENCES
Robert J. Marzano & Debra J. Pickering. (2006). Dimensions of Learning Teacher’s Manual (2nd Ed). Hawker Brownlow Education.
Russell, D, and M Hunter (1976). Planning for Effective Instruction Lesson Design Los Angeles, Calif., Seeds Elementary School.
Santrock, J. (1992). Children. Dubuque, IA: Brown/Benchmark
Simens, G. (2010). "Connectivism", TEDxED Talks 2010. New York.
Simens, G. (2008). "What is Connectivism?". Connectivism and Connective Knowledge MOOC. Canada: University of Manitoba.
Simens, G. (2005). "Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age". Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm.
Tan, O. S., Parsons, R. D., Hinson, S. L., Sardo-Brown, D. (2011). Educational Psychology: A Practitioner-Researcher Approach (An Asian Edition 2nd Ed.) Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd
Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121–131.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. (1993). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 2 (J. Knox & C. Stevens, trans.). New York: Plenum.